Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 14:33 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 14:33
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
aadikamagic
Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Last visit: 04 Dec 2017
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
852
 [75]
Given Kudos: 14
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V32
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V32
Posts: 73
Kudos: 852
 [75]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
67
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,361
 [38]
16
Kudos
Add Kudos
22
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,361
 [13]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
aadikamagic
Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Last visit: 04 Dec 2017
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
852
 [4]
Given Kudos: 14
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V32
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V32
Posts: 73
Kudos: 852
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks Bunuel. The take away for me here is that we can always divide by squares without bothering about sign changes.
User avatar
shreyagmat
Joined: 06 Nov 2013
Last visit: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
17
 [3]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 10
Kudos: 17
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel, can you please explain this :"x < x^3 --> x(x^2 -1) > 0 --> (x + 1)x(x - 1) > 0 --> -1 < x < 0 or x > 1. Not sufficient."

"
i understand that " (x + 1)x(x - 1) > 0" and then the three roots are = 1,-1,0. Since the inequality is ">", x is " outside these values. But how did we come to "-1 < x < 0 or x > 1."

I came to :
x(x+1)(x-1)>0
either x>0 or (x+1)(x-1)>0

and then im lost. Please Help
User avatar
gmat6nplus1
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Last visit: 09 Jan 2019
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
678
 [2]
Given Kudos: 29
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GMAT 1: 590 Q40 V30
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
WE:Project Management (Media/Entertainment)
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
Posts: 141
Kudos: 678
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aadikamagic
Is x^5 > x^4?

(1) x^3 > −x
(2) 1/x < x


It can also quickly be solved thinking about ranges.

Is \(

x^5

>

x^4

\)?

If you think about it, the question is implicitly asking whether a value is greater than one. Indeed every other option (numbers smaller than -1; numbers between -1 and 0; numbers between 0 and 1) if plugged into the expression results in a false statement.

1) picking numbers you can figure out that:

I. the inequality is satisfied when our value is greater than zero. ( pick -1/3. (-1/3)^3 is never gonna be greater than [-(-1/3)]. Same reasoning holds for numbers <= than -1)
II. the inequality is satisfied for both proper fractions and values greater than 1.

NS

2) plugging in numbers you can figure out that the inequality is satisfied for values between both -1 and 0 and greater than 1.

NS

1+2) First statement rules out any value smaller than zero. second statement rules out any proper fraction. Our overlapping result is going to be a value grater than one, making us able to claim an answer.

C.

Hope it helps :)
gmat6nplus1.
User avatar
thefibonacci
Joined: 22 Jan 2014
Last visit: 30 Jan 2019
Posts: 130
Own Kudos:
265
 [1]
Given Kudos: 212
WE:Project Management (Computer Hardware)
Posts: 130
Kudos: 265
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is x^5 > x^4?

Is \(x^5 > x^4\)? --> reduce by x^4: is \(x > 1\)?

(1) x^3 > −x --> \(x(x^2 + 1) > 0\). Since \(x^2 + 1\) is always positive, then the second multiple, x, must also be positive. So, this statement implies that x > 0. Not sufficient.

(2) 1/x < x --> multiply by x^2 (it has to be positive, so we can safely do that): \(x < x^3\) --> \(x(x^2 -1) > 0\) --> \((x + 1)x(x - 1) > 0\) --> \(-1 < x < 0\) or \(x > 1\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of ranges from (1) and (2) is \(x > 1\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hi Bunuel

I was able to solve the ques by plugging in values but can you explain how did x < x^3 become x(x^2-1) > 0
how did you know x^3 would be a negative quantity and took it LHS and change the inequality sign?
Please explain.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,361
 [2]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,361
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thefibonacci
Bunuel
Is x^5 > x^4?

Is \(x^5 > x^4\)? --> reduce by x^4: is \(x > 1\)?

(1) x^3 > −x --> \(x(x^2 + 1) > 0\). Since \(x^2 + 1\) is always positive, then the second multiple, x, must also be positive. So, this statement implies that x > 0. Not sufficient.

(2) 1/x < x --> multiply by x^2 (it has to be positive, so we can safely do that): \(x < x^3\) --> \(x(x^2 -1) > 0\) --> \((x + 1)x(x - 1) > 0\) --> \(-1 < x < 0\) or \(x > 1\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of ranges from (1) and (2) is \(x > 1\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hi Bunuel

I was able to solve the ques by plugging in values but can you explain how did x < x^3 become x(x^2-1) > 0
how did you know x^3 would be a negative quantity and took it LHS and change the inequality sign?
Please explain.

x < x^3
0 < x^3 - x
0 < x(x^2 - 1), which is the same as x(x^2 - 1) > 0 .
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,325
Own Kudos:
3,837
 [2]
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,325
Kudos: 3,837
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shasadou
Is x^5 > x^4?

(1) x^3 > −x
(2) \(\frac{1}{x}\) < x

You are asked is \(x^5 > x^4\) ---> \(x^5-x^4>0\)---> \(x^4(x-1) > 0\) ----> as \(x^4 > 0\) for all x ---> the question basically asks us whether x>1 ?

Per statement 1,\(x^3 > −x\) ---> \(x^3 + x> 0\) ---> x(x^2+1)>0 ---> x>0 (as \(x^2+1 > 0\) for all x) but is x>1 ? no definite answer. Not sufficient.

Per statement 2, 1/x < x ---> 1/x - x<0 ---> (1-x^2)/x < 0 ---> (x^2-1)/x > 0 ---> (x+1)(x-1)/x > 0 ---> -1<x<0 or x>1 , again not sufficient to give you a definite answer.

Combining the 2 statements you get, x>1, thus giving a definite yes to the question asked.

C is thus the correct answer.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
77,000
 [7]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,000
 [7]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aadikamagic
Is x^5 > x^4?

(1) x^3 > −x
(2) 1/x < x

Responding to a pm:

All the given information can be manipulated to form factors. I have discussed how to deal with multiple factors in this video: https://youtu.be/PWsUOe77__E

Is x^5 > x^4?
Is x^5 - x^4 > 0?
Is x^4(x - 1) > 0?

We ignore the even powers because x^4 will never be negative. But we need to ensure that x should not be 0 for the inequality to hold.

Is (x - 1) > 0?
Is x > 1?

Statement 1: x^3 > −x

x^3 + x > 0
x(x^2 + 1) > 0
x^2 + 1 will always be positive.
So we see that x > 0.
But we need to know whether it is greater than 1. Greater than 0 could be 0.5 or it could be 2 (or any other number). So this is not sufficient to say whether x will eb greater than 1.
Not sufficient.

(2) 1/x < x
When the sign of x is not known, we do not multiply by x. We bring it to the o there side.
(1/x) - x < 0
(1 - x^2)/x < 0
(x^2 - 1)/x > 0
(x + 1)(x - 1)/x > 0
The transition points on the number line are -1, 0, and 1. The expression will be positive when x > 1 or -1 < x < 0. This alone is also not sufficient.

Both together we know that x is positive and x > 1 or -1 < x < 0.
So x > 1 is a must.
Sufficient.

Answer (C)
User avatar
pikolo2510
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Jul 2021
Posts: 448
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 294
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Posts: 448
Kudos: 778
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is x^5 > x^4?

Is \(x^5 > x^4\)? --> reduce by x^4: is \(x > 1\)?

(1) x^3 > −x --> \(x(x^2 + 1) > 0\). Since \(x^2 + 1\) is always positive, then the second multiple, x, must also be positive. So, this statement implies that x > 0. Not sufficient.

(2) 1/x < x --> multiply by x^2 (it has to be positive, so we can safely do that): \(x < x^3\) --> \(x(x^2 -1) > 0\) --> \((x + 1)x(x - 1) > 0\) --> \(-1 < x < 0\) or \(x > 1\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of ranges from (1) and (2) is \(x > 1\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hey Bunuel,

How can you divide the equation by x^4 throughout ? As we don't know the value of x. We can't do that right? what if x was 0 , then we can't reduce a equation by 0

Please let me know if I am wrong. Eager to hear back from you
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,361
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pikolo2510
Bunuel
Is x^5 > x^4?

Is \(x^5 > x^4\)? --> reduce by x^4: is \(x > 1\)?

(1) x^3 > −x --> \(x(x^2 + 1) > 0\). Since \(x^2 + 1\) is always positive, then the second multiple, x, must also be positive. So, this statement implies that x > 0. Not sufficient.

(2) 1/x < x --> multiply by x^2 (it has to be positive, so we can safely do that): \(x < x^3\) --> \(x(x^2 -1) > 0\) --> \((x + 1)x(x - 1) > 0\) --> \(-1 < x < 0\) or \(x > 1\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of ranges from (1) and (2) is \(x > 1\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hey Bunuel,

How can you divide the equation by x^4 throughout ? As we don't know the value of x. We can't do that right? what if x was 0 , then we can't reduce a equation by 0

Please let me know if I am wrong. Eager to hear back from you

If it were x^5 < x^4, then after dividing by x^4 we'd get x < 1 but x cannot be 0, so it would be x< 0 or 0 < x < 1.

x^5 > x^4 gives x > 1, so it's redundant to mention that x cannot be 0 because we got x > 1.
User avatar
mtk10
Joined: 02 Jan 2017
Last visit: 19 Mar 2018
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V34
GPA: 3.41
WE:Business Development (Accounting)
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V34
Posts: 46
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is x^5 > x^4?

Is \(x^5 > x^4\)? --> reduce by x^4: is \(x > 1\)?

(1) x^3 > −x --> \(x(x^2 + 1) > 0\). Since \(x^2 + 1\) is always positive, then the second multiple, x, must also be positive. So, this statement implies that x > 0. Not sufficient.

(2) 1/x < x --> multiply by x^2 (it has to be positive, so we can safely do that): \(x < x^3\) --> \(x(x^2 -1) > 0\) --> \((x + 1)x(x - 1) > 0\) --> \(-1 < x < 0\) or \(x > 1\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of ranges from (1) and (2) is \(x > 1\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.


Can we just reduce the equation by \(x^4\), when we do not the sign of the variables? Will that not be wrong?
If it is right to reduce by \(x^4\) in this question, how do we assess this for other questions? What do we base our judgment on to divide by variables?

Or is you reduced here because \(x^5> x^4\) could only hold if \(x>1\)?
Separate from the question above

if we manipulated the stem this way would it be right?
\(x^5 - x^4>0\)
\(x^4(x - 1)>0\)

Therefore
either \(x^4>0 --> x > 0\)

\(Or x >1\)

Kindly explain.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,361
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mtk10
Bunuel
Is x^5 > x^4?

Is \(x^5 > x^4\)? --> reduce by x^4: is \(x > 1\)?

(1) x^3 > −x --> \(x(x^2 + 1) > 0\). Since \(x^2 + 1\) is always positive, then the second multiple, x, must also be positive. So, this statement implies that x > 0. Not sufficient.

(2) 1/x < x --> multiply by x^2 (it has to be positive, so we can safely do that): \(x < x^3\) --> \(x(x^2 -1) > 0\) --> \((x + 1)x(x - 1) > 0\) --> \(-1 < x < 0\) or \(x > 1\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of ranges from (1) and (2) is \(x > 1\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.


Can we just reduce the equation by \(x^4\), when we do not the sign of the variables? Will that not be wrong?
If it is right to reduce by \(x^4\) in this question, how do we assess this for other questions? What do we base our judgment on to divide by variables?

Or is you reduced here because \(x^5> x^4\) could only hold if \(x>1\)?
Separate from the question above

if we manipulated the stem this way would it be right?
\(x^5 - x^4>0\)
\(x^4(x - 1)>0\)

Therefore
either \(x^4>0 --> x > 0\)

\(Or x >1\)

Kindly explain.

When dividing by negative value we should flip the sign of the inequality, when dividing by positive value we should keep the sign of the inequality. x^4 cannot be negative, so we can divide and write x > 1.

If it were x^5 < x^4, then after we divide by x^4, we'd get x < 1 but here we should mention that x ≠ 0 because if x = 0, then x^5 = x^4 = 0.
User avatar
energy2pe
Joined: 11 Mar 2018
Last visit: 17 Dec 2022
Posts: 86
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 121
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V41
GPA: 3.6
WE:Analyst (Energy)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is x^5 > x^4?

Is \(x^5 > x^4\)? --> reduce by x^4: is \(x > 1\)?

(1) x^3 > −x --> \(x(x^2 + 1) > 0\). Since \(x^2 + 1\) is always positive, then the second multiple, x, must also be positive. So, this statement implies that x > 0. Not sufficient.

(2) 1/x < x --> multiply by x^2 (it has to be positive, so we can safely do that): \(x < x^3\) --> \(x(x^2 -1) > 0\) --> \((x + 1)x(x - 1) > 0\) --> \(-1 < x < 0\) or \(x > 1\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of ranges from (1) and (2) is \(x > 1\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hi Bunuel,

From 2 it seems we are able to derive that x cannot equal 0 since 1/x < x and 1< x^2. Why then do we not just do as follows:

1 < x^2
0 < x^2 - 1
(x-1)(x+1) > 0

So, x>1 or x<-1.

Also, keeping in mind that:

1/x < x , then x>0.

Then, from the above x>1.

My tangential questions here would be how did you know to multiply both sides by x^2?

Thanks in advance.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,361
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
energy2pe
Bunuel
Is x^5 > x^4?

Is \(x^5 > x^4\)? --> reduce by x^4: is \(x > 1\)?

(1) x^3 > −x --> \(x(x^2 + 1) > 0\). Since \(x^2 + 1\) is always positive, then the second multiple, x, must also be positive. So, this statement implies that x > 0. Not sufficient.

(2) 1/x < x --> multiply by x^2 (it has to be positive, so we can safely do that): \(x < x^3\) --> \(x(x^2 -1) > 0\) --> \((x + 1)x(x - 1) > 0\) --> \(-1 < x < 0\) or \(x > 1\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of ranges from (1) and (2) is \(x > 1\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hi Bunuel,

From 2 it seems we are able to derive that x cannot equal 0 since 1/x < x and 1< x^2. Why then do we not just do as follows:

1 < x^2
0 < x^2 - 1
(x-1)(x+1) > 0

So, x>1 or x<-1.

Also, keeping in mind that:

1/x < x , then x>0.

Then, from the above x>1.

My tangential questions here would be how did you know to multiply both sides by x^2?

Thanks in advance.

Yes, since x is in the denominator, then it cannot be 0 but we still don't know its sign.

If x > 0, then when cross-multiplying 1/x < x we'd get 1 < x^2.
If x < 0, then when cross-multiplying 1/x < x we'd get 1 > x^2 (flip the sign when multiplying by negative value).

Next, when we multiply an inequality by a variable in even power (x^2, x^4, ...), we don't have to worry about its sing because a number in even power cannot be negative.

9. Inequalities




For more check Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread

User avatar
dcummins
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Last visit: 08 Oct 2025
Posts: 1,064
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is x^5 > x^4?

Is \(x^5 > x^4\)? --> reduce by x^4: is \(x > 1\)?

(1) x^3 > −x --> \(x(x^2 + 1) > 0\). Since \(x^2 + 1\) is always positive, then the second multiple, x, must also be positive. So, this statement implies that x > 0. Not sufficient.

(2) 1/x < x --> multiply by x^2 (it has to be positive, so we can safely do that): \(x < x^3\) --> \(x(x^2 -1) > 0\) --> \((x + 1)x(x - 1) > 0\) --> \(-1 < x < 0\) or \(x > 1\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of ranges from (1) and (2) is \(x > 1\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hey Bunuel

Why were you able to manipulate statement 1 and 2 without knowing the sign?

Is it because the only way for x^5 to be greater than x^4 is for x to be greater than 1? So you tested the statements on this basis?

Secondly,
Why did you multiply statement 2 by x^2? Is it because we don't know the sign but we do know that x^2 > 0?

Third,
The final statements say x>0 x>1 or x>-1 from statement 2, and x^2 +1>0 and x>0 from statement 1, so combined how did we conclude the intersection was >1?

I really found testing values easier with this one, but I'm really unsure how you went about your way.
I don't understand what you mean by second multiple also
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,361
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,361
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dcummins
Bunuel
Is x^5 > x^4?

Is \(x^5 > x^4\)? --> reduce by x^4: is \(x > 1\)?

(1) x^3 > −x --> \(x(x^2 + 1) > 0\). Since \(x^2 + 1\) is always positive, then the second multiple, x, must also be positive. So, this statement implies that x > 0. Not sufficient.

(2) 1/x < x --> multiply by x^2 (it has to be positive, so we can safely do that): \(x < x^3\) --> \(x(x^2 -1) > 0\) --> \((x + 1)x(x - 1) > 0\) --> \(-1 < x < 0\) or \(x > 1\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Intersection of ranges from (1) and (2) is \(x > 1\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hey Bunuel

Why were you able to manipulate statement 1 and 2 without knowing the sign?

Is it because the only way for x^5 to be greater than x^4 is for x to be greater than 1? So you tested the statements on this basis?

Secondly,
Why did you multiply statement 2 by x^2? Is it because we don't know the sign but we do know that x^2 > 0?

Third,
The final statements say x>0 x>1 or x>-1 from statement 2, and x^2 +1>0 and x>0 from statement 1, so combined how did we conclude the intersection was >1?

I really found testing values easier with this one, but I'm really unsure how you went about your way.
I don't understand what you mean by second multiple also

1. We can divide \(x^5 > x^4\) by x^4, because x^4 (x in even power) is non-negative, so we know the sign. This way we get simplified question: is \(x > 1\)?

2. In the firs statement we are not multiplying or dividing x^3 > −x. We are re-arranging it to get x^3 + x > 0, then factoring out x to get x(x^2 + 1) > 0. Here x is the one multiple and x^2 + 1 is another multiple. The product of two multiples to be positive both must have the same sign. Since x^2 + 1 = positive, the x, another multiple, must also be positive.

3. We are multiplying 1/x < x by x^2 to get x < x^3. Again we can do that because x^2 is non-negative.

4.
From (1) -------------------0-----------------------
From (2) --------1---------0---------1--------------------------------
Intersection: -----1---------0---------1--------------------------------
User avatar
gmexamtaker1
Joined: 16 Jul 2018
Last visit: 13 Feb 2023
Posts: 210
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 261
Products:
Posts: 210
Kudos: 79
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello guys ,
I have read in a comment on why x can't be 0 , but didn't understand the reasoning, I was wondering if someone could give an alternative explanation? As per my understanding what we have is, Is x^5>x^4 and I don't understand how we can exclude the possibility that x is 0, (and divide with x^4) , without the stem mentioning it.
User avatar
AnirudhaS
User avatar
LBS Moderator
Joined: 30 Oct 2019
Last visit: 25 Jun 2024
Posts: 811
Own Kudos:
872
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,575
Posts: 811
Kudos: 872
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
UNSTOPPABLE12
Hello guys ,
I have read in a comment on why x can't be 0 , but didn't understand the reasoning, I was wondering if someone could give an alternative explanation? As per my understanding what we have is, Is x^5>x^4 and I don't understand how we can exclude the possibility that x is 0, (and divide with x^4) , without the stem mentioning it.
let us substitute x=0 in (1)
\(x^3>-x\)
\(0^3>-0\)
\(0>0\) --> this cannot be possible

Similarly, let us substitute x=0 in (2)
\(\frac{1}{x}=\frac{1}{0}\) --> in GMAT we do not worry about undefined quantities, so we can safely assume x is not equal to 0
 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
496 posts