It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 02:58

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

CEO
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2734

Kudos [?]: 1045 [2], given: 4

Location: New York City
Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 14:11
2
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

90% (00:44) correct 10% (01:03) wrong based on 2668 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

248. Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette smoking, eating rich foods high in fats, and alcohol consumption not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate genetic predispositions toward certain diseases.
(A) not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate
(B) do damage by themselves but also are aggravating to
(C) are damaging by themselves but also are aggravating
(D) not only do damage by themselves, they are also aggravating to
(E) are doing damage by themselves, and they are also aggravating
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 1045 [2], given: 4

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 490

Kudos [?]: 269 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 14:38
Again, this is idiom. The correct usage is not only...but also.

Kudos [?]: 269 [0], given: 1

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1635

Kudos [?]: 1105 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: SC1000 #248 Docotrs generally... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2011, 17:43
+1 A

However, it seem this is not a good question, IMO.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1105 [0], given: 109

Manager
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
Posts: 118

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE: General Management (Insurance)
Re: SC1000 #248 Docotrs generally... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2011, 18:58
A. Use of Not only---- But also...

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 275

Kudos [?]: 376 [0], given: 51

Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon
Re: Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2012, 23:30
i am a bit confused ..generally not only ..but also is used in a positive context only .
Example :He not only scored high marks but also gained an admit from a top university .
As mettalicafan said this is a not a good question .
_________________

+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks

Kudos [?]: 376 [0], given: 51

VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1403

Kudos [?]: 158 [2], given: 916

Re: Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2013, 16:10
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
be carefull my friends.

not only...but also is used to show the in-the-same- direction content between 2 clauses.

however, "but also" can be used ALONE to show contrast and means "but"

gmatprep presents a question in which "but also " is used ALONE to test whether we know the contrast.

in this question, the meaning is same-direction content between 2 clauses, so, the couple "not only...but also" is used

this is called meaning based analysis which assumes that the wrong answer choice is grammatical and needs to be proved wrong in meaning.

this means "but also" in b and c are grammatical but wrong in meaning.
if you think that "but also" in b and c are wrong because "not only" dose not go with them, you are wrong because "but also" can be used without "not only"

that is my thinking.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Kudos [?]: 158 [2], given: 916

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 287

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 75

Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Re: Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2013, 01:02
bmwhype2 wrote:
248. Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette smoking, eating rich foods high in fats, and alcohol consumption not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate genetic predispositions toward certain diseases.
(A) not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate
(B) do damage by themselves but also are aggravating to
(C) are damaging by themselves but also are aggravating
(D) not only do damage by themselves, they are also aggravating to
(E) are doing damage by themselves, and they are also aggravating

use of idiom: Not only...but also. only A uses the idiom correctly.
_________________

YOU CAN, IF YOU THINK YOU CAN

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 75

Director
Joined: 28 Jun 2011
Posts: 879

Kudos [?]: 244 [0], given: 57

Re: Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2013, 08:53

Kudos [?]: 244 [0], given: 57

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Posts: 302

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 23

Re: Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2014, 20:10
Can someone please explain if parallelism is at work here?

I used the parallelism for the contrasting points: Not only X but also Y.

(A) not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate
(B) do damage by themselves but also are aggravating to
(C) are damaging by themselves but also are aggravating
(D) not only do damage by themselves, they are also aggravating to
(E) are doing damage by themselves, and they are also aggravating

A and C would pass the parallelism test. Is this a correct split?

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 23

Manager
Joined: 25 Jan 2015
Posts: 121

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 260

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Re: Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2015, 06:42
A question on choice E: Do we need a 'that' before 'they' in choice E?

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 260

Chat Moderator
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 690

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 537

Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
Schools: Sloan '18 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2015, 00:35
apolo wrote:
A question on choice E: Do we need a 'that' before 'they' in choice E?

No, we don't. It will change the meaning.
_________________

If my post was helpful, press Kudos. If not, then just press Kudos !!!

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 537

Intern
Joined: 21 Feb 2013
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 9

Schools: Arizona State"19
Re: Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2015, 03:59
Hi guys I have a doubt, MGMAT states that complex gerund is only parallel to an Action Noun. Here Smoking(Complex gerund),Eating(simple gerund) and consumption (action noun). So how can Eating be parallel in the list. Plz clarify

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 9

Manager
Joined: 25 Jan 2015
Posts: 121

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 260

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Re: Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2015, 23:22
caster88 wrote:
Hi guys I have a doubt, MGMAT states that complex gerund is only parallel to an Action Noun. Here Smoking(Complex gerund),Eating(simple gerund) and consumption (action noun). So how can Eating be parallel in the list. Plz clarify

Ask this question from a Manhattan guy; you know what the answer will be: Don't question the official questions! Since the question you ask is about the non-underlined section of the question, your questions is not relevant!

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 260

Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2015
Posts: 51

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 309

Schools: Sloan '19
Re: Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jan 2016, 23:34
please explain the parallelism here..."...cigarette smoking, eating rich foods high in fats, and alcohol consumption....".

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 309

Intern
Joined: 21 Jan 2013
Posts: 46

Kudos [?]: 10 [1], given: 68

Schools: LBS
GPA: 3.82
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2016, 00:06
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
gmatlbs wrote:
please explain the parallelism here..."...cigarette smoking, eating rich foods high in fats, and alcohol consumption....".

Generally, whenever a noun form exists for an action , that noun form is preferred to the -ing form of that action.

Here, alcohol consumption is preferred over consuming of alcohol

Coming to the parallelism aspect , the parallelism rules say the following are parallel
1) action nouns || to action nouns ( consumption here)
2) nouns || to complex gerunds (verb-ing OF <something>) --> notice the presence of "of <something>"
2) verb-ing (simple gerund) || to verb-ing (simple gerund)

Going by the rule - I see what you're saying. it's difficult to explain the parallelism by these rules.
But, going by the construction of this sentence, it is clear to see that smoking , eating and consumption are all unambiguously positioned as nouns . (considering verb-ing can be modifiers as well) ,

so I am guessing GMAC took the liberty to position all the nouns parallel (smoking, eating, and consumption) to avoid the awkwardness of a construction like below.

smoking of cigarettes, eating of rich foods high in fats, and alcohol consumption

this might be the only other possible construction to fit the rule, because smoking and eating do not have a proper noun form.

my takeaway would be that we should keep an eye on the role of verb-ing and if it's unambiguously a noun, it can be presented parallel to action nouns. just noticed that this question is repeated in OG16 (Q87) , verbatim, without eliminating the question. so GMAC believes this a valid construction. the rule is probably hard for modifier forms and soft on noun forms .

A new learning today, after having recently learnt about how past participle forms can be parallel to present participle forms - from the famous fungus question .
thanks for asking this Q. do drop in another post if you notice similar construction in other Qs.
_________________

--

Consider +1 Kudos if you find my post useful

Kudos [?]: 10 [1], given: 68

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4287

Kudos [?]: 7875 [1], given: 363

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2016, 00:40
1
KUDOS
The general observation is that GMAC never comes out and says that this is the rule or that is the rule. Only others interpret them as per their own perceptions. The problem is thicker when, such concepts are tested in the underlined portion. Then we have to look the proclaimed answer choices to expound the acceptance of the diction or the style. However, except for academic purposes, worrying about something that is not underlined or even cultivating that habit will be a strain on the resources, especially in the hall. So, let us take that as far //ism is concerned, that the combination of gerund and an action noun is perfectly ok in GMAT, if I may add including in underlined portion. I hardly remember having seen any GMAT question wherein such a distinction has been used to reject an answer
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7875 [1], given: 363

Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 777

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 267

Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2017, 06:31
victory47 wrote:
be carefull my friends.

not only...but also is used to show the in-the-same- direction content between 2 clauses.

however, "but also" can be used ALONE to show contrast and means "but"

gmatprep presents a question in which "but also " is used ALONE to test whether we know the contrast.

in this question, the meaning is same-direction content between 2 clauses, so, the couple "not only...but also" is used

this is called meaning based analysis which assumes that the wrong answer choice is grammatical and needs to be proved wrong in meaning.

this means "but also" in b and c are grammatical but wrong in meaning.
if you think that "but also" in b and c are wrong because "not only" dose not go with them, you are wrong because "but also" can be used without "not only"

that is my thinking.

Hello GMATNinja

Can we use 'but also' without 'not only' as stated here or it all depends on the context?

If that is so, eliminating choices based on idioms must be the last option.

Also what can be parallel to what as is discussed in above posts?

Thanks

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 267

VP
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1069

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 532

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: 314 Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Re: Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2017, 00:04
Imo A
How option C is wrong as it maintains parallelism.

Sent from my ONE E1003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
_________________

We are more often frightened than hurt; and we suffer more from imagination than from reality

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 532

Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2016
Posts: 200

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 38

Location: United States
GPA: 3.4
Re: Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2017, 10:37
Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette smoking, eating rich foods high in fats, and alcohol consumption not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate genetic predispositions toward certain diseases.

By removing the fluff we notice that the original sentence correctly uses the idiom not only X but also Y

The only answers that follow this rule are A and D. Eliminate B,C and E

With D there is an error with parallelism, 'do damage' and 'aggrevating'. The gerund 'aggrevating' is incorrect. The correct form is aggrevate. Hence answer is A
_________________

Kudosity killed the cat but your kudos can save it.

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 38

Director
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 784

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 164

Re: Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2017, 21:51
bmwhype2 wrote:
248. Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette smoking, eating rich foods high in fats, and alcohol consumption not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate genetic predispositions toward certain diseases.
(A) not only do damage by themselves but also aggravate
(B) do damage by themselves but also are aggravating to
(C) are damaging by themselves but also are aggravating
(D) not only do damage by themselves, they are also aggravating to
(E) are doing damage by themselves, and they are also aggravating

The correct idiom is "not only x but y." The original sentence correctly uses the idiom and is parallel.

A

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 164

Re: Doctors generally agree that such factors as cigarette   [#permalink] 14 Aug 2017, 21:51

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by