Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

 It is currently 19 Jul 2019, 14:30

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Hollywood starlets Ashlee and Britnee each has an entourage

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 53
Hollywood starlets Ashlee and Britnee each has an entourage  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2011, 11:40
4
1
17
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

39% (01:45) correct 61% (01:43) wrong based on 482 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Hollywood starlets Ashlee and Britnee each has an entourage consisting of a number of wannabes. If each starlet has a list of 10 wannabes from which to choose entourage members, which starlet can form the most different entourages?

(1) Britnee’s entourage consists of more wannabes than Ashlee’s entourage does.

(2) Ashlee’s entourage consists of exactly four wannabes.

_________________
---Winners do it differently---
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1503
Re: Hollywood starlets Ashlee and Britnee each has an entourage  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2014, 01:35
3
7
Very clever. This plays on the fact that mathematics is blind to which group is in and which is out. In other words, putting 4 people "in" and 6 "out" is the same as putting 6 "in" and 4 "out." Our intuition is to say that the more members, the more possibilities, but that's not true. In fact, the highest number of possibilities comes at 5 in/5 out, and the number tapers off equally in both directions. There are 252 ways to select a group of 5, 210 ways to select a group of four (or six), etc., all the way down to 1 way to select a group of 10.

(1) INSUFFICIENT:
B could have 5 and A could have 4. B (252) >A (210)
B could have 6 and A could have 5. A (252) >B (210)

(2) INSUFFICIENT:
A's total is 210, but this is useless without info about B.

(1&2) INSUFFICIENT:
A's total is 210.
B could have 5, for a total of 252. B>A
B could have 6, for a total of 210. B=A
B could have 10, for a total of 1. B<A

On a Sentence Correction note, the sentence should read "A&B each have," not "has." The subject is A&B (plural), not each (singular). If this is a real Princeton Review problem, I hope this was a transcription error.
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan Prep GMAT Instructor | San Diego

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews
##### General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2010
Posts: 126

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2011, 19:22
Don't you think this problem is little bit difficult to understand especially for non-native English speaker?
_________________
Consider me giving KUDOS, if you find my post helpful.
If at first you don't succeed, you're running about average. ~Anonymous
Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 53

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2011, 11:10
Yeah it is.. I just assumed entourage for a selected group (word web:The group following and attending to some important person) and wannabes as candidates (word web: An ambitious and aspiring young person). So basically, the no. of people to be selected is different for both the singers. Out of 10 candidates, britnee selects x no. to form her group and ashlee selects y people out of her list of 10 candidates.
Now, statement 2 says- ashlee needs to select 4 out of 10 which means-
there are 10C4 or 210 ways to form ashlee's group. No info about britnee yet.
1st statement says-
Britnee needs to select more people out of 10 than does ashlee. It gives us no clue about the possible no. of groups she can form in comparison to ashlee.
Combining 1st and 2nd-
Britnee needs to select more than 4 people out of 10 to form her group in which case-
No. of ways for britnee ranges from - 10C4 to 10C10 i.e, 252 ways to 1 way.
In the process of explaining it to you, I got my doubt cleared :D Thanks...
_________________
---Winners do it differently---
Current Student
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Posts: 156
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V41
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Hollywood starlets Ashlee and Britnee each has an entourage  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2017, 15:16
Here's my take:
Quote:
(1) Britnee’s entourage consists of more wannabes than Ashlee’s entourage does.
(2) Ashlee’s entourage consists of exactly four wannabes.

From 2, If Ashlee has to make entourages of 4 wannabes each and she has 10 to pick from, she could pick 8 people and therefore 2 entourages. But this is not sufficient.
1 seems insufficient on it's own. But if B's entourage is bigger, let's assume 2 numbers: 5 & >5. At 5, she could make two entourages from the 10 people but only 1 entourage at >5. Therefore we don't have a certain number for B.

Therefore, E?
_________________
If you found this post useful, hit Kudos! :D
Current Student
Joined: 22 Sep 2016
Posts: 169
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 4
Re: Hollywood starlets Ashlee and Britnee each has an entourage  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2017, 21:04
RohitKalla wrote:
Yeah it is.. I just assumed entourage for a selected group (word web:The group following and attending to some important person) and wannabes as candidates (word web: An ambitious and aspiring young person). So basically, the no. of people to be selected is different for both the singers. Out of 10 candidates, britnee selects x no. to form her group and ashlee selects y people out of her list of 10 candidates.
Now, statement 2 says- ashlee needs to select 4 out of 10 which means-
there are 10C4 or 210 ways to form ashlee's group. No info about britnee yet.
1st statement says-
Britnee needs to select more people out of 10 than does ashlee. It gives us no clue about the possible no. of groups she can form in comparison to ashlee.
Combining 1st and 2nd-
Britnee needs to select more than 4 people out of 10 to form her group in which case-
No. of ways for britnee ranges from - 10C4 to 10C10 i.e, 252 ways to 1 way.
In the process of explaining it to you, I got my doubt cleared :D Thanks...

The question states that "which starlet can form the most different groups".

In that way, the answer should be C.
Because, only 10C1 has the issue of not being greater than 10C(1+n) where n is an integer greater than zero and less than 10.
In all other cases, Britnee's group will have fewer different member teams.
_________________
Desperately need 'KUDOS' !!
Manager
Joined: 01 Feb 2017
Posts: 230
Hollywood starlets Ashlee and Britnee each has an entourage  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2017, 08:24
nCk value is maximized when k=n/2.
If n is odd, then value of n/2+-0.5 is same. Eg. 25C12=25C13.

Similarly, max 10Ck is when k=5.

St.1 is Insufficient because we cannot conclude the higher value of 10Ck even if value of k1 is different from k2.

St.2 is Insufficient as k1= 4.
So, if k2=5, then k2>k1. But, if k2=10, then k2<k1.

Even after combining two statements, we cannot decide which k is leading to higher value of 10Ck.

Hence, Ans E

Posted from my mobile device
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 473
Location: India
Schools: XLRI"20
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.5
Re: Hollywood starlets Ashlee and Britnee each has an entourage  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2017, 12:00
Before we solve this problem, we must note that

10C1 = 10C9, 10C2 = 10C8, 10C3 = 10C7, 10C4 = 10C6

So,

10C1 < 10C2 < 10C3 < 10C4 < 10C5
10C9 < 10C8 < 10C7 < 10C6 < 10C5

Let us attack the statements:

Statement 1: Britnee’s entourage consists of more wannabes than Ashlee’s entourage does.
Say Britnee has 4 wannabes out of 10, and Ashlee has 3 wannabes out of 10 => 10C4 > 10C3, so Britnee has more combinations than Ashless has

Say Britnee has 6 wannabes out of 10, and Ashlee has 5 wannabes out of 10 => 10C6 < 10C4 (from above), so Britnee has less number of combinations than Ashless has

InSuff

Statement2: Ashlee’s entourage consists of exactly four wannabes. - Clearly insufficient, as we don't know about Britnee's

From 1 + 2,
A has 4, but if B has 5 wannabes, then B has more combinations than A has
but if B has 7 wannabes, then effectively 10C7 = 10C3 (<10C4), B has less combinations than A has

Still Insuff -> (E)
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 11709
Re: Hollywood starlets Ashlee and Britnee each has an entourage  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2018, 08:56
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: Hollywood starlets Ashlee and Britnee each has an entourage   [#permalink] 27 Nov 2018, 08:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by