Last visit was: 14 Dec 2024, 23:37 It is currently 14 Dec 2024, 23:37
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
SSM700plus
Joined: 01 Aug 2017
Last visit: 08 Aug 2022
Posts: 165
Own Kudos:
176
 []
Given Kudos: 420
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT 1: 500 Q47 V15
GPA: 3.4
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 1: 500 Q47 V15
Posts: 165
Kudos: 176
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rohit8865
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 840
Own Kudos:
908
 []
Given Kudos: 45
Products:
Posts: 840
Kudos: 908
 []
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
afa13
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Last visit: 11 Sep 2019
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 30
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
wishalsp333
Joined: 18 Jul 2017
Last visit: 29 May 2023
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
130
 []
Given Kudos: 261
Posts: 68
Kudos: 130
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Analyst: The Mayor’s petition to revise existing pension systems has raised a significant amount of protest from the city’s labor unions, whose leaders fear that the revision will lead to reduced pensions for retired workers, citing as evidence the fact that the pay scales of government workers are often reduced when the economy experiences a downturn. However, in this case, the union leaders’ fears are baseless since the pension amounts have already been guaranteed to government workers.

The analyst’s argument depends on which of the following assumptions?

A. Some benefits for government employees will continue regardless of the actual amount of pension that is paid to them. - Some benefits for government employees, doesn't justify the significant amount mentioned in the stimulus. So A is incorrect.
B. The union leaders’ protests are a result of expectations from pensioners that their interests will be protected by the labor unions. - The derived result "The union leaders’ protests are a result of expectations from pensioners" is no where mentioned. It is out of scope. So B is eliminated.
C. A current economic downturn is the reason for the Mayor’s decision to revise the city’s existing pension system. - We don't know why mayor is revising the plan, so we don't want to assume it is because of economic downturn. So C is incorrect.
D. The pay scales of government workers that are reduced in times of economic downturns are not already guaranteed by the government. - Here the government after a economic downturn, it is not yet decided what to do. This align with conclusion "the union leaders’ fears are baseless". So D is correct.
E. Revisions of pension systems have not led to disadvantages for pensioners in the past. - We don't know what had happened in the past. Out of scope and E is eliminated.

The answer choice is D.
User avatar
baru
Joined: 18 Jan 2018
Last visit: 02 Dec 2020
Posts: 206
Own Kudos:
293
 []
Given Kudos: 72
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Healthcare
GPA: 3.87
WE:Design (Manufacturing)
Posts: 206
Kudos: 293
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Solution :
Analyst: The Mayor’s petition to revise existing pension systems has raised a significant amount of protest from the city’s labor unions, whose leaders fear that the revision will lead to reduced pensions for retired workers, citing as evidence the fact that the pay scales of government workers are often reduced when the economy experiences a downturn. However, in this case, the union leaders’ fears are baseless since the pension amounts have already been guaranteed to government workers.

The analyst’s argument depends on which of the following assumptions?

Argument Analysis


Pre-Thinking
Conclusion Clarification

The conclusion says that the fears of LU leaders are baseless. This means that the author concludes that the revision of PS won’t lead to reduced pensions for RW.

Pre-Thinking Approach

To pre-think assumptions, we will falsify the conclusion or look for scenarios under which it is no longer valid even when the given premises are true. The assumption then will be that such conditions don’t exist.

Linkage #1: Pension amounts already guaranteed to GW

What if, already guaranteed amounts can still change? Let’s say the government which promised these amounts has changed. The new government may not have the obligation to keep the promises made earlier.

Assumption 1: Guaranteed pension amounts can’t change.

Also, the conclusion here discards the comparison with the pay scales of GW because the amounts in case of RW are guaranteed. So, the author is assuming that:

Assumption 2: Pay scales of GW that are reduced under recession aren’t guaranteed.

With this understanding in mind, let’s take a look at the option statements.

Answer Choices
A . Some benefits for government employees will continue regardless of the actual amount of pension that is paid to them.

Incorrect - Irrelevant

The argument is only concerned with pension amounts, not other benefits.

B. The union leaders’ protests are a result of expectations from pensioners that their interests will be protected by the labor unions.

Incorrect - Irrelevant

Reasons behind the union leaders’ protests are irrelevant.

C. A current economic downturn is the reason for the Mayor’s decision to revise the city’s existing pension system.

Incorrect - Irrelevant

D. The reference to the revisions of the pay scales of GW in times of recession is only an example. It is not a must that the reason behind this revision of PS is the same.

The pay scales of government workers that are reduced in times of economic downturns are not already guaranteed by the government.

Correct

This choice is written along the lines of our pre-thinking per Linkage #1, Assumption 2.

E. Revisions of pension systems have not led to disadvantages for pensioners in the past.

Incorrect - Irrelevant

We aren’t concerned with the past. The argument is about the mayor’s plan to revise the PS at present.
User avatar
Only1
Joined: 11 Sep 2018
Last visit: 03 Sep 2024
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: ISB '20 LBS '21
WE:Accounting (Non-Profit and Government)
Schools: ISB '20 LBS '21
Posts: 24
Kudos: 31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
While reading the argument, two things should click immediately.
1) pay scale is not reduced and it is guaranteed,hence the economy is also not experiencing a downturn
Or
2) last time when pay scale was reduced n the economy experienced a downturn,the pension was not guaranteed


So going by our prethinking n POE, Option D fits with out point 2.

Hope u find this helpful :)

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Pari28
Joined: 24 Feb 2014
Last visit: 19 Dec 2019
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 895
Location: United States (GA)
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 34
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Neither of the choices seem right
avatar
churuand
Joined: 03 Mar 2019
Last visit: 09 May 2021
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 83
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
GMAT 2: 640 Q45 V32
GMAT 2: 640 Q45 V32
Posts: 30
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pari28
Neither of the choices seem right
I agree with you, even the right answer does not seem right to me. The answer D should be turned into the negation of it in order to be the assumption of the argument because the conclusion indicates that the amount has been already guaranteed. any thought?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 15,551
Own Kudos:
70,267
 []
Given Kudos: 449
Location: Pune, India
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 15,551
Kudos: 70,267
 []
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SSM700plus
Analyst: The Mayor’s petition to revise existing pension systems has raised a significant amount of protest from the city’s labor unions, whose leaders fear that the revision will lead to reduced pensions for retired workers, citing as evidence the fact that the pay scales of government workers are often reduced when the economy experiences a downturn. However, in this case, the union leaders’ fears are baseless since the pension amounts have already been guaranteed to government workers.

The analyst’s argument depends on which of the following assumptions?

A. Some benefits for government employees will continue regardless of the actual amount of pension that is paid to them
B. The union leaders’ protests are a result of expectations from pensioners that their interests will be protected by the labor unions.
C. A current economic downturn is the reason for the Mayor’s decision to revise the city’s existing pension system.
D. The pay scales of government workers that are reduced in times of economic downturns are not already guaranteed by the government.
E. Revisions of pension systems have not led to disadvantages for pensioners in the past.

Source :Retired Discussion from GMAT Club

Please explain your reasoning behind choosing the answer and get kudos.

I don't have the Official Explanation so request everyone to participate. Thanks!!

Responding to a pm:

- Pay scales of government workers are often reduced when the economy experiences a downturn
- Mayor’s petition to revise existing pension systems has raised a significant amount of protest from the city’s labor unions, whose leaders fear that the revision will lead to reduced pensions for retired worker
- the pension amounts have already been guaranteed to government workers

Conclusion: The union leaders’ fears are baseless

The argument is concluding that leaders are worrying about nothing based on "pension amounts have been guaranteed".
So the assumption here is that if the pension amount is guaranteed, it is not reduced. We need an assumption that links 'guaranteed payments' with 'no worries of reduction'.

A. Some benefits for government employees will continue regardless of the actual amount of pension that is paid to them

The worry is "reduction in amount".

B. The union leaders’ protests are a result of expectations from pensioners that their interests will be protected by the labor unions.

Irrelevant why leaders are protesting - whether pensioners have expectations from them or not.

C. A current economic downturn is the reason for the Mayor’s decision to revise the city’s existing pension system.

This is a reason to worry. If there is a downturn, it is possible that pension will be reduced.

D. The pay scales of government workers that are reduced in times of economic downturns are not already guaranteed by the government.

Correct. It links the pay scales that are reduced with those that are guaranteed. It tells us that the ones that are reduced are the ones not guaranteed. So the ones that are guaranteed are not reduced. By telling us that the pensions are guaranteed, the argument is telling us that they will not be reduced. So the argument is assuming that guaranteed means they will not be reduced.

E. Revisions of pension systems have not led to disadvantages for pensioners in the past.

Not an assumption of the argument. Doesn't link guaranteed with no worry.

Answer (D)
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,001
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,001
Kudos: 902
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7163 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts