GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Oct 2018, 23:26

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ?

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2015
Posts: 6
Schools: ISB '18
If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2015, 13:11
3
1
22
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (01:24) correct 33% (01:58) wrong based on 633 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ?

(1) p < s
(2) s < t
Most Helpful Community Reply
Current Student
avatar
S
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2633
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Kellogg '18 (M)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2015, 13:18
5
6
ajayvyavahare wrote:
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

need help to solve this one.


Do not forget to mention the source of the question.

it is simple after you realise that as p is positive, you can rewrite the given inequality as |ps-pt| > p(s-t) = p|s-t| > p(s-t) , you can also remove 'p' from both the sides , leaving you with

is |s-t| > s-t which is very clearly obtainable if you know about the relative relation between t and s (side note, not required for this question: for |s-t| > s-t to be true, this means that s-t<0 or s<t)

Statement 1, gives no information about relation between t and s , hence not sufficient.

Statement 2, gives the exact relation we need to answer the question and as such is sufficient.

B is the correct answer.

Hope this helps.
General Discussion
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
User avatar
V
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 6390
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Premium Member
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Dec 2015, 05:43
1
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.


If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)?

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

When you modify the condition and the question, |ps-pt| > p(s-t)?--> ps-pt<0?, therefore p(s-t)<0?. Since p>0, you need to find out s-t<0?. In 2), s-t<0, which is yes and sufficient. Therefore, the answer is B.


-> Once we modify the original condition and the question according to the variable approach method 1, we can solve approximately 30% of DS questions.
_________________

MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare
The one-and-only World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy.
"Only $99 for 3 month Online Course"
"Free Resources-30 day online access & Diagnostic Test"
"Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons - try it yourself"

Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 6961
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Dec 2015, 06:39
ajayvyavahare wrote:
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

need help to solve this one.


Hi,
the eq is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)..
or pls-tl > p(s-t)
since all numbers are positive , p cannot be 0..
two instances..
1) ls-tl will never be smaller than s-t as ls-tl will always be positive while s-t will depend on relative values of s and t..
2) if s and t are equal both will be 0..

so our answer for |ps-pt| > p(s-t) will be NO if s>t or s=t..
and it will be YES if s<t...
so we are just looking for the relation between s and t

lets see the statements..
(1) p < s...
nothing between s and t.. insuff

(2) s < t
answer is YES.. suff
ans B
_________________

1) Absolute modulus : http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
2)Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html
3) effects of arithmetic operations : https://gmatclub.com/forum/effects-of-arithmetic-operations-on-fractions-269413.html


GMAT online Tutor

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2016
Posts: 20
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Sustainability, International Business
Schools: Rotman '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 590 Q43 V28
GPA: 2.95
WE: Account Management (Commercial Banking)
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Oct 2016, 10:19
Engr2012 wrote:
ajayvyavahare wrote:
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

need help to solve this one.


Do not forget to mention the source of the question.

it is simple after you realise that as p is positive, you can rewrite the given inequality as |ps-pt| > p(s-t) = p|s-t| > p(s-t) , you can also remove 'p' from both the sides , leaving you with

is |s-t| > s-t which is very clearly obtainable if you know about the relative relation between t and s (side note, not required for this question: for |s-t| > s-t to be true, this means that s-t<0 or s<t)

Statement 1, gives no information about relation between t and s , hence not sufficient.

Statement 2, gives the exact relation we need to answer the question and as such is sufficient.

B is the correct answer.

Hope this helps.


I did exactly what you did in this question but picked E. I was thinking |x| is x or -x, so |s - t| can be equal to s-t or -(s-t). Plugging in some numbers for s and t: 3 - 5= -2 and -3 + 5 = 2, so |s-t| could be equal to 2 or -2 which would be insufficient. Could you help me to understand why this is wrong? Tks
Manager
Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 12 Oct 2015
Posts: 218
Location: Canada
Concentration: Leadership, Accounting
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
GPA: 3
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jan 2017, 13:12
1
AJ1012 wrote:
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

need help to solve this one.


Excellent question, this one looks a lot tricker than it actually is. Took me for a ride until I saw the "only positive integers". So let's look at |ps - pt| > P(s-t) or re-write it as | p(s-t)| > p (s-t).

Now let's consider a possibility where P(s-t) is greater than | p(s-t)| , think about this one. I can't come up with one. So there's no way | p(s-t | < p (s-t). We know that |p(s-t)| is always positive. So if p (s-t) is negative then, lets call P (s-t) x, so |x| > x is equal when both positive and |x| < x when x is negative correct?

Since all of them are positive, to make P (s-t) negative, T has to be bigger than S. That's the only option. No other way to make it negative since they're all positive. T > s is necessary. 1) insufficient. 2) sufficient !

Here's a easy way: re-write : |p (s-t)| > p(s-t) let call inside X. |x| > x only if X is negative. so if all are positive, (s-t) has to be negative. for that T has to be bigger than S. Bam!
_________________

Winners dont make excuses.

350--> 700

https://gmatclub.com/forum/700-q47-v39-ir-7-awa-246682.html

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 279
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.96
WE: Human Resources (Retail Banking)
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jan 2017, 09:30
in the problem we can take p as common as: |p(s-t)| > p(s-t) so now we need to look at the values of s and t and which tells only statement 2 so its suff. to get a exact yes. hence answer is B
Mannheim Thread Master
User avatar
S
Status: It's now or never
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 200
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q40 V39
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2017, 00:51
hi all, I still am unable to derive the relationship between the |s-t| > s-t. Can anyone please share an easier way to crack this. Thanks.
_________________

2017-2018 MBA Deadlines

Threadmaster for B-school Discussions
Class of 2019: Mannheim Business School
Class 0f 2020: HHL Leipzig

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Jul 2017
Posts: 294
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2017, 05:21
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)
=> Find is |p(s-t)| > p(s-t)

As we know |x| > x only when x is -ve . When x is positive |x| =x

So here we have to check if product p*(s-t) is -ve or not. => either p is -ve or (s-t) is -ve. If both -ve, than product will become +ve => |x|=x

given in question stem that all variables are +ve. So we have to find if (s-t) is -ve or not. => we have to find is s<t or not.

(1) p < s
This just tell value of p is less than s . Not sufficient.

(2) s < t
This directly gives us equation that we are looking for.
=> s<t => (s-t) is -ve => p(s-t) is -ve => |p(s-t)| > p(s-t)
Sufficient

Answer: B
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 22 Nov 2016
Posts: 214
Location: United States
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 3.4
Reviews Badge
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2017, 17:38
AnubhavK wrote:
hi all, I still am unable to derive the relationship between the |s-t| > s-t. Can anyone please share an easier way to crack this. Thanks.



Modulus is always positive or 0.

Hence |s-t| will always be positive or 0. In this problem it can be zero since s can be equal to t (there is nothing that says that these numbers are unique)

On the other hand, s-t will be positive if s>t and negative otherwise.

Statement 2 clearly tells us that s<t. This means that the RHS will be negative. Since LHS, i.e Modulus of any value is always positive, we can answer this question using statement B alone.
_________________

Kudosity killed the cat but your kudos can save it.

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 07 Jun 2017
Posts: 19
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Mar 2018, 14:41
AJ1012 wrote:
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

need help to solve this one.



so we have :

|p(s-t)|>p(s-t)

Now for L.H.S to be greater than R.H.S, 'p' and '(s-t)' should be of opposite signs (as L.H.S is in mod and will eventually become +ve because of mod)
Thus, for 'p' and '(s-t)' to be of opposite signs , 'p' needs to be +ve and (s-t) needs to be -ve.(p can't be negative as the question says p,s and t are +ve integers)
Now:
from 1) p<s----->we get nothing...thus insufficient.

from 2) s<t ===> (s-t)<0 . (as s,t are postive integers)
thus sufficient .
Answer B.
_________________

Thanks,
Rnk

Please click on Kudos, if you think the post is helpful

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Posts: 30
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Apr 2018, 08:23
ENGRTOMBA2018 wrote:
ajayvyavahare wrote:
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

need help to solve this one.


Do not forget to mention the source of the question.

it is simple after you realise that as p is positive, you can rewrite the given inequality as |ps-pt| > p(s-t) = p|s-t|> p(s-t) , you can also remove 'p' from both the sides , leaving you with

is |s-t| > s-t which is very clearly obtainable if you know about the relative relation between t and s (side note, not required for this question: for |s-t| > s-t to be true, this means that s-t<0 or s<t)

Statement 1, gives no information about relation between t and s , hence not sufficient.

Statement 2, gives the exact relation we need to answer the question and as such is sufficient.

B is the correct answer.

Hope this helps.


Though this is a old post i think there is an error here |ps-pt| can't be written as p|s-t| (as i have highlighted above) but instead |ps-pt| = l P(s-t) l
members plz correct me if i am wrong here
PS Forum Moderator
avatar
D
Joined: 25 Feb 2013
Posts: 1216
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Apr 2018, 09:12
cruiseav wrote:
ENGRTOMBA2018 wrote:
ajayvyavahare wrote:
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

need help to solve this one.


Do not forget to mention the source of the question.

it is simple after you realise that as p is positive, you can rewrite the given inequality as |ps-pt| > p(s-t) = p|s-t|> p(s-t) , you can also remove 'p' from both the sides , leaving you with

is |s-t| > s-t which is very clearly obtainable if you know about the relative relation between t and s (side note, not required for this question: for |s-t| > s-t to be true, this means that s-t<0 or s<t)

Statement 1, gives no information about relation between t and s , hence not sufficient.

Statement 2, gives the exact relation we need to answer the question and as such is sufficient.

B is the correct answer.

Hope this helps.


Though this is a old post i think there is an error here |ps-pt| can't be written as p|s-t| (as i have highlighted above) but instead |ps-pt| = l P(s-t) l
members plz correct me if i am wrong here


Hi cruiseav

Note, here p,s & t are positive. so p can be moved out of modulus function and we can divide both sides of the inequality by p as this will not impact the inequality.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ? &nbs [#permalink] 04 Apr 2018, 09:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ?

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.