OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Day 157: Sentence Correction (SC1)
THE PROMPTQuote:
For the Stegosaurus, a dinosaur from the late Jurassic Period, the seventeen bony plates embedded in its back were necessary elements for survival,
to regulate its temperature throughout its bus-sized body and to protect it from much larger carnivores.
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A) For the Stegosaurus, a dinosaur from the late Jurassic Period, the seventeen bony plates embedded in its back were necessary elements for survival,
to regulate its temperature throughout its bus-sized body and to protect it from much larger carnivores.
• the infinitives
to regulate and
to protect are ungrammatical because
they have nothing to modify. • I have not seen one exception to this guideline (and if you can find an official question that is an exception, please send it my way): infinitives cannot set off modifying clauses.
--
Wrong: He spent a few hours each day in the garden, to grow unusual vegetables and fruits.
--
Correct: He spent a few hours each day in the garden, growing unusual vegetables and fruits.
• If the past participle (verbED)
used were included, this sentence would be fine. This way:
Correct but not an option: For the Stegosaurus, the bony plates embedded in its back were necessary
elements for survival,
used to regulate its temperature and
to protect it from much larger carnivores.
-- used is a verbal that can take infinitives. "Used" would modify "elements for survival."
•
elements for survival, in turn = bony plates. See the discussion of an official question about diabetes and the past participle
surpassed, HERE• These verbals, in one form or another, are in every answer choice. We can think: what could we use instead?
Some of you were waiting for a modifier or another clause that would add to or follow from the main clause.
Good. That means you've been reading. (I think. If not, don't disabuse me of my delusions.)
Bottom line: we need something that ties the regulation of temperature and the protection from carnivores to the bony plates or the mechanisms for survival.
--
rishab0507 , you are spot on. GMAC does test infinitives against participles (verbINGs) in this kind of question. Good insight.
Infinitives can be hard. If you are not sure about (A), KEEP
Quote:
B) For the Stegosaurus, a dinosaur from the late Jurassic Period, the seventeen bony plates embedded in
its back were necessary elements for survival,
t to regulate their temperature throughout their bus-sized bodies and to protect them from much larger carnivores.
• same problem as in (A): the infinitive phrases have nothing to modify
• easier to spot: noun/pronoun disagreement.
-- The Stegosaurus is singular; the non-underlined portion contains the singular possessive word ITS.
-- The pronouns
their and
them are plural.
Eliminate B.
Quote:
C) For the Stegosaurus, a dinosaur from the late Jurassic Period, the seventeen bony plates embedded in its back were necessary elements for survival,
for regulating the temperature throughout its bus-sized body and to protect it from much larger carnivores.
•
for regulating and
to protect are not parallel
Eliminate C.
Quote:
D) For the Stegosaurus, a dinosaur from the late Jurassic Period, the seventeen bony plates embedded in its back were necessary elements for survival,
regulating its temperature throughout its bus-sized body and protecting it from much larger carnivores.
• Boom. We needed participial modifiers (verbING words) because they can modify the entire preceding clause
•
regulating and
protecting describe how the bony plates "were" necessary elements for survival.
• alternatively, "regulating and protecting" might be described as adjectives that modify
elements for survival (participles can modify immediately preceding nouns)
• in option A, we needed to tie how the bony plates worked with the descriptors. Present participles (verbINGs) are versatile. They can modify (explain) whole clauses and the subjects of clauses. They can be adjectives. ___ING words can often stand in ways that infinitive phrases (and modifiers such as
which) cannot.
-- Keep perspective. ___ING words are not perfect.
-- I included the "used" sentence in (A) because sometimes the GMAT constructs questions requiring that kind of structure (I linked to one official example).
KEEP. (Option A is now looking rather feeble, but we will check it anyway.)
Quote:
E) For the Stegosaurus, a dinosaur from the late Jurassic Period, the seventeen bony plates embedded in its back were necessary elements for survival,
which are used to regulate its temperature throughout its bus-sized body and to protect it from much larger carnivores.
• we now have
used, but
are is ridiculous. Dinosaurs are extinct. The correct verb is
were.
• pretend that the verb is correct and says
were. In that case,
which would work.
--
which is a noun-modifier and cannot modify a clause
-- Typically
which is placed as close as possible to the noun it modifies.
-- nonessential modifiers such as
which can reach back over essential modifiers such as prepositional phrases, but
which cannot reach back
over a verb to get to "bony plates."
-- We could argue that the
which-clause modified "elements [for survival]." And if the verb were correct, we would follow the structure in the official question that I mentioned above, discussed (same link) [url=See the discussion of an official question about diabetes and the past participle "surpassed," [url=https://gmatclub.com/forum/verb-ed-modifiers-vs-verb-ing-modifiers-125611.html]
HERE[/url].
• Below I offer one final alternative that GMAC could toss at us.
Eliminate E
Option A compared to Option D?
We need modifiers that connect the functions (regulation, protection) to the main clause—on one reading of (D) the words being tested tell us
how the bony plates acted as elements for survival.
The infinitive phrases in A have nothing to modify.
The contest between A and D is no contest.
Whereas the infinitive phrases in option A have nothing to modify, the participles (verbINGs) in (D) tell us how the bony plates functioned as means for survival.
The answer is D.ISSUES• how to see that the infinitive phrases have nothing to modify in option A?-- acquaint yourselves with infinitive phrases (they are not difficult, just a little weird at first for non-native speakers)
-- One good article is
HERE-- A general overview is
HERE In the first article listed, Mike McGarry of
Magoosh lists 10 SC questions from OG 12 that test infinitive phrases. Take a look at those questions.
• when you see infinitives and participles, ask what they are trying to do. What are they supposed to describe or be connected to?
-- set aside "infinitive of purpose" for a moment. What are the ideas?
-- the ideas are
to regulate temperature and
to protect the animal from large carnivores.
-- The bony plates are somehow connected to those two ideas.
-- well,
to regulate and
to protect cannot be adjectives that modify the noun [bony] plates, but we are close.
-- what basic questions do we ask: what? where? when? why? HOW? Aha.
The infinitives describe HOW the bony plates work or what they do. We need a verb (which
were used) or a verbal (
used, which is not an option, or __ING words).
• what about which in option E? I don't typically advocate rewriting sentences, but in this case, to clarify the role that
which could and does play in some GMAT questions, I will do so.
-- we need a noun for
which to modify. We have one: bony plates. That noun is just too far from which. So we can make up a synonym or repeat the noun, and change
which to
that. (Jargon: a repeated word is called a resumptive modifier —as in "resume" [the sentence using the word you need].)
--
Correct but not an option:
For the Stegosaurus, the seventeen bony plates embedded in its back were necessary elements for survival, [i]triangular nodes that[/i] were used to regulate its temperature and protect it from much larger carnivores.[/i]
--
Correct but not an option:
For the Stegosaurus, the seventeen bony plates embedded in its back were necessary elements for survival, [i]plates that[/i] were used to regulate its temperature and protect it from much larger carnivores.[/i] (resumptive modifier)
• finally, learn about participial and prepositional modifiers, which are two of the most easily placed (and hence versatile) modifiers.
-- I wrote a post about six types of introductory modifiers that you can find
HERE and that includes a discussion of
introductory prepositional and participial modifiers (and four other kinds).
-- In general, participles (verbINGS) are more versatile as adverbial modifiers than infinitive phrases are.
-- infinitive phrases
can function as adverbial modifiers (and many other parts of speech), but they cannot modify whole clauses. ING modifiers can do so.
-- examples of infinitive phrases that are adverbial modifiers
(1) modifying an adjective:
Stefan was ready to drive to the airport. Ready is an adjective. Stefan was ready for what? To do what?
to drive to the airport. That infinitive phrase is an adverbial modifier of
ready.
(2) modifying a verb: The repairmen came to inspect the furnace.
To inspect modifies the verb
came and answers, "Why did they come?"
If you have taken some official questions, pull them and see whether you can articulate what is wrong with four answers.
That's the end game.
COMMENTSrishab0507 - That analysis—which I was not planning to write

—is, I hope, at least some of what you were looking for.
I can answer more easily if I know a little more precisely what the issues are.
Everyone is welcome to pull some examples of questions resembling this one (or any question that I post) that bother you, to figure out what bothers you, to post queries on the thread that sparked your initial inquisitiveness, and to tag me.
(Inquisitiveness is a very good thing. I don't get people who aren't curious. Then again, they probably don't get me, either.)
I am always happy to try to help.
I am tagging everyone because I got waylaid and because I want to say
thank you especially to
J2S2019 (it wouldn't matter whether your sentence were grammatical -- it was gracious! but yes, it is very well-written) and
Xylan for posting encouraging words and kudos when I wanted to holler. (At my own eyes.) Kindness and understanding are classy. I felt much better after I read your posts.
I missed two or three people in that mention because I haven't read my email yet. You'll hear from me.
Also thank you to
ChuHoaiNam ,
Arvind42 ,
Ashokshiva ,
rishab0507 ,
TheNightKing ,
Itgelee (welcome to SC Butler!) , and
ccheryn -- I appreciate the effort, the variety, and the consistency. This one is vernacular: I also appreciate good sports.
Nice work, all! Happy kudos.