The advocates content that economical geothermal power will be soon available in most areas. The question asks to support that contention, i.e. we need to strengthen the conclusion of the argument.
(A) Conventional power plants, unlike geothermal power plants, release large amounts of pollutants into the air
- Okay. But even if that is the case, this statement neither strengthens nor weakens the conclusion.
Incorrect.
(B) A typical geothermal power plant produces at least as much energy as a typical conventional power plant
- Hm, maybe one Geothermal power plant can produce 10x the amount of power compared to the output of the conventional power plant. But maybe just 1.1x more... Let's keep this answer choice until we find a better one.
Maybe the answer?(C) The high start-up costs of geothermal power plants discourages their construction even in locations where they are more economical than conventional power plants in the long run
-
Incorrect. This answer choice weakens the argument big time. If the statement C is true, then the geothermal power won't be available in most places soon.
(D) Advanced drilling technology is being developed that will soon make it both feasible and economical to drill wells many timers deeper than it is currently possible to drill
- Alright, advanced drilling will make it both feasible and economical to develop plants that can extract geothermal power from very deep locations. This essentially means that geothermal power will be more affordable and accessible soon. Much better option than B.
Correct!
(E) Recent research has to discoveries that could significantly lower production costs for nearly all types of power plants
- Hm... Power production costs for nearly all types of power plants can go down... this means that conventional power plants will become cheaper to operate, so the power that they produce will be cheaper than that nowadays. Why would anyone want any alternative power sources?
Not a very good choice.