Hi Brett, did you interview on the 23rd? I think we've actually met. Just as a matter of interest, would you mind sharing your GPA/GMAT?
All of your thoughts are basically the same thoughts I've been having - it's kind of scary. The more and more I think about it though, the more and more I'm leaning away from ASU. It's easier for me to reply to your points in line so.. here we go.
Brettmurry
Any updates on your situation Casey? I'm curious to see how your negotiation is going, I may do the same myself.
You and rbsx brought up a lot of good points that I haven't thought of. I'm choosing between USC (no scholarship), UT Austin (with partial scholarship), and ASU (which will cover tuition and then some).
It looks like we applied to all the same schools. Unlike you however, I didn't get into Austin (wait listed) and USC (denied). I've had bad karma with USC for whatever reason, I think partially because I've been off put by how disorganized they are, their **** recruitment, and their aura of "we're USC, we have nothing to prove to you, you have everything to prove to us" attitude, when their program is in a complete state of disarray. Consequently, I think that came across in my application. I digress.
Quote:
To your point rbsx, it sounds like a lot of your decision will come down to whether or not you want to be in the US or Canada after graduation. If you go to Rotman, your connections and network will be extremely solid throughout Canada... Likewise, if you end up at ASU, the transition to California would be very easy. With that said, I'm not sure how the visas work being an international student.
You're pretty much on base here. A lot of it does come down to where I want to be, but there are some other things too.
The challenge with Rotman is this - it's VERY finance heavy (50% of grads end up in Finance). With oil the way it is right now and a depressed mining market, combined with a high price of living and lower pay, Rotman is a challenging value proposition. I'm not sure if the economy of Canada is going to be on very solid footing 2-3 years down the road.
Going to ASU means making more money, lower cost of living if I stay in the South West, but it also means forgoing the benefits of a larger, more well rounded program. ASU lacks the clubs, lacks the case competitions, lacks exchange and travel opportunities. On the other hand it's a smaller, more community minded program because you get to know absolutely everything. But I can't help notice how it lacks aspects which could only bolster your candidacy for future jobs.
The VISA situation isn't nearly as complicated for Canadians as it is for people from elsewhere, we automatically get 18 months to work in the USA as a part of our practical training time as a part of our F1 Visa.
For me the choice is - would I rather go to the top school in my country, in the fu**ing cold, make less money, but have more exposure to a diverse array of employers across multiple industries and functions, or would I rather go to ASU where I have no debt, better climate, but a less well rounded MBA experience, and perhaps be pigeon holed when it comes to work opportunities.
I still have not yet figured out the answer to that.
Quote:
As far as ASU's program, I also noticed how many of the students were married. Class dynamic is also very important to me as silly as it sounds, I want to have fun as well during grad school. I'm wondering if a huge portion of the class is actually married, or if the married students are just more involved with meeting the prospective students within the ambassador program. As far as I know, ASU undergrad has a reputation for being one of the best schools for partying, so there will certainly be opportunities.
There's a number of social challenges associated with Arizona's program, being married is only part of it. Being a smaller program there are:
-Fewer students to socialize with
-Fewer career/interest clubs (no interest clubs really - no beer club? no epicurean/food club? no sports clubs????)
-A larger proportion seem to be married and live further away
-Large number of foreign (and by foreign I mean not from North America foreign) students which poses some cultural barrier issues
To be blunt, I kind of want to party wherever I go. I'm a work hard party hard kind of guy. Though it appears to be great for that at an undergrad level, not so much at the graduate level. I'm worried everyone's going to have to go home after class and babysit the kids.
Quote:
I also agree with your opinion about how much effort they put into each student. It seems like they're building the program exactly the way they want it and are putting a big investment into each student. As far as the career search goes, I'm sure they will help in every way possible, but I'm also concerned that if you are not going into SCM your options may be a little harder to come by. My interests are not necessarily aligned with SCM either, but I think that they would put a lot of effort into helping you along your path, which is not what I saw with other programs. Especially USC... I felt like they were disorganized and did not seem to care too much about the students, even though it is also a smaller program, relatively speaking.
The more and more I dive into the ASU career statistics, the scarier and scarier it is for non-SCM guys. First and foremost, most of the tech companies which come to recruit only come for SCM positions, that's it. I was told this repeatedly by the students I talked to.
One statistic in particular is extremely misleading and alarming - consulting. Though they say they place anywhere from 5%-15% in the consulting function depending on what year you look at, that's not exactly the case. It's not strategy consulting really.
AT Kearney only recruits for SCM consulting positions from ASU, not strategy or anything else. Delloite starts people off in the AERS program, (audit and enterprise risk division), and to a lesser extent S&O with most ASU grads going into the operations side of Strategy & Operations. That effectively puts consulting as a non-option for me.
So the question remains, if you aren't interested in SCM - what do you do with your degree afterward?
It seems that they are trying to build something here - and it would be helpful if I had a better idea of what it was they were building towards. E.G. Are they trying to diversify the type of grads they are putting out, are they trying to grow the program, are they trying to make it more competitive and push it into the mid 20s?
Quote:
After thinking it over this weekend, I'm leaning toward ASU so I'm curious to hear what you two are thinking as well.
At this point I'm begrudgingly looking more and more at Rotman.