I got accepted to the same three schools with similar scholarship offers. I think Georgetown is out for me because the lack of scholarship $ combined with DC cost of living would make it a very expensive two years, and I don't think Georgetown is significantly stronger than ND or IU to make up that difference.
Thinking about ND compared to IU, it seems like Kelley is slightly more well regarded as a MBA, but ND is a much more prestigious university as a whole. I'm struggling to figure out how to weigh the relative strengths of the individual programs vs the institutions as a whole in my decision making.
Poets and quants lets you export rankings data to excel for the past five years, so I looked at how all three of these programs have tracked in that time. I took an average of the six publications that they include for each year. Kelley is strongest, and at times creeps up to the mid to high teens some years for some publications, while Mendoza and McDonough have years where some publications drop them into the 30s. I lined graphed it but can't embed a screenshot because i just joined this site. you can remove the spaces in this if you want to look: i m g u r.c o m/a/mA6xW
I've gone back and forth on Mendoza or Kelley several times since getting decisions, and I am still up in the air, but wanted to share my thought process so far since it sounds like we are in similar positions. Both have small, close-knit cultures with strong midwest presences, but I think you have the ability to move anywhere with either of these degrees if you really want to. I really love the Kelley programs (Me Inc, Academies), but having a degree from Notre Dame would be incredible. I don't think there is necessarily a bad choice, but I am torn.
I am going to try to get in touch with some more students before the ND deposit is due.