Last visit was: 19 Jan 2025, 08:21 It is currently 19 Jan 2025, 08:21
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
vscid
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Last visit: 25 Feb 2011
Posts: 248
Own Kudos:
1,079
 [124]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 248
Kudos: 1,079
 [124]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
116
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
TommyWallach
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Last visit: 14 Nov 2011
Posts: 323
Own Kudos:
7,177
 [46]
Given Kudos: 11
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Location: San Francisco
Concentration: Journalism
 Q47  V47 GMAT 2: 770  Q49  V48
Expert reply
Posts: 323
Kudos: 7,177
 [46]
31
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 16 Jan 2025
Posts: 11,382
Own Kudos:
38,636
 [15]
Given Kudos: 333
Status:Math and DI Expert
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 11,382
Kudos: 38,636
 [15]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
acer2knight
Joined: 26 May 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2012
Posts: 161
Own Kudos:
650
 [1]
Given Kudos: 13
 Q49  V32 GMAT 2: 700  Q49  V35
Posts: 161
Kudos: 650
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Toughie, Between B and C :

b]Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.
c]Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but more effective pest-control methods that were introduced in the 1880s saved the citrus industry.

Getting the right meaning is important I suppose. B conveys that more effective methods save the citrus industry in 1880.
C conveys that methods that were introduced in 1880 solved the problem.

Not sure which one to pick though. I would go for B.

What is the OA?
avatar
aniteshgmat1101
Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Last visit: 16 Aug 2016
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
126
 [1]
Given Kudos: 48
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT Date: 05-10-2015
GPA: 3.51
WE:Programming (Computer Software)
Posts: 108
Kudos: 126
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
souvik101990
Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper crops, sugar beet and walnut in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.

A. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper crops, sugar beet and walnut in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.

B. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.

C. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but more effective pest-control methods that were introduced in the 1880s saved the citrus industry.

D. In the 1880s, pests destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region and more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.

E. In the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry from what was destroying grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region.

OA - In a While!

This one is really confusing. D and E are out because of meaning change issue.
I am trapped between B and C.
Original sentence sounds unclear to me first, because if both the parts of the given sentence are facts then use of past perfect is not warranted.
But since all the 3 options has past perfect in it, then the two parts of the sentence must convey a sequence of action, one after another. 'In 1980' in the middle of the sentence does not make the sequence clear. I mean it is not clear that when were the crops destroyed by the pests. Did it happen before or after 1980, this ambiguity makes it difficult to judge for the use of past perfect in first part of the sentence.
Finally, chose C. (Time taken 3:15 mins :P )
avatar
LaxAvenger
Joined: 18 Aug 2014
Last visit: 10 Nov 2017
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
151
 [1]
Given Kudos: 36
Location: Hong Kong
Schools: Mannheim
Schools: Mannheim
Posts: 91
Kudos: 151
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
A. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper crops, sugar beet and walnut in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.
crops wrongly placed

B. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.
structurally and grammatically correct

C. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but more effective pest-control methods that were introduced in the 1880s saved the citrus industry.
crops rightly placed. but meaning changed. original meaning says that more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry in 1880s(these methods could have been introduced anytime but were effective in 1880s.. so wrong), whereas the sentence now says that these pest control methods were introduced in 1880s.

D. In the 1880s, pests destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region and more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.
it changes meaning by saying that the crops were destroyed in 1880s.the original never says that ...so out

E. In the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry from what was destroying grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region.
structurally and grammatically incorrect

ans B


Could also be the other way round:
For me in C, the actions are logically constructed + past perfect -- > simple past indicate a shift in time and action.

Asking for GMAT Sentence Correction in general, can we assume that original meaning in the given sentence in the question stem is the logic that needs to be properly shown or is it possible that logic in the question stem is flawed already? I think so. And thus, your explanation would just be an assumption that the pest control methods were available earlier.
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 16 Jan 2025
Posts: 11,382
Own Kudos:
38,636
 [1]
Given Kudos: 333
Status:Math and DI Expert
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 11,382
Kudos: 38,636
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
LaxAvenger
chetan2u
A. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper crops, sugar beet and walnut in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.
crops wrongly placed

B. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.
structurally and grammatically correct

C. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but more effective pest-control methods that were introduced in the 1880s saved the citrus industry.
crops rightly placed. but meaning changed. original meaning says that more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry in 1880s(these methods could have been introduced anytime but were effective in 1880s.. so wrong), whereas the sentence now says that these pest control methods were introduced in 1880s.

D. In the 1880s, pests destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region and more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.
it changes meaning by saying that the crops were destroyed in 1880s.the original never says that ...so out

E. In the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry from what was destroying grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region.
structurally and grammatically incorrect

ans B


Could also be the other way round:
For me in C, the actions are logically constructed + past perfect -- > simple past indicate a shift in time and action.

Asking for GMAT Sentence Correction in general, can we assume that original meaning in the given sentence in the question stem is the logic that needs to be properly shown or is it possible that logic in the question stem is flawed already? I think so. And thus, your explanation would just be an assumption that the pest control methods were available earlier.

hi,
whenever there is a change in meaning, the meaning of the original always stays and is correct, unless all the options conveying original meaning are grammatically wrong....
avatar
Humblebuggie
Joined: 10 Jan 2015
Last visit: 04 Oct 2016
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
20
 [2]
Given Kudos: 19
Status:trying hard to beat gmat
Location: China
WE:Consulting (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Posts: 10
Kudos: 20
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
LaxAvenger
chetan2u
A. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper crops, sugar beet and walnut in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.
crops wrongly placed

B. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.
structurally and grammatically correct

C. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but more effective pest-control methods that were introduced in the 1880s saved the citrus industry.
crops rightly placed. but meaning changed. original meaning says that more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry in 1880s(these methods could have been introduced anytime but were effective in 1880s.. so wrong), whereas the sentence now says that these pest control methods were introduced in 1880s.

D. In the 1880s, pests destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region and more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.
it changes meaning by saying that the crops were destroyed in 1880s.the original never says that ...so out

E. In the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry from what was destroying grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region.
structurally and grammatically incorrect

ans B


Could also be the other way round:
For me in C, the actions are logically constructed + past perfect -- > simple past indicate a shift in time and action.

Asking for GMAT Sentence Correction in general, can we assume that original meaning in the given sentence in the question stem is the logic that needs to be properly shown or is it possible that logic in the question stem is flawed already? I think so. And thus, your explanation would just be an assumption that the pest control methods were available earlier.

hi,
whenever there is a change in meaning, the meaning of the original always stays and is correct, unless all the options conveying original meaning are grammatically wrong....

i believe the phrase "but in the 1880s" itself indicates pest control were introduced during a particular time period (that is 1980s) and not in any particular year so there is no meaning change. So option C is clearly conveys the meaning. For B opt, it is a bit clumsy.
avatar
Shawnik
Joined: 13 Jan 2016
Last visit: 27 Apr 2017
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GPA: 3.2
WE:Analyst (Computer Software)
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Posts: 17
Kudos: 85
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
blakemancillas TommyWallach

I thought that this question means: in 1880s, though crops A,B,C etc. were destroyed by pests, the effective pest control saved the citrus industry.

Is this not what the sentence means?

I felt choices A, B and C do not convey this message properly so they have to be ruled out. Please throw some light on this, because if this is not the case then the sentence does not make any sense to me.
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,397
Own Kudos:
15,394
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,397
Kudos: 15,394
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Shawnik
blakemancillas TommyWallach

I thought that this question means: in 1880s, though crops A,B,C etc. were destroyed by pests, the effective pest control saved the citrus industry.

Is this not what the sentence means?

I felt choices A, B and C do not convey this message properly so they have to be ruled out. Please throw some light on this, because if this is not the case then the sentence does not make any sense to me.

