SajjadAhmad
Radioactive waste from nuclear power plants has been temporarily stored on-site, but this is not a satisfactory kind of place for long-range storage. Since no suitable plan of safe permanent storage of such waste from the nation’s existing and planned nuclear plants has been devised, some people propose that we should stop trying to develop such a plan and instead should shut down all present nuclear plants and build no new nuclear plants.
The proposal mentioned above falls short of offering a complete solution to the problem it addresses because
(A) it would prevent the development of safe technologies for producing electric power
(B) it does not distinguish between nuclear plants that have, and plants that do not have, a reputation for operating safely
(C) it does not provide for the permanent storage of already-existing waste
(D) the generation of electric power from fossil fuels is relatively safe
(E) the risks of unsafe disposal of waste from nuclear power plants lie in the future, but the benefits from such plants are in the present
Hi everyone,
logical flaw questionThe conclusion of the argument talk about the solution to a
problem.
The problem is that radioactive waste is dangerous and there is no safety plan existing while some radioactive waste is stored on site.
The problem can be broken down in 2:
#1 what do we do with the current radioactive waste?
#2 what do we do with the future radioactive waste?
The conclusion talks about how to address
#2 sub-problem but it does not talk about #1 sub-problem.
Option C addresses
#1 sub-problem and hence it is the
correct answer.