Last visit was: 13 Jul 2025, 06:28 It is currently 13 Jul 2025, 06:28
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,304
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,304
Kudos: 283
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 13 Jul 2025
Posts: 7,349
Own Kudos:
68,520
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,964
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,349
Kudos: 68,520
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
skycastle19
Joined: 22 Dec 2018
Last visit: 29 Jan 2021
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 94
Posts: 13
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bM22
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Last visit: 08 May 2024
Posts: 741
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,316
Location: India
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
skycastle19
Hi experts,

Could you please help explain why D for Q3 is wrong?
D says the main purpose of the passage is to "explain the underlying causes of a phenomenon"
"a phenomenon" refers to "to decrease inflation without causing a recession and its concomitant increase line in unemployment."
"explain the underlying causes" refers to the two explanations made by economists and policymakers.
Could you please help review what's wrong of this interpretation?

Thanks a lot!

Hi skycastle19,

Option D mentions: "explain the underlying causes of a phenomenon". Throughout the passage we can see that the author doesn't seem to be explaining anything. He starts the passage with an old accepted belief and goes on to examine the different perspectives of economists about that belief.
Explaining something would imply that author present his views with certain examples to make the readers understand something, which is not the case in this passage.

Hope this Helps.
Thanks.
avatar
skycastle19
Joined: 22 Dec 2018
Last visit: 29 Jan 2021
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 94
Posts: 13
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bm2201
skycastle19
Hi experts,

Could you please help explain why D for Q3 is wrong?
D says the main purpose of the passage is to "explain the underlying causes of a phenomenon"
"a phenomenon" refers to "to decrease inflation without causing a recession and its concomitant increase line in unemployment."
"explain the underlying causes" refers to the two explanations made by economists and policymakers.
Could you please help review what's wrong of this interpretation?

Thanks a lot!

Hi skycastle19,

Option D mentions: "explain the underlying causes of a phenomenon". Throughout the passage we can see that the author doesn't seem to be explaining anything. He starts the passage with an old accepted belief and goes on to examine the different perspectives of economists about that belief.
Explaining something would imply that author present his views with certain examples to make the readers understand something, which is not the case in this passage.

Hope this Helps.
Thanks.

Got it. Thanks for the help!
User avatar
lakshya14
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Jul 2022
Posts: 362
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 529
Posts: 362
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Despite passage stating the word "orthodox", why the answer for Q3 is not (C)?
User avatar
bM22
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Last visit: 08 May 2024
Posts: 741
Own Kudos:
766
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,316
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 741
Kudos: 766
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lakshya14
Despite passage stating the word "orthodox", why the answer for Q3 is not (C)?


Hi lakshya14,

Please refer the below reply by expert here:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/is-it-possible-to-decrease-inflation-without-causing-a-recession-and-i-200098.html#p2250291


Let us know if you still have doubts.

Thanks.
User avatar
ueh55406
Joined: 19 Dec 2020
Last visit: 31 Aug 2021
Posts: 151
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 316
Posts: 151
Kudos: 47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
one of the best GMAT prep passages I've come across, took 5.34 to read and get answers right. each question is so nuanced. +1 The Economist.
avatar
UserMaple5
Joined: 27 Apr 2021
Last visit: 24 Jul 2022
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 260
Posts: 45
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja

Could you please help explain question 2 ? I was stuck between Option A and Option D but I don't understand why Option D is wrong.

Thank you!!
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 13 Jul 2025
Posts: 7,349
Own Kudos:
68,520
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,964
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,349
Kudos: 68,520
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 2


UserMaple5
GMATNinja

Could you please help explain question 2 ? I was stuck between Option A and Option D but I don't understand why Option D is wrong.

Thank you!!
Question 2 asks us to strengthen the author's conclusion about wage and price controls.

He/she argues that:

  • wage and price controls eventually collapse, with the result that "hitherto-repressed inflation resurfaces," AND
  • price controls "do damage to the economy’s prospects for long-term growth."

Overall, the author thinks that wage/price controls are a pretty bad idea.

Does (D) strengthen this conclusion?
Quote:
(D) Policymakers who advocate the use of wage and price controls believe that these controls will deal with the underlying causes of inflation.
Hmm. (D) tells us about the believes of the people who advocate the use of wage/price controls -- they think that such controls deal with the underlying causes of inflation.

The author argues against these advocates. He/she thinks that wage controls will lead to pretty bad outcomes. So, does knowing the beliefs of the advocates strengthen the author's argument in any way?

Not that I can see. It provides some insight into the reasoning behind wage/price controls, but doesn't contribute in any way to the argument that these controls are a bad idea.

Contrast that to (A):
Quote:
(A) Countries that repeatedly use wage and price controls tend to have lower long-term economic growth rates than do other countries.
This provides great evidence for the author's claim that price controls "do damage to the economy’s prospects for long-term growth."

Eliminate (D), and (A) is the correct answer for question 2.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
anshul0130
Joined: 11 Oct 2020
Last visit: 26 Jan 2023
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 50
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma - I selected option B for question and I did review answer analysis shared by experts. However, can you explain why option B is incorrect ?

The passage suggests that the high inflation in the United States and many European countries in the
1980’s differed from inflation elsewhere in which of the following ways?
A. It fit the rational expectations theory of inflation but not the inertia theory of inflation.
B. It was possible to control without causing a recession.
C. It was easier to control in those countries by applying tight monetary and fiscal policies than it would have been elsewhere.
D. It was not caused by workers’ and employers’ expectations.
E. It would not necessarily be considered high elsewhere.

Thanks,
Anshul
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 11 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,101
Own Kudos:
74,300
 [1]
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,101
Kudos: 74,300
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PanpaliaAnshul
VeritasKarishma - I selected option B for question and I did review answer analysis shared by experts. However, can you explain why option B is incorrect ?

1. The passage suggests that the high inflation in the United States and many European countries in the
1980’s differed from inflation elsewhere in which of the following ways?
A. It fit the rational expectations theory of inflation but not the inertia theory of inflation.
B. It was possible to control without causing a recession.
C. It was easier to control in those countries by applying tight monetary and fiscal policies than it would have been elsewhere.
D. It was not caused by workers’ and employers’ expectations.
E. It would not necessarily be considered high elsewhere.

Thanks,
Anshul

We are given:
They point out that in the 1980’s, many European countries and the United States conquered high (by these countries’ standards) inflation, but only by applying tight monetary and fiscal policies that sharply increased unemployment.

1. The passage suggests that the high inflation in the United States and many European countries in the 1980’s differed from inflation elsewhere in which of the following ways?

(A) It fit the rational expectations theory of inflation but not the inertia theory of inflation.
Not given.

(B) It was possible to control without causing a recession.
We are given that it was controlled by tight monetary and fiscal policies that sharply increased unemployment. We are not given whether it did cause recession or not. In fact, it seems that they did cause recession because we are given "most economists agree that tight monetary and fiscal policies, which cause recessions, are necessary to..."
PanpaliaAnshul

(C) It was easier to control in those countries by applying tight monetary and fiscal policies than it would have been elsewhere.
Not given that in other countries it would have been harder to control.

(D) It was not caused by workers’ and employers’ expectations.
Not given that it was not caused by the “rational expectations” theory. The passage only mentions how it was controlled (by applying tight monetary and fiscal policies)

(E) It would not necessarily be considered high elsewhere.

Correct. Note "(by these countries’ standards)" given next to high inflation suggesting that it wasn't high by the standards of other countries.

Answer (E)
User avatar
udaypratapsingh99
Joined: 12 Jan 2019
Last visit: 04 Mar 2025
Posts: 399
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 372
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
anilnandyala
Source: GMATPrep Default Exam Pack

Is it possible to decrease inflation without causing a recession and its concomitant increase in unemployment? The orthodox answer is “no.” whether they support the “inertia” theory of inflation (that today’s inflation rate is caused by yesterday’s inflation, the state of the economic cycle, and external influences such as import prices) or the “rational expectations” theory (that inflation is caused by workers’ and employers’ expectations, coupled with a lack of credible monetary and fiscal policies), most economists agree that tight monetary and fiscal policies, which cause recessions, are necessary to decelerate inflation. They point out that in the 1980’s, many European countries and the United States conquered high (by these countries’ standards) inflation, but only by applying tight monetary and fiscal policies that sharply increased unemployment. Nevertheless, some governments’ policymakers insist that direct controls on wages and prices, without tight monetary and fiscal policies, can succeed in decreasing inflation. Unfortunately, because this approach fails to deal with the underlying causes of inflation, wage and price controls eventually collapse, the hitherto-repressed inflation resurfaces, and in the meantime, though the policymakers succeed in avoiding a recession, a frozen structure of relative prices imposes distortions that do damage to the economy’s prospects for long-term growth.

1. The passage suggests that the high inflation in the United States and many European countries in the 1980’s differed from inflation elsewhere in which of the following ways?

(A) It fit the rational expectations theory of inflation but not the inertia theory of inflation.
(B) It was possible to control without causing a recession.
(C) It was easier to control in those countries by applying tight monetary and fiscal policies than it would have been elsewhere.
(D) It was not caused by workers’ and employers’ expectations.
(E) It would not necessarily be considered high elsewhere.


2. Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the author’s conclusion about the use of wage and price controls?

(A) Countries that repeatedly use wage and price controls tend to have lower long-term economic growth rates than do other countries.
(B) Countries that have extremely high inflation frequently place very stringent controls on wages and prices in an attempt to decrease the inflation.
(C) Some countries have found that the use of wage and price controls succeeds in decreasing inflation but also causes a recession.
(D) Policymakers who advocate the use of wage and price controls believe that these controls will deal with the underlying causes of inflation.
(E) Policymakers who advocate the use of wage and price controls are usually more concerned about long-term economic goals than about short-term economic goals.


3. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) apply two conventional theories.
(B) examine a generally accepted position
(C) support a controversial policy
(D) explain the underlying causes of a phenomenon
(E) propose an innovative solution


Q2:

As 2 countries may have different economic growth rates, even if one country's growth slows down, it might still be more than the other country.
Does it make option A wrong for Q2 ?
User avatar
toothless123
Joined: 05 Apr 2020
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 19
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I had a doubt in Option A of Q2(price and wage policy). Option A talks about countries that repeatedly use price and wage controls, whereas author's conclusion doesn't clearly mention about repeated use of price wage controls. Can this be inferred from the passage or is it safe to assume that such policies will be applied repeatedly and not just once during a high inflation economic cycle?
Even though, I understand that this option is best out of all the options, my thought process regarding Option A is that maybe applying the policy repeatedly causes long term damage but we don't know the effect of applying it non-repeatedly (maybe applying this policy after a long time period once/ twice may not result in as much harm). And if author's conclusion doesn't mention the frequency then Option A may not actually support the conclusion.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 13 Jul 2025
Posts: 7,349
Own Kudos:
68,520
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,964
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,349
Kudos: 68,520
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 2


toothless123
I had a doubt in Option A of Q2(price and wage policy). Option A talks about countries that repeatedly use price and wage controls, whereas author's conclusion doesn't clearly mention about repeated use of price wage controls. Can this be inferred from the passage or is it safe to assume that such policies will be applied repeatedly and not just once during a high inflation economic cycle?
Even though, I understand that this option is best out of all the options, my thought process regarding Option A is that maybe applying the policy repeatedly causes long term damage but we don't know the effect of applying it non-repeatedly (maybe applying this policy after a long time period once/ twice may not result in as much harm). And if author's conclusion doesn't mention the frequency then Option A may not actually support the conclusion.
The right answer to this question should "most strengthen the author's conclusion about the use of wage and price controls." More specifically, it should strengthen the idea that wage and price controls ultimately "do damage to the economy’s prospects for long-term growth."

