Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 07:37 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 07:37
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 Level|   Comparisons|               
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
saukrit
Joined: 05 Jul 2018
Last visit: 11 Nov 2025
Posts: 378
Own Kudos:
420
 [1]
Given Kudos: 325
Status:Current student at IIMB
Affiliations: IIM Bangalore
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 600 Q47 V26
GRE 1: Q162 V149
GPA: 3.6
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT 1: 600 Q47 V26
GRE 1: Q162 V149
Posts: 378
Kudos: 420
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
shabuzen102
Joined: 11 Aug 2019
Last visit: 24 Jul 2020
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111
Posts: 67
Kudos: 26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sanjayparihar16
Joined: 12 Apr 2018
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 158
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 426
Posts: 158
Kudos: 145
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My take on option E -> I could not see any subject for verb "were", thus marking this error under the umbrella of Subject-Verb Agreement error I dropped this answer choice.
User avatar
gmatassassin88
Joined: 22 Aug 2018
Last visit: 03 Aug 2022
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 135
Posts: 51
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jitendra
Architects and stonemasons, huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya without benefit of the wheel or animal transport.


(A) huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya without benefit of the wheel or animal transport

(B) without the benefits of animal transport or the wheel, huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya

(C) the Maya built huge palace and temple clusters without the benefit of animal transport or the wheel

(D) there were built, without the benefit of the wheel or animal transport, huge palace and temple clusters by the Maya

(E) were the Maya who, without the benefit of the wheel or animal transport, built huge palace and temple clusters


Verbal :: Sentence correction:: 07631

https://www.nytimes.com/1985/04/26/arts/art-maya-treasures-the-tiny-and-the-vast.html

FROM evidence dug up so far, it appears that the cleverest, hardest-working and most cultivated people of pre-Columbian America were the Mayas, described by the archeologist Sylvanus G. Morley as ''the Greeks of the New World.'' Architects and stonemasons, they built huge palace and temple clusters without benefit of the wheel or animal transport.

AjiteshArun AnthonyRitz GMATNinja

i was not confident while marking option C:Architects and stonemasons, the Maya built huge palace and temple clusters without since i was doubtful how can modifier 'Architects & stonemasons' refer to Maya ?.I realized my concept was not clear & thus following is my concern.

1 a)are Architects and stonemasons two different entity & is Maya both of them?. b)if yes then shouldn't Maya be plural as in Mayas
User avatar
AnthonyRitz
User avatar
Stacy Blackman Consulting Director of Test Prep
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 169
Affiliations: Stacy Blackman Consulting
Location: United States (DC)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
GPA: 3.11
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 238
Kudos: 427
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatassassin88
jitendra
Architects and stonemasons, huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya without benefit of the wheel or animal transport.


(A) huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya without benefit of the wheel or animal transport

(B) without the benefits of animal transport or the wheel, huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya

(C) the Maya built huge palace and temple clusters without the benefit of animal transport or the wheel

(D) there were built, without the benefit of the wheel or animal transport, huge palace and temple clusters by the Maya

(E) were the Maya who, without the benefit of the wheel or animal transport, built huge palace and temple clusters


Verbal :: Sentence correction:: 07631

https://www.nytimes.com/1985/04/26/arts/art-maya-treasures-the-tiny-and-the-vast.html

FROM evidence dug up so far, it appears that the cleverest, hardest-working and most cultivated people of pre-Columbian America were the Mayas, described by the archeologist Sylvanus G. Morley as ''the Greeks of the New World.'' Architects and stonemasons, they built huge palace and temple clusters without benefit of the wheel or animal transport.

AjiteshArun AnthonyRitz GMATNinja

i was not confident while marking option C:Architects and stonemasons, the Maya built huge palace and temple clusters without since i was doubtful how can modifier 'Architects & stonemasons' refer to Maya ?.I realized my concept was not clear & thus following is my concern.

1 a)are Architects and stonemasons two different entity & is Maya both of them?. b)if yes then shouldn't Maya be plural as in Mayas

"The Maya" is plural. It is the name of the Native American civilization (and people) in question. These plural people were plural architects and stonemasons. Not every word in English takes an "s" ending when pluralized.
avatar
Stormcool
Joined: 18 Jul 2019
Last visit: 06 Sep 2021
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 195
Location: India
Posts: 21
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KapTeacherEli
Remember, when a modifying phrase is set off from the rest of the sentence by commas, the rest of the sentence must read correctly if that descriptive phrase is ignored. Ignoring both of the parts of the sentence isolated by commas, and reading (E) into the sentence, we get "...were the Maya who... built huge palace and temple structures." This is clearly grammatically incorrect.

Pls explain, How is this sentence incorrect?
avatar
parthgohel
Joined: 08 Oct 2017
Last visit: 17 Jul 2022
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Location: India
WE:Project Management (Non-Profit and Government)
Posts: 12
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I understood the meaning of the sentence that
Mayan population built temples and palaces without...wheel.

What is the relevance of the modifier "Architects and Stonemasons" before the comma? What does it modify?
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [4]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Stormcool
Pls explain, How is this sentence incorrect?
Hi Stormcool,

This is what E leads to:
Architects and stonemasons, were the Maya who...

