Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 18:32 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 18:32
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
Gauravvinod92
Joined: 02 Jun 2020
Last visit: 07 Oct 2023
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 169
Location: India
Posts: 37
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mSKR
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,290
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,290
Kudos: 937
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
VIGHNESHKAMATH
Joined: 28 Sep 2021
Last visit: 21 Nov 2022
Posts: 151
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 259
Posts: 151
Kudos: 53
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,193
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,193
Kudos: 4,758
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VIGHNESHKAMATH
Can someone explain the rule of non-essential modifier to me? I eliminated Option A as '' Before Australia was Australia'' is placed between two commas, which makes it non-essential, if I remove this non-essential stuff, sentence becomes meaningless as ''it '' doesn't have any referent anymore.

What is wrong with this understanding?

I understand the meaning issues in rest of the 4 options, but unable to digest the issue of ''non-essential stuff'' placed between the two commas in Option A.

Regards
Vighnesh

Hello VIGHNESHKAMATH,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, the rule regarding the removal of information between two commas is that after removal, the sentence should still be a complete one.

In this case, even if the phrase between the commas is removed, the sentence will still be complete.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VIGHNESHKAMATH
I eliminated Option A as '' Before Australia was Australia'' is placed between two commas, which makes it non-essential, if I remove this non-essential stuff, sentence becomes meaningless as ''it '' doesn't have any referent anymore.

What is wrong with this understanding?
Hi VIGHNESHKAMATH,

That's not the right way to look at non-essential modifiers (the name is slightly misleading :)). Non-essential does not mean that the meaning of such an element is not important or that it doesn't contain important elements.

This is not to say that we should not remove remove modifiers from a sentence. This tactic can be very useful, especially in long sentences, but we should not expect to be able to remove modifiers without losing meaning. Generally, we remove elements from a sentence to check the rest of the sentence for structural issues.
User avatar
DesiMozart
Joined: 10 Dec 2020
Last visit: 27 Nov 2022
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 64
Location: India
Schools: ISB '23
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V31
GRE 1: Q164 V157
GPA: 3.45
Schools: ISB '23
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V31
GRE 1: Q164 V157
Posts: 19
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone please add ‘meaning’ tag to this question?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,078
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,078
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DesiMozart
Can someone please add ‘meaning’ tag to this question?

______________________
Done. Thank you!
User avatar
Rickooreo
Joined: 24 Dec 2021
Last visit: 15 Feb 2023
Posts: 302
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 240
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.95
WE:Real Estate (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
Posts: 302
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can you please share your approach to eliminate each of the options

One of the comment mentioned that "it" in option B is ambiguous, if it is correct, isn't "it" in option A also ambiguous?
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,193
Own Kudos:
4,758
 [1]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,193
Kudos: 4,758
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rickooreo
Can you please share your approach to eliminate each of the options

One of the comment mentioned that "it" in option B is ambiguous, if it is correct, isn't "it" in option A also ambiguous?

Hello Rickooreo,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, you are correct; there is no ambiguity regarding "it" in Option B; the error in Option B is that the phrase "before there was Australia" illogically implies that many people living in England held a certain belief before Australia existed; the intended meaning is that many people living in England held a certain belief before Australia was known as Australia.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There is still a pronoun problem with B. Notice that in A, we are talking about how Australia (the place) was known before it was called Australia (the name). When we see "it," this pronoun clearly refers to Australia. However, B shifts to saying "before there was Australia." If we're describing a time before Australia existed, then we can't come in and say "it," since there is nothing for "it" to refer to. If Australia were at least the subject of the modifier, we might get away with it, as in a sentence like this: "Before space travel existed, it was depicted widely in literature and film." But when we just say "Before there was Australia," we are setting up for "there was X." So it's less that "it" is ambiguous--after all, there's no other noun for it to refer to--and more that it does not work in the context of B.

ExpertsGlobal5
Rickooreo
Can you please share your approach to eliminate each of the options

One of the comment mentioned that "it" in option B is ambiguous, if it is correct, isn't "it" in option A also ambiguous?

Hello Rickooreo,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, you are correct; there is no ambiguity regarding "it" in Option B; the error in Option B is that the phrase "before there was Australia" illogically implies that many people living in England held a certain belief before Australia existed; the intended meaning is that many people living in England held a certain belief before Australia was known as Australia.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
Afn24
Joined: 03 Aug 2021
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 195
Location: India
GMAT 1: 470 Q27 V28
GMAT 2: 590 Q43 V28
GMAT 3: 600 Q39 V34
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Good question,
I brought this question down to the bare minimum to get the answer
This isn't a skill-based question but a thinking question

In the minds of many people living in England, before Australia was Australia, it was the antipodes, .....Appositive, modifier(Dont focus)......., an obscure ................ place that was considered .................


(A) before Australia was Australia, it was the antipodes (People thought of the place that they knew as Antipodes as the end of the world) - Probably Correct

(B) before there was Australia, it was the antipodes (There cant be an Australia(physically) in the minds of people) - Wrong.

(C) it was the antipodes that was Australia - By now you understand why C and D can't be the Answer

(D) Australia was what was the antipodes

(E) Australia was what had been known as the antipodes (If it was in the minds of the people or if it was thought of as an obscure place, it couldn't have been know as Australia) - Wrong

Go for A.
avatar
jim441
Joined: 29 Apr 2022
Last visit: 14 Dec 2023
Posts: 193
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 276
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35 (Online)
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35 (Online)
Posts: 193
Kudos: 51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What is the role of " before australia was australia" in A? is it a modifier?
What is the antecedent of "it" in A? It can't be australia if the " before australia was australia" is a modifier.
User avatar
ReedArnoldMPREP
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2021
Last visit: 20 Dec 2024
Posts: 521
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Posts: 521
Kudos: 536
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jim441
What is the role of " before australia was australia" in A? is it a modifier?
What is the antecedent of "it" in A? It can't be australia if the " before australia was australia" is a modifier.

"Before Australia was Australia" is a clause, in this case. It introduces a clause for 'it' [Australia] being an 'antipode' to happen before.

The story we get is that:

Australia was an antipode.
Then
Australia became 'Australia.'

It's a little...stylish. But consider a less stylish, identical structure:

"Before the slab of wood was a stylish bench, it was garbage on the way to the dump."

The antecedent of 'it' is 'the slab of the wood.' The story we get:

The slab of wood was garbage on the way to the dump.
Then.
The slab of wood became a stylish bench.

The pronoun 'it' in both cases replaces the subject of the first clause, joined by the conjunction 'before.'

(Note also, there's no reason, to my knowledge, that a pronoun can't replace a noun that appears in a modifier).
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,835
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,835
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts