Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 19:02 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 19:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Purnank
Joined: 05 Jan 2024
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 680
Own Kudos:
585
 [1]
Given Kudos: 166
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q88 V76 DI80
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q88 V76 DI80
Posts: 680
Kudos: 585
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Rahul_Sharma23
Joined: 05 Aug 2023
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V83 DI83
GPA: 2.5
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V83 DI83
Posts: 114
Kudos: 82
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Rider210
Joined: 07 Jul 2024
Last visit: 13 Dec 2024
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
39
 [1]
Given Kudos: 25
Location: India
Posts: 34
Kudos: 39
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
PK1
Joined: 11 Aug 2018
Last visit: 14 Jun 2025
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
143
 [1]
Given Kudos: 47
Products:
Posts: 96
Kudos: 143
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Bunuel
­Study Findings: A recent study found that introducing electronic textbooks in schools has not significantly improved students' reading comprehension scores. The researchers contended that while electronic textbooks offer interactive features, these do not inherently enhance understanding of the material. They argued that the basic nature of reading comprehension, which relies heavily on text engagement and critical thinking, has not changed despite technological advances.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the researchers' reasoning?

A. Students who use electronic textbooks report higher levels of satisfaction with their learning materials than those using traditional textbooks.

B. Schools that have introduced electronic textbooks have also invested in teacher training to integrate technology effectively into their curriculum.

C. Research has shown that the additional features of electronic textbooks, such as multimedia and hyperlinks, often distract students from the main text, reducing the depth of their engagement with the content.

D. Many students using electronic textbooks perform better on interactive assessments that are integrated into the electronic textbook platform.

E. The cost of electronic textbooks is significantly lower than that of traditional textbooks, making them a more economical option for schools.


­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­Researcher's reasoning: Basic nature of RC, which relies heavily on text engagement and critical thinking, has not changed despite technological advances. Electronic textbooks offer interactive features, but they do not inherently enhance understanding of the material

given that Introduction of electronic textbooks in schools has not significantly improved students' RC scores

A. Students who use electronic textbooks report higher levels of satisfaction with their learning materials than those using traditional textbooks.
--It touches on satisfaction but does not address why it does not significantly improve RC score

B. Schools that have introduced electronic textbooks have also invested in teacher training to integrate technology effectively into their curriculum.
-- This talks about what schools have done apart from introducing electronic textbooks but does not address why scores have not improved

C. Research has shown that the additional features of electronic textbooks, such as multimedia and hyperlinks, often distract students from the main text, reducing the depth of their engagement with the content.
-- This touches on electronic mediums as distracting student and reducing engagement. In a way it is supporting researchers reasoning . So lets keep it

D. Many students using electronic textbooks perform better on interactive assessments that are integrated into the electronic textbook platform.
-- this supports the argument that electronic features have interactive features and they do weel on the interactive asessments but do not address why their RC score do not improve significantly. Hence out

E. The cost of electronic textbooks is significantly lower than that of traditional textbooks, making them a more economical option for schools.
-- Cost is oustide the scope of the argument

In the end C looks good and is the answer
 
User avatar
asad9242
Joined: 07 Jul 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
22
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: Technology, Social Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.7
Products:
Posts: 23
Kudos: 22
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Study Findings: A recent study found that introducing electronic textbooks in schools has not significantly improved students' reading comprehension scores. The researchers contended that while electronic textbooks offer interactive features, these do not inherently enhance understanding of the material. They argued that the basic nature of reading comprehension, which relies heavily on text engagement and critical thinking, has not changed despite technological advances.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the researchers' reasoning?

A. Students who use electronic textbooks report higher levels of satisfaction with their learning materials than those using traditional textbooks.
Opposite to what researchers have said

B. Schools that have introduced electronic textbooks have also invested in teacher training to integrate technology effectively into their curriculum.
We are talking about students and their ability to comprehend text. Not how they can do it.

C. Research has shown that the additional features of electronic textbooks, such as multimedia and hyperlinks, often distract students from the main text, reducing the depth of their engagement with the content.
It shows that students understanding is not good because of distractions and not deeply engaged with texts and does not think critically. This agrees with researchers.


D. Many students using electronic textbooks perform better on interactive assessments that are integrated into the electronic textbook platform.
Opposite to what researcher said.


E. The cost of electronic textbooks is significantly lower than that of traditional textbooks, making them a more economical option for schools.
Cost is not considered here.
User avatar
Fido10
Joined: 12 Aug 2020
Last visit: 27 Aug 2024
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 298
Location: Morocco
Products:
Posts: 103
Kudos: 165
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the conclusion of the passage is that : introducing electronic textbooks in schools has not significantly improved students' reading comprehension scores
And we're looking to strengthen it

A. Students who use electronic textbooks report higher levels of satisfaction with their learning materials than those using traditional textbooks.
we're interested by the devlopemnt of the scores in reading comprehension not the satisfaction compared to other users using other type of materials, False it does not strengthen the conclusion

B. Schools that have introduced electronic textbooks have also invested in teacher training to integrate technology effectively into their curriculum.
this one is irrelevant

C. Research has shown that the additional features of electronic textbooks, such as multimedia and hyperlinks, often distract students from the main text, reducing the depth of their engagement with the content.
this one undermines our reasoning, it's false

D. Many students using electronic textbooks perform better on interactive assessments that are integrated into the electronic textbook platform.
this is correct, the level of student is enhanced but in interactive assessments, not not in absolute
E. The cost of electronic textbooks is significantly lower than that of traditional textbooks, making them a more economical option for schools.
the cost is irrelevant to strengthening the conclusion which is that affecting thescore of RC, False

Correct answer is D
User avatar
sohailasif786
Joined: 13 May 2024
Last visit: 07 Oct 2025
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
50
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 43
Kudos: 50
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­
ANS=C
Attachment:
GMAT-Club-Forum-8rbp478c.png
GMAT-Club-Forum-8rbp478c.png [ 194.29 KiB | Viewed 370 times ]
User avatar
jairovx
Joined: 30 Mar 2023
Last visit: 06 Oct 2024
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
57
 [1]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: Peru
Posts: 48
Kudos: 57
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To strengthen the researchers' reasoning, we need to find an option that supports the idea that electronic textbooks, despite their interactive features, do not inherently enhance understanding of the material and may even detract from the core aspects of reading comprehension.

Option C states:

C. Research has shown that the additional features of electronic textbooks, such as multimedia and hyperlinks, often distract students from the main text, reducing the depth of their engagement with the content.

This option directly supports the researchers' contention by providing evidence that the interactive features of electronic textbooks can distract students, thus hindering their engagement and understanding of the main text. This would align with the researchers' claim that these features do not enhance reading comprehension and might even interfere with it.

IMO C
User avatar
rg270903
Joined: 30 May 2024
Last visit: 18 Apr 2025
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
42
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 30
Kudos: 42
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Study Findings: A recent study found that introducing electronic textbooks in schools has not significantly improved students' reading comprehension scores. The researchers contended that while electronic textbooks offer interactive features, these do not inherently enhance understanding of the material. They argued that the basic nature of reading comprehension, which relies heavily on text engagement and critical thinking, has not changed despite technological advances.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the researchers' reasoning?

A. Students who use electronic textbooks report higher levels of satisfaction with their learning materials than those using traditional textbooks.
Incorrect: No mention about students' level of satisfaction, and a higher level of satisfaction would usually suggest higher understanding of the material, hence, not strengthening the reasoning.

B. Schools that have introduced electronic textbooks have also invested in teacher training to integrate technology effectively into their curriculum.
Incorrect: This statement simply discusses additional teacher training for technology integration, which against deviates from the researchers' reasoning.

C. Research has shown that the additional features of electronic textbooks, such as multimedia and hyperlinks, often distract students from the main text, reducing the depth of their engagement with the content.
Correct: This relates to no improvement in reading comprehension or critical thinking, and thus, strengthens the researchers' reasoning.

D. Many students using electronic textbooks perform better on interactive assessments that are integrated into the electronic textbook platform.
Incorrect: This relates to interactive assessments and not reading comprehension, thus deviating from researchers' reasoning.

E. The cost of electronic textbooks is significantly lower than that of traditional textbooks, making them a more economical option for schools.
Incorrect: The cost has no association with reading comprehension scores, again, deviating from researchers' reasoning.

Explanation for choosing options: To strengthen the researchers' reasoning, the statement must support or add to the ongoing topic that electronic textbooks do NOT significantly improve reading comprehension scores, neither do they inherently enhance understanding of the material. Thus, technological advances have not improved reading comprehension.
 
User avatar
pranjalshah
Joined: 11 Dec 2023
Last visit: 10 Nov 2025
Posts: 101
Own Kudos:
127
 [1]
Given Kudos: 202
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V87 DI82
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V87 DI82
Posts: 101
Kudos: 127
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer: C

A. Students who use electronic textbooks report higher levels of satisfaction with their learning materials than those using traditional textbooks. Satisfaction with materials has nothing to do with strengthening the researcher's reasoning.

B. Schools that have introduced electronic textbooks have also invested in teacher training to integrate technology effectively into their curriculum. Out of scope.

C. Research has shown that the additional features of electronic textbooks, such as multimedia and hyperlinks, often distract students from the main text, reducing the depth of their engagement with the content. This directly supports the researchers' reasoning by providing evidence that the features of electronic textbooks can distract students and reduce their engagement with the main text.

D. Many students using electronic textbooks perform better on interactive assessments that are integrated into the electronic textbook platform. This suggests a benefit of electronic textbooks in a specific area (interactive assessments) but we don't want that.

E. The cost of electronic textbooks is significantly lower than that of traditional textbooks, making them a more economical option for schools. Being more economical has nothing to do with our passage.
User avatar
BGbogoss
Joined: 27 Jan 2024
Last visit: 30 Sep 2025
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
58
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 38
Kudos: 58
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. This statement focuses on students' satisfaction rather than their reading comprehension. While it suggests that students might prefer electronic textbooks, it does not address whether these textbooks improve their understanding of the material. Therefore, it does not strengthen the researchers' reasoning about the impact on reading comprehension.
B. This statement implies that schools are making efforts to use electronic textbooks more effectively. However, it doesn't provide evidence about the impact on reading comprehension. It might even suggest that with proper training, electronic textbooks could be more beneficial, which does not directly support the researchers' claim.
C. Correct This statement directly supports the researchers' reasoning. It explains why the interactive features of electronic textbooks might not improve reading comprehension, as they can distract students and reduce their engagement with the core material. This aligns with the researchers' argument that the basic nature of reading comprehension relies on deep text engagement, which is hindered by these distractions.
D. This statement indicates that students might perform better on specific types of assessments that are part of electronic textbooks. However, this does not necessarily correlate with improved reading comprehension. It could suggest that electronic textbooks are effective for other types of learning, but it doesn't strengthen the researchers' reasoning about reading comprehension.
E. While this statement highlights the economic benefits of electronic textbooks, it does not relate to reading comprehension. It addresses a different aspect (cost efficiency) and does not provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of electronic textbooks in improving students' understanding of the material.

Answer C
User avatar
pianogirl
Joined: 28 Sep 2022
Last visit: 25 May 2025
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
76
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 47
Kudos: 76
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A.This choice discusses student satisfaction, which is not directly related to reading comprehension or the effectiveness of electronic textbooks in improving comprehension. Therefore, it does not strengthen the researchers' reasoning.
B. This choice suggests that schools are making efforts to use electronic textbooks effectively, but it does not address whether these efforts improve reading comprehension. Thus, it does not strengthen the researchers' reasoning about the inherent value of the textbooks themselves.
C. Correct.This choice directly supports the researchers' argument that interactive features do not enhance understanding and may even be detrimental to reading comprehension by causing distractions. Therefore, it strengthens the researchers' reasoning.
D. This choice indicates that students may benefit from electronic textbooks in some aspects (interactive assessments), but it does not address the main point about reading comprehension. It does not strengthen the researchers' argument about the inherent limitations of electronic textbooks for comprehension.
E. This choice discusses the economic benefits of electronic textbooks, which is unrelated to reading comprehension. Therefore, it does not strengthen the researchers' reasoning.
Answer C.
User avatar
FranCifu
Joined: 11 Jun 2024
Last visit: 24 Nov 2024
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
30
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 44
Kudos: 30
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­The researchers reasoning is that "while electronic textbooks offer interactive features, these do not inherently enhance understanding of the material." So this is what we need to strenghten.

A --> is actually a weakener
B --> irrelevant, the teacher training does not matter
C --> Correct, it strenghten that the electronic textbooks do not enhance understanding.
D --> Irrelevant, the stimulus does not mention assesments
E --> Irrelevant, the stimulus does not mention cost

Answer is C
User avatar
Shruuuu
Joined: 21 Nov 2023
Last visit: 10 Nov 2025
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
95
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99
Location: India
Schools: ISB '27 (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q83 V86 DI78
Products:
Schools: ISB '27 (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q83 V86 DI78
Posts: 70
Kudos: 95
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The reasoning to be strengthened is - "While electronic textbooks offer interactive features, these do not inherently enhance understanding of the material. The basic nature of reading comprehension, which relies heavily on text engagement and critical thinking, has not changed despite technological advances."
­The argument doesn't talk about student's satisfaction or cost of electronic textbooks or training of teachers. Hence, A, B & E are out of scope & can be eliminated. 

