Kunni
Hi,
I understood why C is correct. Could you please tell me why is A, B, D & E are incorrect?
Regards
Kunal
Hello, Kunal. I will draw attention to the problematic areas of the other answer choices below.
SajjadAhmad
On this issue, this state’s elected officials ignored the wishes of their electorate, which cannot reasonably be disputed in light of the legislative record.
(A) On this issue, this state’s elected officials ignored the wishes of their electorate, which
A
which clause cannot be used to modify an action (verb), and it would not make sense to indicate that
the electorate cannot reasonably be disputed.
SajjadAhmad
(B) This state’s elected officials, ignoring on this issue the wishes of their electorate,
The idiom appears to be
ignoring on, which would be incorrect. You could place commas around the prepositional phrase and retain the vital meaning, but I would still say the construct was less direct and harder to follow:
This state's elected officials, ignoring, on this issue, the wishes of their electorate...SajjadAhmad
(C) That this state’s elected officials ignored the wishes of their electorate
There is nothing wrong with this
that clause as the subject, and the language is straightforward in the S-V-DO construct.
SajjadAhmad
(D) On this issue, the wishes of the electorate were ignored by this state’s elected officials, and
If you look at the barebones structure of the main clause, you get a comma error:
the wishes of the electorate were ignored, and cannot reasonably be disputed... If the sentence is supposed to indicate that the wishes were ignored and
that fact cannot be disputed, then we either need a subject for the second independent clause or we need to delete the comma.
SajjadAhmad
(E) That the wishes of the electorate on this issue were ignored by this state’s elected officials
Why did I not put any text in
red? Because there is, in fact, nothing grammatically wrong with this choice. However, the passive construct is adopted instead of the active one in (C); here, we have wishes that were ignored, whereas (C) has officials
doing the ignoring. Also, it is harder to follow left-branching sentences than their active, right-branching counterparts. We get a lot of information between
wishes and
officials before we reach the verb of the main clause. That is, by the time we reach that verb, we are just beginning to wrap our head around the subject. Now, I have seen official questions that opt for a longer construct than a condensed or concise one, especially when it comes to possessive nouns, but in this case, I see no reason why (C) would
not be preferred over (E) (notwithstanding the omitted
on this issue).
I hope that helps. If anyone feels strongly about (E), I would be open to hearing your thoughts.
- Andrew