Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 10:54 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 10:54
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
kukr007
Joined: 13 Aug 2014
Last visit: 15 Dec 2014
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
75
 [48]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Finance
GPA: 3.85
WE:Programming (Computer Software)
Posts: 6
Kudos: 75
 [48]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
36
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
b2bt
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Last visit: 14 Apr 2024
Posts: 198
Own Kudos:
631
 [5]
Given Kudos: 242
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V34
Products:
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V34
Posts: 198
Kudos: 631
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 1,143
Own Kudos:
22,217
 [1]
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
arunavamunshi1988
Joined: 22 Mar 2014
Last visit: 10 Jul 2018
Posts: 74
Own Kudos:
41
 [2]
Given Kudos: 136
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Operations
GMAT 1: 530 Q45 V20
GPA: 3.91
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT 1: 530 Q45 V20
Posts: 74
Kudos: 41
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ziyuen
kukr007
Scientists suspect that Europa, a moon orbiting Jupiter, may contain living organisms. However, the government recently scrapped an unmanned science mission to Europa and replaced it with a project aimed at landing an astronaut on Mars. Polls show that the public is far more fascinated by space travel than by discovering life elsewhere in the universe. Critics argue that the government's decision-making process places a greater emphasis on popularity than it does on the importance of scientific research.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen a contention by the government that the new project is a better use of its funds?

(A) In the first year of the project, the government will spend 30% of its total budget on developing a space shuttle that can travel to Mars; that figure is expected to drop to 0% after five years.
(B) The government cannot be absolutely certain of the chances for success of either project.
(C) Some scientists are convinced that a mission to Europa would add immeasurably to our understanding of the universe.
(D) A new telescope that has just become available to scientists promises to yield more information than the planned mission to Europa was designed to provide.
(E) Most people feel that a shuttle to Mars is the next logical step in the development of a system that will allow humans to travel even further in the solar system.

(D) A new telescope that has just become available to scientists promises to yield more information than the planned mission to Europa was designed to provide.

Now they have a new telescope that they can use to get even more research than they would have if they sent an unmanned mission?
That's a good reason to cancel the unmanned mission. If that's true, then pretty much any other project would be a better use of funds!


(E) Most people feel that a shuttle to Mars is the next logical step in the development of a system that will allow humans to travel even further in the solar system.

That's interesting, but it doesn't tell us anything new about why spending the money on the Mars project is better than spending money on the Europa project. We already know that people are more interested in space travel. This answer is a tangent that's trying to get us to think more about that and make us forget about the conclusion, which centered on a comparison of the two projects.

That's ridiculous..... If a telescope can do the same thing as does the Europa unmanned mission, then how the Mars project is the better use of fund... So you send a person to Mars to keep an eye on the Jupiter's moon that could have been done from Earth itself and you are saying that that's a better use of funds? :lol: :lol: :lol:
avatar
HAPPYatHARVARD
Joined: 07 Apr 2018
Last visit: 11 Apr 2020
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 271
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GMAT 1: 600 Q45 V28
GPA: 3.8
GMAT 1: 600 Q45 V28
Posts: 76
Kudos: 66
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
But D does not say that the telescope of Tokyo will be available to NASA.
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,230
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,230
Kudos: 5,890
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
HAPPYatHARVARD
But D does not say that the telescope of Tokyo will be available to NASA.
A new telescope that has just become available to scientists ---- How you figure that ??
HAPPYatHARVARD
avatar
HAPPYatHARVARD
Joined: 07 Apr 2018
Last visit: 11 Apr 2020
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
66
 [1]
Given Kudos: 271
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GMAT 1: 600 Q45 V28
GPA: 3.8
GMAT 1: 600 Q45 V28
Posts: 76
Kudos: 66
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
But it never mentioned that the scientists are from NASA. aragonn
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,230
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,230
Kudos: 5,890
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
HAPPYatHARVARD
I am referring to this one. and why even telescope of Tokyo ???

Quote:
But D does not say that the telescope of Tokyo will be available to NASA.
User avatar
Princ
Joined: 22 Feb 2018
Last visit: 04 May 2025
Posts: 351
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 351
Kudos: 908
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kukr007
Scientists suspect that Europa, a moon orbiting Jupiter, may contain living organisms. However, the government recently scrapped an unmanned science mission to Europa and replaced it with a project aimed at landing an astronaut on Mars. Polls show that the public is far more fascinated by space travel than by discovering life elsewhere in the universe. Critics argue that the government's decision-making process places a greater emphasis on popularity than it does on the importance of scientific research.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen a contention by the government that the new project is a better use of its funds?

(A) In the first year of the project, the government will spend 30% of its total budget on developing a space shuttle that can travel to Mars; that figure is expected to drop to 0% after five years.
(B) The government cannot be absolutely certain of the chances for success of either project.
(C) Some scientists are convinced that a mission to Europa would add immeasurably to our understanding of the universe.
(D) A new telescope that has just become available to scientists promises to yield more information than the planned mission to Europa was designed to provide.
(E) Most people feel that a shuttle to Mars is the next logical step in the development of a system that will allow humans to travel even further in the solar system.

OA: D

Quote:
(D) A new telescope that has just become available to scientists promises to yield more information than the planned mission to Europa was designed to provide.

As New telescope has been already built and it is better than the unmanned mission to Europa in discovering life on Europa,
So landing astronaut on Mars is a better use of its funds
avatar
HAPPYatHARVARD
Joined: 07 Apr 2018
Last visit: 11 Apr 2020
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 271
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GMAT 1: 600 Q45 V28
GPA: 3.8
GMAT 1: 600 Q45 V28
Posts: 76
Kudos: 66
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The original question in the Manhattan SC book has Tokyo mentioned in it and the ans is the same. aragonn
avatar
GMATINSECT
Joined: 17 Jun 2017
Last visit: 22 Jul 2020
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 56
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kukr007
Scientists suspect that Europa, a moon orbiting Jupiter, may contain living organisms. However, the government recently scrapped an unmanned science mission to Europa and replaced it with a project aimed at landing an astronaut on Mars. Polls show that the public is far more fascinated by space travel than by discovering life elsewhere in the universe. Critics argue that the government's decision-making process places a greater emphasis on popularity than it does on the importance of scientific research.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen a contention by the government that the new project is a better use of its funds?

(A) In the first year of the project, the government will spend 30% of its total budget on developing a space shuttle that can travel to Mars; that figure is expected to drop to 0% after five years.
(B) The government cannot be absolutely certain of the chances for success of either project.
(C) Some scientists are convinced that a mission to Europa would add immeasurably to our understanding of the universe.
(D) A new telescope that has just become available to scientists promises to yield more information than the planned mission to Europa was designed to provide.
(E) Most people feel that a shuttle to Mars is the next logical step in the development of a system that will allow humans to travel even further in the solar system.

That's ridiculous ! How is telescope related for what ? Stupid explanation .
avatar
GMATINSECT
Joined: 17 Jun 2017
Last visit: 22 Jul 2020
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 56
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hazelnut
kukr007
Scientists suspect that Europa, a moon orbiting Jupiter, may contain living organisms. However, the government recently scrapped an unmanned science mission to Europa and replaced it with a project aimed at landing an astronaut on Mars. Polls show that the public is far more fascinated by space travel than by discovering life elsewhere in the universe. Critics argue that the government's decision-making process places a greater emphasis on popularity than it does on the importance of scientific research.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen a contention by the government that the new project is a better use of its funds?

(A) In the first year of the project, the government will spend 30% of its total budget on developing a space shuttle that can travel to Mars; that figure is expected to drop to 0% after five years.
(B) The government cannot be absolutely certain of the chances for success of either project.
(C) Some scientists are convinced that a mission to Europa would add immeasurably to our understanding of the universe.
(D) A new telescope that has just become available to scientists promises to yield more information than the planned mission to Europa was designed to provide.
(E) Most people feel that a shuttle to Mars is the next logical step in the development of a system that will allow humans to travel even further in the solar system.

(D) A new telescope that has just become available to scientists promises to yield more information than the planned mission to Europa was designed to provide.

Now they have a new telescope that they can use to get even more research than they would have if they sent an unmanned mission?
That's a good reason to cancel the unmanned mission. If that's true, then pretty much any other project would be a better use of funds!


(E) Most people feel that a shuttle to Mars is the next logical step in the development of a system that will allow humans to travel even further in the solar system.

That's interesting, but it doesn't tell us anything new about why spending the money on the Mars project is better than spending money on the Europa project. We already know that people are more interested in space travel. This answer is a tangent that's trying to get us to think more about that and make us forget about the conclusion, which centered on a comparison of the two projects.



This doesn't makes sense at all !!!
avatar
GMATINSECT
Joined: 17 Jun 2017
Last visit: 22 Jul 2020
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 56
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kukr007
Scientists suspect that Europa, a moon orbiting Jupiter, may contain living organisms. However, the government recently scrapped an unmanned science mission to Europa and replaced it with a project aimed at landing an astronaut on Mars. Polls show that the public is far more fascinated by space travel than by discovering life elsewhere in the universe. Critics argue that the government's decision-making process places a greater emphasis on popularity than it does on the importance of scientific research.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen a contention by the government that the new project is a better use of its funds?

(A) In the first year of the project, the government will spend 30% of its total budget on developing a space shuttle that can travel to Mars; that figure is expected to drop to 0% after five years.
(B) The government cannot be absolutely certain of the chances for success of either project.
(C) Some scientists are convinced that a mission to Europa would add immeasurably to our understanding of the universe.
(D) A new telescope that has just become available to scientists promises to yield more information than the planned mission to Europa was designed to provide.
(E) Most people feel that a shuttle to Mars is the next logical step in the development of a system that will allow humans to travel even further in the solar system.

I think if the question stem was what would strengthen a contention of the critics argument then D would have made sense . !!
User avatar
kush09
Joined: 01 May 2019
Last visit: 25 Aug 2024
Posts: 144
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.5
WE:Information Technology (Finance: Investment Banking)
Products:
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 144
Kudos: 158
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Scientists suspect that Europa, a moon orbiting Jupiter, may contain living organisms. However, the government recently scrapped an unmanned science mission to Europa and replaced it with a project aimed at landing an astronaut on Mars. Polls show that the public is far more fascinated by space travel than by discovering life elsewhere in the universe. Critics argue that the government's decision-making process places a greater emphasis on popularity than it does on the importance of scientific research.

Goverment - Scrapped unmanned science mission and replaced it with with manned mission to Mars.
Critics - Goverment decision is based on popularity rather than importance of scientific research


Quote:
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen a contention by the government that the new project is a better use of its funds?

To strengthen government decision we need an argument whcih tells us that government decision is made in interest of scientific research.


-- A and B are don't help much and C weakens government decision.

Quote:
(D) A new telescope that has just become available to scientists promises to yield more information than the planned mission to Europa was designed to provide.
-- This give us reason why government cancel the unmanned project to Europa.

Quote:
(E) Most people feel that a shuttle to Mars is the next logical step in the development of a system that will allow humans to travel even further in the solar system.
-- This might be true, but it doesn't help us in showing that governments decision is "insert of science", rather it helps critics argument that Goverment decision is based on popularity.

Answer is D. Hope you find explanation helpful.
User avatar
reynaldreni
Joined: 07 May 2015
Last visit: 02 Nov 2022
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
142
 [1]
Given Kudos: 152
Location: India
Schools: Darden '21
GPA: 4
Schools: Darden '21
Posts: 76
Kudos: 142
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kukr007
Scientists suspect that Europa, a moon orbiting Jupiter, may contain living organisms. However, the government recently scrapped an unmanned science mission to Europa and replaced it with a project aimed at landing an astronaut on Mars. Polls show that the public is far more fascinated by space travel than by discovering life elsewhere in the universe. Critics argue that the government's decision-making process places a greater emphasis on popularity than it does on the importance of scientific research.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen a contention by the government that the new project is a better use of its funds?

(A) In the first year of the project, the government will spend 30% of its total budget on developing a space shuttle that can travel to Mars; that figure is expected to drop to 0% after five years.
(B) The government cannot be absolutely certain of the chances for success of either project.
(C) Some scientists are convinced that a mission to Europa would add immeasurably to our understanding of the universe.
(D) A new telescope that has just become available to scientists promises to yield more information than the planned mission to Europa was designed to provide.
(E) Most people feel that a shuttle to Mars is the next logical step in the development of a system that will allow humans to travel even further in the solar system.

The key to answering this question is the focus on "better use of funds". We need to find an options that suggests that travel to mars is better that mission to Europa. Option D does exactly explain why funds to mission Europa will not be worth.
User avatar
sayan640
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,179
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 783
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Products:
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Posts: 1,179
Kudos: 813
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyMurray KarishmaB Is this question legit ?
User avatar
RitabrataSarkar
Joined: 02 Aug 2022
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 11
Given Kudos: 63
Posts: 11
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is from MGMAT CR book, problem set 10 Strengthen Chapter. Even I am starting to doubt the legitimacy of the options. EG ,, for A: Govt is not saying anything regarding the cost of traveling to Europa,,hence in the explanations provided, this is being treated as wrong. for D, The cost of telescope is also not given(as per my pod),,but this is being treated as correct answer. Highly confusing.
User avatar
catcun
Joined: 07 Aug 2025
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 18
Given Kudos: 217
Posts: 18
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat is this question legitimate?
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,886
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RitabrataSarkar
This is from MGMAT CR book, problem set 10 Strengthen Chapter. Even I am starting to doubt the legitimacy of the options. EG ,, for A: Govt is not saying anything regarding the cost of traveling to Europa,,hence in the explanations provided, this is being treated as wrong. for D, The cost of telescope is also not given(as per my pod),,but this is being treated as correct answer. Highly confusing.

RitabrataSarkar To see why (D) works where (A) fails, let's clarify the central idea:

What does "better use of funds" really mean?

A project is a "better use of funds" if it provides a better return on investment. This can happen in two ways:


  • Cost side: It costs less for the same (or better) benefit.
  • Benefit side: It provides a greater benefit for the same (or lower) cost.

You were correctly focused on the cost side, which is why option (A) felt incomplete. Now let's consider the benefit side.

What is the "benefit" of the Europa mission?

The passage tells us the mission is for scientific research—to discover if there is life and "add immeasurably to our understanding of the universe." The benefit is scientific information.

How does option (D) affect this benefit?

Option (D) states that a new telescope "promises to yield more information than the planned mission to Europa was designed to provide."

This statement directly attacks the scientific benefit of the Europa mission. If a different tool can achieve the mission'
s primary goal betterand more effectively, the original mission loses its value. It has become redundant.

Spending
any significant amount of money on a project whose core benefit has been eliminated is, by definition, a poor use of funds. By making the Europa mission a demonstrably bad use of funds, option (D) strengthens the argument that the Mars mission is the better use of funds by comparison, regardless of the exact costs involved.


I hope this clears up your confusion!
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,886
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
catcun
egmat is this question legitimate?

catcun Yes, the question does make sense.

Here's the logic for why option (D) has to be correct:
  1. If the telescope can give us the Europa information (and more), then the Europa mission becomes redundant/unnecessary
  2. Spending funds on a redundant mission = wasteful allocation of resources
  3. Therefore, the Mars mission becomes a better use of funds - not because it's cheaper, but because Europa spending is no longer justified
  4. The government can now say: "We chose Mars because the Europa science goals can be achieved through the telescope, so Mars is the wiser investment"

If you think any part of the question or answer choices do not make sense, you can highlight that. I'd address- but overall, the synthesis of the question is correct.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts