SajjadAhmad
Official Explanation
Difficulty Level: 750
This question asks you to identify hidden assumptions embedded in the speaker’s argument. Examine each statement.
(A) is an assumption of the argument. Barbara told the speaker about two bets, and the speaker assumes those were the only two she made. (She could have made additional wagers.)
(B) is also an assumption of the argument. The speaker concludes that one or the other horse must have won, but that conclusion depends on the assumption that they did not both win.
(C) is also an assumption of the argument. The speaker implicitly assumes that the only reason Barbara would return to the parimutuel window is to cash a winning ticket, as opposed to placing another bet.
(D) is also a hidden assumption, similar to (A).
(E), however, is not an assumption. Barbara could very well have believed that Copper Cane was more likely to win—indeed, she stood to win more money with that result even though her bet was smaller because of the longer odds.
Answer: E
Hope it helpsGmatMinion
Can you please explain the logic for picking E over B in this one?
Thanks for the reply.
However, here are my questions:
B) Is it possible for two horses to win the same race?
My reason for picking B is:
The author is assuming that the two horses finish in a dead heat. Well, they can easily be the #first and the #last horses and Barbara would still make her money.
E) Barbara placed bets on both of them. Maybe she was playing safe on the horse she placed an 'even' bet on, just to recover her money safely and hence believed it to be the horse with a greater chance of winning. Whereas placing a bet with odds so high is more out of desperation (or belief) than calculated risk.
I mean, E can go either way but I feel B is a better pick.
Anyways, I appreciate your inputs!!