Generally, of any two animal species, the species whose ratio of brain mass to body mass is greater will be the more intelligent. However, it has been established that many great mathematicians have brains considerably smaller, relative to their bodies, than the average human. This indicates that while the ratio of brain mass to body mass is a reliable indication of intelligence across species, this is not so within species.
Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
(A) The ratio of brain mass to body mass is the most reliable indicator of intelligence across animal species.
(B) There are no salient physiological differences between members within a species that reliably indicate which member is the more intelligent.
(C) There are some great mathematicians with a relatively low ratio of brain mass to body mass who are more intelligent than the average human.
(D) The ratio of brain mass to body mass in humans is in no way correlated with mathematical ability.
(E) The ratio of brain mass to body mass within animal species tends not to vary greatly.