It is currently 11 Dec 2017, 06:31

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Director
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 554

Kudos [?]: 284 [0], given: 0

Location: SF Bay Area, USA
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Mar 2005, 21:37
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:11) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 23 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled â€œPetition for Statewide Smoking Restrictionâ€

Kudos [?]: 284 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1480

Kudos [?]: 132 [1], given: 0

Re: CR - Smoking Ban [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Mar 2005, 23:32
1
KUDOS
C. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.

Kudos [?]: 132 [1], given: 0

VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1206

Kudos [?]: 855 [0], given: 0

Location: Taiwan
Re: CR - Smoking Ban [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2005, 05:51
[quote="nocilis"]In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled â€œPetition for Statewide Smoking Restrictionâ€

Kudos [?]: 855 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2005, 05:55
Definitely (C)

(E) says it wont affect the local ordinances that impose smoking ban already in places where smoking poses hazard. Hence the ban on these places will exist.

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 65

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Location: Milton Keynes UK

### Show Tags

28 Mar 2005, 04:56
C.

"The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does. "

If there are already strong bans in place, imposed by the local antismoking ordinances and the State law is going to only weaken them, then this is surely going to mislead the voters as they are not told anything about the strictness of the State law.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 456 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

28 Mar 2005, 22:36
1) In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances.
2) A petition entitled â€œPetition for Statewide Smoking Restrictionâ€

Kudos [?]: 456 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 77

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2005, 15:43
I will go with A.

The issue here is to minimize the gap between understandings of advocates and voters about the smoking restriction? What's gap? Advocates's intention is to restrict the smoking in public places, but voters's understanding would be that the smoking be restricted in all places in the state from the quote they were asked.

Therefore, I initially picked A and D and saw A is the best answer to mislead the voters because of the gap of understanding about the petition for smoking.

A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
-> as above statements

B. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
-> Out of scope(not relating to the gap)

C. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
-> Out of scope(not relating to the gap)

D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
-> This may mislead the voters, but we are not so sure whether they will be really misleaded, since the key word is only "sentiment.". Rather than this, A should more clearly express the issue.

E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.
-> Wrong Subject
_________________

Best regards,

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 77

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2005, 15:44
I will go with A.

The issue here is to minimize the gap between understandings of advocates and voters about the smoking restriction? What's gap? Advocates's intention is to restrict the smoking in public places, but voters's understanding would be that the smoking be restricted in all places in the state from the quote they were asked.

Therefore, I initially picked A and D and saw A is the best answer to mislead the voters because of the gap of understanding about the petition for smoking.

A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
-> as above statements

B. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
-> Out of scope(not relating to the gap)

C. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
-> Out of scope(not relating to the gap)

D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
-> This may mislead the voters, but we are not so sure whether they will be really misleaded, since the key word is only "sentiment.". Rather than this, A should more clearly express the issue.

E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.
-> Wrong Subject
_________________

Best regards,

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 554

Kudos [?]: 284 [0], given: 0

Location: SF Bay Area, USA

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2005, 17:38
I don't have an official answer for this.

Kudos [?]: 284 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 456 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2005, 17:50
There isn't a gap in understanding the effects of the petition. The voters believe that a signing the petition will make the local ordinance statwide. We're asked to find an answer choice that makes them think otherwise and hence not sign it. In this respect, A cannot be the answer.

Here's what A says:
A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.

This answer is entirely out of scope. If I'm voting for a petition that I believe will extend the anti-smoking laws statewide, does knowing that health insurance premiums going up for everybody affect my impression of what the petition will do ? It doesn't.

Kudos [?]: 456 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 77

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2005, 19:43
Hello ywilfred,
Yes I agree that you are defenately right, as I made a wrong understanding about the sentences. Yeees, the issue is "statewide restriction vs. local one", NOT the gap of adovocates and voters about the restriction. Appreciate your kind explanation.

ywilfred wrote:
There isn't a gap in understanding the effects of the petition. The voters believe that a signing the petition will make the local ordinance statwide. We're asked to find an answer choice that makes them think otherwise and hence not sign it. In this respect, A cannot be the answer.

Here's what A says:
A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.

This answer is entirely out of scope. If I'm voting for a petition that I believe will extend the anti-smoking laws statewide, does knowing that health insurance premiums going up for everybody affect my impression of what the petition will do ? It doesn't.

_________________

Best regards,

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 44

GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V41
WE: Information Technology (Telecommunications)
Re: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2015, 22:25
Why can't I see the full question?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 44

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10154

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Re: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2016, 02:38
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 12

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 114

Re: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2016, 07:59
skollya wrote:
Why can't I see the full question?

Can't see it either.. This is what I can see: "In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled â€œPetition for Statewide Smoking Restrictionâ€ "

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 114

Re: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking   [#permalink] 15 Sep 2016, 07:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.