RK84
solitaryreaper
Advocate: Millions of plastic shopping bags are discarded every day in the United States. Plastic bags present a problem for the environment because they do not readily decompose, but will remain intact for thousands of years. Policy makers agree that the best solution to the problem is to convince people to bring their own shopping bags so that they do not need disposable plastic bags. Therefore, the U.S. government should implement a tax on disposable plastic bags because this will have the desired effect of dramatically decreasing the number of plastic bags discarded each day in the United States.
Which of the following provides the strongest reason to believe that the plan to levy a tax on disposable plastic bags will be successful in greatly reducing the number of plastic bags being discarded?
A)A similar tax in several European countries resulted in a 90% decrease in the number of plastic bags used by consumers each year.
B)Current incentives, such as crediting customers 5 or 10 cents for each reusable bag, have resulted in only a small decrease in the number of plastic bags discarded.
C)Some customers are very concerned about the environmental impacts of plastic bags and will bring reusable bags without any financial incentive.
D)The bill has substantial support with the Congressional delegations of many states and with the current administration.
E)The bill could be implemented and the tax collected using a very simple addition to the programming of electronic cash registers.
I am not satisfied with the official answer. Please provide explanation for the choice you chose.
Thanks
This is a very poor question. If option A can be justified then Option D & E can also be justified by saying that in Option D, the bill can be easily converted into a law and people will have no choice . Similarly in E, if there is a simple effort towards operational costs, retailers will also support the cause.
A friendly advice: an official question is never poor. In order to have a high score, one must align his / her thinking in line with the official questions, i.e.
try to understand why an option is correct or wrong, rather than
decide whether an answer is correct or wrong.
A: If a plan has already been successful, there are good chances that it would again be successful. This question is not about conclusion, but about support. If it were an inference type question, the answer would be wrong.
D: Support from a group of people who are not experts in the field does not help determine whether the plan will be effective. If instead of "congress delegations", something like "tax implementation experts" or "social psychology experts" (any group of experts who are capable of determining whether implementation of tax would reduce the usage) were mentioned then the answer would be correct.
E: It does not matter how difficult it is to implement the plan. The argument is about once the plan is implemented, whether it would be effective.