Between C & D,
C tells us that due to the additional features students tend to get distracted & their depth of engagement reduces which is exactly on the lines of the reasoning that due to electronic books, the understanding has not enhanced. 
D talks about how the children are able to perform better on the interactive exams but the argument is not concerned about performance on those exams & only sticks to RC scores. Hence, D can be eliminated 

IMO C
User avatar
JDEWERPEF
Joined: 15 Jun 2024
Last visit: 04 May 2025
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
35
 [1]
Posts: 21
Kudos: 35
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the researchers state that the insignificant improvement of students' reading comprehension scores using electronic textbooks is due to:

1. electronic textbooks interactive features do not inherently enhance understanding of the material

2. Reading comprehension still relies heavily on text engagement and critical thinking

A. Student satisfaction using electronic textbooks could weaken the researcher reasoning if its established that satisfacion increases comprehension

B. if B stated the opposite it would weaken the author reasoning as they would state another possibility yet B doesn´t give further evidence to strenghten their reasoning

C. If the features of electronic textbook reduce the depth of their engagement it proves that electronic textbooks interactive features do not inherently enhance understanding of the material.

D. Better performance on interactive assessment could be explain by either better understanting or interactive assessment being easier

E. them being more economical doesn´t affect the authors reasoning

answer C.
User avatar
boomer1ang
Joined: 13 Oct 2022
Last visit: 12 Oct 2025
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
57
 [1]
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 50
Kudos: 57
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. Students who use electronic textbooks report higher levels of satisfaction with their learning materials than those using traditional textbooks. - incorrect. satisfaction does not equal enhanced understanding

B. Schools that have introduced electronic textbooks have also invested in teacher training to integrate technology effectively into their curriculum. - effective teaching from flawed medium does not mean enchanced understanding

C. Research has shown that the additional features of electronic textbooks, such as multimedia and hyperlinks, often distract students from the main text, reducing the depth of their engagement with the content. - supports argument in that its distracting so understanding level is low. Correct.

D. Many students using electronic textbooks perform better on interactive assessments that are integrated into the electronic textbook platform. - perform better on interactive assessment. does it mean better understanding ? how about other type of assessment ?

E. The cost of electronic textbooks is significantly lower than that of traditional textbooks, making them a more economical option for schools. - cost not in question.

Answer (C)
User avatar
andreagonzalez2k
Joined: 15 Feb 2021
Last visit: 26 Jul 2025
Posts: 308
Own Kudos:
497
 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 308
Kudos: 497
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­reasoning: electronic textbooks in schools have not significantly improved students' reading comprehension (text engagement and critical thinking) scores

(A) INCORRECT
Levels of satisfaction are irrelevant here, only reading comprehension matters.

(B) INCORRECT
It does not talk about reading comprehension so it is irrelevant.

(C) CORRECT
Students' distractions when reading do affect their reading comprehension.


(D) INCORRECT
Interactive assessments are not related to reading comprehension skills, so it is irrelevant.

(E) INCORRECT
The cost os electronic books is irrelevant here.

IMO C
User avatar
Aarkoza
Joined: 17 Jan 2024
Last visit: 24 Sep 2024
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 3
Kudos: 5
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C is a clear answer because only c strengths the researchers point of view
User avatar
Ruha
Joined: 04 Nov 2023
Last visit: 30 Jul 2025
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
17
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 14
Kudos: 17
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Para extract: e-textbooks have no improvement in reading comprehension abilities!

To strengthen argument we need some text that talks negative impact of e-textbooks while reading.

A- higher satisfaction, it's a weakening argument
Incorrect

B- alternative teaching methods, doesn't match our description
Incorrect

C- distracting features
High possibility to support our claim

D- argues that e-textbook trained students do better in certain tests, new context and also pro e-textbook
Incorrect

E- e-textbooks are cost effective. The study is only concerned with improvement in understanding and not affordability
Incorrect

Hence, only feasible option - C

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Gemmie
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 491
Own Kudos:
426
 [1]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
GPA: 3.55
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
Posts: 491
Kudos: 426
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­C. Research has shown that the additional features of electronic textbooks, such as multimedia and hyperlinks, often distract students from the main text, reducing the depth of their engagement with the content.

Strengthens Reasoning: This directly addresses the researchers' point that interactive features don't necessarily improve comprehension. It suggests these features might even be detrimental by distracting students from focusing on core text and critical thinking.

+ Supports Argument: It aligns with the researchers' argument that the essence of reading comprehension (text engagement and critical thinking) remains unchanged. Distractions would hinder both these aspects.


Why the other options don't strengthen the reasoning as much:

A. Student Satisfaction: This doesn't address comprehension directly. Students might enjoy the interactivity, but it doesn't guarantee better understanding.

B. Teacher Training: While important for technology integration, it doesn't speak to the effectiveness of the features themselves on comprehension.

D. Performance on Interactive Assessments: This doesn't necessarily reflect overall comprehension. Performance could be due to the specific format of the assessments, not deeper understanding. Also, this is more a weakener

E. Cost-Effectiveness: This is irrelevant to the impact on comprehension scores, the researchers' main concern.­
   1   2   3   4   5   6   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts