Last visit was: 08 Nov 2024, 16:57 It is currently 08 Nov 2024, 16:57
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
605-655 Level|   Assumption|   Weaken|            
User avatar
whichscore
Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Last visit: 06 Nov 2021
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
433
 [125]
Given Kudos: 32
Concentration: Finance, Strategic Management, International Management
Posts: 42
Kudos: 433
 [125]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
118
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
tarunk31
Joined: 25 Feb 2014
Last visit: 20 Jul 2022
Posts: 181
Own Kudos:
452
 [24]
Given Kudos: 147
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Products:
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Posts: 181
Kudos: 452
 [24]
17
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ashkanator
Joined: 16 Mar 2011
Last visit: 29 May 2012
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
20
 [6]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 135
Kudos: 20
 [6]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
gmat1220
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Last visit: 17 Feb 2020
Posts: 467
Own Kudos:
917
 [3]
Given Kudos: 123
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Products:
Posts: 467
Kudos: 917
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D means that 4 countries in question had no stable trade, hence cannot serve as the model

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
crick20002002
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Last visit: 05 Oct 2012
Posts: 285
Own Kudos:
544
 [1]
Given Kudos: 37
Status:Prep started for the n-th time
Posts: 285
Kudos: 544
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D it is.

The conclusion overtly states that : 4 countries have had relatively stable trade share.

D attacks by giving evidence that the share being constant in 1953 and 1984 does not mean that the shares were constant within the time frame.

Crick
User avatar
TirthankarP
Joined: 29 Apr 2013
Last visit: 10 Jan 2016
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
918
 [2]
Given Kudos: 53
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT Date: 11-06-2013
WE:Programming (Telecommunications)
Posts: 81
Kudos: 918
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
whichscore
Of the countries that were the world’s twenty largest exporters in 1953, four had the same share of total world exports in 1984 as in 1953. Theses countries can therefore serve as models for those countries that wish to keep their share of the global export trade stable over the years.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the suitability of those four countries as models in the sense described?

(A) Many countries wish to increase their share of world export trade, not just keep it stable.
(B) Many countries are less concerned with exports alone than with the balance between exports and imports.
(C) With respect to the mix of products each exports, the four countries are very different from each other.
(D) Of the four countries, two had a much larger, and two had a much smaller, share of total world exports in 1970 than in 1984.
(E) The exports of the four countries range from 15 percent to 75 percent of the total national output.

I was confused between A and D.
But then I again read the conclusion and understood that the conclusion is talking about only those countries that wish to keep their share of the global export trade stable over the years.

A says - Many countries wish to increase their share of world export trade, not just keep it stable
That's why A is irrelevant.
User avatar
vikrantgulia
Joined: 18 Oct 2013
Last visit: 23 Oct 2022
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
283
 [3]
Given Kudos: 36
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Finance
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V21
GMAT 2: 530 Q49 V13
GMAT 3: 590 Q49 V21
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V21
GMAT 2: 530 Q49 V13
GMAT 3: 590 Q49 V21
Posts: 62
Kudos: 283
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer is D

A: Even though many country wish to increase their share but it can be possible that many those country are below in share than these countries. So A is incorrect
B:Many countries are less concerned with exports alone than with he balance between exports and imports. Out of scope.
C: With respect to the mix of products each exports, the four countries are very different from each other. Out of scope.
D: Of the four countries, two had a much larger, and two had a much smaller, share of total world exports in 1970 than in 1984. It cast doubt on stable export as the export varies in 1970 and 1984.So conclusion got weaken export trade stable over the years. So it is correct.
E:The exports of the four countries range from 15 percent to 75 percent of the total national output. It does not weaken conclusion

+1 for me.cheers. :P
avatar
OptimusPrepJanielle
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Last visit: 08 Sep 2017
Posts: 1,787
Own Kudos:
1,407
 [1]
Given Kudos: 23
Expert reply
Posts: 1,787
Kudos: 1,407
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
batliwala
Of the countries that were the worldтАЩs twenty largest exporters in 1953, four had the same share of total world exports in 1984 as in 1953. Theses countries can therefore serve as models for those countries that wish to keep their share of the global export trade stable over the years.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the suitability of those four countries as models in the sense described?

(A) Many countries wish to increase their share of world export trade, not just keep it stable.
(B) Many countries are less concerned with exports alone than with he balance between exports and imports.
(C) With respect to the mix of products each exports, the four countries are very different from each other.
(D) Of the four countries, two had a much larger, and two had a much smaller, share of total world exports in 1970 than in 1984.
(E) The exports of the four countries range from 15 percent to 75 percent of the total national output

As per the premise, the countries can serve as a model if they keep share constant.
Although the share is same in 1953 and 1984, but what if the share varied in between. In such case, we cannot say them as models

Option D says just the same by saying that the shares were different in 1970

Correct Option: D
User avatar
abhishekdadarwal2009
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Last visit: 07 Dec 2022
Posts: 533
Own Kudos:
448
 [3]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
Posts: 533
Kudos: 448
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Of the countries that were the worlds twenty largest exporters in 1953, four had the same share of total world exports in 1984 as in 1953. Theses countries can therefore serve as models for those countries that wish to keep their share of the global export trade stable over the years.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the suitability of those four countries as models in the sense described?



The conclusion of the argument is that these four countries can serve as models for those countries that are trying to keep a stable share of the global trade.

To find the answer that weakens the argument in a best way lets try process of elimination



A. Many countries wish to increase their share of world export trade, not just keep it stable.
Good for those countries.. :P , but the argument is not concerned that some countries want to increase the share, the argument focuses on to keeping the share stable.so its not actually weakening the argument as to why the countries are choosen to be models.

B. Many countries are less concerned with exports alone than with he balance between exports and imports.
yeah sure..., sounds like phrase some whould say to sound intelligent.. :P , but its not in the scope of our argument as the arguemtn is not discussing about the inport vs the export,and focuses on trade share overall.

C. With respect to the mix of products each exports, the four countries are very different from each other.
well all countries have a unique set of trade goods and hardly any is alike. but the what constitutes the traded products is also out of scope.it doesnt weaken the argument in any way.


D. Of the four countries, two had a much larger, and two had a much smaller, share of total world exports in 1970 than in 1984.

correct weakener as it shows that the trade share for the four counties respectively were not stable, so if thye shares were not stable how can they be modles to other counties. therefore correct weakener.

E. The exports of the four countries range from 15 percent to 75 percent of the total national output.
this also does not weakne the argument as the TNO cannot weaken the argument
User avatar
ahabib
Joined: 12 Dec 2018
Last visit: 27 May 2020
Posts: 99
Own Kudos:
125
 [1]
Given Kudos: 101
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V41
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V41
Posts: 99
Kudos: 125
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
whichscore
Of the countries that were the world’s twenty largest exporters in 1953, four had the same share of total world exports in 1984 as in 1953. Theses countries can therefore serve as models for those countries that wish to keep their share of the global export trade stable over the years.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the suitability of those four countries as models in the sense described?

As long as you can summarize the argument and understand the question this is easy, so we gotta take time to make sure that's understood.


Summary: Exports in 53' = 84', therefore stable throughout years

Prethink: What if there was a lot of fluctuation in the middle?



(A) Many countries wish to increase their share of world export trade, not just keep it stable.

Irrelevant, the passage specifically mentions that these countries serve as models for STABLE trade, which is what we want. We don't care about improving trade.


(B) Many countries are less concerned with exports alone than with the balance between exports and imports.

Irrelevant. What they are concerned (or not) with is outside the scope.

(C) With respect to the mix of products each exports, the four countries are very different from each other.

Irrelevant. This doesn't matter, we're not getting into the details, we just want big picture stuff that helps trade stay STABLE.

(D) Of the four countries, two had a much larger, and two had a much smaller, share of total world exports in 1970 than in 1984.

Sounds like fluctuations (Aligns with Prethinking). Good

(E) The exports of the four countries range from 15 percent to 75 percent of the total national output.

Irrelevant. Totally outside the scope of the passage and question.
User avatar
dcummins
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Last visit: 18 Jul 2024
Posts: 1,077
Own Kudos:
2,213
 [1]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
Posts: 1,077
Kudos: 2,213
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1984
A – 20%
B– 20%
C– 20%
D– 20%
1953
A – 20%
B– 20%
C– 20%
D– 20%

Conclusion: these countries can serve as models for those countries that wish to keep their share of the global export trade stable over the years

D highlights that actually, no, the 4 countries in question weren't "stable over the years" as they deviated in 1970, thus casting doubt on the argument that these 4 countries can serve as a model for stable trade.
User avatar
mSKR
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,322
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,322
Kudos: 874
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Any 2nd opinion on option B?

What if some countries continue to export way much higher than import such that the strategy is not worth follow . Then in this case , even export remains stable , it is not good for economy as the country could be in loss with time.
or we should ignore B because we don't care how they made this export stable. it is worth to follow the strategy

Please give your opinion
Usually I don't ignore such options when the manner that how conclusion is achieved could be be important .

btw, i rejected option D - was my 2nd preference.
-> it went from ups and downs but finally it maintained its percentage share. So it is worth noting how these 4 countries managed in 30 years.
Moreover it is not important how much percentage they maintained these years. The key point is they didn't go bankrupt
So I assume this option is worth strengthening the conclusion instead of weakening.

please share your opinion on my thinking for option B and D.
GMATGuruNY MartyTargetTestPrep AnthonyRitz BrightOutlookJenn GMATNinja
User avatar
AnthonyRitz
User avatar
Stacy Blackman Consulting Director of Test Prep
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Last visit: 08 Nov 2024
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
403
 [3]
Given Kudos: 166
Affiliations: Stacy Blackman Consulting
Location: United States (DC)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
GPA: 3.11
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 237
Kudos: 403
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mSKR
Any 2nd opinion on option B?

What if some countries continue to export way much higher than import such that the strategy is not worth follow . Then in this case , even export remains stable , it is not good for economy as the country could be in loss with time.
or we should ignore B because we don't care how they made this export stable. it is worth to follow the strategy

Please give your opinion
Usually I don't ignore such options when the manner that how conclusion is achieved could be be important .

btw, i rejected option D - was my 2nd preference.
-> it went from ups and downs but finally it maintained its percentage share. So it is worth noting how these 4 countries managed in 30 years.
Moreover it is not important how much percentage they maintained these years. The key point is they didn't go bankrupt
So I assume this option is worth strengthening the conclusion instead of weakening.

please share your opinion on my thinking for option B and D.
GMATGuruNY MartyTargetTestPrep AnthonyRitz BrightOutlookJenn GMATNinja

There is no way that B could work here, but I think the problem is that you're not sufficiently focused on the stated conclusion. You're speculating, and that's just not what the GMAT is about.

Specifically, the question asks us to consider

Quote:
the suitability of those four countries as models in the sense described.


What "sense" is that? The sense in which

Quote:
These countries can therefore serve as models for those countries that wish to keep their share of the global export trade stable over the years. [emphasis added]

The key word here is export. Should countries in the real world care about their imports? ... Maybe? Who knows? I'm not an economist, and I'm not their mom.

But also: Who cares? We don't live in the real world. We live in GMAT-land. The argument tells us that exports are all that matters! And in GMAT-land we only care about whatever the argument tells us to care about.

As a result, we simply don't care about any countries that, as B describes, are

Quote:
less concerned with exports alone than with the balance between exports and imports.

So that's why B is wrong.

Your understanding of D was also incorrect. You said that

Quote:
it is not important how much percentage they maintained these years.

Yes it is! The conclusion is literally about these countries' exports' stability.

You also said that

Quote:
The key point is they didn't go bankrupt

No it isn't! The key point is that these countries' exports were not stable! They went up and back down, or down and back up, or generally anywhere but "flat and consistent."

Again you seem to care about some phantom point about what's good for the countries or their economies or something irrelevant like that. We're not here to show off our macroeconomics skillz! We're here to address the stated arguments, those arguments' conclusions, and the gaps in those arguments' reasoning leading up to those conclusions. That's it.

The conclusion was that these countries are good models of stability in exports. But D says that they weren't -- their exports went up and down. That's a weakener, and the one and only right answer. Period.
User avatar
kittle
Joined: 11 May 2021
Last visit: 08 Nov 2024
Posts: 318
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 546
Products:
Posts: 318
Kudos: 151
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
whichscore
Of the countries that were the world’s twenty largest exporters in 1953, four had the same share of total world exports in 1984 as in 1953. Theses countries can therefore serve as models for those countries that wish to keep their share of the global export trade stable over the years.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the suitability of those four countries as models in the sense described?


(A) Many countries wish to increase their share of world export trade, not just keep it stable.

(B) Many countries are less concerned with exports alone than with the balance between exports and imports.

(C) With respect to the mix of products each exports, the four countries are very different from each other.

(D) Of the four countries, two had a much larger, and two had a much smaller, share of total world exports in 1970 than in 1984.

(E) The exports of the four countries range from 15 percent to 75 percent of the total national output.

GMATNinja - Can you please help me figure out why option E is wrong? If there is a range in which the exports of four countries vary, doesn't that doubt the stability ? Please help­
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 08 Nov 2024
Posts: 7,112
Own Kudos:
65,625
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,855
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,112
Kudos: 65,625
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kittle

GMATNinja - Can you please help me figure out why option E is wrong? If there is a range in which the exports of four countries vary, doesn't that doubt the stability ? Please help
The passage talks about countries that "had the same share of total world exports in 1984 as in 1953." For example, maybe Morocco accounted for 3% of all of the exports in the world in 1953, and also 3% of all exports in the world in 1984. Additionally, maybe Papua New Guinea accounted for 1% of all of the exports in the world in 1953, and also 1% of all exports in the world in 1984.

The author argues that other countries that want to have similar stability can look to these countries as models.

Take another look at the exact wording of (E):

Quote:
The exports of the four countries range from 15 percent to 75 percent of the total national output.
(E) compares exports to national output. Or, in other words, how much a particular country produces in total, vs. how much that country exports.

Going back to the Morocco example: maybe its exports, which amount to 3% of total world exports, account for 15% of Morocco's national output. The other 85% of stuff produced in Morocco stays in Morocco.

In Papua New Guinea, on the other hand, maybe that 1% of world exports accounts for 75% of all of the stuff produced in Papua New Guinea, and only 25% of that national output stays within the country.

This kind of variation has no impact on the author's argument. As long as the "model" countries have stability in their share of total world exports, then the author is happy.

That's why we can eliminate (E).

I hope that helps!
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 17,939
Own Kudos:
Posts: 17,939
Kudos: 896
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7112 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts