But won't AD only be bisector of angle A if D is the height on segment BC hence perpendicular? Could someone please explain this one?
I think what’s going on here.
Statement 1 we have that the areas of both triangles created by line AE have same areas. Well, we still don't know if this is the bisector of angle A. Put it this way, we could have that BC>AC, and thus compensating for the area, AD needs not to be the bisector of A. In other words, it will ONLY be the bisector of A is AD is perpendicular to BC, which we can't assume from this information
Statement 2 tells us that AD is NOT perpendicular to BC. We could have AD be the bisector of angle A (as in statement 1) if the triangle is constructed similarly. Likewise, we could have that AD stands somewhere else thus making the triangle have different areas. Clearly insufficient
Both together, we know that the areas are the same and that AD is NOT perpendicular to BC. Therefore, AD CANNOT be the bisector of angle A for the reasons explained above.
C stands
Thanks
Cheers
J