Oh yeah.. Day 3 and counting.
We got a really tough challenge with the Orange Team.
But we will make it. We will win, I'm sure.
Let's get started with our explanation for this topic on day three:
Identify the Question:Evaluate type. looking for Premise and Conclusion.
Deconstruct the Argument:A new smartphone app that encourages healthy eating by tracking daily nutrient intake has reported significant user weight loss after six months of use. -
Premise.
The developers claim that the app’s reminder system, which prompts users to record their meals and snacks, is the primary reason for this weight loss success. -
Conclusion.State the goal:Can it be a coincidence? Yes..
Can somethingelse can cause this effect? Yes..
Can it be baised? Yes..
Let's think of some possible solutions: if I told you that all this people that are using the app also go every day to diet program? would you think that they are losing weight because of the remainder of the app?
If i told you that the act of remainding of food can't cause of changing in habits?
Hence, We are looking for statement that in her one way it will strengthen the argument and on the other hand will weaken it.
Elimination:A) UnclearImpact - If they exercise do we know how frequant and what exercise do they do? if we will assume they are losing weight by the exercise we are making an assumption that is not stated. Therefore -
eliminateB) No tie - If other nutrient also making wight loss, does it mean that the REMAINDER is the cause of that effect? maybe they have other way of making that effect? -
eliminate.C) No tie - as we saw on Answer choice B, here we also don't have any connection to the remainder of the app. the evidence that they tried other diet and failed doesn't make the remainder the cause of their weight loss. -
eliminate.D) Ohh.. yea Exactly what we were looking for. If the Remainder can change their habits - our conclusion just got stronger. And if the Remainder can't change their habits - our conclusion is simply weakened. -
KeepE) No tie - What is happenening after the 6 month period is not in our knowledge. we can infer only from the given premises and it's not talking about the future. -
eliminate.THE ENDI hope you liked the explanation, I have tried my best here.
Let me know if you have any questions about this question or my explanation.