1. A high number of crop failures are attributed to bacterial infections each year.
You need to find statements that challenge the new solution against the existing one not a broad statement. This statement only highlights the need for an anti-bacterial agent, which is something that the chemist does not argue with.
2. Streptomycin and oxytetracycline are fairly cheap to produce.
There is nothing said about the cost to produce vancomycin in contrast. We cannot conclude from the statement that they are more cost-efficient and, nothing in the text indicates that cost is a factor that either the organic chemist or the disease specialist are considering. We are only talking about health risks here.
3. Streptomycin and oxytetracycline runoff can damage water bodies.
This is a new piece of information that adds to the negative effects of streptomycin and oxytetracycline which would only strenghten the need for an alternative, in this case vancomycin.
4. Vancomycin is effective against a narrower range of bacteria than streptomycin and oxytetracycline are.
This is a piece of information that works against the introduction of vancomycin as it is not as effective as its alternatives. The anti-bacterial agent must first perform its job before being considered as a legitimate alternative, which in this case is put into question with the information provided.
5. Streptomycin and oxytetracycline present in livestock further accumulate in humans who consume animal products.
While this statement might be true, it is not new information that would strenghten the argument. This is something that would have already been accounted for when the search began for an alternative.
Therefore the answers are 4. most weaken and 3. most strengthen
Bunuel
Organic chemist: Streptomycin and oxytetracycline are two anti-bacterial agents used in commercial farming, and may pose a serious public health risk down the line. These anti-bacterial agents are liberally applied to crops grown for animal feed and, as a result, it is common to find livestock with a build up of the chemicals in their bodies. In fact, levels of the antibiotics in livestock have been found to be up to 100 times what is needed to break down the natural bacterial eco-system of the animal, an outcome that leads to poor health outcomes for the animal and increases the risk of anti-biotic resistant bacterial strains evolving within them.
A disease specialist intends to use the chemist’s observations to argue that vancomycin, a compound that breaks down much faster than streptomycin and oxytetracycline, should replace them in the production of livestock feed, reducing the build-up of anti-biotic agents in livestock. Select the information that, if true, would most strengthen the disease specialists’ position, and that which, if true would most weaken it. Make only two selections, one in each column.