GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Feb 2019, 23:27

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Free GMAT Prep Hour

February 20, 2019

February 20, 2019

08:00 PM EST

09:00 PM EST

Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. Wednesday, February 20th at 8 PM EST

February 21, 2019

February 21, 2019

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

Kick off your 2019 GMAT prep with a free 7-day boot camp that includes free online lessons, webinars, and a full GMAT course access. Limited for the first 99 registrants! Feb. 21st until the 27th.

# Juror anonymity was unknown to American common law and

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 725
Juror anonymity was unknown to American common law and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 17 Jan 2019, 13:02
1
2
Question 1
00:00

based on 28 sessions

70% (03:41) correct 30% (02:19) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

based on 28 sessions

11% (01:57) correct 89% (01:51) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Juror anonymity was unknown to American common law and jurisprudence in the country?s first two centuries. Anonymity was first employed in federal prosecutions of organized crime in New York in the 1980's. Although anonymous juries are unusual since they are typically only empanelled in organized-crime cases, its use has spread more recently to widely publicized cases, such as the federal prosecution of police officers accused of beating Rodney King and the trial of those accused of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. In these cases, attorneys selected a jury from a panel of prospective jurors whose names, addresses, ethnic backgrounds and religious affiliations remained unknown to either side. This unorthodox procedure, designed to protect jurors from outside influence and the fear of retaliation, has occasionally been employed in New York federal courts since the trial of drug kingpin Leroy "Nicky" Barnes. Despite apparent benefits, critics assail anonymous juries on the grounds that they are an infringement of the sixth amendment guarantee of an impartial jury and because they present a serious and unnecessary erosion of the presumption of innocence. Since many attorneys believe trials are frequently won or lost during jury selection, any procedure diminishing the role of counsel in the procedure necessitates close scrutiny and criticism. Opponents of anonymous juries argue that the procedure restricts meaningful voir dire, (questioning of the jury panel), and thereby undermines the defendant's sixth amendment right to an impartial jury. Critics also claim that jurors interpret their anonymity as proof of the defendant's criminal proclivity, thereby subverting the presumption of innocence. However, consistent with due process and the sixth amendment, the trial judge may refuse to ask prospective jurors any questions not reasonably calculated to expose biases or prejudices relevant to the case. Although addresses and group affiliations may indicate significant potential for bias, attorneys do not have an unfettered right to this information in every circumstance. Denying access to these facts may indeed constrain an attorney's ability to assemble an ideal jury, but it violates no constitutional right.

1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

A. Enumerate reasons why anonymous juries are unconstitutional
B. Discuss whether anonymous juries are an infringement of the sixth amendment
C. Identify a shortcoming in a scholarly approach to jurisprudence
D. Define the concept of anonymous juries and explore efforts taken over the last twenty years to increase their use
E. Review strategies for ensuring that anonymous juries will not infringe on the constitutional right to a fair trial of one?s peers

2. It can be inferred from the passage that a jurors ethnic background and religious affiliation

A. Is considered by defendants not to have a significant effect on the outcome of their trials
B. Is considered by defendants to have a significant effect on the outcome of their trials
C. Would be unlikely to have a significant effect on the verdict of a trial
D. Is considered by attorneys likely to have a significant effect on the verdict of a trial
E. Is considered by attorneys unlikely to have a significant effect on the verdict of a trial in a widely publicized case

Originally posted by gmat1220 on 15 Apr 2011, 02:21.
Last edited by Gladiator59 on 17 Jan 2019, 13:02, edited 2 times in total.
Edit 1:Formatted, added timers (workout) Edit 2: Fixed option D in Q1.
Intern
Joined: 30 May 2011
Posts: 8
Re: Juror anonymity was unknown to American common law and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2011, 11:42
Though I got the answer wrong for the second question, here goes my understanding..

It can be inferred from the last line that it'll not have any effect.. so that should be our inference. Note " Although addresses and group affiliations may indicate significant potential for bias"... The author is presenting a conflicting view here which is our inference....

