December 10, 2018 December 10, 2018 10:00 PM PST 11:00 PM PST Practice the one most important Quant section  Integer properties, and rapidly improve your skills. December 11, 2018 December 11, 2018 09:00 PM EST 10:00 PM EST Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. December 11 at 9 PM EST.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Current Student
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4409
Location: India
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (NonProfit and Government)

A tree's age can be determined by counting the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Apr 2015, 07:15
Question Stats:
51% (02:31) correct 49% (02:29) wrong based on 583 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
A tree's age can be determined by counting the annual growth rings in its trunk. Each ring represents one year, and the ring's thickness reveals the relative amount of rainfall that year. Archaeologists successfully used annual rings to determine the relative ages of ancient tombs at Pazyryk. Each tomb was constructed from freshly cut logs, and the tombs builders were constrained by tradition to use only logs from trees growing in the sacred Pazyryk Valley. Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the archaeologists' success in using annual rings to establish the relative ages of the tombs at the Pazyryk site? (A) The Pazyryk tombs were all robbed during ancient times, but breakage of the tombs seals allowed the seepage of water, which soon froze permanently, thereby preserving the tombs' remaining artefacts. (B) The Pazyryk Valley, surrounded by extremely high mountains, has a distinctive yearly pattern of rainfall, and so trees growing in the Pazyryk Valley have annual rings that are quite distinct from trees growing in nearby valleys. (C) Each log in the Pazyryk tombs has among its rings a distinctive sequence of twelve annual rings representing six drought years followed by three rainy years and three more drought years. (D) The archaeologists determined that the youngest tree used in any of the tombs was 90 years old and that the oldest tree was 450 years old. (E) All of the Pazyryk tombs contained cultural artefacts that can be dated to roughly 2300 years ago.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
Have an MBA application Question? ASK ME ANYTHING!
My Stuff: Four Years to 760  MBA Trends for Indian Applicants
My GMAT Resources V30V40: How to do it!  GMATPrep SC  GMATPrep CR  GMATPrep RC  Critical Reasoning Megathread  CR: Numbers and Statistics  CR: Weaken  CR: Strengthen  CR: Assumption  SC: Modifier  SC: Meaning  SC: SV Agreement  RC: Primary Purpose  PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities  PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates
My MBA Resources Everything about the MBA Application  OverRepresented MBA woes  Fit Vs Rankings  Low GPA: What you can do  Letter of Recommendation: The Guide  Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score  Why MBA?
My Reviews How I got into five schools from zero  Applicant Lab Review Veritas Prep Live Online




Retired Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1236
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33 GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40

A tree's age can be determined by counting the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jun 2015, 11:15
souvik101990 wrote: A tree's age can be determined by counting the annual growth rings in its trunk. Each ring represents one year, and the ring's thickness reveals the relative amount of rainfall that year. Archaeologists successfully used annual rings to determine the relative ages of ancient tombs at Pazyryk. Each tomb was constructed from freshly cut logs, and the tombs builders were constrained by tradition to use only logs from trees growing in the sacred Pazyryk Valley.
Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the archaeologists' success in using annual rings to establish the relative ages of the tombs at the Pazyryk site?
(A) The Pazyryk tombs were all robbed during ancient times, but breakage of the tombs seals allowed the seepage of water, which soon froze permanently, thereby preserving the tombs' remaining artefacts.
(B) The Pazyryk Valley, surrounded by extremely high mountains, has a distinctive yearly pattern of rainfall, and so trees growing in the Pazyryk Valley have annual rings that are quite distinct from trees growing in nearby valleys.
(C) Each log in the Pazyryk tombs has among its rings a distinctive sequence of twelve annual rings representing six drought years followed by three rainy years and three more drought years.
(D) The archaeologists determined that the youngest tree used in any of the tombs was 90 years old and that the oldest tree was 450 years old.
(E) All of the Pazyryk tombs contained cultural artefacts that can be dated to roughly 2300 years ago. Question asks not about ages of tombs or logs but about relative ages of tombs. So scientists need to know that this tomb (number 1) was build firstly and this tomb 3 year after the first tomb and so on. They need only order of ages of buildings. If we have sequence of rainy and drought years: 6D3R3D when we can analyze tombs in such way: tomb #1  its logs has 10 drought years  this is oldest tomb, tomb #2  its logs has 10 drought years + 3 rainy years  this tomb is younger than tomb#1, tomb #3  its logs has 10 drought years + 3 rainy years + 2 drought  this tomb is younger than tomb#2 and so on. So answer is C.
_________________
Simple way to always control time during the quant part. How to solve main idea questions without full understanding of RC. 660 (Q48, V33)  unpleasant surprise 740 (Q50, V40, IR3)  antidebrief




Manager
Joined: 03 Sep 2014
Posts: 74
Concentration: Marketing, Healthcare
Schools: Kellogg 1YR '17, Booth '16, McCombs '18, Tepper '18, INSEAD Jan '17, ISB '17, NUS '18, IIMA , IIMB, IIMC , IIML '15

Re: A tree's age can be determined by counting the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Apr 2015, 11:18
A tree's age can be determined by counting the annual growth rings in its trunk. Each ring represents one year, and the ring's thickness reveals the relative amount of rainfall that year. Archaeologists successfully used annual rings to determine the relative ages of ancient tombs at Pazyryk. Each tomb was constructed from freshly cut logs, and the tombs builders were constrained by tradition to use only logs from trees growing in the sacred Pazyryk Valley.
Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the archaeologists' success in using annual rings to establish the relative ages of the tombs at the Pazyryk site?
(A) The Pazyryk tombs were all robbed during ancient times, but breakage of the tombs seals allowed the seepage of water, which soon froze permanently, thereby preserving the tombs' remaining artefacts  too far off the point. question says nothing about preservation of artifacts
(B) The Pazyryk Valley, surrounded by extremely high mountains, has a distinctive yearly pattern of rainfall, and so trees growing in the Pazyryk Valley have annual rings that are quite distinct from trees growing in nearby valleys  it only compares rings characteristics, not sufficient
(C) Each log in the Pazyryk tombs has among its rings a distinctive sequence of twelve annual rings representing six drought years followed by three rainy years and three more drought years  distinguishing between rainy ring and drought rings is enough to calculate the logs age
(D) The archaeologists determined that the youngest tree used in any of the tombs was 90 years old and that the oldest tree was 450 years old  not sufficient
(E) All of the Pazyryk tombs contained cultural artefacts that can be dated to roughly 2300 years ago  irrelevant



Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 228
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GPA: 3.19
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: A tree's age can be determined by counting the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 May 2015, 01:42
Question is very difficult ,atleast i felt so . I marked C because thought others are not much relevant and C spoke something about years etc.
_________________
Press +1 Kudos if you find this Post helpful



Current Student
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 380

Re: A tree's age can be determined by counting the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 May 2015, 03:58
Option C precisely tells about how the scientists were able to determine the age based on the number of rings. B is another option that talks about changes in rain pattern but nothing about how rings were used. So C.



Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2014
Posts: 268
GPA: 3.76

A tree's age can be determined by counting the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Jul 2015, 14:26
B seemed to be initial choice for me But was not fully convinced with C ,until read the question again Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the archaeologists' success in using annual rings to establish the relative ages of the tombs at the Pazyryk site?
C fulfills this requirement better than B



VP
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 1004

Re: A tree's age can be determined by counting the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Aug 2015, 08:54
Harley1980 wrote: souvik101990 wrote: A tree's age can be determined by counting the annual growth rings in its trunk. Each ring represents one year, and the ring's thickness reveals the relative amount of rainfall that year. Archaeologists successfully used annual rings to determine the relative ages of ancient tombs at Pazyryk. Each tomb was constructed from freshly cut logs, and the tombs builders were constrained by tradition to use only logs from trees growing in the sacred Pazyryk Valley.
Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the archaeologists' success in using annual rings to establish the relative ages of the tombs at the Pazyryk site?
(A) The Pazyryk tombs were all robbed during ancient times, but breakage of the tombs seals allowed the seepage of water, which soon froze permanently, thereby preserving the tombs' remaining artefacts.
(B) The Pazyryk Valley, surrounded by extremely high mountains, has a distinctive yearly pattern of rainfall, and so trees growing in the Pazyryk Valley have annual rings that are quite distinct from trees growing in nearby valleys.
(C) Each log in the Pazyryk tombs has among its rings a distinctive sequence of twelve annual rings representing six drought years followed by three rainy years and three more drought years.
(D) The archaeologists determined that the youngest tree used in any of the tombs was 90 years old and that the oldest tree was 450 years old.
(E) All of the Pazyryk tombs contained cultural artefacts that can be dated to roughly 2300 years ago. Question asks not about ages of tombs or logs but about relative ages of tombs. So scientists need to know that this tomb (number 1) was build firstly and this tomb 3 year after the first tomb and so on. They need only order of ages of buildings. If we have sequence of rainy and drought years: 6D3R3D when we can analyze tombs in such way: tomb #1  its logs has 10 drought years  this is oldest tomb, tomb #2  its logs has 10 drought years + 3 rainy years  this tomb is younger than tomb#1, tomb #3  its logs has 10 drought years + 3 rainy years + 2 drought  this tomb is younger than tomb#2 and so on. So answer is C. Not understand ur concept...Please elaborate....



