GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 14 Dec 2018, 09:28

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Typical Day of a UCLA MBA Student - Recording of Webinar with UCLA Adcom and Student

     December 14, 2018

     December 14, 2018

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    Carolyn and Brett - nicely explained what is the typical day of a UCLA student. I am posting below recording of the webinar for those who could't attend this session.
  • Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

     December 15, 2018

     December 15, 2018

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 240
After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 14 May 2018, 05:04
10
49
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

48% (00:43) correct 52% (00:41) wrong based on 2358 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.

(A) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing

(B) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developed

(C) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and he developed

(D) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, developing

(E) attending the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and developing

Originally posted by crejoc on 09 Aug 2009, 09:47.
Last edited by hazelnut on 14 May 2018, 05:04, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question.
Most Helpful Community Reply
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 18 Jan 2012
Posts: 46
Location: United States
Schools: IIM A '15 (A)
After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2012, 07:34
51
7
I see a lot of complicated explanations involving the use of grammatical terms. While most of these explanations are accurate , i believe that when we prioritize grammar over
the meaning, we may miss the sky for the stars. We have 3 verbs in the sentence. If we recognize the correct sequence of the actions, then the keys to the kingdom will be ours.

The 3 verbs in the sentence are

- Attend
- Receive
- Develop

a) We need to understand the importance and sequence of EACH OF these verbs. The actions which are parallel need to be in same tense.
b) "AND" is usually a parallelism marker. The word "AND" can either indicate a set of events that happen AT THE SAME TIME, or indicate a SEQUENCE of events that happen one after the other.
c) Remember for a list of 3 or more items that are described using the word "AND", GMAT always uses a ,comma to separate the last item.
E.g: red, blue ,and green.
E.g : John, jane, jacob ,and Chris

A detour :-
Let's look at a few examples. Full Disclosure : These examples are based on a couple of examples that i have seen Ron Purewal (MGMAT fame) use. Somehow, examples that require one to visualize someone else eating, burping and slurping turn out to be the ones that kinda burn concepts into our memory :-).

John ate the pizza, slurping loudly and burping regularly - IMPLIES THAT JOHN ATE THE PIZZA AND WHILE EATING, JOHN MADE SLURPING AND BURPING SOUNDS.
John ate the pizza, slurped loudly and ,burped regularly - IMPLIES THAT JOHN FINISHED EATING THE PIZZA FIRST AND THEN AFTER EATING , HE MADE SLURPING SOUNDS (second) AND AFTER HE MADE SLURPING SOUNDS, HE MADE BURPING SOUNDS(third).
John ate the pizza, slurping loudly and burped regularly- IMPLIES THAT JOHN ATE THE PIZZA AND WHILE EATING THE PIZZA, HE MADE SLURPING SOUNDS and AFTER HE FINISHED EATING(and slurping), he MADE BURPING SOUNDS.

Typically -
[*]A ,COMMA VERB-ing modifier (E.g : burping and slurping in the above examples) tends to describe the main verb in the preceding clause.
[*]A VERB - ING-modifier WITHOUT A COMMA is attached to the preceding noun.

A couple of Examples :-
[*]John watched Sam running around a tree. (Meaning - Sam was running around a tree and John saw him. Note the absence of a COMMA)
[*]John watched Sam,using a pair of binoculars.(Meaning - John used a pair of binoculars to watch Same)

Back to the question :-
MEANING OF THE GIVEN SENTENCE :
Albert Einstein attended some college and during his period of attendance, he received training and developed something. The main verb of the sentence is is "Attended" and the other terms "Receive" and "develop" are VERB-ing modifiers that describe the how Albert Einstein attended college.


CORRECT ANSWER :-
(A) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and developing

------------------------------------------------------------------
IT TAKES A LOT OF TIME AND EFFORT TO POST DETAILED EXPLANATIONS.
YOUR KUDOS IS VERY MUCH APPRECIATED

------------------------------------------------------------------

_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IT TAKES QUITE A BIT OF TIME AND ENERGY TO POST DETAILED RESPONSES.
A KUDOS IS a small but effective way to say "Thank You"

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Senior SC Moderator
avatar
V
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 2207
Premium Member CAT Tests
After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Oct 2018, 21:56
2
crejoc wrote:
After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.

(A) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing

(B) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developed

Harshgmat wrote:
minwoswoh wrote:
I believe answer choices A and B are very close...

However, answer choice B is not grammatically incorrect. It just changes the original meaning of the sentence.

Answer choice A says:
After moving to Switzerland, Einstein attended a school in Zurich. There, he did 2 things:
a- received in-depth training in quantitative analysis and
b- developed a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.
These 2 things are consequences of Einstein attending that school in Zurich.

This makes sense. This answer is correct grammatically.

Answer choice B says.
After moving to Switzerland, Einstein did 2 things:
1- he attended a school in Zurich. There, he received in-depth training in quantitative analysis (the ING Modifier "receiving in-depth training..." modifies "attended the Swiss Federal...")
2- developed a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.
This means that the foundation for his future work was not developed as a consequence of attending the school in Zurich but was indeed developed after moving to Switzerland.

This also makes sense and it is correct grammatically.

So, how you tell the difference?
1- You know the biography of Einstein cold (not required for the GMAT)
2- You refer to the intended meaning of the original sentence. In other words, answer choice A states the correct sequence of events. Answer choice B states a slightly different scenario and thus distorts the intended original meaning.

mikemcgarry, GMATNinja, generis

Is there possibility of having 2 grammatically correct choices on GMAT as in above case?

Can you please guide how to tackle such problems? Your expert insights will be very valuable.

Thanks.

Harshgmat , wow, the post that you quote is probably confusing.

Before I answer your question I will address two errors. They are common and hence understandable, but too significant to leave alone.

Error #1: option A does NOT establish original or intended meaning
Quote:
How do you tell the difference [between A and B]?
. . .You refer to the intended meaning of the original sentence.
In other words, answer choice A states the correct sequence of events.

NO.

MYTH : Option A determines or sets the tone for the meaning of the sentence.
FACT: Option A does NOT determine the meaning of the sentence

Intended or original meaning is not determined or demonstrated by Option A.

If that myth were true, questions in which option (A) creates illogical, nonsensical, or unclear meaning could not exist.
Such questions exist. Below are a few examples.

• Official Guide 2012: In this question,
option (A) is illogical. In option A, the bad guys (defendants) attribute their criminal behavior to an allergy.
No. The attorneys argued for that proposition.


• Official Guide 2016: In this question,
option (A) is confusing and ambiguous.

• Official Guide 2018 SC # 676 In this question,,
option (A) creates nonsensical meaning.

Some "official explanations" from NON-GMAC sources have contributed to the confusion.

As late as 2017 , on the Economist blog, the official Economist explanation for this SC question about Iceland and global warming stated that
Options C and E could be eliminated because both changed the meaning as expressed in (A). WRONG

See also this post.
The official explanation in full can be found here.

Marty Murry — an expert who earned a perfect score of 800 — highlighted one part of that official explanation by the Economist:
"Notice how answer option C changes the meaning of the original sentence. 'Likely' is not the same as 'most likely'. So, you can eliminate C."
Quote:
The highlighted portion of the above official explanation for this question is based on a myth. The myth is that the meaning conveyed by the sentence created via the use of the correct answer to a GMAT Sentence Correction question has to match the meaning conveyed by the original sentence, i.e., the version created via the use of choice A.

There is no such rule.

The correct answer to a Sentence Correction question is the one the use of which results in a sentence that makes sense - end of story.

My emphasis. That post can be found here.

Another issue needs to be addressed.

Error #2: option B is NOT correct grammatically
Double negatives coming . . .
In reply to the statement that "answer choice B is not grammatically incorrect" (= B is grammatically correct). NO.

B is grammatically incorrect

We have an "and" after the "receiving" phrase, i.e. "and developed."

Developed is not parallel to receiving.

Could it be that developed belongs with attended?
NO. Option B is missing a crucial comma that would make the two past tense verbs parallel.

Specifically, option (B) lacks a comma after analysis and before and

-- If attended and developed are parallel, we have a compound verb ("compound predicate")
-- Any intervening phrase in a compound predicate must be set off with commas*

"Receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis" is now an intervening phrase in a compound verb
That participial phrase needs a comma before and after it. See the footnote.

If (B) were a viable option, it would state:
After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis[,] and developed a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.

In the original B, I see one comma only, right before receiving. I do not see two commas.

What if the intervening phrase does not have TWO commas to set it off?
Fatal. Option B is not grammatical.
If there is not a second comma to set off the "receiving" phrase, then

attended and developed cannot be parallel, a fact that means

receiving and developed are now paired. They cannot be paired. They are not parallel.

Option B is ungrammatical.

Answer A

*********
STRATEGIES: if two options seem equally correct
Okay, let's discuss your good question.
In hindsight we know that Option B is grammatically incorrect.
What should we do if we cannot see that fact?

Quote:
Is there possibility of having 2 grammatically correct choices on GMAT as in above case?

Yes, two grammatically correct choices are possible.
That said, more than 90 percent of the time, the other grammatically correct option is a stylistic disaster.

In this case, plenty of people believed that (B) was grammatically correct.
The meanings of A and B are different. We have to choose.
Neither A nor B is a stylistic disaster, so we cannot use that property to eliminate one of them.

PURELY HYPOTHETICAL EXERCISE
Suppose option (B) were grammatically correct (WHICH, just for the broken record, is it NOT)?

Then option (B) would be:
After moving to Switzerland in 1910, Einstein attended a school in Zurich, receiving XYZ, and developed the foundation for ABC.

What should we do we if we think there are two grammatically correct answers, neither of which is a stylistic disaster?
That phenomenon is fairly rare. I am tallying, which will take awhile.

Original prompt with B: After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and developed a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.

WHAT TO DO?
• Read the non-underlined part again for clues in the context of whatever problem you face. Find key words and then compare the two options.

(The issue could be direct causation, for example. In that case you would look for clues that implied "A therefore B.")

Options A and B present time sequence issues. Look for words related to time, timing, segments of time, etc.
In the non-underlined part is the word future.

Hold on here a minute.
Why does the author separate "the development of the foundation" in time from the future work in physics?

In option B, "developed the foundation" came after his time at school.
Well, that's one future.
Why is this author talking about a second future in the non-underlined portion (as an adjective)?
Aren't there now a lot of confusing time periods? YES.

Now compare to (A). There is a before [moving to Switzerland], a during [school], and a future [work in physics]. Simple. Conclude that:
This author is not talking about a second future as option B suggests --
because the development of the foundation happens while Einstein is in school.

I suspect that the simple act of considering time as an issue a bit more carefully than the first time around would often lead quickly to option A.

What happens while we attend school? We get training and we develop foundations (for later use).
The latter sentence contains the temporal logic that drives the core of this question.

• ask questions about "larger" sentence structure IF you happen to notice

(Thinking about B): Why would one sentence try to jam together all that happened
AFTER he moved, WHILE he attended school, and AFTER he left school?
(It wouldn't, not compared to the simplicity of answer A.)

Why is the prompt talking about some vague "future," given that
the prompt began with a very particular time period?

One answer that may strike: Because the sentence is focused on a specific time period, namely, the period in which he attended school.
That period is "framed" by a past without content and a future whose content is hazy.

We know the future work is in physics, but not when or where.
In addition, the introductory phrase chops off a chunk of time ("before").

Both a non-existent past and a vague future serve as a sort of background picture frame, bringing into focus what must be . . .
what happened while Einstein attended school.
In that context, option A makes more sense.

• Read the two options in quick succession one more time.

Take a breath. I'm serious. We have seen dozens or hundreds or thousands of sentences. This is doable.
Neither (A) nor (B) has more style than the other. After you take a breath and exhale, pick one and move on.

Hope that helps. :)

*• If a sentence contains compound verbs and no intervening phrases, the coordinating conjunction is not preceded by a comma
She studied the subject thoroughly and performed well on the test.
Same subject, two verbs
If a sentence contains a compound verb and an intervening phrase, however, the
intervening phrase must be set off by commas
Same subject, two verbs, intervening phrase:
She studied the subject thoroughly, making hundreds of note cards, and performed well on the test.
The intervening phrase modifies only the previous clause. She was not making hundreds of note cards during the test.


With gratitude to Harshgmat , whose advice about this edited answer I both sought and took. :thumbup:
General Discussion
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 612
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Re: After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2009, 09:31
5
Quote:
After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.

A) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing
-correct
- gerunds are correct here as 'receiving' and 'developing' happened while he attended the school. 'Gerunds' correctly modifying the preceding clause.
B) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developed

C) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and he developed
it changes the meaning.

D) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, developing

E) attending the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and developing


_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ... :beer
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 333
Schools: LBS, INSEAD, IMD, ISB - Anything with just 1 yr program.
Re: After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2009, 09:45
3
This one is a classic parallelism list vs modifier problem. The 'receiving' part apparently appears to be a modifier, a reason for AE attending the school. And if it were one, it must have been modifying the nearest noun (subject or object, whatever be it) the school. But, evidently it is not and therefore, it's a parallelism issue. And as the formula for parallelism goes, every 2+ in the list should follow exactly the structure and style of 2 in the list. Obviously, A wins!!!!
_________________

I am AWESOME and it's gonna be LEGENDARY!!!

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Jul 2009
Posts: 36
Re: After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2009, 10:18
7
1
This Q requires knowledge in ||ism, comma splice and participle modifier



A) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing
- correct 'receiving... and developing ...' acts as participle phrase for the main clause, 'attended the swiss ...'



B) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developed

here attended , receiving and developed are not ||.

If I were to correct this option it would have read either


attended the swiss ..., received ... and developed - making the sentence ||

or

attended ... ;receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis, he developed... - This case,puntuated with a comma , has 'receiving in-depth training' as participle modifier



C) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and he developed - note the comman before and .


The correct form for this option is either

attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developed

or

attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich and received in-depth training, and he developed.. - in this case 'and he developed' is a conjunctive clause preceded by a comma, avoiding a comman splice .




D) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, developing - not ||

The correct form would have been

attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich and received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, developing... - in this case 'developing..' acts as a participle phrase . I am not sure whether this would become a dangling modifier.


E) attending the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and developing

- there is no verb and the sentence structure is seriously flawed in this option
.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1111
Re: After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2010, 08:04
2
the correct option should be either

Einstein attended the school, received in-depth training, and developed a foundation.

OR

Einstein attended the school, receiving in-depth training and developing a foundation --> here the modifier 'receiving' and 'developing' are modifying the entire preceding clause and 'receiving' and 'developing' are parallel

Lets look at the options.

After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.

(A) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing - CORRECT

(B) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developed - not parallel

(C) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and he developed - not parallel

(D) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, developing - not parallel

(E) attending the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and developing - awkward

Hope this helps!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 157
Location: Prague
Schools: University of Economics Prague
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2010, 15:43
To me it's no so much about the paralelism as about grammatical rules and structure of the sentence.

(A) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing
This sentence is correct
(B) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developed
Comma should be here before and.
(C) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and he
developed
He is redundant - without comma and he - I would incline to such answer.
(D) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, developing
This could be correct, but only with and before received. Without and I makes you to expect something more with -ed form, but modifier comes instead.
(E) attending the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and developing
Comma is redundant here.
_________________

You want somethin', go get it. Period!

Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: Enjoying the GMAT journey....
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Posts: 593
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V24
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2011, 06:57
After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing[b][/b] a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.

(A) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing
Recieving ..... and developing ...... are the actions/results/consequences Albert's attended the class...thus Recieving...and developing should be II to each other...correct :)
(B) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developed
(C) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, ]received[] in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and [b]he developed[/b] he is not required(independent clause)
(D) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, developing
(E) attending the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and developing IS he still attending?thus incorrect
_________________

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.

A WAY TO INCREASE FROM QUANT 35-40 TO 47 : http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-way-to-increase-from-q35-40-to-q-138750.html

Q 47/48 To Q 50 + http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-final-climb-quest-for-q-50-from-q47-129441.html#p1064367

Three good RC strategies http://gmatclub.com/forum/three-different-strategies-for-attacking-rc-127287.html

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 472
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2013, 01:33
3
manimgoindowndown wrote:
After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.

A lot of the approaches for this question revolved about elimating the wrong answer choice-which is fine. What I didn't get was how a noun modifier could be so far away from the noun it modifies. It seems as if receiving is modifying school (or Zurich?) rather than Albert Einstein. To me that is incorrect

Could someone explain how we are to know that it modifies Albert Einstein grammatically?


Hi manimgoindowndown,

Comma followed by an -ing word generally does not modify the noun right before the comma. i.e. , a "comma -ing" set-up is not a traditional noun modifier; it is an adverbial modifier (modifying things other than nouns).

The phrase "receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing..." is not a noun modifier but and adverbial or ing-modifier which is modifying the complete clause "Albert Einstein attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich"

Anything that modifies a noun should have the effect of an adjective.

Tired from cleaning the whole apartment, John took a nap. --> the phrase "Tired from cleaning the whole apartment" is modifying the noun John.

Using the mop, John cleaned the apartment --> here "using the mop" is adverbial modifier which modifies the whole clause, whose subject is John.

Hope that helps,

Vercules
_________________

Press Kudos if you want to say thanks

Ultimate Reading Comprehension Encyclopedia | Ultimate Sentence Correction Encyclopedia | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- VERBAL | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- IR

Please Read and Follow the 9 Rules of Posting in Verbal Forum

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Mar 2012
Posts: 17
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GPA: 3.04
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Feb 2013, 03:20
crejoc wrote:
After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.

(A) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing
(B) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developed
(C) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and he developed
(D) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, developing
(E) attending the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and developing

EXPLAIN the correct answer as well as why other options are wrong..


Option A: Einstein attended the ....in Zurich, (subordinate phrase starts) receiving A and developing B (subordinate phrase ends). This is correct usage.
Option B: Einstein attended the ....in Zurich, (subordinate phrase starts) receiving A and developed B (subordinate phrase ends). If there was a comma after "receiving A", then this statement would have been correct. Because then A would act as a subordinate phrase and B would be a continuation of the original sentence and should be in simple past.
Option C: The pronoun "he" is not needed.
Option D: "developing" is wrong. It should be "and developed".
Option E: This is entirely wrong. Continuous form should be complemented with simple past.
Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3292
Re: After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2013, 09:17
sayansarkar wrote:
After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.

a.attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing
b.attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developed
c.attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and he developed
d.attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, developing
e.attending the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and developing


Aside answer choice A all the others lack of parallellism.

Hope this helps you


PS: is not a 700 level. Maybe 600
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 May 2014
Posts: 138
Premium Member
Re: After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 24 Dec 2014, 08:16
4
I believe answer choices A and B are very close...

However, answer choice B is not grammatically incorrect. It just changes the original meaning of the sentence.

Answer choice A says:
After moving to Switzerland, Einstein attended a school in Zurich. There, he did 2 things:
a- received in-depth training in quantitative analysis and
b- developed a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.
These 2 things are consequences of Einstein attending that school in Zurich.

This makes sense. This answer is correct grammatically.


Answer choice B says.
After moving to Switzerland, Einstein did 2 things:
1- he attended a school in Zurich. There, he received in-depth training in quantitative analysis (the ING Modifier "receiving in-depth training..." modifies "attended the Swiss Federal...")
2- developed a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.
This means that the foundation for his future work was not developed as a consequence of attending the school in Zurich but was indeed developed after moving to Switzerland.

This also makes sense and it is correct grammatically.



So, how you tell the difference?
1- You know the biography of Einstein cold (not required for the GMAT)
2- You refer to the intended meaning of the original sentence. In other words, answer choice A states the correct sequence of events. Answer choice B states a slightly different scenario and thus distorts the intended original meaning.


Kudos if it helped :)
_________________

Consider giving me Kudos if I helped, but don´t take them away if I didn´t! :)

What would you do if you weren´t afraid?


Originally posted by minwoswoh on 21 Dec 2014, 11:56.
Last edited by minwoswoh on 24 Dec 2014, 08:16, edited 1 time in total.
Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2618
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2016, 06:06
sayansarkar wrote:
After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.

a.attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing
b.attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developed
c.attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and he developed
d.attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, developing
e.attending the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and developing


Only A makes perfect sense here...
he attended Uni, and as a result, he received training + developed...

B is incorrect, as it puts attended and developed on the same level of timing. + improperly connected.
C this one has few errors. it should either be A, B, and C, or present all 3 elements as clauses. Nonetheless, it makes the same error as B does, putting everything on the same level on timeline.
D improperly connected the first modifier.
E classic no verb error :)

A is the correct answer.
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1356
Re: After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2016, 22:22
sukeshap, C breaks parallelism: Einstein attended school, received training, and he developed a foundation. We can have just one subject, or we can have a subject for all the verbs, but we can't mix and match!

"Receiving and training" in A serves as a modifier. Those are not present tense verbs. In fact, they're not verbs at all! They are present participles, and this use of present participles as modifiers is extremely common.

1) She dominated the Olympics, earning top scores in every event.
2) A rumor circulating when I was in school was that Pop Rocks and Coke together could kill you.


In both the above cases, we're talking about the past, but the present participles serves as a modifier. In 1), "earning top scores" is an adverbial modifier that adds information to the previous clause. In 2), "circulating" is a noun modifier describing "rumor." This modifier is in turn modified by "when I was in school." Neither of these "-ing" words is a verb, so we don't have to worry about a clash of tenses.
_________________


Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1223
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Dec 2017, 08:39
After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.

(A) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing -Correct
(B) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developed -receiving and developed aren't parallel
(C) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and he developed -meaning is altered. He attended the school and at the same time received training so we need verb+ing
(D) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, developing -receiving and developed aren't parallel
(E) attending the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and developing -attending is wrong
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!
Preparing for RC my way
RC Summary Activity - New Project to imporve RC Skills
Bloomberg's US Bschool Ranking

My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant | 2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation | 3. LSAT RC compilation | 4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal | 5. QOTD RC (Carcass) | 6. Challange OG RC | 7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2018
Posts: 1
Re: After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jun 2018, 20:09
It is important to understand the meaning of this sentence. "Albert attended a school, receiving something and developing something else." The first part indicates that Albert attended a school and that after he attended the school two other events occurred (It is important to keep the order in mind.) The participle form of the verbs in choice A) correctly indicate this structure.
For example: "I heard someone playing the piano." This sentence correctly indicates that at a past time I heard something and that this something was someone playing the piano. Let us re-write this sentence. "I heard someone played the piano." This sentence changes the meaning by creating two events that occurred at some point in the past but don't have to be related to each

I hope this explanation helps.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Sep 2016
Posts: 21
Re: After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2018, 11:21
nachobioteck wrote:
carcass wrote:
sayansarkar wrote:
After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.

a.attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing
b.attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developed
c.attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and he developed
d.attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, received in-depth training in quantitative analysis, developing
e.attending the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis, and developing


Aside answer choice A all the others lack of parallellism.

Hope this helps you


PS: is not a 700 level. Maybe 600


If in B, there had been a coma before developed would that have been correct? I thought developed was parallel with attended.

Thanks!


egmat ; if the meaning does not strike us during an exam time scenario is there a mechanical provision available to discern between option A and B.
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 515
Location: India
Schools: INSEAD Jan '19
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 3.82
WE: Engineering (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Oct 2018, 04:28
minwoswoh wrote:
I believe answer choices A and B are very close...

However, answer choice B is not grammatically incorrect. It just changes the original meaning of the sentence.

Answer choice A says:
After moving to Switzerland, Einstein attended a school in Zurich. There, he did 2 things:
a- received in-depth training in quantitative analysis and
b- developed a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.
These 2 things are consequences of Einstein attending that school in Zurich.

