GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Jul 2018, 20:18

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

13 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Posts: 189
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GMAT Date: 11-23-2015
GPA: 3.6
WE: Science (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jul 2015, 09:05
13
17
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

78% (01:17) correct 22% (01:32) wrong based on 1675 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region with a large mosquito population. Since mosquitoes lay their eggs in standing water, flooded fields would normally attract mosquitoes, yet no mosquitoes were found in the fields. Diallyl sulfide, a major component of garlic, is known to repel several species of insects, including mosquitoes, so it is likely that diallyl sulfide from the garlic repelled the mosquitoes.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) Diallyl sulfide is also found in onions but at concentrations lower than in garlic.

(B) The mosquito population of the region as a whole was significantly smaller during the year in which the flooding took place than it had been in previous years.

(C) By the end of the summer, most of the garlic plants in the flooded fields had been killed by waterborne fungi.

(D) Many insect species not repelled by diallyl sulfide were found in the flooded garlic fields throughout the summer.

(E) Mosquitoes are known to be susceptible to toxins in plants other than garlic, such as marigolds.
Most Helpful Community Reply
6 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Posts: 189
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GMAT Date: 11-23-2015
GPA: 3.6
WE: Science (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jul 2015, 10:50
6
3
Hello,

I think analysis of this question is as follows:

Premise 1: Garlic fields in region with high mosquito population

Premise 2: Since mosquitoes lay their eggs in standing water, flooded fields would normally attract mosquitoes

Counter premise: Yet no mosquitoes were found in the fields.

Conclusion: Reason for low population of mosquito's is Diallyl sulfide, a major component of garlic, which is known to repel several species of insects, including mosquitoes.

So whats going on here? A field located in area of high mosquito population and additional risk of even higher mosquito population (due to standing water, flood etc) than the surrounding high population mosquito area.

Question stem: Which of following strengthen the argument???

I don't think no cause - no effect is appropriate justification for correct choice.

Argument can be strengthen in one of following ways:

1. Stating a unstated assumption

2. Support or elaborate existing premise

3. New support premise

etc.......

Analysis of answer choices:

(A) Diallyl sulfide is also found in onions but at concentrations lower than in garlic.

Out of Scope

(B) The mosquito population of the region as a whole was significantly smaller during the year in which the flooding took place than it had been in previous years.

Population of mosquito in a particular year has nothing to do with conclusion. Even if population is higher, same or smaller (at most we are only concerned about relationship of population from surrounding area), it does not have any impact


(C) By the end of the summer, most of the garlic plants in the flooded fields had been killed by waterborne fungi.

So that means, it this is the case then probably something else is responsible for low mosquito population. Possibly a weakner at most, but mainly it have no impact on argument.



(D) Many insect species not repelled by diallyl sulfide were found in the flooded garlic fields throughout the summer.

CORRECT. Well this is new supporting premise.

Many other species not repelled by diallyl sulfide are available in the fields. So, we have a reason to believe that since diallyl sulfide repeal mosquito not some other insect species hence mosquito population is low.


(E) Mosquitoes are known to be susceptible to toxins in plants other than garlic, such as marigolds.

Out of scope again. Similar to A

Regards
Vikas

Please hit kudos, if it helps. It will be very motivating.
General Discussion
2 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: Getting strong now, I'm so strong now!!!
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 507
Location: India
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jul 2015, 10:26
2
Ahh this is the first question i lay my hands from the new og. Also thanks for posting such questions.
D. Sulphide present ----> no mosquito
Therefore no cause ---> no effect.
Option d says
No problem from sulphide therefore other insects are present
_________________

Regards,

S

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

4 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Posts: 182
Location: United States
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT Date: 10-16-2013
GPA: 3
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jul 2015, 07:27
4
3
[quote="vikasbansal227"]One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region with a large mosquito population. Since mosquitoes lay their eggs in standing water, flooded fields would normally attract mosquitoes, yet no mosquitoes were found in the fields. Diallyl sulfide, a major component of garlic, is known to repel several species of insects, including mosquitoes, so it is likely that diallyl sulfide from the garlic repelled the mosquitoes.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

The Gmat loves to test logic similar to thats given here in this argument.
Premise - No mosquites found in garlic fields flooded with water.
Conclusion - DS ( Dialllyl Sulphide) found in garlic repelled the mosquitoes.

This argument is of type X ->Y where X is DS and Y is mosquitoes repelled.
We can strengthen the argument in two ways :
Either we limit out other choices which can result in Y or we can provide additional evidence that X results in Y.

Here Choice D is such an answer choice where we are limiting other factors which can result in mosquito repeals.


(A) Diallyl sulfide is also found in onions but at concentrations lower than in garlic.

(B) The mosquito population of the region as a whole was significantly smaller during the year in which the flooding took place than it had been in previous years.

(C) By the end of the summer, most of the garlic plants in the flooded fields had been killed by waterborne fungi.

(D) Many insect species not repelled by diallyl sulfide were found in the flooded garlic fields throughout the summer.
Limiting out other potential factors which could repeal mosquitoes. If other insect species , which are not repelled by DS then it is possible that DS is responsible for mosquito repeals.
Lets take an opposite of this answer choice - If many other insect species were also not found in the fields this particular year - this would mean that some other factor such as maybe extreme environment or poor water quality could result in insect species getting repelled (including mosquitoes).

(E) Mosquitoes are known to be susceptible to toxins in plants other than garlic, such as marigolds.
_________________

Kudos me if you like my post !!!!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2013
Posts: 84
Re: One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2015, 00:39
is it just me finding the language/subject matter of the CR arguments/options significantly different from that of the previous og versions??
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 207
Location: India
GMAT 1: 570 Q50 V19
GMAT 2: 650 Q49 V28
GMAT 3: 690 Q50 V34
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Oct 2015, 12:48
Unfortunately, I am also feeling the same :oops:

arnabs wrote:
is it just me finding the language/subject matter of the CR arguments/options significantly different from that of the previous og versions??

_________________

Middle of nowhere!

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 562
Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 580 Q46 V24
GPA: 3.88
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Nov 2015, 16:33
1
1
WillGetIt wrote:
One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region with a large mosquito population. Since mosquitoes lay their eggs in standing water, flooded fields would normally attract mosquitoes, yet no mosquitoes were found in the fields. Diallyl sulfide, a major component of garlic, is known to repel several species of insects, including mosquitoes, so it is likely that diallyl sulfide from the garlic repelled the mosquitoes.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) Diallyl sulfide is also found in onions but at concentrations lower than in garlic.

(B) The mosquito population of the region as a whole was significantly smaller during the year in which the flooding took place than it had been in previous years.

(C) By the end of the summer, most of the garlic plants in the flooded fields had been killed by waterborne fungi.

(D) Many insect species not repelled by diallyl sulfide were found in the flooded garlic fields throughout the summer.

(E) Mosquitoes are known to be susceptible to toxins in plants other than garlic, such as marigolds.

Regards
Vikas

Please hit kudos if you like this post


To be honest it's a really poorly constructed question for an official one. So we are looking fot something that says that garlic field repelled the mosquitoes...

(A) Diallyl sulfide is also found in onions but at concentrations lower than in garlic. --> clearly out of scope
(B) The mosquito population of the region as a whole was significantly smaller during the year in which the flooding took place than it had been in previous years. --> Great, if true it only weakens the argument that garlic fields repelled mosquitoes

(C) By the end of the summer, most of the garlic plants in the flooded fields had been killed by waterborne fungi -->one more weakener, if garlic plants have beend killed, so if garlic fields have been killed, then it's 100% that somethin other then garlic field repelled insects...
(D) Many insect species not repelled by diallyl sulfide were found in the flooded garlic fields throughout the summer --> derived on the answer choices by POE, as this answer choice doesn't convince me, BUT others are just worse....
(E) Mosquitoes are known to be susceptible to toxins in plants other than garlic, such as marigolds --> we are interested in the effect of garlic fields on insects... actually one more weakener
_________________

When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.

Share some Kudos, if my posts help you. Thank you !

800Score ONLY QUANT CAT1 51, CAT2 50, CAT3 50
GMAT PREP 670
MGMAT CAT 630
KAPLAN CAT 660

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 05 Jan 2016
Posts: 19
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V24
GPA: 3.4
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2016, 02:23
1
D as it is specifying that insects which are not repelled by sulfide were found in the flooded fields which means sulfide worked on mosquitoes.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 01 Sep 2016
Posts: 97
Re: One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Dec 2016, 07:41
Thank you for pointing out the problem with B>

WillGetIt wrote:
Hello,

I think analysis of this question is as follows:

Premise 1: Garlic fields in region with high mosquito population

Premise 2: Since mosquitoes lay their eggs in standing water, flooded fields would normally attract mosquitoes

Counter premise: Yet no mosquitoes were found in the fields.

Conclusion: Reason for low population of mosquito's is Diallyl sulfide, a major component of garlic, which is known to repel several species of insects, including mosquitoes.

So whats going on here? A field located in area of high mosquito population and additional risk of even higher mosquito population (due to standing water, flood etc) than the surrounding high population mosquito area.

Question stem: Which of following strengthen the argument???

I don't think no cause - no effect is appropriate justification for correct choice.

Argument can be strengthen in one of following ways:

1. Stating a unstated assumption

2. Support or elaborate existing premise

3. New support premise

etc.......

Analysis of answer choices:

(A) Diallyl sulfide is also found in onions but at concentrations lower than in garlic.

Out of Scope

(B) The mosquito population of the region as a whole was significantly smaller during the year in which the flooding took place than it had been in previous years.

Population of mosquito in a particular year has nothing to do with conclusion. Even if population is higher, same or smaller (at most we are only concerned about relationship of population from surrounding area), it does not have any impact


(C) By the end of the summer, most of the garlic plants in the flooded fields had been killed by waterborne fungi.

So that means, it this is the case then probably something else is responsible for low mosquito population. Possibly a weakner at most, but mainly it have no impact on argument.



(D) Many insect species not repelled by diallyl sulfide were found in the flooded garlic fields throughout the summer.

CORRECT. Well this is new supporting premise.

Many other species not repelled by diallyl sulfide are available in the fields. So, we have a reason to believe that since diallyl sulfide repeal mosquito not some other insect species hence mosquito population is low.


(E) Mosquitoes are known to be susceptible to toxins in plants other than garlic, such as marigolds.

Out of scope again. Similar to A

Regards
Vikas

Please hit kudos, if it helps. It will be very motivating.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 196
Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 470 Q30 V20
GMAT 2: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2017, 13:43
WillGetIt wrote:

(D) Many insect species not repelled by diallyl sulfide were found in the flooded garlic fields throughout the summer.

Please hit kudos if you like this post


The right option prevents the argument from falling if someone comes and say:

"Well, what if other insect species were also not found on the field"

So, the effect of D.S. on the repelling of mosquitoes becomes "truer"
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Jun 2012
Posts: 5
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jul 2017, 05:25
(D) Many insect species not repelled by diallyl sulfide were found in the flooded garlic fields throughout the summer.

It can be explained as follows :

Here it says 'Many' ( or Most ) , so % of insect species >=50%
So there are around < 50% of the insect species those are repelled by DS.

So it supports "diallyl sulfide from the garlic repelled the mosquitoes".

Kudos me if my post helps you
VP
VP
User avatar
P
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1203
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jul 2017, 09:53
The answer is D
The argument talks about flood and then the risk of mosquitoes breeding in the standing water yet there no mosquitoes were found .The reason cited for this the presence of Diallyl sulfide .The substance kills mosques toes .
Out of the very other option only option D strengthens the argument that Diallyl sulfide is responsible for killing of mosquitoes because there were insects throughout the summer that were not harmed by the substance.
_________________

Please give kudos if you found my answers useful

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 24 May 2014
Posts: 1
CAT Tests
Re: One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2017, 11:26
For better understanding, please note that an argument can also be made stronger by presenting a possible counter premise &
refuting it


Argument says : High Population of Mosquitoes -> Flood -> No Mosquito || Hence, Garlic is responsible for No Mosquito

Here, the author assumes that only some xyz from garlic is responsible for repelling mosquitoes and, there are no other factors such as the flood itself:

what if there were some other factors (eg: flood)? [counter premise]

[refuting counter premise] if flood was responsible then all insects, including mosquitoes would have been gone.. but flood was not responsible because only mosquitoes were gone (not all insects) (Option D)

"had there been other factors, no insect would have been found on the flooded fields (both those which are repelled by Diallyl sulfide & those which are not)"