Notice that we aren't looking for something that conclusively proves the author's argument to be correct. Instead, we're looking for the answer choice that "most strengthens" it.

Let's consider (A) again:

Quote:
(A) Countries that repeatedly use wage and price controls tend to have lower long-term economic growth rates than do other countries.
This fact suggests that wage and price controls do in fact damage long-term growth. For that reason, (A) is correct.

Of course, it doesn't conclusively prove that wage and price controls damage long-term growth. Maybe other factors, aside from wage and price controls, are actually causing the damage in these countries? In other words, maybe what we're seeing is not a causal effect, but merely a correlation of wage and price controls with lower growth?

So (A) isn't airtight evidence that the author's argument is 100% correct. Nonetheless, it strengthens the conclusion better than any other answer choice.

As you point out, the author doesn't specify the number of times wage and price controls need to be implemented, or how extensively they need to be applied, to slow economic growth. And since the author doesn't give us specifics here, it probably won't help to fill in the gaps ourselves. In fact, doing so runs the risk of distorting the author's position. For instance, we wouldn't want to change the author's argument to "one application of wage and price controls is always sufficient to damage long-term economic growth." That would certainly distort the author's point of view, and throw off our analysis.

Instead, let's stick with author's general point that wage and price controls ultimately "do damage to the economy's prospects for long-term growth." Keeping the author's exact argument in mind, we can conclude that (A), while not conclusive proof, is the best answer of the five we're given.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
toothless123
Joined: 05 Apr 2020
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 19
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks so much GMATNinja, that helps!
User avatar
manhanld
Joined: 01 May 2023
Last visit: 24 Sep 2024
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 8
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi, I wonder why for question 2 B is wrong. Thankks
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,486
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,486
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
manhanld
Hi, I wonder why for question 2 B is wrong. Thankks
Question 2 asks the following:

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the author’s conclusion about the use of wage and price controls?

Let's find "the author’s conclusion about the use of wage and price controls."

It's the following from near the end of the pasage:

wage and price controls eventually collapse, the hitherto-repressed inflation resurfaces, and in the meantime, though the policymakers succeed in avoiding a recession, a frozen structure of relative prices imposes distortions that do damage to the economy’s prospects for long-term growth.

That must be the author's conclusion since every other conclusion presented by the passage is someone else's conclusion.

Now, let's consider choice (B) in question 2.

(B) Countries that have extremely high inflation frequently place very stringent controls on wages and prices in an attempt to decrease the inflation.

Notice that what choice (B) says about what countries do does not support the conclusion that "wage and price controls eventually collapse, the hitherto-repressed inflation resurfaces, and ... a frozen structure of relative prices imposes distortions that do damage to the economy’s prospects."

In other words, since the conclusion is about the outcome of using wage and price controls and choice (B) just describes how "stringent" the controls are, (B) does nothing to support the conclusion.

After all, the fact that the controls are stringent doesn't mean that the controls "eventually collapse" or that "inflation resurfaces" or that "a frozen structure of relative prices imposes distortions that do damage to the economy’s prospects for long-term growth."
User avatar
tinbq
Joined: 04 Nov 2016
Last visit: 26 May 2024
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 599
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.12
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38
Posts: 121
Kudos: 24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
patto
Would you please explain why B is the correct answer instead of C in question 3(primary purpose)?
Let's break down the passage to understand its primary purpose:

  • First, the author poses a question: "Is it possible to decrease inflation without causing a recession and... [an] increase in unemployment?
  • Then, the author gives the orthodox answer ("no,"), two theories behind this answer, and an example to support this assertion (US and Europe in the 1980's).
  • The author presents a policy that seeks to disprove the "orthodox answer": "direct controls on wages and prices, without tight monetary and fiscal policies, can succeed in decreasing inflation"
  • Finally, the author presents several negative consequences of enacting the policy above.

Now, take a look at (C):
Quote:
(C) support a controversial policy
You could argue that the "controversial policy" referenced here is using "direct controls on wages and prices" to decrease inflation without causing high unemployment (seen above in bullet point #3). The author does introduce this policy, but does not support it -- the last sentence of the passage lists the negative consequences of enacting such a policy in fairly strong terms, and the author does not defend the policy at all. Because of this, (C) cannot be the primary purpose of the passage.

Now look at (B):
Quote:
(B) examine a generally accepted position
Here, the "generally accepted position" is the "orthodox answer" to the author's question: no, it is not possible to decrease inflation without causing a recession and its concomitant increase in unemployment.

The author examines this position by explaining two theories behind it, presenting a policy that seeks to disprove it, and then listing the negative consequences of this policy. The overall purpose of the passage is to explore various aspects of the "orthodox answer" to the author's question, which is nicely captured in this answer choice. (B) is the correct answer to question #3.

I hope that helps!

Hi GMATNinja,

Can we consider tight monetary and fiscal policies as controversial policies (because some policymakers disagreed and they proposed a new approach)? If so, how do we eliminate choice C?

Thanks.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 13 Jul 2025
Posts: 7,349
Own Kudos:
68,520
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,964
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,349
Kudos: 68,520
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 3


tinbq
GMATNinja
patto
Would you please explain why B is the correct answer instead of C in question 3(primary purpose)?

Let's break down the passage to understand its primary purpose:

  • First, the author poses a question: "Is it possible to decrease inflation without causing a recession and... [an] increase in unemployment?
  • Then, the author gives the orthodox answer ("no,"), two theories behind this answer, and an example to support this assertion (US and Europe in the 1980's).
  • The author presents a policy that seeks to disprove the "orthodox answer": "direct controls on wages and prices, without tight monetary and fiscal policies, can succeed in decreasing inflation"
  • Finally, the author presents several negative consequences of enacting the policy above.

Now, take a look at (C):

Quote:
support a controversial policy

You could argue that the "controversial policy" referenced here is using "direct controls on wages and prices" to decrease inflation without causing high unemployment (seen above in bullet point #3). The author does introduce this policy, but does not support it -- the last sentence of the passage lists the negative consequences of enacting such a policy in fairly strong terms, and the author does not defend the policy at all. Because of this, (C) cannot be the primary purpose of the passage.

Now look at (B):

Quote:
examine a generally accepted position

Here, the "generally accepted position" is the "orthodox answer" to the author's question: no, it is not possible to decrease inflation without causing a recession and its concomitant increase in unemployment.

The author examines this position by explaining two theories behind it, presenting a policy that seeks to disprove it, and then listing the negative consequences of this policy. The overall purpose of the passage is to explore various aspects of the "orthodox answer" to the author's question, which is nicely captured in this answer choice. (B) is the correct answer to question #3.

I hope that helps!

Hi GMATNinja,

Can we consider tight monetary and fiscal policies as controversial policies (because some policymakers disagreed and they proposed a new approach)? If so, how do we eliminate choice C?

Thanks.

As you point out, the passage discusses monetary and fiscal policies. Nonetheless, there are two good reasons to eliminate (C).

First, while the author discusses tight monetary and fiscal policies, he or she never explicitly supports them. So what exactly does the author say about these policies? Basically, the following three things:

  • Most economists support them.
  • Some government's policymakers insist they aren't necessary to get out of a recession.
  • Relying on other methods to control inflation can "do damage to the economy’s prospects for long-term growth."

Notice that pointing out the negative consequences of failing to use a policy is different than supporting that policy. For that reason, we can't claim that supporting the policy is the primary purpose of the passage.

From another angle: is the policy really controversial? That would also be hard to defend. We know that the "orthodox" view, which is held by "most economists," is that the policies are necessary to control inflation. It's true that some government policy makers disagree, but it would be a stretch to conclude from this that the policy is controversial. The fact that it's an "orthodox" view supported by "most economists" makes it sound pretty uncontroversial.

For both of those reasons, we can eliminate (C).

I hope that helps!
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
15828 posts