This makes sense. This answer is correct grammatically.


Answer choice B says.
After moving to Switzerland, Einstein did 2 things:
1- he attended a school in Zurich. There, he received in-depth training in quantitative analysis (the ING Modifier "receiving in-depth training..." modifies "attended the Swiss Federal...")
2- developed a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.
This means that the foundation for his future work was not developed as a consequence of attending the school in Zurich but was indeed developed after moving to Switzerland.

This also makes sense and it is correct grammatically.



So, how you tell the difference?
1- You know the biography of Einstein cold (not required for the GMAT)
2- You refer to the intended meaning of the original sentence. In other words, answer choice A states the correct sequence of events. Answer choice B states a slightly different scenario and thus distorts the intended original meaning.


Kudos if it helped :)


mikemcgarry, GMATNinja, generis

Is there possibility of having 2 grammatically correct choices on GMAT as in above case?

Can you please guide how to tackle such problems? Your expert insights will be very valuable.

Thanks.
_________________

It seems Kudos button not working correctly with all my posts...

Please check if it is working with this post......

is it?....

Anyways...Thanks for trying :cool:

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 515
Location: India
Schools: INSEAD Jan '19
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 3.82
WE: Engineering (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2018, 08:38
1
generis wrote:
crejoc wrote:
After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.

(A) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developing

(B) attended the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich, receiving in-depth training in quantitative analysis and developed

Harshgmat wrote:
minwoswoh wrote:
I believe answer choices A and B are very close...

However, answer choice B is not grammatically incorrect. It just changes the original meaning of the sentence.

Answer choice A says:
After moving to Switzerland, Einstein attended a school in Zurich. There, he did 2 things:
a- received in-depth training in quantitative analysis and
b- developed a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.
These 2 things are consequences of Einstein attending that school in Zurich.

This makes sense. This answer is correct grammatically.

Answer choice B says.
After moving to Switzerland, Einstein did 2 things:
1- he attended a school in Zurich. There, he received in-depth training in quantitative analysis (the ING Modifier "receiving in-depth training..." modifies "attended the Swiss Federal...")
2- developed a foundation for his future work in mathematical physics.
This means that the foundation for his future work was not developed as a consequence of attending the school in Zurich but was indeed developed after moving to Switzerland.

This also makes sense and it is correct grammatically.

So, how you tell the difference?
1- You know the biography of Einstein cold (not required for the GMAT)
2- You refer to the intended meaning of the original sentence. In other words, answer choice A states the correct sequence of events. Answer choice B states a slightly different scenario and thus distorts the intended original meaning.


mikemcgarry, GMATNinja, generis

Is there possibility of having 2 grammatically correct choices on GMAT as in above case?

Can you please guide how to tackle such problems? Your expert insights will be very valuable.

Thanks.

Quote:
Is there possibility of having 2 grammatically correct choices on GMAT as in above case?

Harshgmat , Option (B) is not correct grammatically.
So (B) isn't grammatically correct, but yes, two grammatically correct choices are possible.
That said, about 90% of the time, maybe more, the other grammatically correct option is a stylistic disaster.
.
.
.
Take a breath. I'm serious.
You have seen dozens or hundreds of sentences. This is doable.
Neither (A) nor (B) has more style than the other.

Pick one and move on.

Hope that helps. :)

*• If a sentence contains compound verbs and no intervening phrases, the coordinating conjunction is not preceded by a comma
She studied the subject thoroughly and performed well on the test.
Same subject, two verbs
If a sentence contains a compound verb and and intervening phrase, however, the
intervening phrase must be set off by commas
She studied hard, making hundreds of note cards, and performed well on the test.


generis

A big thanks. As always -"detailed and through".
_________________

It seems Kudos button not working correctly with all my posts...

Please check if it is working with this post......

is it?....

Anyways...Thanks for trying :cool:

GMAT Club Bot
After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended &nbs [#permalink] 08 Oct 2018, 08:38

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 26 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

After moving to Switzerland in the 1890’s, Albert Einstein attended

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.