Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 13:26 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 13:26
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
heyholetsgo
Joined: 06 Jul 2010
Last visit: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
876
 [30]
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 64
Kudos: 876
 [30]
Kudos
Add Kudos
30
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,880
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,897
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,880
Kudos: 811,431
 [12]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
ramana
Joined: 18 Oct 2008
Last visit: 29 Mar 2011
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 79
Kudos: 111
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mission2009
Joined: 27 May 2008
Last visit: 01 Dec 2017
Posts: 92
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Concentration: Finance
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel,
why have to taken only the second equation in Statement B not the first one? Plz explain briefly.

Thanks..
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,880
Own Kudos:
811,431
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,897
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,880
Kudos: 811,431
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ramana
Bunuel

Given: \(x=integer\) and \(8x>4+6x\) --> \(2x>4\) --> \(x>2\). Question: \(x=?\)

(1) \(6-5x>-13\) --> \(19>5x\) --> \(\frac{19}{5}=3.8>x\) --> as \(x=integer\) and \(x>2\), then \(x=3\). Sufficient.

(2) \(3-2x<-x+4<7.2-2x\) --> take only the following part: \(-x+4<7.2-2x\)--> \(x<3.2\) --> as \(x=integer\) and \(x>2\), then \(x=3\). Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Hi,

can you explain stmt B please, why is that only the second part is considered?
mission2009
Hi Bunuel,
why have to taken only the second equation in Statement B not the first one? Plz explain briefly.

Thanks..

The reason for considering only the second part of the second statement is that the first part is not needed to determine the answer. The second part, which states \(-x + 4 < 7.2 - 2x\), provides sufficient information to solve for x: \(x < 3.2\). Since we know that \(x\) is an integer and \(x > 2\), we can conclude that \(x = 3\). This is sufficient to determine the value of x, making the first part of the second statement unnecessary.
avatar
Reetabrata Ghosh
Joined: 21 May 2013
Last visit: 08 Jan 2014
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V32
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V32
Posts: 20
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
ramana
Bunuel

Given: \(x=integer\) and \(8x>4+6x\) --> \(2x>4\) --> \(x>2\). Question: \(x=?\)

(1) \(6-5x>-13\) --> \(19>5x\) --> \(\frac{19}{5}=3.8>x\) --> as \(x=integer\) and \(x>2\), then \(x=3\). Sufficient.

(2) \(3-2x<-x+4<7.2-2x\) --> take only the following part: \(-x+4<7.2-2x\)--> \(x<3.2\) --> as \(x=integer\) and \(x>2\), then \(x=3\). Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Hi,

can you explain stmt B please, why is that only the second part is considered?
mission2009
Hi Bunuel,
why have to taken only the second equation in Statement B not the first one? Plz explain briefly.

Thanks..

Because to reach the answer we don't need the first part at all. The part which says \(-x+4<7.2-2x\) is enough to give necessary info: \(x<3.2\) --> as \(x=integer\) and \(x>2\), then \(x=3\). Sufficient.
Hi Bunuel,

but if we consider the first part of the statement B we don't get the answer, right? if we have been given the equation with both the parts then we should be considering both the parts, right??? please explain...
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,880
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,897
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,880
Kudos: 811,431
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Reetabrata Ghosh
Bunuel
ramana

Given: \(x=integer\) and \(8x>4+6x\) --> \(2x>4\) --> \(x>2\). Question: \(x=?\)

(1) \(6-5x>-13\) --> \(19>5x\) --> \(\frac{19}{5}=3.8>x\) --> as \(x=integer\) and \(x>2\), then \(x=3\). Sufficient.

(2) \(3-2x<-x+4<7.2-2x\) --> take only the following part: \(-x+4<7.2-2x\)--> \(x<3.2\) --> as \(x=integer\) and \(x>2\), then \(x=3\). Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Hi,

can you explain stmt B please, why is that only the second part is considered?
mission2009
Hi Bunuel,
why have to taken only the second equation in Statement B not the first one? Plz explain briefly.

Thanks..

Because to reach the answer we don't need the first part at all. The part which says \(-x+4<7.2-2x\) is enough to give necessary info: \(x<3.2\) --> as \(x=integer\) and \(x>2\), then \(x=3\). Sufficient.
Hi Bunuel,

but if we consider the first part of the statement B we don't get the answer, right? if we have been given the equation with both the parts then we should be considering both the parts, right??? please explain...

Yes, if (2) were just \(3-2x<-x+4\) --> \(x>-1\), then it wouldn't be sufficient. As for your other question: can you please elaborate what you mean? Thank you.
avatar
Reetabrata Ghosh
Joined: 21 May 2013
Last visit: 08 Jan 2014
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V32
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V32
Posts: 20
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel,

but if we consider the first part of the statement B we don't get the answer, right? if we have been given the equation with both the parts then we should be considering both the parts, right??? please explain...[/quote]

Yes, if (2) were just \(3-2x<-x+4\) --> \(x>-1\), then it wouldn't be sufficient. As for your other question: can you please elaborate what you mean? Thank you.[/quote]

Hi Bunuel,

what I meant to say that in the statement B there are two equations and both gives us different answers for X, but you have taken the 2nd part only and discarded the first part..why is that..if both the parts are given then should not we take both the parts into consideration?? and if we take both the parts into consideration we do not get the desired result..hope I am able to explain myself....
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,880
Own Kudos:
811,431
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,897
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,880
Kudos: 811,431
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Reetabrata Ghosh


what I meant to say that in the statement B there are two equations and both gives us different answers for X, but you have taken the 2nd part only and discarded the first part..why is that..if both the parts are given then should not we take both the parts into consideration?? and if we take both the parts into consideration we do not get the desired result..hope I am able to explain myself....

I did not discard anything. The point is that the first part does not give us any relevant info.

If we use both we'd have the same!

\(3-2x < -x + 4 < 7.2 - 2x\) --> \(-1<x<3.2\). We know that \(x>2\), so we have \(2<x<3.2\).

Hope it's clear now.
User avatar
mvictor
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Last visit: 14 Jul 2021
Posts: 2,118
Own Kudos:
1,277
 [1]
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Posts: 2,118
Kudos: 1,277
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
heyholetsgo
If 8x > 4 + 6x, what is the value of the integer x?

(1) 6 – 5x > -13

(2) 3 – 2x < -x + 4 < 7.2 – 2x


Could anybody tell me when it is appropriate to add up equations? That's what I did and it didn't work...


from the given information
8x-6x > 4
2x > 4
x>2.

1. 19>5x -> 3.8 > x -> since x must be an integer, and since x>2, we know for sure that X is 3. Suficient.

2. 3-2x<-x+4<7.2-2x
add 2x to each side:
3<x+4<7.2
subtract 4
-1<x<3.2
since x>2, must be and integer, and since x<3.2, x must be equal to 3
sufficient.

answer is D.
User avatar
NikGujju
Joined: 20 Aug 2014
Last visit: 22 Apr 2021
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
49
 [2]
Given Kudos: 163
Status:Target 760
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.6
WE:Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Products:
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
heyholetsgo
If 8x > 4 + 6x, what is the value of the integer x?

(1) 6 – 5x > -13

(2) 3 – 2x < -x + 4 < 7.2 – 2x


Could anybody tell me when it is appropriate to add up equations? That's what I did and it didn't work...

8x>4+6x
therefore, x>2

St. 1: 6-5x>-13
-5x>-19
x<19/5

we know that x>2 and is an integer.

therefore, x=3

St.2: 3-2x<-x+4<7.2-2x
3<x+4<7.2
x=3

Choice D
User avatar
PriyamRathor
Joined: 17 Aug 2021
Last visit: 24 May 2024
Posts: 146
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 167
Location: India
WE:Corporate Finance (Accounting)
Posts: 146
Kudos: 124
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
If 8x > 4 + 6x, what is the value of the integer x?

(1) 6 – 5x > -13

(2) 3 – 2x < -x + 4 < 7.2 – 2x

Quote:
Solving The given statement,
2x>4 , x>2



Hi , KarishmaB

I solved Statement 2 using the below method , but couldnt reach an answer.

Step1. Bringing all x in one place

3<-x+2x+2x+4<7.2
3<3x+4<7.2

Step2. subtracting 4 from all
-1<3x<3.2

Step3. Dividing by 3 in all sides
-1/3 <x<3.2/3

-0.33<x<1.06777

But given in the question that X >2

Hence Statement 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Please guide .
Thanks
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,441
Own Kudos:
79,419
 [2]
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,441
Kudos: 79,419
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PriyamRathor
Quote:
If 8x > 4 + 6x, what is the value of the integer x?

(1) 6 – 5x > -13

(2) 3 – 2x < -x + 4 < 7.2 – 2x

Quote:
Solving The given statement,
2x>4 , x>2



Hi , KarishmaB

I solved Statement 2 using the below method , but couldnt reach an answer.

