Bunuel
Study Findings: A recent study found that introducing electronic textbooks in schools has not significantly improved students' reading comprehension scores. The researchers contended that while electronic textbooks offer interactive features, these do not inherently enhance understanding of the material. They argued that the basic nature of reading comprehension, which relies heavily on text engagement and critical thinking, has not changed despite technological advances.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the researchers' reasoning?
A. Students who use electronic textbooks report higher levels of satisfaction with their learning materials than those using traditional textbooks.
B. Schools that have introduced electronic textbooks have also invested in teacher training to integrate technology effectively into their curriculum.
C. Research has shown that the additional features of electronic textbooks, such as multimedia and hyperlinks, often distract students from the main text, reducing the depth of their engagement with the content.
D. Many students using electronic textbooks perform better on interactive assessments that are integrated into the electronic textbook platform.
E. The cost of electronic textbooks is significantly lower than that of traditional textbooks, making them a more economical option for schools.
GMAT Club Official Explanation:
Correct Answer: C. Research has shown that the additional features of electronic textbooks, such as multimedia and hyperlinks, often distract students from the main text, reducing the depth of their engagement with the content.C) states that interactive features of electronic textbooks, which are supposed to enhance learning, may actually be hurting students and distracting them from the text and deep understanding of the material which in turn does not help their scores. Thus despite advantages brought by the ebooks, students are finding ways to distract themselves, and negate them, thus not getting higher reading comprehension scores.
A. Incorrect.Students who use electronic textbooks report higher levels of satisfaction with their learning materials than those using traditional textbooks.
Student satisfaction has nothing to do with how effective the textbooks are in improving reading comprehension scores. Preference for books does not mean people get higher scores, or at least that's not anything we know from the passage. Irrelevant. Eliminate.
B. IncorrectSchools that have introduced electronic textbooks have also invested in teacher training to integrate technology effectively into their curriculum.
This choice does not strengthen the claim that electronic textbooks do not improve reading comprehension scores. Instead it says that several other factors (such as technology and teacher training) were not at fault of scores not improving. It may seem like it strengthens the argument but it does not strengthen it, this choice only eliminates some doubts (while many others may remain - e.g. the reason students did not improve their scores could have been that they had games installed on the ebook readers or perhaps those books had a high failure rate). From this choice, we only know that the scores did not go down due to teacher training. Weak and indirect. Eliminate.
D. Incorrect.Many students using electronic textbooks perform better on interactive assessments that are integrated into the electronic textbook platform.
D introduces an external/parallel line of reasoning that is not related to Reading Comprehension scores and instead talks about the interactive assessments. We are not sure how this relates to RC scores, so we will let this choice be and move on. Eliminate.
E. Incorrect. The cost of electronic textbooks is significantly lower than that of traditional textbooks, making them a more economical option for schools.
The cost of books is irrelevant to the discussion of reading comprehension. It is introducing another topic which is not tied to score improvement in any direct way. Elimiate.