gmat2013s
105.
Marconi’s conception of the radio was as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation; instead, it is precisely the opposite, a tool for communicating with a large, public audience.
(B) Marconi conceived of the radio as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation, but which is
(C) Marconi conceived of the radio as a tool for private conversation that could substitute for the telephone; instead, it has become
CONFUSION BETWEEN ANS CHOICE B & C [Error analysis]
Pronoun - Why in ans choice B - Which [ DC ] cant refer to radio
How ans choice C- It in IC 2 refers back to radio?
Modifier- Also there is modifier placement [ a tool for private conversation ] issue with original choice and answer choice C ? Where the modifier should be placed ?
Tense - Use of present perfect tense in correct answer choice C. Can I not use is as mentioned in the original choice and answer choice B ?
Meaning analysis
1. Marconi had a conception of the radio that it could be used as a substitute for telephone
2. But the use of radio is precisely the opposite
Dear
gmat2013s,
I'm happy to help.
Question #1In
(B), "
which is ..." begins a modifying clause. There are a few problems here. First of all, a modifying clause generally touches the noun is modifies --- the
Modifier Touch Rule, and this clause doesn't touch "
radio." See this link for more on the Modifier Touch Rule:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/modifiers- ... orrection/Second, the GMAT uses "
which" exclusively for non-restrictive, non-vital modifiers, so this doesn't fit here. For more on these, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/that-vs-which-on-the-gmat/https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... modifiers/Finally, the use of the "
which" clause does something funky to the parallelism. It would be perfectly fine to have two "
as" prepositions in parallel, a second one in parallel with "
as a tool ..." It would also be perfectly fine to have two independent clauses, as
(C) has. The structure in
(B) though,
conceived of A as B, but which ... It is certainly not parallel, and because of this, it feels awkward. We know that the "
which" should modify "
radio", but that's way over in another part of the sentence, so the antecedent of "
which" is grammatically unclear. This is a very poor design for the sentence.
Question #2Unlike a modifier, a pronoun can appear in a distant part of a sentence, not touching the noun to which it refers. That is a HUGE difference between pronouns and modifiers. After the "
but", the "
which" is very strange, because it's not touching the thing it modifies, but this is no problem for the pronoun "
it."
What is the antecedent of the pronoun "
it" in
(C)? Well, in the first half of the sentence, there are a few singular nouns, but I would really say that "
radio" is the star and focus of the first half. If you had to sum up in one word what the topic of the first half of the sentence was, it's absolutely unambiguous that this one word would be "
radio." Therefore, when the "
it" appears in the second half, it's absolutely unambiguous that it refers to "
radio." What justifies this exclusive focus is not anything in the grammar, but the logic and meaning. Folks mistakenly think that GMAT SC is only about grammar. Not true. Logic and meaning are much much more important than grammar.
Question #3(B) Marconi conceived of the radio as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation, ...
Think about this. Here, the phrase "
a tool for private conversation" modifies "
telephone", explaining to us what a telephone is. That's ridiculous! What person over the age of six need any explanation about what a telephone is? This is entirely absurd!!
Also, think: did Marconi say "
I want to invent a new substitute"? Or did he say, "
I want to invent a new tool"? There's something subtly illogical about Marconi conceiving of his invention primarily as a substitute. That's really a level of subtlety a little beyond what the GMAT would test, but notice that incorrect answers on the GMAT SC, in addition to having something 100% clear and bonafide wrong, also are sprinkled with these subtle logical mistakes.
Now, think about
(C)'s phrasing:
(C) Marconi conceived of the radio as a tool for private conversation that could substitute for the telephone...
This is far superior. Now, the phrase "
a tool for private conversation" is how Marconi thought of the radio ---- that's surprising and interesting, because it's different from the way we think about the radio! It's placement here is interesting and thought-provoking. By contrast, it's placement in
(B) is mind-numbingly uninteresting. Marconi invents a "
tool", and this "
tool" can also be a "
substitute" --- far more logical.
Question #4The choice of tense is not black & white. A few different options would be completely acceptable. It would be 100% correct in this context to say:
(a)
... instead, it is precisely the opposite, ... (b)
... instead, it became precisely the opposite, ..(c)
... instead, it has become precisely the opposite, ..The GMAT would not consider any of those "
wrong" in the sense of something that would make an answer choice incorrect. Of these three, the present perfect, the third option, is the best. The present perfect tense shows an action that began in the past and, in some way, still continues to the present moment. It is perfect for a situation in which an action happened in the past but the influence of the action continues to the present moment --- in that sense, the action is still "with us." It was a while ago, probably in Marconi's own time, that folks figured out that the radio would not work as a private communication device, and it became a tool for large-scale broadcasting. That happened a while ago, but the effect of that revisioning is still with us, insofar as we still listen to radio and use in precisely the same way in the present day. This situation makes the present perfect tense ideal, although, once again, neither of the other two would be "
wrong" on the GMAT. Here's a blog on the perfect tenses:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-verb- ... ct-tenses/For all these reasons,
(B) is highly flawed, and
(C) is a wonderfully clear & logical choice.
Does all this make sense?
Mike