Explanation
1. According to the passage, which one of the following is currently an obstacle to the implementation of an ideal industrial ecosystem?
Difficulty Level: Easy
Explanation
“According to the passage,” and the categorical “which…is,” clearly signal a Detail Question. But where? The phrase “obstacle to the implementation” doesn’t occur in the text per se, but our Roadmap must send us to Paragraph 4, in which the author asserts pessimism about the early implementation of the iie. The semicolon gives it away. That little punctuation mark connects the pessimistic prediction with line 19, which (D) directly echoes: Today’s technology is just not up “to the task,” meaning it’s not ready to process and reuse manufacturing by-products.
(A), (B), (C) Each asserts an intransigence on someone’s part that is either contradicted by, or off the topic of, the passage. Far from balking, manufacturers (A) are cited in Paragraph 3 as changing in the spirit of the iie.
The author wants the industrialized countries (B) to change their manufacturing ways, and shows no interest in their cutting back for the good of the rest of the world.
As for the developing countries (C), the author wants them to avoid older and damaging technologies; there’s no sense that they would be unwilling to do so. Anyway, (C) makes an unwarranted comparison to the industrial nations’ technology.
(E) implies that it’s the new industrial ecosystem that wouldn’t be up to the task—that it wouldn’t supply what we need. But it’s current technology that’s the obstacle to the idea, as (D) points out, not the idea itself.
Answer: D
2. The author of the passage would most probably agree with which one of the following statements about standards of living?
Difficulty Level: Medium
Explanation
From line 49 for Q. 1, we’ll move back to line 3. “Most probably agree” signals Inference, and the Buzzword phrase “standards of living” should send you up top, where the author asserts his “ideal” of everyone, all 10 billion of us, enjoying the same standards. Think Globally—does the author think that that can happen? Sure, if the “iie” ever came to pass. Remember, he explicitly told us to reject the prediction of a grim future (lines 14–15). A quick scan of the choices in search of this kind of optimism must yield (D)—it’s the idea that underlies the entire plan thereafter outlined.
(A), (B), (C) All are way too pessimistic, all suggestive of some sort of “grim future.” The author is not interested in improving industrialized countries’ living standards (A), just in maintaining everyone’s; nor does he imply that one set of nations’ standards must be at the expense of another’s. (B) might work if appended to it were the words “unless we institute an iie,” but as is, (B) sounds as if the author were despairing and had no plan to offer. (Even then, (B) would have to read “by the year 2040.” The author seems confident that the downturn would happen between 2030 and 2040—see lines 8–9).
(C) has the same flaw as (B). Sure we can maintain the industrialized nations’ living standards in the face of a population boom, IF the iie plan takes hold.
Answer: D
3. The author of the passage would most probably agree with which one of the following statements about the use of “designed offal” (line 38)?
Difficulty Level: Easy
Explanation
“Most probably agree” again. That means Inference again. And both the quoted phrase and line reference send us to the latter portion of Paragraph 3. Now (if not before) would be the time to read and understand the “designated offal” example as a current procedure in which the “waste from a manufacturing process…can be fed back into that process or a related one.” That’s the kind of thinking right in line with the new, iie. Yet we have to keep reading, the author’s not done with “designated offal”: The procedure, he implies, is still a bit wasteful, but less than normal (lines 42–45). The only choice that registers qualified enthusiasm is (D).
(A) “Harmful”? Toss this one immediately. “Designated offal” is way too close to the iie to merit such disdain.
(B) “Not entirely helpful”? That’s OK, but the remainder of (B) is sheer fancy. “Designated offal” is distracting us from nothing; it’s a step in the right direction.
(C), like (A), is way too downbeat, and the “temporary” thing comes out of nowhere.
(E) errs in the other direction—too celebratory of a procedure that has limits (lines 42–44), and too global in scope. “Designated offal” is not the author’s #1 solution, of course.
Answer: D
4. The author mentions all of the following as advantages of replacing current industrial practices with an industrial ecosystem approach EXCEPT:
Difficulty Level: Medium
Explanation
“The author mentions” is the kind of categorical language that clearly signals a Detail Question. And where are the advantages of the iie to be found? In Paragraph 2, of course, where it’s described. And the list, in lines 22–28, of aspects of the proposal is practically tailor-made for an “all of the following EXCEPT.” Your approach ought to be to reread that list, and try matching up each of its phrases to the choices. We’ll review them in order. The list begins at lines 22–23 with optimizing energy consumption and materials—the latter is (D).
Minimizing waste is next, that’s (A). Minimizing pollution—or “harmful by-products” as (B) has it—is next. Finally, the reuse of one process’s “effluents” (don’t panic, it’s just a fancy way of saying “waste”) is echoed in (E).
Interestingly, that list begins at line 23 with the issue of energy, but notice how correct choice (C) distorts it. (C)’s reference to alternative energy sources sounds pretty progressive and environment friendly. Also, it might seem to echo the reference to “alternative materials” in lines 16–17. But alternative energy sources never appear in the text, are never attached to the iie concept.
Answer: C
5. Of the following, which one is the best example of the use of “designed offal” (line 38) as it is defined in the passage?
Difficulty Level: Hard
Explanation
“Which one is the best example,” and the off-the-topic nature of the choices, signal a Logic Question, in specific a Parallel Logic puzzler of the type we associate with Logical Reasoning. Happily, it’s based on the “designated offal” concept to which we have already given keen attention thanks to Q. 3. Brush up on it: “Designated offal” means feeding “waste from a manufacturing process…back into that process or a related one” in an almost circular way. That’s what we want. Attack the choices and accept no substitutes.
(A) Using purchased recycled newspaper isn’t the same as using waste from the production of newspaper. There’s no “offal” involved in (A).
(B), likewise, fails to involve the use of waste. Both (A) and (B) sound vaguely like positive recycling, and thus may have tempted you as being somewhat in line with the sensible use of resources that the author wants to institute. But you must keep the specific idea of “designated offal” in mind for this question: We are looking for the positive use of production waste in a way that will tie into the original, or a related, process. Anyhow, (B) further errs by selling its reconditioned brass rather than rolling it over into a manufacturing process.
(C) Taking steel from “discarded” cars doesn’t involve the use of manufacturing waste. And even if it did, (C)’s steel is going into beams, whereas in the “designated offal” model it would have to go back into car manufacture or some related area.
(D) There ya go: Auto manufacturing waste circles right back into an auto manufacturing process. Fits like a glove.
Let’s look at (E) for completeness’s sake, but not with any respect. (E) As expected, it’s way off. Recycling, however admirable, is not using manufacturing waste, and there’s no circular reuse present between beverage containers and polyester fiber.
Answer: D
Explanation Credit: Kaplan LSAT