It is currently 19 Jan 2018, 11:40

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Expert
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3278

Kudos [?]: 3794 [1], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Dec 2016, 07:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
natley4788 wrote:
I understand why the past perfect "had reduced" is correct here - but how can the simple past tense "blocked" in the relative clause be correct? Doesn't this imply that the sequence of events is: "landings are reduced" followed by "the culverts blocked shad migrations"? But how is this logical? First the migrations are blocked by the culverts and subsequently (or perhaps at the same time) landings are reduced, so the verb tense for "blocked" should either be the same as "reduced" or further in the past then "reduced". Shouldn't the correct use of verb tenses be:
"...the proliferation of milldams and culverts that HAD BLOCKED shad migrations up their spawning streams HAD REDUCED landings to less than four million pounds"

?


The sequential relation is required to be established between the time reference 1920 and the verb "had reduced". The verb "blocked" is not a part of this relationship - hence past perfect is not to be used for this verb.

Kudos [?]: 3794 [1], given: 22

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Nov 2016
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 2

Location: Australia
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
GPA: 4
Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Dec 2016, 19:45
sayantanc2k wrote:
natley4788 wrote:
I understand why the past perfect "had reduced" is correct here - but how can the simple past tense "blocked" in the relative clause be correct? Doesn't this imply that the sequence of events is: "landings are reduced" followed by "the culverts blocked shad migrations"? But how is this logical? First the migrations are blocked by the culverts and subsequently (or perhaps at the same time) landings are reduced, so the verb tense for "blocked" should either be the same as "reduced" or further in the past then "reduced". Shouldn't the correct use of verb tenses be:
"...the proliferation of milldams and culverts that HAD BLOCKED shad migrations up their spawning streams HAD REDUCED landings to less than four million pounds"

?


The sequential relation is required to be established between the time reference 1920 and the verb "had reduced". The verb "blocked" is not a part of this relationship - hence past perfect is not to be used for this verb.


Great answer, thanks sayantanc.

Since the verb "blocked" does not need to be part of this sequential relationship, could another verb tense have been used correctly (i.e. if answer option B was one of the below, would it have been correct?)

  • Present Simple tense (for an event the recurs) -> "...the proliferation of milldams and culverts that BLOCK shad migrations up their spawning streams HAD REDUCED landings to less than four million pounds"
  • Present Perfect tense (for an event that occurred in the past and continues to be true) -> "...the proliferation of milldams and culverts that HAVE BLOCKED shad migrations up their spawning streams HAD REDUCED landings to less than four million pounds"

?

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 2

Expert Post
Verbal Expert
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3278

Kudos [?]: 3794 [0], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2016, 03:33
natley4788 wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
natley4788 wrote:
I understand why the past perfect "had reduced" is correct here - but how can the simple past tense "blocked" in the relative clause be correct? Doesn't this imply that the sequence of events is: "landings are reduced" followed by "the culverts blocked shad migrations"? But how is this logical? First the migrations are blocked by the culverts and subsequently (or perhaps at the same time) landings are reduced, so the verb tense for "blocked" should either be the same as "reduced" or further in the past then "reduced". Shouldn't the correct use of verb tenses be:
"...the proliferation of milldams and culverts that HAD BLOCKED shad migrations up their spawning streams HAD REDUCED landings to less than four million pounds"

?


The sequential relation is required to be established between the time reference 1920 and the verb "had reduced". The verb "blocked" is not a part of this relationship - hence past perfect is not to be used for this verb.


Great answer, thanks sayantanc.

Since the verb "blocked" does not need to be part of this sequential relationship, could another verb tense have been used correctly (i.e. if answer option B was one of the below, would it have been correct?)

  • Present Simple tense (for an event the recurs) -> "...the proliferation of milldams and culverts that BLOCK shad migrations up their spawning streams HAD REDUCED landings to less than four million pounds"
  • Present Perfect tense (for an event that occurred in the past and continues to be true) -> "...the proliferation of milldams and culverts that HAVE BLOCKED shad migrations up their spawning streams HAD REDUCED landings to less than four million pounds"

?


Yes, any tense could be used instead depending on the meaning required to be conveyed.

Kudos [?]: 3794 [0], given: 22

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 03 Jan 2017
Posts: 194

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 4

Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2017, 14:01
C, E out: amount is used with uncountable
D having blocked modifies clause incorrectly and is wordy
A is wrong because of the false tense used

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 4

Director
Director
User avatar
S
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 773

Kudos [?]: 343 [0], given: 14

Location: Bangalore, India
Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2017, 23:37
natley4788 wrote:
Shouldn't the correct use of verb tenses be:
"...the proliferation of milldams and culverts that HAD BLOCKED shad migrations up their spawning streams HAD REDUCED landings to less than four million pounds"

Hi natley4788, that would not be a great construct. Normally, past perfect is used to depict chronological sequence of two events/instances that happened one after the other in the past. Here however, clearly milldams and culverts were still there in 1920. So, at the very least, had blocked would make the sequence quite cryptic to understand.

