Oct 22 09:00 AM PDT  10:00 AM PDT Watch & learn the Do's and Don’ts for your upcoming interview Oct 22 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT On Demand for $79. For a score of 4951 (from current actual score of 40+) AllInOne Standard & 700+ Level Questions (150 questions) Oct 23 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Join an exclusive interview with the people behind the test. If you're taking the GMAT, this is a webinar you cannot afford to miss! Oct 26 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Want to score 90 percentile or higher on GMAT CR? Attend this free webinar to learn how to prethink assumptions and solve the most challenging questions in less than 2 minutes. Oct 27 07:00 AM EDT  09:00 AM PDT Exclusive offer! Get 400+ Practice Questions, 25 Video lessons and 6+ Webinars for FREE.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 25 Jun 2015
Posts: 5

If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Dec 2015, 13:11
Question Stats:
71% (01:28) correct 29% (01:59) wrong based on 1023 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ? (1) p < s (2) s < t
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 8005

Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Dec 2015, 06:39
ajayvyavahare wrote: If p,s, and t are positive integer, is pspt > p(st)
(1) p < s (2) s < t
need help to solve this one. Hi, the eq is pspt > p(st).. or plstl > p(st) since all numbers are positive , p cannot be 0.. two instances.. 1) lstl will never be smaller than st as lstl will always be positive while st will depend on relative values of s and t.. 2) if s and t are equal both will be 0.. so our answer for pspt > p(st) will be NO if s>t or s=t.. and it will be YES if s<t... so we are just looking for the relation between s and tlets see the statements.. (1) p < s... nothing between s and t.. insuff (2) s < t answer is YES.. suff ans B
_________________




CEO
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2596
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)

Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Dec 2015, 13:18
ajayvyavahare wrote: If p,s, and t are positive integer, is pspt > p(st)
(1) p < s (2) s < t
need help to solve this one. Do not forget to mention the source of the question.it is simple after you realise that as p is positive, you can rewrite the given inequality as pspt > p(st) = pst > p(st) , you can also remove 'p' from both the sides , leaving you with is st > st which is very clearly obtainable if you know about the relative relation between t and s (side note, not required for this question: for st > st to be true, this means that st<0 or s<t)Statement 1, gives no information about relation between t and s , hence not sufficient. Statement 2, gives the exact relation we need to answer the question and as such is sufficient. B is the correct answer. Hope this helps.




Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 8025
GPA: 3.82

Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Dec 2015, 05:43
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution. If p,s, and t are positive integer, is pspt > p(st)? (1) p < s (2) s < t When you modify the condition and the question, pspt > p(st)?> pspt<0?, therefore p(st)<0?. Since p>0, you need to find out st<0?. In 2), st<0, which is yes and sufficient. Therefore, the answer is B. > Once we modify the original condition and the question according to the variable approach method 1, we can solve approximately 30% of DS questions.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spareThe oneandonly World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy. "Only $79 for 1 month Online Course""Free Resources30 day online access & Diagnostic Test""Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons  try it yourself"



Intern
Joined: 07 Sep 2016
Posts: 20
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Sustainability, International Business
GPA: 2.95
WE: Account Management (Commercial Banking)

Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Oct 2016, 10:19
Engr2012 wrote: ajayvyavahare wrote: If p,s, and t are positive integer, is pspt > p(st)
(1) p < s (2) s < t
need help to solve this one. Do not forget to mention the source of the question.it is simple after you realise that as p is positive, you can rewrite the given inequality as pspt > p(st) = pst > p(st) , you can also remove 'p' from both the sides , leaving you with is st > st which is very clearly obtainable if you know about the relative relation between t and s (side note, not required for this question: for st > st to be true, this means that st<0 or s<t)Statement 1, gives no information about relation between t and s , hence not sufficient. Statement 2, gives the exact relation we need to answer the question and as such is sufficient. B is the correct answer. Hope this helps. I did exactly what you did in this question but picked E. I was thinking x is x or x, so s  t can be equal to st or (st). Plugging in some numbers for s and t: 3  5= 2 and 3 + 5 = 2, so st could be equal to 2 or 2 which would be insufficient. Could you help me to understand why this is wrong? Tks



Current Student
Joined: 12 Oct 2015
Posts: 214
Location: Canada
Concentration: Leadership, Accounting
GPA: 3
WE: Accounting (Accounting)

Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Jan 2017, 13:12
AJ1012 wrote: If p,s, and t are positive integer, is pspt > p(st)
(1) p < s (2) s < t
need help to solve this one. Excellent question, this one looks a lot tricker than it actually is. Took me for a ride until I saw the "only positive integers". So let's look at ps  pt > P(st) or rewrite it as  p(st) > p (st). Now let's consider a possibility where P(st) is greater than  p(st) , think about this one. I can't come up with one. So there's no way  p(st  < p (st). We know that p(st) is always positive. So if p (st) is negative then, lets call P (st) x, so x > x is equal when both positive and x < x when x is negative correct? Since all of them are positive, to make P (st) negative, T has to be bigger than S. That's the only option. No other way to make it negative since they're all positive. T > s is necessary. 1) insufficient. 2) sufficient ! Here's a easy way: rewrite : p (st) > p(st) let call inside X. x > x only if X is negative. so if all are positive, (st) has to be negative. for that T has to be bigger than S. Bam!
_________________



Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 251
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
GPA: 3.96
WE: Human Resources (Retail Banking)

Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Jan 2017, 09:30
in the problem we can take p as common as: p(st) > p(st) so now we need to look at the values of s and t and which tells only statement 2 so its suff. to get a exact yes. hence answer is B



Mannheim Thread Master
Status: It's now or never
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 178
Location: India
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Consulting)

Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Aug 2017, 00:51
hi all, I still am unable to derive the relationship between the st > st. Can anyone please share an easier way to crack this. Thanks.
_________________
20172018 MBA Deadlines
Threadmaster for Bschool Discussions Class of 2019: Mannheim Business School Class 0f 2020: HHL Leipzig



Current Student
Joined: 02 Jul 2017
Posts: 289
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology

Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Sep 2017, 05:21
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is pspt > p(st) => Find is p(st) > p(st)
As we know x > x only when x is ve . When x is positive x =x
So here we have to check if product p*(st) is ve or not. => either p is ve or (st) is ve. If both ve, than product will become +ve => x=x
given in question stem that all variables are +ve. So we have to find if (st) is ve or not. => we have to find is s<t or not.
(1) p < s This just tell value of p is less than s . Not sufficient.
(2) s < t This directly gives us equation that we are looking for. => s<t => (st) is ve => p(st) is ve => p(st) > p(st) Sufficient
Answer: B



Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2016
Posts: 202
Location: United States
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 3.4

Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Sep 2017, 17:38
AnubhavK wrote: hi all, I still am unable to derive the relationship between the st > st. Can anyone please share an easier way to crack this. Thanks. Modulus is always positive or 0.Hence st will always be positive or 0. In this problem it can be zero since s can be equal to t (there is nothing that says that these numbers are unique) On the other hand, st will be positive if s>t and negative otherwise. Statement 2 clearly tells us that s<t. This means that the RHS will be negative. Since LHS, i.e Modulus of any value is always positive, we can answer this question using statement B alone.
_________________
Kudosity killed the cat but your kudos can save it.



Intern
Joined: 07 Jun 2017
Posts: 22

Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Mar 2018, 14:41
AJ1012 wrote: If p,s, and t are positive integer, is pspt > p(st)
(1) p < s (2) s < t
need help to solve this one. so we have : p(st)>p(st) Now for L.H.S to be greater than R.H.S, 'p' and '(st)' should be of opposite signs (as L.H.S is in mod and will eventually become +ve because of mod) Thus, for 'p' and '(st)' to be of opposite signs , 'p' needs to be +ve and (st) needs to be ve.(p can't be negative as the question says p,s and t are +ve integers) Now: from 1) p<s>we get nothing...thus insufficient. from 2) s<t ===> (st)<0 . (as s,t are postive integers) thus sufficient . Answer B.
_________________
Thanks, Rnk
Please click on Kudos, if you think the post is helpful



Intern
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Posts: 34

Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Apr 2018, 08:23
ENGRTOMBA2018 wrote: ajayvyavahare wrote: If p,s, and t are positive integer, is pspt > p(st)
(1) p < s (2) s < t
need help to solve this one. Do not forget to mention the source of the question.it is simple after you realise that as p is positive, you can rewrite the given inequality as pspt > p(st) = pst> p(st) , you can also remove 'p' from both the sides , leaving you with is st > st which is very clearly obtainable if you know about the relative relation between t and s (side note, not required for this question: for st > st to be true, this means that st<0 or s<t)Statement 1, gives no information about relation between t and s , hence not sufficient. Statement 2, gives the exact relation we need to answer the question and as such is sufficient. B is the correct answer. Hope this helps. Though this is a old post i think there is an error here pspt can't be written as pst (as i have highlighted above) but instead pspt = l P(st) l members plz correct me if i am wrong here



Retired Moderator
Joined: 25 Feb 2013
Posts: 1178
Location: India
GPA: 3.82

Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Apr 2018, 09:12
cruiseav wrote: ENGRTOMBA2018 wrote: ajayvyavahare wrote: If p,s, and t are positive integer, is pspt > p(st)
(1) p < s (2) s < t
need help to solve this one. Do not forget to mention the source of the question.it is simple after you realise that as p is positive, you can rewrite the given inequality as pspt > p(st) = pst> p(st) , you can also remove 'p' from both the sides , leaving you with is st > st which is very clearly obtainable if you know about the relative relation between t and s (side note, not required for this question: for st > st to be true, this means that st<0 or s<t)Statement 1, gives no information about relation between t and s , hence not sufficient. Statement 2, gives the exact relation we need to answer the question and as such is sufficient. B is the correct answer. Hope this helps. Though this is a old post i think there is an error here pspt can't be written as pst (as i have highlighted above) but instead pspt = l P(st) l members plz correct me if i am wrong here Hi cruiseavNote, here p,s & t are positive. so p can be moved out of modulus function and we can divide both sides of the inequality by p as this will not impact the inequality.



Director
Joined: 19 Oct 2013
Posts: 516
Location: Kuwait
GPA: 3.2
WE: Engineering (Real Estate)

Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Oct 2018, 11:58
AJ1012 wrote: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
(1) p < s (2) s < t Given that all are positive integers. p(st) > p (st) ? What will provide us an answer is the relationship between s and t From statement 1) Knowing anything about p will not help us. From statement 2) Knowing that t > s will give us a clear answer p() > p () Since the p is positive it can be cancelled without changing the inequality direction +ve > ve Answer choice B



GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 4015
Location: Canada

Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Jan 2019, 11:28
AJ1012 wrote: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
(1) p < s (2) s < t Target question: Is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?In other words, Is ps  pt > ps  pt?This is a good candidate for rephrasing the target question. KEY CONCEPT: x  y can be thought as the DISTANCE between x and y on the number line. For example, 3  10 = the DISTANCE between 3 and 10 on the number line. And 6  1 = the DISTANCE between 6 and 1 on the number line. IMPORTANT: We can also find the distance 6 and 1 on the number line by simply subtracting 6  1 to get 5, so why do we need absolute values? Can't we just conclude that x  y = x  y? Great questions, me! For SOME values of x and y, it's true that x  y = x  y, and for other values it is NOT the case that x  y = x  y For example, if x = 5 and y = 2, then we get: 5  2 = 5  2. In this case x  y = x  y Likewise, if x = 11 and y = 3, then we get: 11  3 = 11  3. In this case x  y = x  y And, if x = 7 and y = 7, then we get: 7  7 = 7  7. In this case x  y = x  y CONVERSELY, if x = 4 and y = 6, then we get: 4  6 = 4  6. In this case x  y ≠ x  y Likewise, if x = 5 and y = 20, then we get: 5  20 = 5  20. In this case x  y ≠ x  y And, if x = 0 and y = 1, then we get: 0  1 = 0  1. In this case x  y ≠ x  y Notice the x  y = x  y IS true when x > y, and x  y = x  y is NOT true when x < y If x < y, then x  y = some POSITIVE value, and x  y = some NEGATIVE value. This means that, if x < y, then x  y > x  y The target question asks Is ps  pt > ps  pt?According to our conclusion above, if ps > pt, then ps  pt = ps  pt and . . . if ps < pt, then ps  pt > ps  ptThis means we can REPHRASE the target question.... REPHRASED target question: Is ps < pt?We can make things even easier, if we notice that, since p is POSITIVE, we can safely take the inequality ps < pt and divide both sides by p to get: s < t?. REREPHRASED target question: Is s < t?At this point, it will be very easy to analyze the answer choices.... Statement 1: p < sSince there's no information about t, there's no way to answer the REREPHRASED target question with certainty. Statement 1 is SUFFICIENT Statement 2: s < tPerfect! The answer to the REREPHRASED target question is YES, s IS less than tSince we can answer the REREPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT Answer: B Cheers, Brent
_________________
Test confidently with gmatprepnow.com



Manager
Joined: 15 Jul 2016
Posts: 101
Location: India

Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Aug 2019, 20:40
Hi all! Can somebody please help me in understanding why this approach is incorrect? ps  pt > p(s  t) ^^ I decided to solve this further in the Q stem to get a clearer picture. I used x = root x^2 and converted L.H.S into root form, squared on both sides but all the variables cancel out. What am I doing wrong? VeritasKarishma Bunuel chetan2u egmat
Attachments
File comment: Working attached.
unnamed.jpg [ 873.74 KiB  Viewed 1371 times ]
_________________
Please give Kudos if you agree with my approach :)




Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is ps  pt > p(s  t) ?
[#permalink]
17 Aug 2019, 20:40






