GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 21 Aug 2018, 08:54

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# QOTD #29 While critics have written off the APG company’s new Model T

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3447
QOTD #29 While critics have written off the APG company’s new Model T  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Dec 2017, 13:12
Top Contributor
1
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

53% (01:16) correct 47% (01:28) wrong based on 208 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

While critics have written off the APG company’s new Model T chandelier, owing to its poor sales across the globe, the Model T is actually not a complete failure because it has managed to sell 10,000 pieces in Eastern Europe, a market in which rival companies haven’t even managed to sell 5,000 pieces of their respective chandeliers.

Which of the following is assumed in the above argument?

(A) If a chandelier does not sell well in the Eastern European market, then it is a complete failure.
(B) The Eastern European market is the biggest market for chandeliers.
(C) If a chandelier sells well in the Eastern European market, then it cannot be considered a complete failure.
(D) The Model T is the only type of chandelier manufactured by the APG company.
(E) If the Model T had not sold in good numbers in Eastern Europe, then it could have been considered a complete failure.

_________________
Senior CR Moderator
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1392
Location: Viet Nam
Re: QOTD #29 While critics have written off the APG company’s new Model T  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Dec 2017, 20:37
1
carcass wrote:
While critics have written off the APG company’s new Model T chandelier, owing to its poor sales across the globe, the Model T is actually not a complete failure because it has managed to sell 10,000 pieces in Eastern Europe, a market in which rival companies haven’t even managed to sell 5,000 pieces of their respective chandeliers.

Which of the following is assumed in the above argument?

(A) If a chandelier does not sell well in the Eastern European market, then it is a complete failure.
(B) The Eastern European market is the biggest market for chandeliers.
(C) If a chandelier sells well in the Eastern European market, then it cannot be considered a complete failure.
(D) The Model T is the only type of chandelier manufactured by the APG company.
(E) If the Model T had not sold in good numbers in Eastern Europe, then it could have been considered a complete failure.

A is wrong since it didn't convey the correct opposite meaning.
B is wrong since the argument provided no information to support that.
D provided an information, true or false, is irrelevant to the argument.
E is wrong since it follows the wrong logic: "If X then Y" => "If not X then not Y".
C is correct.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Posts: 214
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V36
GPA: 3.54
Re: QOTD #29 While critics have written off the APG company’s new Model T  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Dec 2017, 04:08
1
broall wrote:
carcass wrote:
While critics have written off the APG company’s new Model T chandelier, owing to its poor sales across the globe, the Model T is actually not a complete failure because it has managed to sell 10,000 pieces in Eastern Europe, a market in which rival companies haven’t even managed to sell 5,000 pieces of their respective chandeliers.

Which of the following is assumed in the above argument?

(A) If a chandelier does not sell well in the Eastern European market, then it is a complete failure.
(B) The Eastern European market is the biggest market for chandeliers.
(C) If a chandelier sells well in the Eastern European market, then it cannot be considered a complete failure.
(D) The Model T is the only type of chandelier manufactured by the APG company.
(E) If the Model T had not sold in good numbers in Eastern Europe, then it could have been considered a complete failure.

A is wrong since it didn't convey the correct opposite meaning.
B is wrong since the argument provided no information to support that.
D provided an information, true or false, is irrelevant to the argument.
E is wrong since it follows the wrong logic: "If X then Y" => "If not X then not Y".
C is correct.

Hey Broall,
I marked option C as the OA. Just a thought. What is the negation of If X, then Y? Is it If X, then not Y.
(C) If a chandelier sells well in the Eastern European market, then it cannot be considered a complete failure.
Negation- If a chandelier sells well in the Eastern European market, then it cannot be considered a complete failure.
Senior CR Moderator
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1392
Location: Viet Nam
Re: QOTD #29 While critics have written off the APG company’s new Model T  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Dec 2017, 07:33
1
sunny91 wrote:
Hey Broall,
I marked option C as the OA. Just a thought. What is the negation of If X, then Y? Is it If X, then not Y.
(C) If a chandelier sells well in the Eastern European market, then it cannot be considered a complete failure.
Negation- If a chandelier sells well in the Eastern European market, then it cannot be considered a complete failure.

Correct logic is: "If X, then Y" => "If not Y, then not X"
_________________
Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Posts: 214
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V36
GPA: 3.54
Re: QOTD #29 While critics have written off the APG company’s new Model T  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Dec 2017, 08:46
broall wrote:
sunny91 wrote:
Hey Broall,
I marked option C as the OA. Just a thought. What is the negation of If X, then Y? Is it If X, then not Y.
(C) If a chandelier sells well in the Eastern European market, then it cannot be considered a complete failure.
Negation- If a chandelier sells well in the Eastern European market, then it cannot be considered a complete failure.

Correct logic is: "If X, then Y" => "If not Y, then not X"

Hey Broall,
I agree with the logic "If X, then Y" => "If not Y, then not X. However, I was looking for the negation of option C that will destroy the argument in case of assumption.
Kindly let me know if my negation of option C is correct.
(C) If a chandelier sells well in the Eastern European market, then it cannot be considered a complete failure.
Negation- If a chandelier sells well in the Eastern European market, then it can be considered a complete failure. So, the argument weakens. Please rectify if the negation is wrong.
Senior CR Moderator
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1392
Location: Viet Nam
Re: QOTD #29 While critics have written off the APG company’s new Model T  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Dec 2017, 20:05
sunny91 wrote:
broall wrote:
sunny91 wrote:
Hey Broall,
I marked option C as the OA. Just a thought. What is the negation of If X, then Y? Is it If X, then not Y.
(C) If a chandelier sells well in the Eastern European market, then it cannot be considered a complete failure.
Negation- If a chandelier sells well in the Eastern European market, then it cannot be considered a complete failure.

Correct logic is: "If X, then Y" => "If not Y, then not X"

Hey Broall,
I agree with the logic "If X, then Y" => "If not Y, then not X. However, I was looking for the negation of option C that will destroy the argument in case of assumption.
Kindly let me know if my negation of option C is correct.
(C) If a chandelier sells well in the Eastern European market, then it cannot be considered a complete failure.
Negation- If a chandelier sells well in the Eastern European market, then it can be considered a complete failure. So, the argument weakens. Please rectify if the negation is wrong.

Yep, I think you are right.
_________________
Re: QOTD #29 While critics have written off the APG company’s new Model T &nbs [#permalink] 09 Dec 2017, 20:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.