Last visit was: 14 Dec 2024, 16:35 It is currently 14 Dec 2024, 16:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
vatsight01
Joined: 01 Sep 2016
Last visit: 28 Nov 2024
Posts: 7
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 7
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Russ19
Joined: 29 Oct 2019
Last visit: 29 Sep 2024
Posts: 1,347
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 582
Posts: 1,347
Kudos: 1,684
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 5,670
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 706
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,670
Kudos: 4,907
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
vatsight01
Joined: 01 Sep 2016
Last visit: 28 Nov 2024
Posts: 7
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 7
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
vatsight01
In many cases of Relative Pronoun modifier clauses "that" becomes the subject referring to the preceding noun entity and fulfils the SV Pair condition ,then why in those questions the "noun entity" and "that" is not viewed separately as seen in the above question?
Hi vatsight01,

A relative clause that describes a noun before it will never provide a verb for the main or any other clause.

\(\left [{S_1} \right ] + \left [{V_1} \right ] + \left [{Obj_1} \right ] \left [that \left (verb \right ) | \left (sub + verb \right ) \right ] .\)

1. {X} did not approve the {Y} {that-relative clause}. ← This is a complete sentence because the subject, {X}, has a verb (did approve).

2. {X} said that the {A} {that-relative clause}... ← This is not a complete sentence. Even though the main subject, {X}, has a verb (said), the subject after the first that, {A}, doesn't have a verb.

Thanks for clearing my doubt👍

Posted from my mobile device
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7163 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
14163 posts