The verb is were, and we expect a subject for that verb. One way to take E out is to focus on the comma between architects and stonemasons and were. This is like "X, were Y". If X is the subject of were, then there should not be a comma there. If X is a modifier, then there is no subject at all.
avatar
Stormcool
Joined: 18 Jul 2019
Last visit: 06 Sep 2021
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 195
Location: India
Posts: 21
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pls, explain why 'E' is wrong other than the fact that 'Architects...' should be immediately followed by a suitable noun/pronoun.

Thanks
User avatar
shyam30
Joined: 20 Feb 2019
Last visit: 26 Aug 2021
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 95
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Nonprofit
GPA: 2
Posts: 4
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I cannot wrap my head around this:

(1) Scientists and engineers, the Russians built a huge rocket.
How is this not a fragmented sentence?

(2) Scientists and engineers, were the Russians who, ... , built a huge rocket.
Though the , is clearly wrong here, I've seen GMAT use commas to mark pauses arbitrarily.
If that's the case, would this option be more valid?
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shyam30
I cannot wrap my head around this:

(1) Scientists and engineers, the Russians built a huge rocket.
How is this not a fragmented sentence?
Hi shyam30, I can understand the confusion. Scientists and engineers are actually nouns; however, in this sentence, they are in some sense describing who the Russians are/were. So, the phrase Scientists and engineers is used as a modifier here, modifying the Russians.

Hence, it is not a fragmented sentence.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses Fragmented sentences, their application and examples in significant detail. If you or someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,294
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,294
Kudos: 317
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber
MAnkur The part in question begins with a verb, so it's not a modifier. We generally only skip over modifying text. If it said "who were . . . ," then it would be a modifier.

Hi DmitryFarber GMATNinja Abhi077 generis

It seems like in E -- were the Maya who is not a modifier according to E

If that is indeed the case, why is were the Maya who in between comma's in E?

Also, where can i read more about this part quoted by DmitryFarber - The part in question begins with a verb, so it's not a modifier. - i thought as long as anything is in between two comma's -- we can assume it's a modifier
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jabhatta2
i thought as long as anything is in between two comma's -- we can assume it's a modifier
Hi jabhatta2,

Unfortunately, we can't do that. You could try this question and this question and then go through these posts: 1 and 2.
User avatar
sislam04
Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Last visit: 10 Nov 2022
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 37
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Abhi077

Wouldn't "without the benefit..." be a prepositional phrase describing 'temple clusters and palaces' and therefore illogical or at the very least ambiguous if you said it could refer to architects and stonemansons?

(C) the Maya built huge palace and temple clusters without the benefit of animal transport or the wheel
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sislam04
Prepositional phrases can be noun modifiers or adverbial modifiers, depending on the phrase and the context. In this case, "without the benefit" describes how something was done, so it's adverbial and modifies the verb "built."
User avatar
sislam04
Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Last visit: 10 Nov 2022
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 37
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber
sislam04
Prepositional phrases can be noun modifiers or adverbial modifiers, depending on the phrase and the context. In this case, "without the benefit" describes how something was done, so it's adverbial and modifies the verb "built."



Thank you for the response.

My counterpoint would be below:

We saw a tiger on they way to the store.

Did we see a tiger while we were going to the store or did we see a tiger on his way to the store?

Obliviously the later is a bit nonsensical but it does leave ambiguity (I think you would argue it's adverbial in this case). Similarly from the question above can't
the same be said that its ambiguous?
avatar
Vartikaa14
Joined: 05 Sep 2018
Last visit: 08 Oct 2022
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 60
Posts: 9
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi GMATNinja

It would be really helpful if you could post a detailed solution to this question.
Also, what is the role of 'architects and stonemasons'
User avatar
woohoo921
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2023
Posts: 516
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 623
Posts: 516
Kudos: 142
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="jitendra"]Architects and stonemasons, huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya without benefit of the wheel or animal transport.


(A) huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya without benefit of the wheel or animal transport

(B) without the benefits of animal transport or the wheel, huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya

(C) the Maya built huge palace and temple clusters without the benefit of animal transport or the wheel

(D) there were built, without the benefit of the wheel or animal transport, huge palace and temple clusters by the Maya

(E) were the Maya who, without the benefit of the wheel or animal transport, built huge palace and temple clusters


GMATNinja

I have come across two official problems that treat the descriptor of a noun at the beginning of the sentence being offset by a comma or no comma differently.
In this problem, there is a comma --> "Architects and stonemasons, the Maya".

In number 868 in the Official Guide 2020 version, there is no comma--> "Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk produced..."

How should I go about this?

Thank you :) I trust your words of wisdom.
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sislam04
We want to avoid ambiguity, but it has to be real ambiguity to be a problem. In other words, a reader who is trying to understand the meaning would have to be genuinely unsure. In your tiger example, we don't have ambiguity, because tigers don't go to the store. Similarly, it doesn't make sense to refer to clusters of buildings "without the benefit of animal transport." We don't expect our buildings to be carried around on animals, and if they were, I'm not sure that would be a benefit! ;)

Now, if we said "We saw a tiger on the way to the river," that might be unclear, although it could still be fine if it's not important to establish that the tiger was going to the river and we were not.
   1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts