It is currently 19 Feb 2018, 09:48

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

QOTD: A study of food resources in the North Pacific

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
MBA Section Director
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4823
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
QOTD: A study of food resources in the North Pacific [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2017, 09:46
Expert's post
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (01:18) correct 43% (01:05) wrong based on 434 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Verbal Question of The Day: Day 34: Sentence Correction


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here


A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly a result from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.

(A) that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly a result from increasing

(B) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in

(C) that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing

(D) creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in

(E) creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing

Every question of the day will be followed by an expert reply by GMATNinja in 12-15 hours. Stay tuned! Post your answers and explanations to earn kudos.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Have an MBA application Question? ASK ME ANYTHING!

My Stuff: Four Years to 760 | MBA Trends for Indian Applicants

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
Veritas Prep Live Online

Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
G
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1437
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Re: QOTD: A study of food resources in the North Pacific [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2017, 09:47
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Quote:
A: that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly a result from increasing

I don't love the “a result from increasing” at the end of the sentence. “A result of” is the correct idiom. But if you don’t feel certain about that idiom… well, read this article about idioms, maybe. And then look for other stuff.

The more important thing: logically, the first part of the underlined sentence doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. The creatures weren’t suffering from “dwindling food supplies.” Sure, they were suffering because the supplies were dwindling, but they weren’t suffering from the supplies themselves. Food supplies don’t make you suffer. Eliminate (A).

Quote:
B: that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in

Nice, this seems to fix exactly the problems described in (A). Let’s keep (B).

Quote:
C: that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing

Same problem as (A): creatures weren’t suffering because of the food supplies. Food supplies are awesome, and don’t cause suffering. :banana:

Quote:
D: creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in

We actually need the word “that” at the beginning of the underlined portion in this case. Without it, the sentence says that the study “revealed creatures of the seabed…” – and that makes no sense, unless you think that the study involved peeling away layers of sand from the ocean floor to reveal creatures. We also still have the same meaning issue as in (A) and (C): (D) also seems to be saying that the creatures suffered from food supplies. Eliminate (D).


Quote:
E: creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing

(E) is easier to eliminate. Sure, there’s the same meaning issue as in (D) (“revealed creatures of the seabed”), but the modifier beginning with “which” can’t logically modify “dwindling.”

So (E) is gone, and (B) is the winner.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset -- starts February 14!

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99... in any section order

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Nov 2016
Posts: 100
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 2.8
Re: QOTD: A study of food resources in the North Pacific [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2017, 11:24
souvik101990 - IMO B

I reject the others because of following reasons:

A - because is a better option but more importantly - the phrase after food supplies tends to modify the food supplies and not explain that the food supplies are dwindling as a result of an increase in .....

B - seems ok and logical in conveying message - not rejected

C - use of which seems redundant further - they are suffering because of the dwindling and not because of the supplies as a whole

D - that is missing and sentence is awkwardly constructed

E- use of which tends to modify dwindling. awkwardly constructed. that is missing
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Jun 2016
Posts: 140
CAT Tests
Re: QOTD: A study of food resources in the North Pacific [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2017, 13:58
A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly a result from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.

Besides A and B, other options change meaning and thus eliminated them. That said, between A and B, I preferred B because of two reasons:
1. "a result from" appears to be an incorrect idiom. "as a result of" is better
2. increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period - "an increase" sounds better since we are talking about a time duration during which, possibly, the temperature rose. the study was done after 1996 and the author would have noted "net" (or an) increase rather than continuous "increasing".
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Posts: 62
Re: QOTD: A study of food resources in the North Pacific [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2017, 07:50
GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
A: that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly a result from increasing

I don't love the “a result from increasing” at the end of the sentence. “A result of” is the correct idiom. But if you don’t feel certain about that idiom… well, read this article about idioms, maybe. And then look for other stuff.

The more important thing: logically, the first part of the underlined sentence doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. The creatures weren’t suffering from “dwindling food supplies.” Sure, they were suffering because the supplies were dwindling, but they weren’t suffering from the supplies themselves. Food supplies don’t make you suffer. Eliminate (A).

Quote:
B: that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in

Nice, this seems to fix exactly the problems described in (A). Let’s keep (B).

Quote:
C: that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing

Same problem as (A): creatures weren’t suffering because of the food supplies. Food supplies are awesome, and don’t cause suffering. :banana:

Quote:
D: creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in

We actually need the word “that” at the beginning of the underlined portion in this case. Without it, the sentence says that the study “revealed creatures of the seabed…” – and that makes no sense, unless you think that the study involved peeling away layers of sand from the ocean floor to reveal creatures. We also still have the same meaning issue as in (A) and (C): (D) also seems to be saying that the creatures suffered from food supplies. Eliminate (D).


Quote:
E: creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing

(E) is easier to eliminate. Sure, there’s the same meaning issue as in (D) (“revealed creatures of the seabed”), but the modifier beginning with “which” can’t logically modify “dwindling.”

So (E) is gone, and (B) is the winner.


But MGMAT book lists results from as right in its idiom lists.
However, so we can't say "he is suffering from/bcz of low food supply"?
Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
S
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2455
Re: QOTD: A study of food resources in the North Pacific [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2017, 14:05
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
rma26 wrote:
However, so we can't say "he is suffering from/bcz of low food supply"?



Hello rma26,

I will be glad to help you out with this one. :-)

The answer to you question is no. We cannot say: He is suffering from low food supply.

It is so because low in your example sentence dwindling in the official sentence are mere modifiers that present some feature of food supply. The main entity in the phrase dwindling/low food supply remains food supply. And as already pointed out, logically food supply cannot be the cause of anyone's suffering.

Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Re: QOTD: A study of food resources in the North Pacific   [#permalink] 03 Aug 2017, 14:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

QOTD: A study of food resources in the North Pacific

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.