Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2206:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Let’s dive deep into advanced CR to ace GMAT Focus! Join this webinar to unlock the secrets to conquering Boldface and Paradox questions with expert insights and strategies. Elevate your skills and boost your GMAT Verbal Score now!
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
03 Feb 2019, 03:15
Kudos
Bookmarks
Even in this age of conservation, cooking ranges that consume fossil fuels are far more common than those that rely on magnetic resonance, producing heat more efficiently than natural gas.
A. producing heat more efficiently than natural gas
B. producing heat more efficiently than natural gas does
C. which produce heat more efficiently than natural gas
D. which produce heat more efficiently than natural gas does
E. much more efficient at producing heat than natural gas
Option B: There seems to be a misconception about what is the real previous clause that the comma + verb+ing modifier is modifying. It is not the clause starting with the cooking ranges that consume fossil fuels (incidentally. natural gas is one such fossil fuel), but the relative clause that starts with the demonstrative pronoun -- 'those' that rely on MR. -- Therefore, it is clear that 'producing heat more efficiently than natural gas does" is justly modifying the cooking ranges that rely on MR
A. producing heat more efficiently than natural gas
B. producing heat more efficiently than natural gas does
C. which produce heat more efficiently than natural gas
D. which produce heat more efficiently than natural gas does
E. much more efficient at producing heat than natural gas
Option B: There seems to be a misconception about what is the real previous clause that the comma + verb+ing modifier is modifying. It is not the clause starting with the cooking ranges that consume fossil fuels (incidentally. natural gas is one such fossil fuel), but the relative clause that starts with the demonstrative pronoun -- 'those' that rely on MR. -- Therefore, it is clear that 'producing heat more efficiently than natural gas does" is justly modifying the cooking ranges that rely on MR
03 Feb 2019, 03:24
Kudos
Bookmarks
daagh sir
I understand that “ producing heat....” refers to MR based cooking ranges .
However my doubt is that we are comparing cooking ranges to natural gas , I was thinking as below
“Producing heat more efficiently than those using natural gas do “
Am I thinking too literally ?
How to deal with such subtle questions ?
I understand that “ producing heat....” refers to MR based cooking ranges .
However my doubt is that we are comparing cooking ranges to natural gas , I was thinking as below
“Producing heat more efficiently than those using natural gas do “
Am I thinking too literally ?
How to deal with such subtle questions ?
Even in this age of conservation, cooking ranges that consume fossil fuels are far more common than those that rely on magnetic resonance, producing heat more efficiently than natural gas.
A. producing heat more efficiently than natural gas
B. producing heat more efficiently than natural gas does
C. which produce heat more efficiently than natural gas
D. which produce heat more efficiently than natural gas does
E. much more efficient at producing heat than natural gas
Option B: There seems to be a misconception about what is the real previous clause that the comma + verbing modifier is modifying. It is not the clause starting with the cooking ranges that consume fossil fuels (incidentally. natural gas is one such fossil fuel), but the relative clause that starts with the demonstrative pronoun -- 'those' that rely on MR. -- Therefore, it is clear that 'producing heat more efficiently than natural gas does" is justly modifying the MR based cooking ranges.
We can see that essentially, there are two comparisons involved in this hard nut of the question.
The first is the comparison between the cooking ranges of fossil fuels and the MRs. The first "than" marks this comparison.
The second one is about which produces heat more efficiently, whether NG or MR. The second 'than' signifies this aspect.
Both the comparisons should be dealt with one-on-one, like A vs. B and C vs. D but not A vs.C and B vs. D.
A. producing heat more efficiently than natural gas
B. producing heat more efficiently than natural gas does
C. which produce heat more efficiently than natural gas
D. which produce heat more efficiently than natural gas does
E. much more efficient at producing heat than natural gas
Option B: There seems to be a misconception about what is the real previous clause that the comma + verbing modifier is modifying. It is not the clause starting with the cooking ranges that consume fossil fuels (incidentally. natural gas is one such fossil fuel), but the relative clause that starts with the demonstrative pronoun -- 'those' that rely on MR. -- Therefore, it is clear that 'producing heat more efficiently than natural gas does" is justly modifying the MR based cooking ranges.
We can see that essentially, there are two comparisons involved in this hard nut of the question.
The first is the comparison between the cooking ranges of fossil fuels and the MRs. The first "than" marks this comparison.
The second one is about which produces heat more efficiently, whether NG or MR. The second 'than' signifies this aspect.
Both the comparisons should be dealt with one-on-one, like A vs. B and C vs. D but not A vs.C and B vs. D.