Crops A, B, C, D and E were destroyed not in 1880, but before that year. Subsequently in the year 1880 pest-control was used, thereby saving crop F.
User avatar
dcummins
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Last visit: 18 Jul 2024
Posts: 1,073
Own Kudos:
2,230
 [2]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The difference between B and C is clearer to me after understanding this.

In
B. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.

B communicates that in the 1880s the industry was saved, C does not.

C. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but more effective pest-control methods that were introduced in the 1880s saved the citrus industry.

In C we are just told that methods saved the citrus industry, not that the industry was actually saved in the 1880s
User avatar
hero_with_1000_faces
Joined: 02 Jan 2016
Last visit: 24 Sep 2024
Posts: 362
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 314
Status:Studying 4Gmat
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 590 Q37 V33
GPA: 4
WE:Law (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 590 Q37 V33
Posts: 362
Kudos: 128
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello MentorTutoring AjiteshArun

I went with C, how is B correct in this, but demands parallelism, so the sentence after but should have been a clause and C should have been correct IMO.

I dont agree with popular answer here: Pest had destroyed compared with in 1880. doesnt make sense.

Please help!
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 19 Jan 2025
Posts: 5,763
Own Kudos:
4,946
 [1]
Given Kudos: 715
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,763
Kudos: 4,946
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hero_with_1000_faces
Hello MentorTutoring AjiteshArun

I went with C, how is B correct in this, but demands parallelism, so the sentence after but should have been a clause and C should have been correct IMO.

I dont agree with popular answer here: Pest had destroyed compared with in 1880. doesnt make sense.

Please help!
Hi hero_with_1000_faces,

We must ignore the prepositional phrase modifier to understand the actual structure of the sentence.

Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry. ← The but joins two independent clauses here ("Pests had destroyed..." and "... methods saved...").
User avatar
hero_with_1000_faces
Joined: 02 Jan 2016
Last visit: 24 Sep 2024
Posts: 362
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 314
Status:Studying 4Gmat
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 590 Q37 V33
GPA: 4
WE:Law (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 590 Q37 V33
Posts: 362
Kudos: 128
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
hero_with_1000_faces
Hello MentorTutoring AjiteshArun

I went with C, how is B correct in this, but demands parallelism, so the sentence after but should have been a clause and C should have been correct IMO.

I dont agree with popular answer here: Pest had destroyed compared with in 1880. doesnt make sense.

Please help!
Hi hero_with_1000_faces,

We must ignore the prepositional phrase modifier to understand the actual structure of the sentence.

Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry. ← The but joins two independent clauses here ("Pests had destroyed..." and "... methods saved...").


Thanks Ajitesh, however my point is But needs to be followed by the clause: more effective pest control. am I correct in my thinking
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 18 Jan 2025
Posts: 3,503
Own Kudos:
7,138
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert reply
Posts: 3,503
Kudos: 7,138
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hero_with_1000_faces
AjiteshArun
hero_with_1000_faces
Hello MentorTutoring AjiteshArun

I went with C, how is B correct in this, but demands parallelism, so the sentence after but should have been a clause and C should have been correct IMO.

I dont agree with popular answer here: Pest had destroyed compared with in 1880. doesnt make sense.

Please help!
Hi hero_with_1000_faces,

We must ignore the prepositional phrase modifier to understand the actual structure of the sentence.

Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry. ← The but joins two independent clauses here ("Pests had destroyed..." and "... methods saved...").


Thanks Ajitesh, however my point is But needs to be followed by the clause: more effective pest control. am I correct in my thinking
Sorry to chime in late on this one, but, well, I was sleeping. (It is about 6.30 where I live, so I am at it quite early.) I think AjiteshArun has shown above how there is an independent clause after the coordinating conjunction but... it is only delayed by the presence of an introductory phrase for that clause. The structure is no different from starting a sentence with any sort of phrase before jumping across the comma to the main clause:

1) Powered by a Core Processor, the computer was capable of...

2) In the 1950s, McCarthyism in the U.S. led to...

3) By 2050, the world population will have...

Any of the above sentences could be written with a conjunction at the head of the sentence (in an emphatic manner). Sometimes such phrases are surrounded by commas instead of employing a single comma at the end, but shorter phrases, especially those under five words in length, often omit the initial comma. This is more of a convention than a hard-and-fast rule.

I hope that helps. Thank you for the initial mention.

- Andrew
User avatar
hero_with_1000_faces
Joined: 02 Jan 2016
Last visit: 24 Sep 2024
Posts: 362
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 314
Status:Studying 4Gmat
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 590 Q37 V33
GPA: 4
WE:Law (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 590 Q37 V33
Posts: 362
Kudos: 128
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MentorTutoring
hero_with_1000_faces
AjiteshArun
hero_with_1000_faces
Hello MentorTutoring AjiteshArun

I went with C, how is B correct in this, but demands parallelism, so the sentence after but should have been a clause and C should have been correct IMO.

I dont agree with popular answer here: Pest had destroyed compared with in 1880. doesnt make sense.

Please help!
Hi hero_with_1000_faces,

We must ignore the prepositional phrase modifier to understand the actual structure of the sentence.

Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry. ← The but joins two independent clauses here ("Pests had destroyed..." and "... methods saved...").


Thanks Ajitesh, however my point is But needs to be followed by the clause: more effective pest control. am I correct in my thinking
Sorry to chime in late on this one, but, well, I was sleeping. (It is about 6.30 where I live, so I am at it quite early.) I think AjiteshArun has shown above how there is an independent clause after the coordinating conjunction but... it is only delayed by the presence of an introductory phrase for that clause. The structure is no different from starting a sentence with any sort of phrase before jumping across the comma to the main clause:

1) Powered by a Core Processor, the computer was capable of...

2) In the 1950s, McCarthyism in the U.S. led to...

3) By 2050, the world population will have...

Any of the above sentences could be written with a conjunction at the head of the sentence (in an emphatic manner). Sometimes such phrases are surrounded by commas instead of employing a single comma at the end, but shorter phrases, especially those under five words in length, often omit the initial comma. This is more of a convention than a hard-and-fast rule.

I hope that helps. Thank you for the initial mention.

- Andrew

MentorTutoring AjiteshArun
Understood, learned something new for me.
Thanks Andrew, good morning and good day!

so now that B is correct, this begs the question what is wrong with C then?

The only difference is presence of "methods that were introduced in the 1880s" and this logically makes sense to me.
How do you think B and C differ?
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 18 Jan 2025
Posts: 3,503
Own Kudos:
7,138
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert reply
Posts: 3,503
Kudos: 7,138
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hero_with_1000_faces
MentorTutoring AjiteshArun
Understood, learned something new for me.
Thanks Andrew, good morning and good day!

so now that B is correct, this begs the question what is wrong with C then?

The only difference is presence of "methods that were introduced in the 1880s" and this logically makes sense to me.
How do you think B and C differ?
You can go by the subtle difference in meaning and parallelism that TommyWallach has pointed out above, in this post, but to be honest, whenever I see extra words in one answer choice that do not appear in another, I ask myself, Are these words necessary? Do they add anything in the way of clarity that the shorter version lacks? Compare the two sentence side by side:

vscid
B. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.
C. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but more effective pest-control methods that were introduced in the 1880s saved the citrus industry.
Now ask yourself, does the clause with the extra information that were introduced add clarity to the sentence? Not really. At the very least, we can interpret (B) as saying that these more effective pest-control methods were not being used until the 1880s. In fact, I would be fine with cutting out the embedded clause altogether and focusing instead on the placement of the phrase in the 1880s:

Version 2:
C. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but more effective pest-control methods that were introduced in the 1880s saved the citrus industry.

If the expression of vital meaning is the same, then I would ditch the sentence with the superfluous words. (The placement of the time phrase makes more sense anyway at the head of the second independent clause.) You asked about my approach, and what I have outlined above is exactly what led me to choose (B) over (C).

I hope that helps you out. If not, you need only ask a follow-up question.

- Andrew
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,121
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,121
Kudos: 914
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7212 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts