Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 03:28 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 03:28
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,192
 [15]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
14
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
778,192
 [3]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,192
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Pallavimalik2597
Joined: 05 Aug 2022
Last visit: 15 Sep 2025
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 23
Kudos: 37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
SomeOneUnique
Joined: 17 Mar 2019
Last visit: 26 Dec 2024
Posts: 122
Own Kudos:
117
 [1]
Given Kudos: 41
Location: India
Posts: 122
Kudos: 117
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­A disease specialist intends to use the chemist’s observations to argue that vancomycin, a compound that breaks down much faster (it would not build-up any longer than other 2) than streptomycin and oxytetracycline, should replace them in the production of livestock feed, reducing the build-up of anti-biotic agents in livestock.

The disease specialist intends to replace streptomycin and oxytetracycline with vancomycin because he is worried about 'build-up'.
Option E gives a reason to use vancomycin based on the same 'build-up' ground.

Option D states a -ve of vancomycin and gives a reason why the use of streptomycin and oxytetracycline should be continued.

Therefore, Part 1 is option E, and Part 2 is option D.
User avatar
jack5397
Joined: 13 Sep 2020
Last visit: 15 May 2025
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
708
 [1]
Given Kudos: 278
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT Focus 1: 575 Q79 V79 DI77
GMAT Focus 2: 575 Q80 V81 DI75
GMAT Focus 3: 635 Q82 V83 DI79
GMAT 1: 460 Q36 V18 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
Products:
GMAT Focus 3: 635 Q82 V83 DI79
GMAT 1: 460 Q36 V18 (Online)
Posts: 141
Kudos: 708
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Strengthen - Streptomycin and oxytetracycline present in livestock further accumulate in humans who consume animal products. // It strengthens the argument by showing the disadvantages of S & O.

Most Weaken - Vancomycin is effective against a narrower range of bacteria than streptomycin and oxytetracycline are. // It weakens the argument by showing the limitation of the V.
User avatar
divi22
Joined: 03 Jul 2024
Last visit: 31 Aug 2024
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
58
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 45
Kudos: 58
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The best answer that seems to strengthen the argument the most is, Streptomycin and oxytetracycline present in livestock further accumulate in humans who consume animal products.
And the argument that weaken the claim most is, Vancomycin is effective against a narrower range of bacteria than streptomycin and oxytetracycline are.
User avatar
Emkicheru
Joined: 12 Sep 2023
Last visit: 12 Sep 2025
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Location: Kenya
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V48
GRE 1: Q167 V164
GPA: 3.7
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V48
GRE 1: Q167 V164
Posts: 119
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The iterations to that effect is clearly as elaborate as to the fact that bacteria is contagious

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
meet459
User avatar
Goizueta / Scheller Moderator
Joined: 03 Jun 2024
Last visit: 29 May 2025
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
95
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q90 V81 DI79
GPA: 8.55
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A high number of crop failures are attributed to bacterial infections each year. -> Doesn't deal with any of the drugs, irrelevant
Streptomycin and oxytetracycline are fairly cheap to produce. -> We aren't concerned about their price
Streptomycin and oxytetracycline runoff can damage water bodies. -> How will they reach the water bodies though is not explained
Vancomycin is effective against a narrower range of bacteria than streptomycin and oxytetracycline are. -> Weakens
Streptomycin and oxytetracycline present in livestock further accumulate in humans who consume animal products.­ -> Strengthens
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 8,422
Own Kudos:
4,980
 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,422
Kudos: 4,980
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Organic chemist: Streptomycin and oxytetracycline are two anti-bacterial agents used in commercial farming, and may pose a serious public health risk down the line.

These anti-bacterial agents are liberally applied to crops grown for animal feed and, as a result, it is common to find livestock with a build up of the chemicals in their bodies. In fact, levels of the antibiotics in livestock have been found to be up to 100 times what is needed to break down the natural bacterial eco-system of the animal, an outcome that leads to poor health outcomes for the animal and increases the risk of anti-biotic resistant bacterial strains evolving within them.

A disease specialist intends to use the chemist’s observations to argue that vancomycin, a compound that breaks down much faster than streptomycin and oxytetracycline, should replace them in the production of livestock feed, reducing the build-up of anti-biotic agents in livestock. Select the information that, if true, would most strengthen the disease specialists’ position, and that which, if true would most weaken it. Make only two selections, one in each column.

both Streptomycin and oxytetracycline are two anti-bacterial agents used in commercial farming ...


strengthen the disease specialists’ position : Streptomycin and oxytetracycline present in livestock further accumulate in humans who consume animal products.

weaken the disease specialists’ position : Vancomycin is effective against a narrower range of bacteria than streptomycin and oxytetracycline are.
User avatar
anish0953
Joined: 20 May 2024
Last visit: 13 Mar 2025
Posts: 86
Own Kudos:
49
 [1]
Given Kudos: 103
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: Leadership, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 9.2
WE:Business Development (Finance)
Products:
Posts: 86
Kudos: 49
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­Organic chemist: Streptomycin and oxytetracycline are two anti-bacterial agents used in commercial farming, and may pose a serious public health risk down the line. These anti-bacterial agents are liberally applied to crops grown for animal feed and, as a result, it is common to find livestock with a build up of the chemicals in their bodies. In fact, levels of the antibiotics in livestock have been found to be up to 100 times what is needed to break down the natural bacterial eco-system of the animal, an outcome that leads to poor health outcomes for the animal and increases the risk of anti-biotic resistant bacterial strains evolving within them.

A disease specialist intends to use the chemist’s observations to argue that vancomycin, a compound that breaks down much faster than streptomycin and oxytetracycline, should replace them in the production of livestock feed, reducing the build-up of anti-biotic agents in livestock. Select the information that, if true, would most strengthen the disease specialists’ position, and that which, if true would most weaken it. Make only two selections, one in each column.

­
 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2024

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

­
­
­Strengthen the Argument:

Streptomycin and oxytetracycline present in livestock further accumulate in humans who consume animal products.

This information supports the argument for replacing streptomycin and oxytetracycline with vancomycin because it highlights a serious public health risk associated with the accumulation of these antibiotics in humans. This accumulation could lead to similar issues in humans as those observed in livestock, such as the disruption of the natural bacterial ecosystem and the potential for antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains. If vancomycin breaks down faster and thus reduces this accumulation, it would be a strong reason to prefer its use.

Weaken the Argument:

Vancomycin is effective against a narrower range of bacteria than streptomycin and oxytetracycline are.

This information weakens the argument for using vancomycin because it suggests that vancomycin may not be as effective in preventing bacterial infections in crops grown for animal feed. If vancomycin cannot cover the same range of bacterial threats as streptomycin and oxytetracycline, it might lead to higher rates of bacterial infections in crops, which could result in crop failures and potentially higher costs or reduced availability of animal feed.
User avatar
A_Nishith
Joined: 29 Aug 2023
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 455
Own Kudos:
199
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 455
Kudos: 199
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To evaluate the disease specialist’s argument that vancomycin should replace streptomycin and oxytetracycline in livestock feed, let's identify information that would either strengthen or weaken this position.

Most Strengthen:
Streptomycin and oxytetracycline present in livestock further accumulate in humans who consume animal products.

This statement strengthens the disease specialist's position because it highlights a significant public health risk associated with the continued use of streptomycin and oxytetracycline. If these antibiotics accumulate in humans, it could lead to increased antibiotic resistance and other health issues. Therefore, replacing them with a compound that breaks down faster, such as vancomycin, would reduce these risks.

Most Weaken:
Vancomycin is effective against a narrower range of bacteria than streptomycin and oxytetracycline are.

This statement weakens the disease specialist's position because it suggests that vancomycin may not be as effective in protecting crops from bacterial infections as streptomycin and oxytetracycline. If vancomycin is less effective, it might lead to higher incidences of crop failures or reduced overall efficacy in preventing bacterial infections in livestock, thereby undermining the rationale for its use.
Therefore, the selections are:

Most Strengthen: Streptomycin and oxytetracycline present in livestock further accumulate in humans who consume animal products.

Most Weaken: Vancomycin is effective against a narrower range of bacteria than streptomycin and oxytetracycline are.
User avatar
busygmatbee1290
Joined: 27 Dec 2023
Last visit: 18 Mar 2025
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
73
 [1]
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q87 V90 DI86
GPA: 10/10
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q87 V90 DI86
Posts: 50
Kudos: 73
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
"­vancomycin, a compound that breaks down much faster than streptomycin and oxytetracycline, should replace them in the production of livestock feed, reducing the build-up of anti-biotic agents in livestock"
The disease specialist wants to claim that faster breakdown of anti-biotic would help. 
Hence, the last option "Streptomycin and oxytetracycline present in livestock further accumulate in humans who consume animal products" strengthens the specialist's claim the most. If vancomycin breaks down fast, it won't spread to humans when they consume it later. 
The weaken part would give us an issue with vancomycin. "Vancomycin is effective against a narrower range of bacteria than streptomycin and oxytetracycline are." is the obvious choice here. 
User avatar
Oppenheimer1945
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 784
Own Kudos:
639
 [1]
Given Kudos: 223
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V76 DI80
GPA: 7.81
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Disease specialist: V, a compound that breaks down much faster than S and O should replace them in the production of livestock feed, reducing the build-up of anti-biotic agents in livestock.

1) high number of crop failures are attributed to bacterial infections each year.(very generic)

2) Streptomycin and oxytetracycline are fairly cheap to produce.(cost is not discussed in arg)


3) Streptomycin and oxytetracycline runoff can damage water bodies.
- we are concerned with reducing the build-up of anti-biotic agents in livestock

4) Vancomycin is effective against a narrower range of bacteria than streptomycin and oxytetracycline are.
- if V is weaker, O&S should be not repalced (Weakens)

5) Streptomycin and oxytetracycline present in livestock further accumulate in humans who consume animal products
(Strengthens atht S&O accumulate further in humans, hence S&O should be replaced)­
User avatar
bomberjack
Joined: 22 Nov 2023
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
73
 [1]
Given Kudos: 122
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q84 V81 DI79
GMAT Focus 2: 675 Q88 V82 DI80
GMAT Focus 3: 715 Q88 V86 DI83
GMAT Focus 3: 715 Q88 V86 DI83
Posts: 67
Kudos: 73
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Quote:
­Organic chemist: Streptomycin and oxytetracycline are two anti-bacterial agents used in commercial farming, and may pose a serious public health risk down the line. These anti-bacterial agents are liberally applied to crops grown for animal feed and, as a result, it is common to find livestock with a build up of the chemicals in their bodies. In fact, levels of the antibiotics in livestock have been found to be up to 100 times what is needed to break down the natural bacterial eco-system of the animal, an outcome that leads to poor health outcomes for the animal and increases the risk of anti-biotic resistant bacterial strains evolving within them.

A disease specialist intends to use the chemist’s observations to argue that vancomycin, a compound that breaks down much faster than streptomycin and oxytetracycline, should replace them in the production of livestock feed, reducing the build-up of anti-biotic agents in livestock. Select the information that, if true, would most strengthen the disease specialists’ position, and that which, if true would most weaken it. Make only two selections, one in each column.
A high number of crop failures are attributed to bacterial infections each year.
- This doesn't talk about the conclusion at all which is about the usage of different compounds and their effects.

Streptomycin and oxytetracycline are fairly cheap to produce.
- This doesn't tell us whether vancomycin is relatively cheaper or not.

Streptomycin and oxytetracycline runoff can damage water bodies.
- The argument is about the buildup of the compounds in animals. The runoff of them in water bodies in the outside environment isn't discussed.

Vancomycin is effective against a narrower range of bacteria than streptomycin and oxytetracycline are.
- This weakens the argument because if it is less effective it's not a viable substitute.

Streptomycin and oxytetracycline present in livestock further accumulate in humans who consume animal products.
- This makes the argument stronger because it gives us another reason to look for substitutes.
User avatar
8Harshitsharma
Joined: 25 Oct 2017
Last visit: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 133
Own Kudos:
142
 [1]
Given Kudos: 723
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q87 V80 DI80
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GRE 1: Q165 V160
GRE 2: Q170 V162
GPA: 9.25
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q87 V80 DI80
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GRE 1: Q165 V160
GRE 2: Q170 V162
Posts: 133
Kudos: 142
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­Organic chemist: Streptomycin and oxytetracycline are two anti-bacterial agents used in commercial farming, and may pose a serious public health risk down the line. These anti-bacterial agents are liberally applied to crops grown for animal feed and, as a result, it is common to find livestock with a build up of the chemicals in their bodies. In fact, levels of the antibiotics in livestock have been found to be up to 100 times what is needed to break down the natural bacterial eco-system of the animal, an outcome that leads to poor health outcomes for the animal and increases the risk of anti-biotic resistant bacterial strains evolving within them.

A disease specialist intends to use the chemist’s observations to argue that vancomycin, a compound that breaks down much faster than streptomycin and oxytetracycline, should replace them in the production of livestock feed, reducing the build-up of anti-biotic agents in livestock. Select the information that, if true, would most strengthen the disease specialists’ position, and that which, if true would most weaken it. Make only two selections, one in each column.

­
 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2024

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

­
­
We are looking for an option that strengthens and another that weakens the disease specialist's argument that V is better than S&O. Let us go through each choice and observe the effect it has on the argument. 

­A high number of crop failures are attributed to bacterial infections each year.
This choice is saying that we need to use more anti-bacterial agents. But it does not help us differentiate which is better S&O or V.

Streptomycin and oxytetracycline are fairly cheap to produce.
Since we do not know the relative price of S&O vs V, this choice is of no-use on its own.

Streptomycin and oxytetracycline runoff can damage water bodies.
Since we do not know the effect of V on water bodies. This choice doesn't help support/weaken the specialist's argument.

Vancomycin is effective against a narrower range of bacteria than streptomycin and oxytetracycline are.
This option gives us a direct disadvantage of V over S&O. This choice WEAKENS the specialist's position that V should replace S&O.

Streptomycin and oxytetracycline present in livestock further accumulate in humans who consume animal products.
This option provides another harmful effect of the S&O chemicals in the humans. And since we know that V breaks down faster than S&O, it's accumulation will be less. Thus this choice SUPPORTS the specialist's argument that V should replace S&O.
 
User avatar
Abhijeet24
Joined: 06 Apr 2023
Last visit: 23 Feb 2025
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
54
 [1]
Given Kudos: 30
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q83 V79 DI80
GPA: 3.94
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q83 V79 DI80
Posts: 48
Kudos: 54
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Bunuel
­Organic chemist: Streptomycin and oxytetracycline are two anti-bacterial agents used in commercial farming, and may pose a serious public health risk down the line. These anti-bacterial agents are liberally applied to crops grown for animal feed and, as a result, it is common to find livestock with a build up of the chemicals in their bodies. In fact, levels of the antibiotics in livestock have been found to be up to 100 times what is needed to break down the natural bacterial eco-system of the animal, an outcome that leads to poor health outcomes for the animal and increases the risk of anti-biotic resistant bacterial strains evolving within them.

A disease specialist intends to use the chemist’s observations to argue that vancomycin, a compound that breaks down much faster than streptomycin and oxytetracycline, should replace them in the production of livestock feed, reducing the build-up of anti-biotic agents in livestock. Select the information that, if true, would most strengthen the disease specialists’ position, and that which, if true would most weaken it. Make only two selections, one in each column.

­
 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2024

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

­
­
­Vancomycin, a compound that breaks down much faster than streptomycin and oxytetracycline, should replace them in the production of livestock feed, reducing the build-up of anti-biotic agents in livestock. - means it will also help in combating the problem given in the option: Streptomycin and oxytetracycline present in livestock further accumulate in humans who consume animal products.

Vancomycin is effective against a narrower range of bacteria than streptomycin and oxytetracycline are. - It put forwards the limitations of using Vancomycin....seriously weakens the statements.

Other options are not even talking on the points explained in the passage.

A high number of crop failures are attributed to bacterial infections each year. - No reason why we should (or not) use Vancomycin instead of the other two anti-bacterial agents.
Streptomycin and oxytetracycline are fairly cheap to produce. - no talk related to the break down feature of Vancomycin. Not on the point.
Streptomycin and oxytetracycline runoff can damage water bodies. - Whether Vancomycin do the same or not, we do not have any idea. Not useful option.
User avatar
Varshachichu
Joined: 01 Jul 2020
Last visit: 25 Jul 2024
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
7
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Posts: 15
Kudos: 7
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vancomycin is effective against a narrower range of bacteria than streptomycin and oxytetracycline are. Most Weakens - If Vancomycin is effective only against narrower range of bacteria, it is not suitable to be used by everyone.

Streptomycin and oxytetracycline present in livestock further accumulate in humans who consume animal products. Most Strengthens. The antibiotics not only affect livestock but also humans, hence the need to use Vancomycin increases.
User avatar
Surya_singh29
Joined: 07 Jul 2024
Last visit: 22 Aug 2025
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 7
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For strengthen E option and for weeken - option D

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Raxit85
Joined: 22 Feb 2018
Last visit: 02 Aug 2025
Posts: 766
Own Kudos:
1,177
 [1]
Given Kudos: 135
Posts: 766
Kudos: 1,177
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Organic chemist: Streptomycin and oxytetracycline are two anti-bacterial agents used in commercial farming (premise), and may pose a serious public health risk down the line (Chemist's conclusion). These anti-bacterial agents are liberally applied to crops grown for animal feed (cause) and, as a result, it is common to find livestock with a build up of the chemicals in their bodies (effect of applying antibacterial agents to crops). In fact, levels of the antibiotics in livestock have been found to be up to 100 times what is needed to break down the natural bacterial eco-system of the animal (cause), an outcome that leads to poor health outcomes for the animal and increases the risk of anti-biotic resistant bacterial strains evolving within them (effect of antibiotics into animals).

Here chemist mentions the disadvantage of usage of antibiotics (Streptomycin and oxytetracycline) into commercial farming by mentioning the causal reasoning with respect to plants and animals.

A disease specialist intends to use the chemist’s observations to argue that vancomycin, a compound that breaks down much faster than streptomycin and oxytetracycline, should replace them in the production of livestock feed, reducing the build-up of anti-biotic agents in livestock.

Disease specialist extends the chemists reasoning by stating to replace of Streptomycin and oxytetracycline with another antibiotic, vancomycin (that breakdown quicker than other two antibiotics) in production of livestock feed so that it will reduce building up of antibiotic in livestock.

Select the information that, if true, would most strengthen the disease specialists’ position, and that which, if true would most weaken it. Make only two selections, one in each column. - We need to evaluate disease specialist's argument.

1) A high number of crop failures are attributed to bacterial infections each year. - Crop failure because of bacterial infections is not relevant to the disease specialist's argument. Out of scope.

2) Streptomycin and oxytetracycline are fairly cheap to produce. - Cost of these two antibiotics does neither strengthen nor weaken the disease specialist's argument.

3) Streptomycin and oxytetracycline runoff can damage water bodies. - Again as per 1) & 2) this option is also neither weakens nor reinforces the reasoning of disease specialist. So wrong.

4) Vancomycin is effective against a narrower range of bacteria than streptomycin and oxytetracycline are. - If vancomycin is effective for lesser no. of bacteria, then there is no meaning of usage of vancomycin than streptomycin and oxytetracycline as it fails to protect plants and livestock effectively. This option strongly weakens the disease specialist's argument regarding usage of vancomycin.

5) Streptomycin and oxytetracycline present in livestock further accumulate in humans who consume animal products.- This option states further risk to humans who consume livestock product containing Streptomycin and oxytetracycline. Hence it supports disease specialist's argument regarding usage of vancomycin instead of other two.

So, 4) weakener and 5) strengthener.­
User avatar
lhg1709
Joined: 10 Aug 2023
Last visit: 18 Feb 2025
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 54
Posts: 34
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
STRENGTHEN: Streptomycin and oxytetracycline present in livestock further accumulate in humans who consume animal products.

WEAKEN: Vancomycin is effective against a narrower range of bacteria than streptomycin and oxytetracycline are.
 1   2   3   4   5   
Moderators:
Math Expert
105379 posts
496 posts