Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
$84 + an extra $10 off for the first month of EMPOWERgmat access. Train to be ready for Round 3 Deadlines with EMPOWERgmat's Score Booster. Ends April 21st Code: GCENHANCED
Christina scored 760 by having clear (ability) milestones and a trackable plan to achieve the same. Attend this webinar to learn how to build trackable milestones that leverage your strengths to help you get to your target GMAT score.
The Easter Bunny brings … the first day of school?? Yes! Now is the time to start studying for the GMAT if you’re planning to apply to Round 1 of fall MBA programs. Get a special discount with the Easter sale!
What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips, and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL. Save your spot today!
Jane started baby-sitting when she was 18 years old.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 02 Oct 2013, 09:56
4
24
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
85% (hard)
Question Stats:
41% (01:33) correct 59% (01:11) wrong based on 479 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Jane started baby-sitting when she was 18 years old. Whenever she baby-sat for a child, that child was no more than half her age at the time. Jane is currently 32 years old, and she stopped baby-sitting 10 years ago. What is the current age of the oldest person for whom Jane could have baby-sat?
When she sat initially Jane's age = 18, and the child's max age = 9
10 yrs back, she was 22 yrs old, so the child's age max age possible = 22/2 = 11
So the child would be now 22 + 10 = 21 yrs old
Answer - B
I got the answer right but Jane started baby sitting at 18 max age of child at that time will be 9 Jane left baby sitting at the age of 22 At that time age of child will be 11 As current age of jane is 32 Current age of child will be 11+10=21
I want to discuss the trap answer 23
Jane started baby sitting at 18 max age of child at that time will be 9 As current age of jane is 32 Current age of child will be 9+14=23
Take away we need to imply the statement as mentioned in the Word Problem.
M i correct... Basically i also want to discuss the strategy for solving Word Problems Generally I write as i read any implied statement and following this strategy since childhood & comfortable with it.But my friend told that your strategy is wrong.
Pls comment
D (23) is not a trap answer, it's a correct answer.
Jane started baby-sitting when she was 18 years old. Whenever she baby-sat for a child, that child was no more than half her age at the time. Jane is currently 32 years old, and she stopped baby-sitting 10 years ago. What is the current age of the oldest person for whom Jane could have baby-sat? A. 20 B. 21 C. 22 D. 23 E. 24
Check two extreme cases: Jane = 18, child = 9, years ago = 32-18 = 14 --> child's age now = 9+14 = 23; Jane = 22, child = 11, years ago = 32-22 = 10 --> child's age now = 11+10 = 21.
Jane started baby-sitting when she was 18 years old. Whenever she baby-sat for a child, that child was no more than half her age at the time. Jane is currently 32 years old, and she stopped baby-sitting 10 years ago. What is the current age of the oldest person for whom Jane could have baby-sat?
(a) 20 (b) 21 (c) 22 (d) 23 (e) 24
Jane's Age Then
Oldest Child's Age Then
Years Elapsed so far
The same Child's Age now
18
9
14
9+14=23
19
9.5
13
9.5+13=22.5
20
10
12
10+12=22
21
10.5
11
10.5+11=21.5
22
11
10
11+10=21
Now,
The current age of the oldest person among the people she ever baby-sat=23 The current age of the oldest person she ever baby-sat=21
Jane started baby-sitting when she was 18 years old. Whenever she baby-sat for a child, that child was no more than half her age at the time. Jane is currently 32 years old, and she stopped baby-sitting 10 years ago. What is the current age of the oldest person for whom Jane could have baby-sat?
(a) 20 (b) 21 (c) 22 (d) 23 (e) 24
As far as I remember think the OA has to be D. when Jane was 18 = the child was 9 yrs old after 14 years 9+14 = 23 .. the question is asking oldest person (now) , for whom jane have baby sat. The question isn't asking the oldest person ( at the point of baby -sitting), for whom Jane baby sat. In this case it would have been 21(11+10)
Jane started baby-sitting when she was 18 years old. Whenever she baby-sat for a child, that child was no more than half her age at the time. Jane is currently 32 years old, and she stopped baby-sitting 10 years ago. What is the current age of the oldest person for whom Jane could have baby-sat?
(a) 20 (b) 21 (c) 22 (d) 23 (e) 24
As far as I remember think the OA has to be D. when Jane was 18 = the child was 9 yrs old after 14 years 9+14 = 23 .. the question is asking oldest person (now) , for whom jane have baby sat. The question isn't asking the oldest person ( at the point of baby -sitting), for whom Jane baby sat. In this case it would have been 21(11+10)
But the Question is asking for whom Jane could have baby-sat? _________________
when jane is 18, the oldest she could have baby sat = 9 yr old
as jane is 32 . i.e after 14 years that oldest baby would be 9+14 = 23
Answer is 23 D.
there is another post out there where they are asking for youngest .
if the question is asking for youngest then answer is 21 . if its asking for oldest then it got to be 23.
Old post: Jane started baby-sitting when she was 18 years old, however, she only baby-sat children that were, at most, half her age. Jane is currently 32 years old, and she stopped baby-sitting ten years ago. What is the current age of the youngest child that Jane could have baby-sat?
When she sat initially Jane's age = 18, and the child's max age = 9
10 yrs back, she was 22 yrs old, so the child's age max age possible = 22/2 = 11
So the child would be now 22 + 10 = 21 yrs old
Answer - B
I got the answer right but Jane started baby sitting at 18 max age of child at that time will be 9 Jane left baby sitting at the age of 22 At that time age of child will be 11 As current age of jane is 32 Current age of child will be 11+10=21
I want to discuss the trap answer 23
Jane started baby sitting at 18 max age of child at that time will be 9 As current age of jane is 32 Current age of child will be 9+14=23
Take away we need to imply the statement as mentioned in the Word Problem.
M i correct... Basically i also want to discuss the strategy for solving Word Problems Generally I write as i read any implied statement and following this strategy since childhood & comfortable with it.But my friend told that your strategy is wrong.
Pls comment
_________________
The proof of understanding is the ability to explain it.
When she sat initially Jane's age = 18, and the child's max age = 9
10 yrs back, she was 22 yrs old, so the child's age max age possible = 22/2 = 11
So the child would be now 22 + 10 = 21 yrs old
Answer - B
I got the answer right but Jane started baby sitting at 18 max age of child at that time will be 9 Jane left baby sitting at the age of 22 At that time age of child will be 11 As current age of jane is 32 Current age of child will be 11+10=21
I want to discuss the trap answer 23
Jane started baby sitting at 18 max age of child at that time will be 9 As current age of jane is 32 Current age of child will be 9+14=23
Take away we need to imply the statement as mentioned in the Word Problem.
M i correct... Basically i also want to discuss the strategy for solving Word Problems Generally I write as i read any implied statement and following this strategy since childhood & comfortable with it.But my friend told that your strategy is wrong.
Pls comment
D (23) is not a trap answer, it's a correct answer.
Jane started baby-sitting when she was 18 years old. Whenever she baby-sat for a child, that child was no more than half her age at the time. Jane is currently 32 years old, and she stopped baby-sitting 10 years ago. What is the current age of the oldest person for whom Jane could have baby-sat? A. 20 B. 21 C. 22 D. 23 E. 24
Check two extreme cases: Jane = 18, child = 9, years ago = 32-18 = 14 --> child's age now = 9+14 = 23; Jane = 22, child = 11, years ago = 32-22 = 10 --> child's age now = 11+10 = 21.
Answer: D.
Thanks Bunuel
Whats the best strategy for solving Word Problems.
_________________
The proof of understanding is the ability to explain it.
Whats the best strategy for solving Word Problems.
It really depends on the question itself, there is no general "best strategy". Check this: word-problems-made-easy-87346.html, it might helps in word translation.
_________________
Re: Jane started baby-sitting when she was 18 years old.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Feb 2015, 14:08
Hi melissamartin,
This question comes with a minor "twist" - you have to account for the number of years SINCE Jane baby-sat any of those children.
We're told that that the children were no more than HALF of Jane's age at the time AND we have to account for the change in time since Jane baby-sat each child.
When Jane was.... 18....the oldest a child could have been was 9. Since that was 14 years ago, the child would now be 9+14 = 23
20....the oldest a child could have been was 10, but that was 12 years ago, so the child would now be 10+12 = 22
22....the oldest a child could have been was 11, but that was 10 years ago, so the child would now be 11+10 = 21
This oldest that any of those children could be NOW is 23.
Re: Jane started baby-sitting when she was 18 years old.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Jul 2017, 08:54
The question clearly says that the age of the child is no more than half of Janes age at the time of baby sitting. So The age of 18 years the oldest child whom she baby sat was < 9 years so the maximum age is 8 and the maximum age of the oldest child when she baby sat The age of 22 is < 11 years. Where am I going wrong in my understanding of the problem??
Re: Jane started baby-sitting when she was 18 years old.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Jul 2017, 09:26
muthappashivani wrote:
The question clearly says that the age of the child is no more than half of Janes age at the time of baby sitting. So The age of 18 years the oldest child whom she baby sat was < 9 years so the maximum age is 8 and the maximum age of the oldest child when she baby sat The age of 22 is < 11 years. Where am I going wrong in my understanding of the problem??
No no more than half her age does not mean less than half her age.
The correct relationship is \(\{baby's \ age\} \leq \frac{\{Jane's \ age\}}{2}\).
_________________
Jane started baby-sitting when she was 18 years old.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Feb 2018, 14:35
i think wording of the question matters very much.
Had the question been, what is current age of oldest child, she could have baby-sat, then answer is 21. (Even i fell for this) but actual question is , what is current age of oldest person, she could have baby-sat, then answer is 23 (as shown above)
Re: Jane started baby-sitting when she was 18 years old.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Mar 2019, 22:05
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
close
41% (01:33) correct 
