Ok, We need to fight back if we want to WIN.
Green team, it's time to wake up!
Fifth Day, Here we go:
Let's get started with our explanation for this topic:
Identify the Question:This is a Strengthen question. we need to be focus on Premises and Conclusion.
Deconstruct the Argument:Study Findings: A recent study found that introducing electronic textbooks in schools has not significantly improved students' reading comprehension scores. - Background.
The researchers contended that while electronic textbooks offer interactive features, these do not inherently enhance understanding of the material. - Conclusion.
They argued that the basic nature of reading comprehension, which relies heavily on text engagement and critical thinking, has not changed despite technological advances. -Premise.
State the goal:We are looking for piece of information that will help up think that the argument just made stronger. it can defend the C or strengthen it.
We have here lots of connections so we need to be carefull with our critical thinking.
Electronic textbook DOESN'T increase SIGNIFICANTLY RC.
But, The Researchers conclude that it is because RC relies HEAVILY on text engagement AND critical thinking.
So after synchronize: they assume that the text book doesn't causing these two basic factors of RC.
if the textbook was making these conditions, we can expect that the RC was increased SIGNIFICANTLY.
So we are looking something that strengthen this point: TEXTBOOK is not making these two factors.
EliminationA) Opposite - if they report more satisfaction with learning materials, one can expect that it should enhance they RC skills. but the Researches said it is not! - Eliminate
B) No tie - This choice doesn't speak of the factors that enhance the RC skill. it talks about an possibility that the teacher didn't teached how to integrate the textbook better. It suggests that maybe the students didn't improve their RC because they don't know how to use the textbook, but we need to stay in our argument. In our argument we that 2 factors affect RC skill and those are: text engagement + critical thinking. Adding this information is not related to our argument. - Eliminate
C)
Correct - This Choice says exactly what we thought in our Prethinking, that the textbook doesn't enhance factors of RC (text engagement) and therefore the RC skill of the student did not increased SIGNIFICANTLY. Given the premise that textbook indeed offer Interactive features and it makes the students less engagement, we just enhance the researchers conclusion.
D)Irrelevant Distinction - This option talks about an Premise we already know and not relevant to our conclusion. we know that Text book is good for Interactive assesments. we are looking for an assumption about it is not enhancing RC skills. - Eliminate
E)No Tie - We are speaking of the ability of students to enhance their RC skill. The argument do not speak for a moment on cost. - Eliminate
THE ENDI hope you liked the explanation, I have tried my best here.
Let me know if you have any questions about this question or my explanation.