Step1. Bringing all x in one place

3<-x+2x+2x+4<7.2

3<3x+4<7.2

Step2. subtracting 4 from all
-1<3x<3.2

Step3. Dividing by 3 in all sides
-1/3 <x<3.2/3

-0.33<x<1.06777

But given in the question that X >2

Hence Statement 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Please guide .
Thanks

Highlighted is not correct.

a < b < c can be handled in one of two ways:

I. Break into two inequalities and then work on them as usual
a < b and b < c

II. Do the same operation on each inequality
a + 2 < b + 2 < c + 2



So what you can do is add 2x to all three expressions:
\(3 – 2x < -x + 4 < 7.2 – 2x\)
becomes
\(3 – 2x + 2x < -x + 4 + 2x < 7.2 – 2x + 2x\)
which is
\(3 < x + 4 < 7.2\)

Now subtract 4 from all.

\(3-4 < x + 4 - 4 < 7.2 - 4\)
\(-1 < x < 3.2\)
User avatar
ChanSu
Joined: 22 Feb 2020
Last visit: 12 Aug 2023
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 18
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
heyholetsgo
If 8x > 4 + 6x, what is the value of the integer x?

(1) 6 – 5x > -13

(2) 3 – 2x < -x + 4 < 7.2 – 2x


Could anybody tell me when it is appropriate to add up equations? That's what I did and it didn't work...

Given: \(x=integer\) and \(8x>4+6x\) --> \(2x>4\) --> \(x>2\). Question: \(x=?\)

(1) \(6-5x>-13\) --> \(19>5x\) --> \(\frac{19}{5}=3.8>x\) --> as \(x=integer\) and \(x>2\), then \(x=3\). Sufficient.

(2) \(3-2x<-x+4<7.2-2x\) --> take only the following part: \(-x+4<7.2-2x\)--> \(x<3.2\) --> as \(x=integer\) and \(x>2\), then \(x=3\). Sufficient.

Answer: D.

So no need to add inequality in this case. But if you are interested:

You can only add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction:

If \(a>b\) and \(c>d\) (signs in same direction: \(>\) and \(>\)) --> \(a+c>b+d\).
Example: \(3<4\) and \(2<5\) --> \(3+2<4+5\).

You can only apply subtraction when their signs are in the opposite directions:

If \(a>b\) and \(c<d\) (signs in opposite direction: \(>\) and \(<\)) --> \(a-c>b-d\) (take the sign of the inequality you subtract from).
Example: \(3<4\) and \(5>1\) --> \(3-5<4-1\).

Hope it helps.

I think I have a conceptual gap. I started taking two cases x is +ve and x is -ve and (x= 0 is not possible) got everything messed and chose E

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,880
Own Kudos:
811,431
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,897
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,880
Kudos: 811,431
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ChanSu
Bunuel
heyholetsgo
If 8x > 4 + 6x, what is the value of the integer x?

(1) 6 – 5x > -13

(2) 3 – 2x < -x + 4 < 7.2 – 2x


Could anybody tell me when it is appropriate to add up equations? That's what I did and it didn't work...

Given: \(x=integer\) and \(8x>4+6x\) --> \(2x>4\) --> \(x>2\). Question: \(x=?\)

(1) \(6-5x>-13\) --> \(19>5x\) --> \(\frac{19}{5}=3.8>x\) --> as \(x=integer\) and \(x>2\), then \(x=3\). Sufficient.

(2) \(3-2x<-x+4<7.2-2x\) --> take only the following part: \(-x+4<7.2-2x\)--> \(x<3.2\) --> as \(x=integer\) and \(x>2\), then \(x=3\). Sufficient.

Answer: D.

So no need to add inequality in this case. But if you are interested:

You can only add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction:

If \(a>b\) and \(c>d\) (signs in same direction: \(>\) and \(>\)) --> \(a+c>b+d\).
Example: \(3<4\) and \(2<5\) --> \(3+2<4+5\).

You can only apply subtraction when their signs are in the opposite directions:

If \(a>b\) and \(c<d\) (signs in opposite direction: \(>\) and \(<\)) --> \(a-c>b-d\) (take the sign of the inequality you subtract from).
Example: \(3<4\) and \(5>1\) --> \(3-5<4-1\).

Hope it helps.

I think I have a conceptual gap. I started taking two cases x is +ve and x is -ve and (x= 0 is not possible) got everything messed and chose E

Posted from my mobile device

9. Inequalities



For more check Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread



Hope it helps.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,990
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,990
Kudos: 1,118
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109880 posts
498 posts
212 posts