Quote:
could another verb tense have been used correctly (i.e. if answer option B was one of the below, would it have been correct?)

Present Simple tense (for an event the recurs) -> "...the proliferation of milldams and culverts that BLOCK shad migrations up their spawning streams HAD REDUCED landings to less than four million pounds"

Present Perfect tense (for an event that occurred in the past and continues to be true) -> "...the proliferation of milldams and culverts that HAVE BLOCKED shad migrations up their spawning streams HAD REDUCED landings to less than four million pounds"

That would be incorrect because the entire sentence talks about events/instances that happened in the past. So, we cannot be using present tense.
_________________

Thanks,
Ashish (GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle)
http://www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com

Kudos [?]: 343 [0], given: 14

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Posts: 200

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 33

Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Apr 2017, 04:12
Hi mikemcgarry,

Long time no see.
How are you?

Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than seventeen million pounds of shad in a single year, but by 1920, over-fishing and the proliferation of milldams and culverts that have blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less than four million pounds.

(A) that have blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less
(B) that blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less
(C) that blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams reduced landings to a lower amount
(D) having blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams reduced landings to less
(E) having blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to an amount lower

When I practiced this question,

I first eliminated choice C, D because past perfect (had reduced ) is necessary if there is a signal " by 1920" that means an action happens before a past time,

second, I think "having blocked" is ok if modifies preceding noun "milldams and culverts"

third, I think block ... from doing is a good idiom, so i eliminated A, and E, unfortunately, I haven't read the idiom issue throughout the posts., Am i right ?

Last, I think less than is more concise than a lower amount / an amount lower


Although I got the right answer choice B, I have some confusion when i checked the OA, so i genuinely want your help.

First OA said "migrations up their spawning streams" in choice A is incorrect, I am not sure why it is incorrect

Second, In choice D and E, "having blocked ... streams" should be set off in commas, this point is opposite of my reasoning above (second),

Does OA mean that "having blocked ... streams" is nonessential modifier ? so it should be set off in commas ?
while I think that "having blocked ... streams" is essential modifier, so it can follow the noun "milldams and culverts"

Mike, please help correct my fault.

thanks so much in deed.

Have a nice day.
>_~

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 33

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 Feb 2017
Posts: 13

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 May 2017, 10:39
Quick question:

In B, shouldn't "blocked" be in the past perfect? The block happened first, and then came the reduction?

Or is blocked OK because it's part of the noun modifying phrase that modifies milldams and culverts, and the only verb that connects to 1920 is reduced, requiring a past perfect?

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 395

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 240

Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.56
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 May 2017, 16:44
Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than seventeen million pounds of shad in a single year, but by 1920, over-fishing and the proliferation of milldams and culverts that have blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less than four million pounds.

(A) that have blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less

(B) that blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less

(C) that blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams reduced landings to a lower amount

(D) having blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams reduced landings to less

(E) having blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to an amount lower
_________________

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one - Bruce Lee

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 240

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 395

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 240

Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.56
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2017, 08:10
Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than seventeen million pounds of shad in a single year, but by 1920, over-fishing and the proliferation of milldams and culverts that have blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less than four million pounds.

(A) that have blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less
(B) that blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less
(C) that blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams reduced landings to a lower amount
(D) having blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams reduced landings to less
(E) having blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to an amount lower
_________________

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one - Bruce Lee

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 240

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 58

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Reviews Badge
Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2017, 06:41
Hi All,

Can someone please summarize the concept here as I feel this is a very different concept and not covered explicitly in any notes or by anyone. Going through the thread, I think I have a rough idea about this but I am not 100% sure on this. Would be great if somebody can summarize this please.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 58

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Status: IF YOU CAN DREAM IT, YOU CAN DO IT
Joined: 03 Jul 2017
Posts: 186

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Oct 2017, 04:38
Can someone let me know the exceptional rule for the past perfect tense. Thank you

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 170

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 74

Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.32
Reviews Badge
Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Oct 2017, 04:45
longhaul123 wrote:
Can someone let me know the exceptional rule for the past perfect tense. Thank you


Hi longhaul123,

Here is the link I used: https://gmatclub.com/forum/rule-for-sim ... 81001.html

I have found it immensely helpful and concise, and I hope you do too!
_________________

D-Day: November 18th, 2017

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 74

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2017, 12:32
How is B the right answer??? It uses Past Perfect tense for an event that is happening later in the timeline. Pls help.

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
S
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2415

Kudos [?]: 9635 [0], given: 351

Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2017, 14:30
monidip1010 wrote:
How is B the right answer??? It uses Past Perfect tense for an event that is happening later in the timeline. Pls help.



Hello monidip1010,

I will be glad to help you out with this one. :-)


This official sentence uses the phrase by 1920. Whenever the phrase by 1234 is used in a sentence, it requires the usage of past perfect tense. It is so because the expression denotes that first some other action took place, and then 1234 arrived.

Same is the case with the usage of by 1920 in this official sentence. Presence of this phrase says that over-fishing and the proliferation of milldams and culverts had already reduced the amount of landings by the time 1920 arrived. Hence, use of past perfect tense verb had reduced is correct.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Kudos [?]: 9635 [0], given: 351

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 223

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 519

Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2017, 21:15
JarvisR wrote:
Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than seventeen million pounds of shad in a single year, but by 1920, over-fishing and the proliferation of milldams and culverts that have blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less than four million pounds.

(A) that have blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less

(B) that blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less

(C) that blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams reduced landings to a lower amount

(D) having blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams reduced landings to less

(E) having blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to an amount lower


"by 1920" shows that "had done" is needed. had done is used to show an action happen before a past point of time. we go to choice A and B
choice A use "have blocked" . this tense is complex. it is used to say an action beginning in the past and continue until present. this case is popular and never is used wrongly

present perfect also is used to say about past actions WITHOUT PAST POINT OF TIME. in this case present perfect is interchangeable with SIMPLE PAST.

this is two main uses of present perfect.

present perfect never is used to show a past actions WITH PAST POINT OF TIME.
choice A is wrong.
gmat test the very basic grammar.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 519

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 223

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 519

Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Dec 2017, 01:23
JarvisR wrote:
Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than seventeen million pounds of shad in a single year, but by 1920, over-fishing and the proliferation of milldams and culverts that have blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less than four million pounds.

(A) that have blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less

(B) that blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less

(C) that blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams reduced landings to a lower amount

(D) having blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams reduced landings to less

(E) having blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to an amount lower


look at choice B, why "that blocked" is right ?

the basic point of past perfect is that it is used to show an action happen before a past point of time . this point dose not mean that past perfect show an action which happen before all the actions presented by past simple in the sentence.

in choice b, it dose not mean that " had reduced landing"happen before "blocked shad". the action of "blocked shad" is happenning at 1920, at the time of speaking, skeaking is in the past. so, choice b is logic.

so, at 1920, the overfishing still block ( presented by simple past) and finish reducing (presented by past perfect). at 1920, action of blocking still happen and action of reducing is finished. the sequence of actions/tenses is logic.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 519

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 35

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 22

Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2018, 06:09
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
262. Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than seventeen million pounds of shad in a single year, but by 1920, overfishing and the proliferation of milldams and culverts that have blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less than four million pounds.

A. that have blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less
B. that blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less
C. that blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams reduced landings to a lower amount
D. having blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams reduced landings to less
E. having blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to an amount lower


Don't understand the usage of 'had'

NOTE: ACTIVE DISCUSSION OF THIS TOPIC can be found here

Last edited by generis on 07 Jan 2018, 10:06, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 22

VP
VP
avatar
P
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 1250

Kudos [?]: 462 [0], given: 682

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2018, 10:47
AshutoshB wrote:
262. Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than seventeen million pounds of shad in a single year, but by 1920, overfishing and the proliferation of milldams and culverts that have blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less than four million pounds.

A. that have blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less
B. that blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams had reduced landings to less
C. that blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams reduced landings to a lower amount
D. having blocked shad from migrating up their spawning streams reduced landings to less
E. having blocked shad migrations up their spawning streams had reduced landings to an amount lower


Don't understand the usage of 'had'

AshutoshB , please see this expert's reply to the same question. Various posts in [url]https://gmatclub.com/forum/around-1900-fishermen-in-the-chesapeake-bay-area-landed-more-than-203779.html]this thread with an identical topic[/url] should give you additional assistance.
_________________

At the still point, there the dance is. -- T.S. Eliot
Formerly genxer123

Kudos [?]: 462 [0], given: 682

Re: Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than   [#permalink] 07 Jan 2018, 10:47

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 38 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Around 1900, fishermen in the Chesapeake Bay area landed more than

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.