Elite097
GMATNinja Bunuel bb which versions of LSAT are we referring to here? ALso without the explanations, how do we identify the reasoning errors or other errors in our approach?
I'm not quite sure what you mean by the question about LSAT "versions." Every official LSAT is broadly the same, and includes three different section types: reading comprehension (very similar to GMAT RC, but generally harder), logical reasoning (nearly identical to GMAT CR), and a thing called analytical reasoning that you can ignore, since it's irrelevant to the GMAT.
The problem with reviewing individual explanations is that it's extremely time-consuming, and not always very productive or efficient. I've done my best to explain why
here and
here, and also in
the study plan intro video.
I know: that seems counterintuitive (especially coming from a guy who has posted thousands of explanations for verbal questions). But think of it this way: does reading somebody else's simplified summary of, say, an RC passage really help you figure out how YOU misread or misinterpreted the passage? Does it make you a better reader? Does somebody else's explanation show you the patterns in your mistakes, or the flawed thinking or reading that you've employed? Sure, it can help a bit to see somebody else's way of thinking, presented in clearer language than the passage itself. But other people's explanations will never tell you anything about YOU -- and that's the thing that really matters.
Yes, it's hard to figure out how to spot patterns in your own results, and it's hard to be introspective about why you're making mistakes. But it's really the only way to improve. Written explanations can maybe play a small role in helping you get there, but if they're a cornerstone of your studies, I can promise that you'll waste quite a bit of time.
We see lovely folks on GMAT Club every day who have asked 100 questions about 100 different RC/CR passages -- and it's clear that they're not getting better, because they're not learning anything about themselves by reading 100 expert answers to their questions. They're just learning more about the specifics of 100 different passages... none of which will appear on their actual exam.
Instead, please embrace the GMAT journey of self-discovery. And just be careful about how you use other people's explanations, especially on verbal. Small amounts can help. Large amounts are probably a waste of your time.
I hope that helps a bit!