Intern
Joined: 20 Apr 2015
Posts: 10

Re: A tree's age can be determined by counting the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Aug 2015, 09:52
I marked it B, but now i realize its C I think what kanigmat011 mentioned "the relative age of Tombs" in the question is the catch here to go for option C.



Retired Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1236
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33 GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40

Re: A tree's age can be determined by counting the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Aug 2015, 11:27
rohit8865 wrote: Harley1980 wrote: souvik101990 wrote: A tree's age can be determined by counting the annual growth rings in its trunk. Each ring represents one year, and the ring's thickness reveals the relative amount of rainfall that year. Archaeologists successfully used annual rings to determine the relative ages of ancient tombs at Pazyryk. Each tomb was constructed from freshly cut logs, and the tombs builders were constrained by tradition to use only logs from trees growing in the sacred Pazyryk Valley.
Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the archaeologists' success in using annual rings to establish the relative ages of the tombs at the Pazyryk site?
(A) The Pazyryk tombs were all robbed during ancient times, but breakage of the tombs seals allowed the seepage of water, which soon froze permanently, thereby preserving the tombs' remaining artefacts.
(B) The Pazyryk Valley, surrounded by extremely high mountains, has a distinctive yearly pattern of rainfall, and so trees growing in the Pazyryk Valley have annual rings that are quite distinct from trees growing in nearby valleys.
(C) Each log in the Pazyryk tombs has among its rings a distinctive sequence of twelve annual rings representing six drought years followed by three rainy years and three more drought years.
(D) The archaeologists determined that the youngest tree used in any of the tombs was 90 years old and that the oldest tree was 450 years old.
(E) All of the Pazyryk tombs contained cultural artefacts that can be dated to roughly 2300 years ago. Question asks not about ages of tombs or logs but about relative ages of tombs. So scientists need to know that this tomb (number 1) was build firstly and this tomb 3 year after the first tomb and so on. They need only order of ages of buildings. If we have sequence of rainy and drought years: 6D3R3D when we can analyze tombs in such way: tomb #1  its logs has 10 drought years  this is oldest tomb, tomb #2  its logs has 10 drought years + 3 rainy years  this tomb is younger than tomb#1, tomb #3  its logs has 10 drought years + 3 rainy years + 2 drought  this tomb is younger than tomb#2 and so on. So answer is C. Not understand ur concept...Please elaborate.... Hello rohit8865Could you please specify which moments exactly you did not understand?
_________________
Simple way to always control time during the quant part. How to solve main idea questions without full understanding of RC. 660 (Q48, V33)  unpleasant surprise 740 (Q50, V40, IR3)  antidebrief



Manager
Joined: 11 Jun 2017
Posts: 73

Re: A tree's age can be determined by counting the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Oct 2017, 08:10
6 droughts, followed by 3 Rains and 3 droughts. Oldest will have as many number of continuous droughts. If a log X has 7 drought ones, whereas on the other hand a second one Y has 7 droughts and 2 rainy ones. It will imply the first one is older than the second. A third Z with 7 droughts 2 rain and 2 droughts will still be younger than the first because the first probably did not survive after the 7 droughts. So, the final order is X>Y>Z. Answer option C.



Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2128
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Re: A tree's age can be determined by counting the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Dec 2017, 21:09
souvik101990 wrote: A tree's age can be determined by counting the annual growth rings in its trunk. Each ring represents one year, and the ring's thickness reveals the relative amount of rainfall that year. Archaeologists successfully used annual rings to determine the relative ages of ancient tombs at Pazyryk. Each tomb was constructed from freshly cut logs, and the tombs builders were constrained by tradition to use only logs from trees growing in the sacred Pazyryk Valley.
Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the archaeologists' success in using annual rings to establish the relative ages of the tombs at the Pazyryk site?
(A) The Pazyryk tombs were all robbed during ancient times, but breakage of the tombs seals allowed the seepage of water, which soon froze permanently, thereby preserving the tombs' remaining artefacts.
(B) The Pazyryk Valley, surrounded by extremely high mountains, has a distinctive yearly pattern of rainfall, and so trees growing in the Pazyryk Valley have annual rings that are quite distinct from trees growing in nearby valleys.
(C) Each log in the Pazyryk tombs has among its rings a distinctive sequence of twelve annual rings representing six drought years followed by three rainy years and three more drought years.
(D) The archaeologists determined that the youngest tree used in any of the tombs was 90 years old and that the oldest tree was 450 years old.
(E) All of the Pazyryk tombs contained cultural artefacts that can be dated to roughly 2300 years ago. Perhaps the key here is the term "relative ages." The notion of the "age" of the trees is a red herring. The archaeologist's aren't trying to determine, for example, that the tombs are 450 years old or something. They are trying to determine the relative ages of the tombs  that is, the age of the tombs in relation to one another (which tomb is oldest, second oldest, etc.). We want an answer choice that helps explain how they were able to use tree rings to do this. We know that the tombs used freshly cut logs and that all the trees came from the same valley. (A) says nothing about tree rings. (B) says the trees in the valley are distinct from other trees. It seems close, but ultimately won't help us. We already know that the tombs were made from trees in the valley. (C) helps. If each of the trees has this distinct pattern of 6, 3, 3, then we can use that pattern to judge the relative ages of the trees, and thus the relative ages of the tombs. For example, a tree with 10 rings after the distinctive set grew to be older than a tree with only 4 rings after the distinctive set. (D) doesn't help us determine the relative ages of the tombs. (E) doesn't help us determine the relative ages of the tombs.
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it.  Henry Ford The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long +1 Kudos if you find this post helpful



Intern
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 49
Location: Azerbaijan
GMAT 1: 530 Q42 V21 GMAT 2: 600 Q42 V31 GMAT 3: 700 Q47 V38

A tree's age can be determined by counting the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Sep 2018, 02:58
Harley1980 wrote: souvik101990 wrote: A tree's age can be determined by counting the annual growth rings in its trunk. Each ring represents one year, and the ring's thickness reveals the relative amount of rainfall that year. Archaeologists successfully used annual rings to determine the relative ages of ancient tombs at Pazyryk. Each tomb was constructed from freshly cut logs, and the tombs builders were constrained by tradition to use only logs from trees growing in the sacred Pazyryk Valley.
Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the archaeologists' success in using annual rings to establish the relative ages of the tombs at the Pazyryk site?
(A) The Pazyryk tombs were all robbed during ancient times, but breakage of the tombs seals allowed the seepage of water, which soon froze permanently, thereby preserving the tombs' remaining artefacts.
(B) The Pazyryk Valley, surrounded by extremely high mountains, has a distinctive yearly pattern of rainfall, and so trees growing in the Pazyryk Valley have annual rings that are quite distinct from trees growing in nearby valleys.
(C) Each log in the Pazyryk tombs has among its rings a distinctive sequence of twelve annual rings representing six drought years followed by three rainy years and three more drought years.
(D) The archaeologists determined that the youngest tree used in any of the tombs was 90 years old and that the oldest tree was 450 years old.
(E) All of the Pazyryk tombs contained cultural artefacts that can be dated to roughly 2300 years ago. Question asks not about ages of tombs or logs but about relative ages of tombs. So scientists need to know that this tomb (number 1) was build firstly and this tomb 3 year after the first tomb and so on. They need only order of ages of buildings. If we have sequence of rainy and drought years: 6D3R3D when we can analyze tombs in such way: tomb #1  its logs has 10 drought years  this is oldest tomb, tomb #2  its logs has 10 drought years + 3 rainy years  this tomb is younger than tomb#1, tomb #3  its logs has 10 drought years + 3 rainy years + 2 drought  this tomb is younger than tomb#2 and so on. So answer is C. Your reasoning is not correct. With your reasoning we could determine relative ages of trees but not relative ages of tombs. For example imagine tomb x is the last (newest) tomb but made of a tree that has the greatest number of rings (and sequence). From your reasoning it follows that this tomb must be the oldest tomb. Answer choice (C) means that there was one distinct period of time in which there were 6 drought years followed by 3 rainy years followed by 3 drought years. Knowing this will allow to determine relative ages of TOMBS. Tomb 1  10D+3R+3D+6 other rings This means that tomb was made 6 years after the certain period, tomb 2 x years after the special sequence, and so on. Like this you can determine relative age of each tomb. Correct answer is C though




A tree's age can be determined by counting the &nbs
[#permalink]
04 Sep 2018, 02:58






