Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
21 May 2020, 14:50
Kudos
Bookmarks
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
96% (01:06) correct
5%
(01:09)
wrong
based on 400
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
It is good legal procedure to rehearse an argument before a group of practice jurors in order to assess whether they understand the argument and for observation of how they react to it.
A. in order to assess whether they understand the argument and for observation of how they react to it
B. so that whether they understand the argument and observation of how they react to it can be assessed
C. to assess whether or not they understand the argument and observing how they react to it
D. in order to assess whether they understand the argument and to observe how they react to it
E. so as to assess whether they understand the argument and for observation of how they react to it
SC16507
A. in order to assess whether they understand the argument and for observation of how they react to it
B. so that whether they understand the argument and observation of how they react to it can be assessed
C. to assess whether or not they understand the argument and observing how they react to it
D. in order to assess whether they understand the argument and to observe how they react to it
E. so as to assess whether they understand the argument and for observation of how they react to it
SC16507
Solving this question helps.
Taking a timed set of similar questions in
GMAT Club Forum Quiz →
is even better.
ArunSharma12
Joined: 25 Oct 2015
Last visit: 20 Jul 2022
Posts: 512
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 74
Location: India
Schools: IIML-IPMX '22 (A)
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38 (Online)
GPA: 4
Products:
21 May 2020, 22:58
Kudos
Bookmarks
Ans: D
It is good legal procedure to rehearse an argument before a group of practice jurors in order to assess whether they understand the argument and for observation of how they react to it.
A. in order to assess whether they understand the argument and for observation of how they react to it; for understand is not parallel to assess
B. so that whether they understand the argument and observation of how they react to it can be assessed; they understand.. and observation.. are not parallel
C. to assess whether or not they understand the argument and observing how they react to it; Redundancy issue.
D. in order to assess whether they understand the argument and to observe how they react to it; to assess and to observe are parallel
E. so as to assess whether they understand the argument and for observation of how they react to; for observation is not parallel. so as for observation is incorrect
It is good legal procedure to rehearse an argument before a group of practice jurors in order to assess whether they understand the argument and for observation of how they react to it.
A. in order to assess whether they understand the argument and for observation of how they react to it; for understand is not parallel to assess
B. so that whether they understand the argument and observation of how they react to it can be assessed; they understand.. and observation.. are not parallel
C. to assess whether or not they understand the argument and observing how they react to it; Redundancy issue.
D. in order to assess whether they understand the argument and to observe how they react to it; to assess and to observe are parallel
E. so as to assess whether they understand the argument and for observation of how they react to; for observation is not parallel. so as for observation is incorrect
ChiranjeevSingh
Expert
Tutor
Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 427
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 161
Status:Private GMAT Tutor
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: IIMA (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT Focus 2: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT Focus 3: 735 Q88 V87 DI84
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GRE 1: Q170 V168
Expert reply
30 Oct 2020, 02:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
Here's the official explanation provided by the GMAC for this question:
The underlined portion of the sentence cites two purposes of rehearsing a legal argument before a group of practice jurors: (1) to check whether the practice jurors understand the argument; (2) to observe their responses to the argument. The two purposes, signaled by in order to, are best expressed by two parallel phrases conjoined by and. The infinitive form to observe should be paralleled by the infinitive form to observe.
Option A: This answer choice fails because for observation is not parallel with to assess. For example, observation (unlike assess) is a noun, not a verb.
Option B: The use of the passive verb form be assessed leads to an unnecessarily awkward sentence form—for example the juxtaposition of the conjunctions so that and whether. Also, this version misstates what is to be assessed, namely, the jurors’ reactions rather than observation of those reactions. Alternatively, observation might be absurdly read as a direct object of understand, along with the argument.
Option C: The verbal noun form observing is not parallel with the infinitive verb form to assess, and the resulting sentence is ungrammatical. The words or not are verbiage that serves no purpose.
Option D: Correct. This version correctly conjoins two parallel phrases to express the purposes of rehearsing a legal argument. The infinitive verb-form to assess is parallel to the form to observe. Moreover, the noun clause whether … argument that is the object of assess is parallel with the noun clause how … it that is the object of observe.
Option E: This answer choice has a failure of parallelism: for observation is not parallel with to assess. Purpose can be correctly expressed by so as to, but the failure of parallelism is sufficient to make the resulting sentence incorrect.
The correct answer is D.
Please note that I'm not the author of this explanation. I'm just posting it here since I believe it can help the community.
The underlined portion of the sentence cites two purposes of rehearsing a legal argument before a group of practice jurors: (1) to check whether the practice jurors understand the argument; (2) to observe their responses to the argument. The two purposes, signaled by in order to, are best expressed by two parallel phrases conjoined by and. The infinitive form to observe should be paralleled by the infinitive form to observe.
Option A: This answer choice fails because for observation is not parallel with to assess. For example, observation (unlike assess) is a noun, not a verb.
Option B: The use of the passive verb form be assessed leads to an unnecessarily awkward sentence form—for example the juxtaposition of the conjunctions so that and whether. Also, this version misstates what is to be assessed, namely, the jurors’ reactions rather than observation of those reactions. Alternatively, observation might be absurdly read as a direct object of understand, along with the argument.
Option C: The verbal noun form observing is not parallel with the infinitive verb form to assess, and the resulting sentence is ungrammatical. The words or not are verbiage that serves no purpose.
Option D: Correct. This version correctly conjoins two parallel phrases to express the purposes of rehearsing a legal argument. The infinitive verb-form to assess is parallel to the form to observe. Moreover, the noun clause whether … argument that is the object of assess is parallel with the noun clause how … it that is the object of observe.
Option E: This answer choice has a failure of parallelism: for observation is not parallel with to assess. Purpose can be correctly expressed by so as to, but the failure of parallelism is sufficient to make the resulting sentence incorrect.
The correct answer is D.
Please note that I'm not the author of this explanation. I'm just posting it here since I believe it can help the community.
