Last visit was: 29 Apr 2026, 06:55 It is currently 29 Apr 2026, 06:55
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
hafgola
Joined: 05 Oct 2010
Last visit: 28 Sep 2012
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
38
 [10]
Given Kudos: 1
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sudhanshuacharya
Joined: 31 May 2011
Last visit: 18 Jun 2016
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
GMAT Date: 12-07-2011
GPA: 3.22
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 49
Kudos: 206
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jamifahad
Joined: 03 Mar 2010
Last visit: 14 Mar 2015
Posts: 256
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 256
Kudos: 1,735
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
hafgola
Joined: 05 Oct 2010
Last visit: 28 Sep 2012
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thanks, is there anyway for me to recognize how "most of them at least..." becomes a modifying clause, is most of the some sort of a indicator ? subordinating conjunction ?

or should I focus on the fact that there is no subject verb agreement in the clause
"most of them at least as common as the birch aphid...living on the bottom of oceans..." (modifying clause that modifies "species")

I could be tempted to think that. "most of them" is the subject, and living the main verb, is the error there that Living can´t it be the main verb because it is functioning as an Adverb (resent Participle)? -ing form

can -ing forms maybe never function as a main verb ??? (that would be a comfortable rule to remember:)

thanks
User avatar
akbism
Joined: 14 Jun 2011
Last visit: 30 Jul 2019
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
73
 [2]
Given Kudos: 11
Status:Struggling hard to maintain focus
Location: Kolkata
Concentration: General Management , Enterprenureship
Schools:ISB, IIM
GPA: 3.93
Posts: 73
Kudos: 73
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,262
Own Kudos:
42,465
 [2]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,262
Kudos: 42,465
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The gist of the passage is that, 1. Scientists have discovered a number of new insect species (plural); these insects live in oceans or icebergs; they are at least as common as the birch aphid, a tree-dweller.

* (A) most of them as common or more common than the birch aphid, a tree-dwelling insect, which live --- it should be ‘most of them at least as common as'

* (B) most of them at least as common as the birch aphid, a tree-dwelling insect, and living --- Misses the symmetrical parallelism by using a noun on one side of the parallel marker ‘and’; on the other side, a participial phrase is used.

* (C) most of them at least as common as the birch aphid, a tree-dwelling insect, living -- correct combination; living here modifies the new species.

* (D) mostly at least as common as the birch aphid, a tree-dwelling insect, which live -- which live is wrong modification and verb number

* (E) mostly as common or more common than the birch aphid, a tree-dwelling insect, living – missing the idiom as common as
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts,
In option c, I feel there is an ambiguity regarding what living modifies. How can living modify insect species. If we remove the non-essential modifier- ,a tree-dwelling insect, then living modifies birch aphid. The sentence stands by as follows-
Recently, entomologists have discovered a number of new insect species most of them at least as common as the birch aphid living on the bottom of oceans or within icebergs.
In the comments, people , living modifies the subject(insect species) of the previous clause. But, we have the comma before living as part of non essential modifier ,a tree-dwelling insect,
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
The gist of the passage is that, 1. Scientists have discovered a number of new insect species (plural); these insects live in oceans or icebergs; they are at least as common as the birch aphid, a tree-dweller.

* (A) most of them as common or more common than the birch aphid, a tree-dwelling insect, which live --- it should be ‘most of them at least as common as'

* (B) most of them at least as common as the birch aphid, a tree-dwelling insect, and living --- Misses the symmetrical parallelism by using a noun on one side of the parallel marker ‘and’; on the other side, a participial phrase is used.

* (C) most of them at least as common as the birch aphid, a tree-dwelling insect, living -- correct combination; living here modifies the new species.

* (D) mostly at least as common as the birch aphid, a tree-dwelling insect, which live -- which live is wrong modification and verb number

* (E) mostly as common or more common than the birch aphid, a tree-dwelling insect, living – missing the idiom as common as


daagh, GMATNinja, broall

In option c, I feel there is an ambiguity regarding what living modifies. How can living modify insect species. If we remove the non-essential modifier- ,a tree-dwelling insect, then living modifies birch aphid. The sentence stands by as follows-
Recently, entomologists have discovered a number of new insect species most of them at least as common as the birch aphid living on the bottom of oceans or within icebergs.
In the comments, people , living modifies the subject(insect species) of the previous clause. But, we have the comma before living as part of non essential modifier ,a tree-dwelling insect,
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
15,572
 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,572
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sunny91
Hi Experts,
In option c, I feel there is an ambiguity regarding what living modifies. How can living modify insect species. If we remove the non-essential modifier- ,a tree-dwelling insect, then living modifies birch aphid. The sentence stands by as follows-
Recently, entomologists have discovered a number of new insect species most of them at least as common as the birch aphid living on the bottom of oceans or within icebergs.
In the comments, people , living modifies the subject(insect species) of the previous clause. But, we have the comma before living as part of non essential modifier ,a tree-dwelling insect,

If two modifiers are required to be placed one after the other referring to the same antecedent, then there must be a conjunction (e.g. "and") between them. Thus if "living..." were to refer to "birch aphid", then the modifiers "a tree-dwelling insect" and "living..." would be separated by a conjunction (e.g.,"and").
[Nonetheless there would be a parallelsim issue then, since placing a noun phrase modifier i.e., an appositive ("a tree-dwelling insect") and a present participle modifier "living..." in parallel is not recommended.]

Just some additional thought: If the comma before "living" were not there, then the present participle modifier "living.." would clearly refer to "insect", which in turn refers to "birch aphid".
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sayantanc2k
sunny91
Hi Experts,
In option c, I feel there is an ambiguity regarding what living modifies. How can living modify insect species. If we remove the non-essential modifier- ,a tree-dwelling insect, then living modifies birch aphid. The sentence stands by as follows-
Recently, entomologists have discovered a number of new insect species most of them at least as common as the birch aphid living on the bottom of oceans or within icebergs.
In the comments, people , living modifies the subject(insect species) of the previous clause. But, we have the comma before living as part of non essential modifier ,a tree-dwelling insect,

If two modifiers are required to be placed one after the other referring to the same antecedent, then there must be a conjunction (e.g. "and") between them. Thus if "living..." were to refer to "birch aphid", then the modifiers "a tree-dwelling insect" and "living..." would be separated by a conjunction (e.g.,"and").
[Nonetheless there would be a parallelsim issue then, since placing a noun phrase modifier i.e., an appositive ("a tree-dwelling insect") and a present participle modifier "living..." in parallel is not recommended.]

Just some additional thought: If the comma before "living" were not there, then the present participle modifier "living.." would clearly refer to "insect", which in turn refers to "birch aphid".

Hi Sayantanc2k,
Thanks for the explanation. But, I still have the question is the OA fine?
I just want to recall my understanding from the above.
Living cant modify bird aphid. as two modifiers are required to be placed one after the other referring to the same antecedent, then there must be a conjunction (e.g. "and") between them. We have and missing. Also, even if a conjunction is there, the sentence lacks parallelism. So, living modifies a number of new insect species.
But again, if we remove the non-essential modifier, we can read the sentence as -
Recently, entomologists have discovered a number of new insect species, most of them at least as common as the birch aphid living on the bottom of oceans or within icebergs.
So, here the bird apchid and not a number of new insect species live on the bottom of oceans or within icebergs.
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
15,572
 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,572
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sunny91
sayantanc2k
sunny91
Hi Experts,
In option c, I feel there is an ambiguity regarding what living modifies. How can living modify insect species. If we remove the non-essential modifier- ,a tree-dwelling insect, then living modifies birch aphid. The sentence stands by as follows-
Recently, entomologists have discovered a number of new insect species most of them at least as common as the birch aphid living on the bottom of oceans or within icebergs.
In the comments, people , living modifies the subject(insect species) of the previous clause. But, we have the comma before living as part of non essential modifier ,a tree-dwelling insect,

If two modifiers are required to be placed one after the other referring to the same antecedent, then there must be a conjunction (e.g. "and") between them. Thus if "living..." were to refer to "birch aphid", then the modifiers "a tree-dwelling insect" and "living..." would be separated by a conjunction (e.g.,"and").
[Nonetheless there would be a parallelsim issue then, since placing a noun phrase modifier i.e., an appositive ("a tree-dwelling insect") and a present participle modifier "living..." in parallel is not recommended.]

Just some additional thought: If the comma before "living" were not there, then the present participle modifier "living.." would clearly refer to "insect", which in turn refers to "birch aphid".

Hi Sayantanc2k,
Thanks for the explanation. But, I still have the question is the OA fine?
I just want to recall my understanding from the above.
Living cant modify bird aphid. as two modifiers are required to be placed one after the other referring to the same antecedent, then there must be a conjunction (e.g. "and") between them. We have and missing. Also, even if a conjunction is there, the sentence lacks parallelism. So, living modifies a number of new insect species.
But again, if we remove the non-essential modifier, we can read the sentence as -
Recently, entomologists have discovered a number of new insect species, most of them at least as common as the birch aphid living on the bottom of oceans or within icebergs.
So, here the bird apchid and not a number of new insect species live on the bottom of oceans or within icebergs.

In Option C, "living" refers to "new insect species". "Living" cannot refer to "birch aphid" because of the reason I stated (and you correctly understood).

As for eliminating a non-essential modifier, you have to remove the complete non-essential modifier: "most of them at least as common as the birch aphid, a tree-dwelling insect".

"The tree-dwelling insect" is a non-essential modifier WITHIN another non-essential modifier. the structure is as follows:

Recently, entomologists have discovered a number of new insect species[, most of them at least as common as the birch aphid, (a tree-dwelling insect),] living on the bottom of oceans or within icebergs.
User avatar
chesstitans
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 963
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,561
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
Posts: 963
Kudos: 1,936
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh, sayantanc2k is there are tip, or way to see that B has errors. It is difficult to me to know for sure that C is the answer.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,262
Own Kudos:
42,465
 [1]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,262
Kudos: 42,465
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chesstitans wrote
Quote:
daagh, sayantanc2k is there are tip, or way to see that B has errors. It is difficult to me to know for sure that C is the answer.
Though belatedly, let me use chesstitans' question to reopen this thread as verbalbot wants.

Quote:
Recently, entomologists have discovered a number of new insect species, most of them as common or more common than the birch aphid, a tree-dwelling insect, which live on the bottom of oceans or within icebergs.

(B) most of them at least as common as the birch aphid, a tree-dwelling insect, and living
(C) most of them at least as common as the birch aphid, a tree-dwelling insect, living

The main difference between the two is the ill-timed intrusion of the conjunction 'and' in B, altering the originally intended meaning.

As per the original, the new species are a common group found in the bottoms of the oceans or the icebergs. The birch aphid is cited for the commonalty of the new insects and not for the marine habitats.

In B, the compound modifiers both refer to the aphid; after all, neither the tree nor the terrestrial insect can live under oceans or icebergs.

In C, the comma plus living is an adverbial modifier modifying the previous clause's action namely the entomologist's discovery of the new insects. This is the original intent.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,424
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,424
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
509 posts
363 posts