Since we have to make our belief in the conclusion stronger, we are refuting the possibility of "other factors" by Option D

hope this helps :)

Since this is an OG question, we have to make peace with it..
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 231
Concentration: Marketing, Social Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.65
WE: Marketing (Education)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Oct 2017, 07:36
WillGetIt wrote:
One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region with a large mosquito population. Since mosquitoes lay their eggs in standing water, flooded fields would normally attract mosquitoes, yet no mosquitoes were found in the fields. Diallyl sulfide, a major component of garlic, is known to repel several species of insects, including mosquitoes, so it is likely that diallyl sulfide from the garlic repelled the mosquitoes.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) Diallyl sulfide is also found in onions but at concentrations lower than in garlic.

(B) The mosquito population of the region as a whole was significantly smaller during the year in which the flooding took place than it had been in previous years.

(C) By the end of the summer, most of the garlic plants in the flooded fields had been killed by waterborne fungi.

(D) Many insect species not repelled by diallyl sulfide were found in the flooded garlic fields throughout the summer.

(E) Mosquitoes are known to be susceptible to toxins in plants other than garlic, such as marigolds.

Regards
Vikas

Please hit kudos if you like this post

My analysis :

(A) Diallyl sulfide is also found in onions but at concentrations lower than in garlic.
Irrelevant

(B) The mosquito population of the region as a whole was significantly smaller during the year in which the flooding took place than it had been in previous years.
Where is diallyl sulfide here? We can't find any relationship with diallyl sulfide. Incorrect.
Moreover, if last year there were no flood, how mosquito could grow when garlic releases the diallyl sulfide?


(C) By the end of the summer, most of the garlic plants in the flooded fields had been killed by waterborne fungi.
Weaken. It says that there is another reason rather than sulfide.

(D) Many insect species not repelled by diallyl sulfide were found in the flooded garlic fields throughout the summer.
Correct. It strengthens our argument.

(E) Mosquitoes are known to be susceptible to toxins in plants other than garlic, such as marigolds.
Irrelevant.
_________________

There's an app for that - Steve Jobs.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 15 Nov 2016
Posts: 135
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
CAT Tests
Re: One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Apr 2018, 00:34
One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region with a large mosquito population. Since mosquitoes lay their eggs in standing water, flooded fields would normally attract mosquitoes, yet no mosquitoes were found in the fields. Diallyl sulfide, a major component of garlic, is known to repel several species of insects, including mosquitoes, so it is likely that diallyl sulfide from the garlic repelled the mosquitoes.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

This is a strengthen the argument question.

Like weaken, strengthen questions also require us to isolate the conclusion. As we will be looking for the answer that makes our belief stronger on the premise-conclusion relationship such as analogies, survey, reports, statistical data etc.

Protect the missing information
a) by keeping any option that fills the gap
b) by eliminating the answer that attacks the missing information

Causality and Strengthen Questions: The steps taken to prove a cause-effect relationship is strong requires the OPPOSITE steps as weakening:
o Prove that when the cause occurs, effect always takes place
o Prove that when effect occurs, it occurs because of the cause.
o Eliminate any other reasons that cause the effect.
o Prove that the relationship between C -> E cannot be reversed.
o Prove that statistical improbability won't occur.

Conclusion: Diallyl sulfide from the garlic repelled the mosquitoes

(A) Diallyl sulfide is also found in onions but at concentrations lower than in garlic.
That's a great news but it doesn't help. Eliminate.

(B) The mosquito population of the region as a whole was significantly smaller during the year in which the flooding took place than it had been in previous years.
This option is giving us an alternate reason why the mosquito's population was low in that area. It has nothing to do with D sulfide.

(C) By the end of the summer, most of the garlic plants in the flooded fields had been killed by waterborne fungi.
This option doesn't have any effect on the conclusion. Eliminate.

(D) Many insect species not repelled by diallyl sulfide were found in the flooded garlic fields throughout the summer.
This is our answer. It makes us believe that when D sulfide was found in flooded garlic field there were no insects including mosquitoes

(E) Mosquitoes are known to be susceptible to toxins in plants other than garlic, such as marigolds.
Alternate reason. Eliminate.
Re: One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region   [#permalink] 14 Apr 2018, 00:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

One summer, floods covered low-lying garlic fields situated in a region

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.