gmat1220 wrote:
Juror anonymity was unknown to American common law and jurisprudence in the country?s first two centuries. Anonymity was first employed in federal prosecutions of organized crime in New York in the 1980's. Although anonymous juries are unusual since they are typically only empanelled in organized-crime cases, its use has spread more recently to widely publicized cases, such as the federal prosecution of police officers accused of beating Rodney King and the trial of those accused of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. In these cases, attorneys selected a jury from a panel of prospective jurors whose names, addresses, ethnic backgrounds and religious affiliations remained unknown to either side. This unorthodox procedure, designed to protect jurors from outside influence and the fear of retaliation, has occasionally been employed in New York federal courts since the trial of drug kingpin Leroy "Nicky" Barnes. Despite apparent benefits, critics assail anonymous juries on the grounds that they are an infringement of the sixth amendment guarantee of an impartial jury and because they present a serious and unnecessary erosion of the presumption of innocence. Since many attorneys believe trials are frequently won or lost during jury selection, any procedure diminishing the role of counsel in the procedure necessitates close scrutiny and criticism. Opponents of anonymous juries argue that the procedure restricts meaningful voir dire, (questioning of the jury panel), and thereby undermines the defendant's sixth amendment right to an impartial jury. Critics also claim that jurors interpret their anonymity as proof of the defendant's criminal proclivity, thereby subverting the presumption of innocence. However, consistent with due process and the sixth amendment, the trial judge may refuse to ask prospective jurors any questions not reasonably calculated to expose biases or prejudices relevant to the case. Although addresses and group affiliations may indicate significant potential for bias, attorneys do not have an unfettered right to this information in every circumstance. Denying access to these facts may indeed constrain an attorney's ability to assemble an ideal jury, but it violates no constitutional right.

1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. Enumerate reasons why anonymous juries are unconstitutional
B. Discuss whether anonymous juries are an infringement of the sixth amendment
C. Identify a shortcoming in a scholarly approach to jurisprudence
D. Define the concept of anonymous juries and explore efforts taken over the last twenty
E. years to increase their use Review strategies for ensuring that anonymous juries will not infringe on the constitutional right to a fair trial of one?s peers

2. It can be inferred from the passage that a jurors ethnic background and religious affiliation
A. Is considered by defendants not to have a significant effect on the outcome of their trials
B. Is considered by defendants to have a significant effect on the outcome of their trials
C. Would be unlikely to have a significant effect on the verdict of a trial
D. Is considered by attorneys likely to have a significant effect on the verdict of a trial
E. Is considered by attorneys unlikely to have a significant effect on the verdict of a trial in a widely publicized case

1. B
2. C

When I read the passage - the author seems to be questioning the juror anonymity. And I also read that defendant is not in favor of this as it seems to violate his right to impartial jury. So the answer to Q2 should be B. Am I missing something here? How can the author infer "no effect" on the trial when juror anonymity may be against the sixth amendment ?? Is this because of the last line -
Denying access to these facts may indeed constrain an attorney's ability to assemble an ideal jury, but it violates no constitutional right.
MBA Section Director
Affiliations: GMATClub
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 2097
Concentration: Nonprofit
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: Juror anonymity was unknown to American common law and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2019, 20:38

+1 kudos to all the posts containing proper explanations for all questions

_________________
Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2016
Posts: 94
Re: Juror anonymity was unknown to American common law and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2019, 11:59
1
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

A. Enumerate reasons why anonymous juries are unconstitutional Passage moreover relates to Introduction of AJ, usage of AJ, How critics view AJ, how anonymity is maintained, and AJs being in line with US laws, it is not enumerating reasons for it being unconstitutional
B. Discuss whether anonymous juries are an infringement of the sixth amendment Passage talks about whether anonymous juries are for/ against sixth amendment, Lets keep it
C. Identify a shortcoming in a scholarly approach to jurisprudence No, No shortcoming mentioned
D. Define the concept of anonymous juries and explore efforts taken over the last twenty years to increase their use -Passage does not narrate the efforts taken to increase their use
E. Review strategies for ensuring that anonymous juries will not infringe on the constitutional right to a fair trial of one?s peers - No strategies discussed - Out

Ans: B

2. It can be inferred from the passage that a jurors ethnic background and religious affiliation

A. Is considered by defendants not to have a significant effect on the outcome of their trials Not mentioned
B. Is considered by defendants to have a significant effect on the outcome of their trials Close, passage does say- Critics also claim that jurors interpret their anonymity as proof of the defendant's criminal proclivity, thereby subverting the presumption of innocence. but this is critics claim not authors
C. Would be unlikely to have a significant effect on the verdict of a trial Passage says Although addresses and group affiliations may indicate significant potential for bias, something may indicate potential bias, but apparently there is no bias - lets keep it
D. Is considered by attorneys likely to have a significant effect on the verdict of a trial Not mentioned
E. Is considered by attorneys unlikely to have a significant effect on the verdict of a trial in a widely publicized case Not mentioned

Ans: C
Re: Juror anonymity was unknown to American common law and   [#permalink] 23 Jan 2019, 11:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by