GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 Oct 2019, 19:48

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

It is true that Washington Mudskippers shortstop Jason hit three home

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1348
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User
It is true that Washington Mudskippers shortstop Jason hit three home  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2017, 18:24
1
11
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (01:44) correct 33% (02:02) wrong based on 405 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

It is true that Washington Mudskippers shortstop Jason hit three home runs in a game last week. However, over the course of the Little League season, Jason has struck out in more than half of his at bats, and no player who strikes out that often is truly a great baseball player. Only truly great players deserve to be chosen for the Little League All-Star team, so none of the Mudskippers players deserve to be selected as All-Stars this year.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) Most of the Mudskippers players are truly terrible baseball players
(B) The entire Mudskippers team is currently embroiled in a major cheating scandal.
(C) The other players on Jason’s team are even less likely to be named to the All-Star team this year than is Jason himself.
(D) Jason is the best player on his baseball team.
(E) The other Mudskippers players will refuse to play for the All-Star team unless Jason is selected.

_________________
"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/
Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1348
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: It is true that Washington Mudskippers shortstop Jason hit three home  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2017, 19:52
2
ziyuen wrote:
It is true that Washington Mudskippers shortstop Jason hit three home runs in a game last week. However, over the course of the Little League season, Jason has struck out in more than half of his at bats, and no player who strikes out that often is truly a great baseball player. Only truly great players deserve to be chosen for the Little League All-Star team, so none of the Mudskippers players deserve to be selected as All-Stars this year.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) Most of the Mudskippers players are truly terrible baseball players
(B) The entire Mudskippers team is currently embroiled in a major cheating scandal.
(C) The other players on Jason’s team are even less likely to be named to the All-Star team this year than is Jason himself.
(D) Jason is the best player on his baseball team.
(E) The other Mudskippers players will refuse to play for the All-Star team unless Jason is selected.


OFFICIAL EXPLANATION


This question hinges on the idea of generalization. There's a huge gap when the fact pattern leaps from discussing Jason to reaching a conclusion about the entire Mudskippers baseball team. The total lack of information about whether other Mudskippers players might be deserving is a problem that will have to be remedied in order to strengthen the argument.

Answer A makes a valiant attempt in this regard; if most of the Mudskippers players are terrible, and we're given that only great players are deserving, then certainly most of the Mudskippers players are undeserving. However, the conclusion is that none of the players are deserving, and it's quite plausible that some Mudskippers could be deserving even if most are not.

Answer B plays on mental inertia; students may speculate that players embroiled in cheating scandals should not be named All-Stars, but nothing in the argument ever specifies this fact. Without support in the argument, we cannot conclude that this information would render the Mudskippers players undeserving.

Answer C recognizes that a comparison could be used to connect Jason with the rest of the Mudskippers team. However, this answer choice subtly misses the conclusion of the argument. The question isn't whether the players will be selected for the team -- it's whether any of the players deserve to be selected. Thus, answer C doesn't really address the gap in the argument at all.

Answer D is the correct answer. If Jason is the best player on his baseball team, then every other Mudskippers player is worse than Jason himself. But we already know that Jason, because of his excessive strikeout rate, is not a truly great baseball player. Thus, none of Jason's inferior teammates are truly great players either. And only great players deserve to be chosen. So D does, in fact, strengthen the conclusion that none of the Mudskippers deserve to be All-Stars.

Answer E again misses the conclusion. Whether the Mudskippers will play has nothing to do with whether any of them are deserving of selection for the All-Star team.

D is correct.
_________________
"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 Oct 2017
Posts: 1
It is true that Washington Mudskippers shortstop Jason hit three home  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2018, 13:18
Don't agree totally with the explanation.
The steam gives a very precise way to classify a "trully great baseball player": someone who doesn't "strikes out that often". Steam also brings that the requirement to be on the All star team is be a "trully great player".

D gives me an absolute statment that does not guarantee that any of the other players would fit the classification of "trully great player" - A player can, for instance, be the best on striking, but still don't be the best player - on this case, he would deserve to be selected to All Star Team, by the requirements definition.

C, on the other hand, brings a direct comparision between Jason and the rest of the team, saying that the others would be even less likely to join. Regardless the reason for that (probably they are worse than Jason on striking), It gives a better ground to guarantee that no other player can be classified as "trully great player" (as Jason already cannot be classified), and, by that, cannot join the All Star Team.

So, with this reasoning, C is the best answear for this one.
Director
Director
User avatar
D
Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Posts: 607
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
GPA: 3.97
WE: Project Management (Investment Banking)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: It is true that Washington Mudskippers shortstop Jason hit three home  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2019, 02:10
i am confused between C and D.
I feel C is also a good contender.
The other players on Jason’s team are even less likely to be named to the All-Star team this year than is Jason himself.: that means if it is not Jason there is no other player also.
However D says Jason is the best player but the argument never says that only best play should go in league
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 20 Aug 2017
Posts: 21
Reviews Badge
Re: It is true that Washington Mudskippers shortstop Jason hit three home  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2019, 21:10
Dear GMATNinja nightblade354 gmat1393

Could you please look at this question.
It seems that answer should be C.
_________________
"If a street performer makes you stop walking, you owe him a buck"
"If this post helped you on your GMAT journey, drop a +1 Kudo "
Director
Director
User avatar
D
Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Posts: 607
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
GPA: 3.97
WE: Project Management (Investment Banking)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: It is true that Washington Mudskippers shortstop Jason hit three home  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2019, 22:06
nitinaroraaa wrote:
Dear GMATNinja nightblade354 gmat1393

Could you please look at this question.
It seems that answer should be C.

No, as per veritasprep , answer is D
even i checked the question back at veritas it is D
Veritas Prep Representative
User avatar
S
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 409
Re: It is true that Washington Mudskippers shortstop Jason hit three home  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jun 2019, 15:56
Top Contributor
nitinaroraaa wrote:
Dear GMATNinja nightblade354 gmat1393

Could you please look at this question.
It seems that answer should be C.


There's a glaring problem with C that's subtle but really important. The argument is all about who is DESERVING of being on the all-star team:

so none of the Mudskippers players deserve to be selected as All-Stars this year


But C is only about who is LIKELY to be named to the all-star team. And that's not the same thing as being deserving (we don't know, for example, that the process for naming people to the team has anything to do with being deserving (maybe it's a random drawing, maybe it's voting done by players so it turns into a "who's more popular" contest, etc.). That word shift is subtle but really important: we need to determine who's deserving, not who's likely, and all we know is that 1) Jason is not deserving, and 2) anyone who strikes out more than half the time is not deserving because they're not a great player.

Where D comes in is that it's much more closely tied to the argument (in which "great player" and "deserving" are linked). We know that Jason is not a great player by definition, and so if everyone else on his team is less great than he is, then none of them are great players and so none deserve to be named all-stars.

Functionally this is a generalization issue: we only know about one player on the Mudskippers, Jason, and the conclusion makes a claim about all the players. In a generalization case, a good answer choice candidate is one that can draw a line that begins or ends at the one case you know about (all other data points are greater than or less than the one you know...at that point you're much more likely to be able to draw a conclusion about "all" because the one data point tells you something about all of them).
_________________
Brian

Curriculum Developer, Instructor, and Host of Veritas Prep On Demand

Save $100 on live Veritas Prep GMAT Courses and Admissions Consulting

Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews
GMAT Club Bot
Re: It is true that Washington Mudskippers shortstop Jason hit three home   [#permalink] 02 Jun 2019, 15:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

It is true that Washington Mudskippers shortstop Jason hit three home

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne