It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 02:16

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A tree's age can be determined by counting the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
MBA Section Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4485

Kudos [?]: 17041 [1], given: 1963

Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
A tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Apr 2015, 08:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
12
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

53% (01:55) correct 47% (01:59) wrong based on 308 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A tree's age can be determined by counting the annual growth rings in its trunk. Each ring represents one year, and the ring's thickness reveals the relative amount of rainfall that year. Archaeologists successfully used annual rings to determine the relative ages of ancient tombs at Pazyryk. Each tomb was constructed from freshly cut logs, and the tombs builders were constrained by tradition to use only logs from trees growing in the sacred Pazyryk Valley.

Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the archaeologists' success in using annual rings to establish the relative ages of the tombs at the Pazyryk site?

(A) The Pazyryk tombs were all robbed during ancient times, but breakage of the tombs seals allowed the seepage of water, which soon froze permanently, thereby preserving the tombs' remaining artefacts.

(B) The Pazyryk Valley, surrounded by extremely high mountains, has a distinctive yearly pattern of rainfall, and so trees growing in the Pazyryk Valley have annual rings that are quite distinct from trees growing in nearby valleys.

(C) Each log in the Pazyryk tombs has among its rings a distinctive sequence of twelve annual rings representing six drought years followed by three rainy years and three more drought years.

(D) The archaeologists determined that the youngest tree used in any of the tombs was 90 years old and that the oldest tree was 450 years old.

(E) All of the Pazyryk tombs contained cultural artefacts that can be dated to roughly 2300 years ago.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
Veritas Prep Live Online

Kudos [?]: 17041 [1], given: 1963

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Sep 2014
Posts: 75

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 89

Concentration: Marketing, Healthcare
Premium Member
Re: A tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Apr 2015, 12:18
A tree's age can be determined by counting the annual growth rings in its trunk. Each ring represents one year, and the ring's thickness reveals the relative amount of rainfall that year. Archaeologists successfully used annual rings to determine the relative ages of ancient tombs at Pazyryk. Each tomb was constructed from freshly cut logs, and the tombs builders were constrained by tradition to use only logs from trees growing in the sacred Pazyryk Valley.

Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the archaeologists' success in using annual rings to establish the relative ages of the tombs at the Pazyryk site?

(A) The Pazyryk tombs were all robbed during ancient times, but breakage of the tombs seals allowed the seepage of water, which soon froze permanently, thereby preserving the tombs' remaining artefacts --- too far off the point. question says nothing about preservation of artifacts

(B) The Pazyryk Valley, surrounded by extremely high mountains, has a distinctive yearly pattern of rainfall, and so trees growing in the Pazyryk Valley have annual rings that are quite distinct from trees growing in nearby valleys --- it only compares rings characteristics, not sufficient

(C) Each log in the Pazyryk tombs has among its rings a distinctive sequence of twelve annual rings representing six drought years followed by three rainy years and three more drought years --- distinguishing between rainy ring and drought rings is enough to calculate the logs age

(D) The archaeologists determined that the youngest tree used in any of the tombs was 90 years old and that the oldest tree was 450 years old --- not sufficient

(E) All of the Pazyryk tombs contained cultural artefacts that can be dated to roughly 2300 years ago --- irrelevant

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 89

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Mar 2014
Posts: 237

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 175

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.19
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 May 2015, 02:42
Question is very difficult ,atleast i felt so .
I marked C because thought others are not much relevant
and C spoke something about years etc.
_________________

Press +1 Kudos if you find this Post helpful :)

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 175

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 444

Kudos [?]: 238 [0], given: 39

Re: A tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 May 2015, 04:58
Option C precisely tells about how the scientists were able to determine the age based on the number of rings.

B is another option that talks about changes in rain pattern but nothing about how rings were used.

So C. :)

Kudos [?]: 238 [0], given: 39

2 KUDOS received
Math Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1272

Kudos [?]: 2315 [2], given: 178

Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
A tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jun 2015, 12:15
2
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
souvik101990 wrote:
A tree's age can be determined by counting the annual growth rings in its trunk. Each ring represents one year, and the ring's thickness reveals the relative amount of rainfall that year. Archaeologists successfully used annual rings to determine the relative ages of ancient tombs at Pazyryk. Each tomb was constructed from freshly cut logs, and the tombs builders were constrained by tradition to use only logs from trees growing in the sacred Pazyryk Valley.

Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the archaeologists' success in using annual rings to establish the relative ages of the tombs at the Pazyryk site?

(A) The Pazyryk tombs were all robbed during ancient times, but breakage of the tombs seals allowed the seepage of water, which soon froze permanently, thereby preserving the tombs' remaining artefacts.

(B) The Pazyryk Valley, surrounded by extremely high mountains, has a distinctive yearly pattern of rainfall, and so trees growing in the Pazyryk Valley have annual rings that are quite distinct from trees growing in nearby valleys.

(C) Each log in the Pazyryk tombs has among its rings a distinctive sequence of twelve annual rings representing six drought years followed by three rainy years and three more drought years.

(D) The archaeologists determined that the youngest tree used in any of the tombs was 90 years old and that the oldest tree was 450 years old.

(E) All of the Pazyryk tombs contained cultural artefacts that can be dated to roughly 2300 years ago.


Question asks not about ages of tombs or logs but about relative ages of tombs.

So scientists need to know that this tomb (number 1) was build firstly and this tomb 3 year after the first tomb and so on.
They need only order of ages of buildings.

If we have sequence of rainy and drought years: 6D-3R-3D when we can analyze tombs in such way:
tomb #1 - its logs has 10 drought years - this is oldest tomb,
tomb #2 - its logs has 10 drought years + 3 rainy years - this tomb is younger than tomb#1,
tomb #3 - its logs has 10 drought years + 3 rainy years + 2 drought - this tomb is younger than tomb#2 and so on.

So answer is C.
_________________

Simple way to always control time during the quant part.
How to solve main idea questions without full understanding of RC.
660 (Q48, V33) - unpleasant surprise
740 (Q50, V40, IR3) - anti-debrief ;)

Kudos [?]: 2315 [2], given: 178

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2014
Posts: 325

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 15

Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.76
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
A tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2015, 15:26
B seemed to be initial choice for me
But was not fully convinced with C ,until read the question again
Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the archaeologists' success in using annual rings to establish the relative ages of the tombs at the Pazyryk site?

C fulfills this requirement better than B

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 15

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 964

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 41

Re: A tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Aug 2015, 09:54
Harley1980 wrote:
souvik101990 wrote:
A tree's age can be determined by counting the annual growth rings in its trunk. Each ring represents one year, and the ring's thickness reveals the relative amount of rainfall that year. Archaeologists successfully used annual rings to determine the relative ages of ancient tombs at Pazyryk. Each tomb was constructed from freshly cut logs, and the tombs builders were constrained by tradition to use only logs from trees growing in the sacred Pazyryk Valley.

Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the archaeologists' success in using annual rings to establish the relative ages of the tombs at the Pazyryk site?

(A) The Pazyryk tombs were all robbed during ancient times, but breakage of the tombs seals allowed the seepage of water, which soon froze permanently, thereby preserving the tombs' remaining artefacts.

(B) The Pazyryk Valley, surrounded by extremely high mountains, has a distinctive yearly pattern of rainfall, and so trees growing in the Pazyryk Valley have annual rings that are quite distinct from trees growing in nearby valleys.

(C) Each log in the Pazyryk tombs has among its rings a distinctive sequence of twelve annual rings representing six drought years followed by three rainy years and three more drought years.

(D) The archaeologists determined that the youngest tree used in any of the tombs was 90 years old and that the oldest tree was 450 years old.

(E) All of the Pazyryk tombs contained cultural artefacts that can be dated to roughly 2300 years ago.


Question asks not about ages of tombs or logs but about relative ages of tombs.

So scientists need to know that this tomb (number 1) was build firstly and this tomb 3 year after the first tomb and so on.
They need only order of ages of buildings.

If we have sequence of rainy and drought years: 6D-3R-3D when we can analyze tombs in such way:
tomb #1 - its logs has 10 drought years - this is oldest tomb,
tomb #2 - its logs has 10 drought years + 3 rainy years - this tomb is younger than tomb#1,
tomb #3 - its logs has 10 drought years + 3 rainy years + 2 drought - this tomb is younger than tomb#2 and so on.

So answer is C.

Not understand ur concept...Please elaborate.... :? :?

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 41

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2015
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 5

Re: A tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Aug 2015, 10:52
I marked it B, but now i realize its C
I think what kanigmat011 mentioned "the relative age of Tombs" in the question is the catch here to go for option C.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 5

Math Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1272

Kudos [?]: 2315 [0], given: 178

Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: A tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Aug 2015, 12:27
rohit8865 wrote:
Harley1980 wrote:
souvik101990 wrote:
A tree's age can be determined by counting the annual growth rings in its trunk. Each ring represents one year, and the ring's thickness reveals the relative amount of rainfall that year. Archaeologists successfully used annual rings to determine the relative ages of ancient tombs at Pazyryk. Each tomb was constructed from freshly cut logs, and the tombs builders were constrained by tradition to use only logs from trees growing in the sacred Pazyryk Valley.

Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the archaeologists' success in using annual rings to establish the relative ages of the tombs at the Pazyryk site?

(A) The Pazyryk tombs were all robbed during ancient times, but breakage of the tombs seals allowed the seepage of water, which soon froze permanently, thereby preserving the tombs' remaining artefacts.

(B) The Pazyryk Valley, surrounded by extremely high mountains, has a distinctive yearly pattern of rainfall, and so trees growing in the Pazyryk Valley have annual rings that are quite distinct from trees growing in nearby valleys.

(C) Each log in the Pazyryk tombs has among its rings a distinctive sequence of twelve annual rings representing six drought years followed by three rainy years and three more drought years.

(D) The archaeologists determined that the youngest tree used in any of the tombs was 90 years old and that the oldest tree was 450 years old.

(E) All of the Pazyryk tombs contained cultural artefacts that can be dated to roughly 2300 years ago.


Question asks not about ages of tombs or logs but about relative ages of tombs.

So scientists need to know that this tomb (number 1) was build firstly and this tomb 3 year after the first tomb and so on.
They need only order of ages of buildings.

If we have sequence of rainy and drought years: 6D-3R-3D when we can analyze tombs in such way:
tomb #1 - its logs has 10 drought years - this is oldest tomb,
tomb #2 - its logs has 10 drought years + 3 rainy years - this tomb is younger than tomb#1,
tomb #3 - its logs has 10 drought years + 3 rainy years + 2 drought - this tomb is younger than tomb#2 and so on.

So answer is C.

Not understand ur concept...Please elaborate.... :? :?



Hello rohit8865
Could you please specify which moments exactly you did not understand?
_________________

Simple way to always control time during the quant part.
How to solve main idea questions without full understanding of RC.
660 (Q48, V33) - unpleasant surprise
740 (Q50, V40, IR3) - anti-debrief ;)

Kudos [?]: 2315 [0], given: 178

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10121

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: A tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2017, 04:51
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Re: A tree's age can be determined by counting the   [#permalink] 28 Sep 2017, 04:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A tree's age can be determined by counting the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.