Jun 29 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Learn reading strategies that can help even nonvoracious reader to master GMAT RC Jun 30 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. Jul 01 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Game of Timers is a teambased competition based on solving GMAT questions to win epic prizes! Starting July 1st, compete to win prep materials while studying for GMAT! Registration is Open! Jul 01 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day workshop and learn how to ace the GMAT while keeping your fulltime job. Limited for the first 99 registrants.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 705

For a certain exam, was the standard deviation of the scores
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 May 2011, 00:12
Question Stats:
63% (01:09) correct 38% (01:11) wrong based on 412 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
For a certain exam, was the standard deviation of the scores for students U, V, W, X, Y, Z less than the standard deviation of the scores for students A B and C? 1. The standard deviation of the scores of students U V and W was less than the standard deviation of the scores of the students A B and C on the exam 2. The standard deviation of the scores of students X Y and Z was less than the standard deviation of the scores of the students A B and C on the exam
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9369
Location: Pune, India

Re: SD of the combined set
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 May 2011, 07:38
Good thinking. This is how I will go about analyzing these statements. 1. SD is a measure of compactness, not the measure of the absolute value of the number. Hence if we have two sets of numbers and we want to know the SD of the combined set, then we must know the mean and distance of each data separately. Suppose {U V W } and { X Y Z } are combined to form a new set { U V W X Y Z } then the SD of the combined set cannot be predicted, even if we know that SD (U V W) < SD ( A B C) and SD (X Y Z) < SD (A B C)
SD(u,v,w,x,y,z) < SD(a,b,c)  this cannot be inferred. When I see SD(U, V, W) < SD(A, B, C), I think of this case: U=V=W=10 so SD(X, Y, Z) = 0 SD(A, B, C) has some positive value. Say A = 1, B = 2, C = 3
When I see SD(X, Y, Z) < SD(A, B, C), I think of this case: X=Y=Z=20 so SD(X, Y, Z) = 0 SD(A, B, C) has some positive value. Say A = 1, B = 2, C = 3
Now, SD(U, V, W, X, Y, Z) = SD(10,10,10, 20, 20, 20) which is more than SD (A, B, C) On the other hand, if U = X, SD(U, V, W, X, Y, Z) = SD(10,10,10,10,10,10) = 0 which is less than SD (A, B, C)
So I cannot say anything about the combined SD.
2. On the other hand two sets  { L M N } and { X Y Z } and it is given that  SD { L M N} > SD ( X Y Z)If we add numbers to the first set  { P Q R } and then the set becomes { L M N P Q R}. We can infer that  SD (L M N P Q R) > SD (X Y Z)[/quote] Let me write down some relations: SD(10, 11, 12) > SD(10, 11, 11) (less dispersed, closer together) SD(10, 11, 12) < SD(9, 10, 11, 12, 13) (More dispersed) SD(10, 11, 12) > SD(10, 11, 11, 11, 12) (Closer together  If this is not apparent, think of the formula of SD. It is root of the sum of the squares of the distance from the mean divided by the number of elements. If you keep adding more numbers at the mean, number of elements keeps increasing but the sum of distance doesn't so SD keeps going down.
So when you add new elements, SD could increase/decrease. Hence, you cannot infer anything in this case either.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >




Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1743

Re: SD of the combined set
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 May 2011, 01:12
gmat1220 wrote: Karishma / fluke / Ian Can you please verify this reasoning? I hope there are 2 takeaways from this question 
1. SD is a measure of compactness, not the measure of the absolute value of the number. Hence if we have two sets of numbers and we want to know the SD of the combined set, then we must know the mean and distance of each data separately.
Suppose {U V W } and { X Y Z } are combined to form a new set { U V W X Y Z } then the SD of the combined set cannot be predicted, even if we know that
SD (U V W) < SD ( A B C) and SD (X Y Z) < SD (A B C)
SD(u,v,w,x,y,z) < SD(a,b,c)  this cannot be inferred.
This one is pretty straight forward. {A,B,C}={1,3,5} {U,V,W}={1,2,3} {X,Y,Z}={1000000000,1000000001,1000000002} OR {X,Y,Z}={1,2,3}
2. On the other hand two sets  { L M N } and { X Y Z } and it is given that 
SD { L M N} > SD ( X Y Z)
If we add numbers to the first set  { P Q R } and then the set becomes { L M N P Q R}. We can infer that 
SD (L M N P Q R) > SD (X Y Z) This one is bit trickier. This is my rough analysis. When we have 3 terms with a particular range and standard deviation. If we add more numbers within the maximum and minimum value, the new standard deviation will be less. {1,2,3}: min=1, max=3; if we add any number within 1 and 3, the std dev will decrease. say, we add "2", std dev will decrease if we add any number beyond 1 and 3, the std dev will increase. say, we add "0.9" or "3.1", std dev will increase. Thus, we can't infer this either. {L M N} > {X Y Z} L,M,N=0.9,3,5.1 X,Y,Z=1,3,5 If P,Q,R=3,3,3(Very close to the mean and within 0.9 and 5.1) {L,M,N,P,Q,R}<{X,Y,Z} If P,Q,R=5.1,0.9,0.9(Pretty skewed from the mean and is more than 5.1 and <=0.9) {L,M,N,P,Q,R}>{X,Y,Z} I agree this is convoluted!!
_________________




Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 705

Re: SD of the combined set
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 May 2011, 00:16
Karishma / fluke / Ian Can you please verify this reasoning? I hope there are 2 takeaways from this question 
1. SD is a measure of compactness, not the measure of the absolute value of the number. Hence if we have two sets of numbers and we want to know the SD of the combined set, then we must know the mean and distance of each data separately.
Suppose {U V W } and { X Y Z } are combined to form a new set { U V W X Y Z } then the SD of the combined set cannot be predicted, even if we know that
SD (U V W) < SD ( A B C) and SD (X Y Z) < SD (A B C)
SD(u,v,w,x,y,z) < SD(a,b,c)  this cannot be inferred.
2. On the other hand two sets  { L M N } and { X Y Z } and it is given that 
SD { L M N} > SD ( X Y Z)
If we add numbers to the first set  { P Q R } and then the set becomes { L M N P Q R}. We can infer that 
SD (L M N P Q R) > SD (X Y Z)



Director
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 952

Re: SD of the combined set
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 May 2011, 03:02
let the scores be out of 200.
a,b,c = 40,50,60 SD = approx 10 considering the difference only.
u,v,w = 20,25,30 and x,y,z = 35,40,45  105,110,115
now either a or b alone is not sufficient.
a+b sets will be (20,25,30,35,40,45) SD approx 5
(20,25,30,105,110,115) SD >10
Hence E.



Director
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 952

Re: SD of the combined set
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 May 2011, 03:10
gmat1220 wrote: Karishma / fluke / Ian Can you please verify this reasoning? I hope there are 2 takeaways from this question 
2. On the other hand two sets  { L M N } and { X Y Z } and it is given that 
SD { L M N} > SD ( X Y Z)
If we add numbers to the first set  { P Q R } and then the set becomes { L M N P Q R}. We can infer that 
SD (L M N P Q R) > SD (X Y Z) Set (p,q,r) can have values such that they are closer to the mean of the set L,M,N. (L,M,N) = (2,4,6) (P,Q,R) = (4,4,4) The SD decreases. and similarly (P,Q,R) can have values such that SD will increase. Here degree of relativeness has to be tested. Meaning, If SD(L,M,N) > SD (X,Y,Z) then SD(L,M,N,P,Q,R) may be greater than or lesser than SD (X,Y,Z) depending upon by how much SD(P,Q,R) effects.



Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 705

Re: SD of the combined set
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 May 2011, 09:37
Ohh so we have to know the data exactly to determine the SD. There are no short cuts I believe. fluke and amit2k9 +1



Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1743

Re: SD of the combined set
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 May 2011, 10:04
gmat1220 wrote: Ohh so we have to know the data exactly to determine the SD. There are no short cuts I believe. fluke and amit2k9 +1 thanks for bringing up the discussion gmat1220. It was useful.
_________________



GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1663

Re: SD of the combined set
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 May 2011, 08:31
I'd just add that you really don't need to know much about how the standard deviation will be affected when you enlarge a set. If you take the set {1, 3, 5}, and you add the number 4.5 to the set, it's mathematically quite complicated to see what effect that will have on the standard deviation, mainly because your mean changes, so *all* of the distances change. While you might need to be concerned with this kind of situation in an advanced statistics course, you'll certainly never need to worry about it on the GMAT. The lone situation you'd want to understand is the one Karishma discusses above: if you enlarge a set by adding new elements which are exactly equal to the mean, that will bring the standard deviation closer to 0, because you are adding elements with a distance of 0 to the mean. So if you have the set {1, 3, 5}, and you add new elements to this set which are equal to 3, that will lower the standard deviation. As for the question in the original post, the answer is E. One can take two extreme examples to see this easily. Suppose our test is graded out of 100, and that testtakers A, B and C had scores of 49, 50 and 51. Their standard deviation is then some small positive number. We could have either of the following scenarios, using both statements: * U, V, W, X, Y and Z all received scores of 100 on the test. Their standard deviation is thus 0 when we combine their scores into one set. * U, V and W received scores of 100 on the test, and X, Y and Z received scores of 0 on the test. Then when we combine their scores into one set, we have the set {0, 0, 0, 100, 100, 100} which has a comparatively large standard deviation, certainly much larger than that of {49,50,51}.
_________________
GMAT Tutor in Toronto
If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com



Intern
Affiliations: CPA
Joined: 09 May 2011
Posts: 41

Re: SD of the combined set
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 May 2011, 17:05
My quick and dirty thought process: When I think about standard deviation I think about variance. How different the scores are from one another.
There's no way I can know for sure whether answers A or B are true by themselves, I think that's fairly obvious. With both assumptions combined, I just created a simple hypothetical situation and realized I still didn't have enough information:
(U,V,W) = (1,2,3) (X,Y,Z) = (100,101,102)
(A,B,C) = (7,9,11)
From this set up it becomes clear that unless there is a restriction as to what the scores can be, determining the difference in variance between the two groups is impossible.



Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 170

Re: For a certain exam, was the standard deviation of the scores
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Jan 2012, 02:12
Wonderful question gmat1220. Thanks. Thanks for the explanations Ian, Karishma and fluke. Learnt a very vital lesson here.
_________________
Consider KUDOS if you feel the effort's worth it



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 11448

Re: For a certain exam, was the standard deviation of the scores
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Sep 2018, 11:27
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________




Re: For a certain exam, was the standard deviation of the scores
[#permalink]
13 Sep 2018, 11:27






