GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Jan 2019, 18:24

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

     January 19, 2019

     January 19, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
  • FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

     January 20, 2019

     January 20, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     07:00 AM PST

    Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.

Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 739
Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 06 Jan 2019, 12:32
8
46
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (01:15) correct 45% (01:28) wrong based on 1944 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes. However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run. Once an airline successfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?


(A) In some countries it is not illegal for a company to drive away competitors by selling a product below cost.

(B) Airline executives generally believe that a company that once underpriced its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new competitors emerge.

(C) As part of promotions designed to attract new customers, airlines sometimes reduce their ticket prices to below an economically sustainable level.

(D) On deciding to stop serving particular routes, most airlines shift resources to other routes rather than reduce the size of their operations.

(E) When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly.

_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-polygons-87336.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html


Originally posted by nitya34 on 15 Mar 2009, 10:30.
Last edited by Bunuel on 06 Jan 2019, 12:32, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question.
Most Helpful Community Reply
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: CFA
Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Posts: 380
Location: United States (NY)
Schools: Columbia - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 710 Q45 V43
GMAT 2: 760 Q49 V45
Premium Member
Re: Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2010, 06:53
14
4
Answer: B

Reason: The conclusion states that the strategy of lowering prices cannot be profitable long term – the reason why it cannot be profitable is because when the airliner that dumped begins to raise prices to recoup dumping losses, competitors will re-enter the market and undercut them. B states that the competitors would actually be unlikely to actually re-enter the market because they believe the airliner will go back to dumping. This would imply that the strategy is indeed profitable in the long-term, nullifying the conclusion.
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

General Discussion
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Posts: 8
Re: Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2009, 06:52
12
5
IMO the answer should be B. The author says first competitors are driven off these routes, but they will come back once the airline x charges higher prices again (i.o. to become profitable). Answer B says "no, the competitors won't come back because once they start flying these routes again the airline x will lower prices again and nobody makes any profit".

On answer E: The increase in passenger numbers could lead to higher utilization of planes and this higher efficiency to profitability, but it could also lead to the following: if I sell flight tickets for 1 Dollar I will make 100 Dollar loss on every customer. If the total number of airline passengers increases greatly, I may lose even more money.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Its Wow or Never
Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Posts: 160
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2010, 05:56
1
1
nitya34 wrote:
Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes. However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run. Once an airline sucessfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A) In some countries it is not illegal for a company to drive away competitors by selling a product below cost.

B) Airline executives generally believe that a company that once underpriced its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new competitors emerge.

C) As part of promotions designed to attract new customers, airlines sometimes reduce their ticket prices to below an economically sustainable level.

D) On deciding to stop serving particular routes, most airlines shift resources to other routes rather than reduce the size of their operations.

E) When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly.

Spoiler: :: OA
B


Pls elaborate


A.incorrect.the legality or the illegality of the price cutting is out of question.the main concern is the profit and loss of the concerned company
C.Incorrect.In my opinion,this strengthens the argument by pointing out that the airlines reduce the pay to unsustainable levels that losses will occur.
D.Incorrect.Shifting of the resources to other routes is irrelevant.
E.Incorrect.The number of passengers on a route has little to do with the argument.
B.Correct.Best describes the point that even if the competitors come back to the original routes the Company concerned is willing to drop the prices again to low levels.Hence weakens the argument that it will provide the competitors with a better opportunity.
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think you can,you can
If you think you can't,you are right.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 301
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2010, 10:47
Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes. However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run. Once an airline sucessfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A) In some countries it is not illegal for a company to drive away competitors by selling a product below cost.

B) Airline executives generally believe that a company that once underpriced its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new competitors emerge.
Correct Answer
Reason: Conclusion talks about the methodology of cutting pricing on a route to kick out competitors. Only this options gives a weakening stand to this methodology!


C) As part of promotions designed to attract new customers, airlines sometimes reduce their ticket prices to below an economically sustainable level.

D) On deciding to stop serving particular routes, most airlines shift resources to other routes rather than reduce the size of their operations.

E) When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly.
_________________

Cheers!
JT...........
If u like my post..... payback in Kudos!! :beer

|Do not post questions with OA|Please underline your SC questions while posting|Try posting the explanation along with your answer choice|
|For CR refer Powerscore CR Bible|For SC refer Manhattan SC Guide|


~~Better Burn Out... Than Fade Away~~

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 14
Re: Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jan 2011, 19:10
1
Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes. However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run. Once an airline successfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In some countries it is not illegal for a company to drive away competitors by selling a product below cost. (NOT RELAVANT)
(B) Airline executives generally believe that a company that once underpriced its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new competitors emerge.
CONCLUSION: However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run.
ANSWER: Must weaken the conclusion. Ans: B is a cyclic process.

(C) As part of promotions designed to attract new customers, airlines sometimes reduce their ticket prices to below an economically sustainable level.(ATTRACTS NEW CUSTOMERS...INCREASE REVENUES BUT DOES NOT DRIVE COMPETITIORS)
(D) On deciding to stop serving particular routes, most airlines shift resources to other routes rather than reduce the size of their operations.(THIS WILL SAVE MONEY BUT DOES NOT DRIVE COMPETITIORS)
(E) When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly.(WILL INCREASE REVENUES NO DISCUSSION ABOUT NOT DRIVE COMPETITIORS)

HOPE THIS HELPS !!!!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 03 May 2013
Posts: 280
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: XLRI GM"18
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Re: Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jan 2014, 17:48
PREMISE - Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes.
PREMISE - Once an airline successfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares.
CONCLUSION - This method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run.


Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? WE ARE LOOKING FOR A SOLUTION WHERE IN THIS METHOD IS PROFITABLE IN A LONG RUN...

(A) In some countries it is not illegal for a company to drive away competitors by selling a product below cost....SO WHAT
(B) Airline executives generally believe that a company that once under priced its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new competitors emerge... SO NEW COMPETITORS can again be eliminated and profit resumed by fare hike
(C) As part of promotions designed to attract new customers, airlines sometimes reduce their ticket prices to below an economically sustainable level...... already known.........but if they go too low on prices ... it would rather be a strengthener...
(D) On deciding to stop serving particular routes, most airlines shift resources to other routes rather than reduce the size of their operations....routes don't matter....profit does.....
(E) When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly...BUT WOULD STILL BE AT LOSSES AS PER THE OPENING STATEMENT...
Director
Director
User avatar
B
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 848
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 May 2015, 02:05
Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes. However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run. Once an airline successfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares.

In short, the airlines can drive off the competitors and the loss they make, the airlines cannot recoup that losses by charging high fares for an extended period (Conclusion of the argument) and the competitors can easily come back by under cutting the prices.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In some countries it is not illegal for a company to drive away competitors by selling a product below cost.
Not worried about the legality of the process -> OFS

(B) Airline executives generally believe that a company that once underpriced its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new competitors emerge.
This weakens the conclusion as when the competitors come back and try to under cut the prices, the airlines again do so to drive off the competitors -> Correct

(C) As part of promotions designed to attract new customers, airlines sometimes reduce their ticket prices to below an economically sustainable level.
That is given in the premise. It doesn't talk about weakening the argument

(D) On deciding to stop serving particular routes, most airlines shift resources to other routes rather than reduce the size of their operations.
In fact this strengthens the argument

(E) When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly.
Losses * (Number of passengers) = More losses
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal
My Debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267.html#p1449379
My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961
Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/in/kinjal-das/

Please click on Kudos, if you think the post is helpful

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Posts: 282
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Re: Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jun 2017, 09:04
2
Here is why E cannot be right.

From the argument:

Quote:
Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money,


In other words, while holding fares at the level necessary for driving away competitors, the airline doing so loses money.

Here's what E says.

Quote:
E. When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly.


Notice, what E say does not undermine the conclusion, because even with the increase in passengers mentioned in E, the airline offering the lower prices will continue to lose money. A money losing fare level is a money losing fare level regardless of how many passengers an airline has at that level. So, adding the information provided by E does not change the conclusion that the strategy is not profitable.
_________________

Marty Murray
GMAT Coach
m.w.murray@hotmail.com
http://infinitemindprep.com

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 15 Jan 2017
Posts: 355
Re: Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Sep 2017, 08:13
Hoping that experts would help me out here with the reasoning - I was stuck between B and E and picked E.
How does B win over E?
(B) Airline executives generally believe that a company that once underpriced its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new competitors emerge. - This means that competition won't enter the market of that particular route; cause the initial company would reduce its prices again. A contender

(E) When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly.This means that the particular airline would make profits, another contender

So one talks about profit (E) and one talks about competition (B); and both weaken - can anyone help me on this?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Posts: 282
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Re: Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2017, 18:31
Madhavi1990 wrote:
Hoping that experts would help me out here with the reasoning - I was stuck between B and E and picked E.
How does B win over E?
(B) Airline executives generally believe that a company that once underpriced its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new competitors emerge. - This means that competition won't enter the market of that particular route; cause the initial company would reduce its prices again. A contender

(E) When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly.This means that the particular airline would make profits, another contender

So one talks about profit (E) and one talks about competition (B); and both weaken - can anyone help me on this?


One key to getting the correct answer to a CR question is being very clear regarding what conclusion you are seeking to weaken or strengthen.

Here is the conclusion to this argument in this question.

this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run.

Notice, in order to be profitable, the airline has to increase fares.

E does not indicate that the airline will be profitable, as E says what will happen when the fares are STILL DRAMATICALLY REDUCED. As long as the fares are dramatically reduced, the route will not be profitable no matter how many passengers take that route.

B, by indicating that it is likely that other airlines will stay out of the market even if the airline controlling the route increases prices, shows a path to profitability for the airline that took control of the route by underpricing the competition.
_________________

Marty Murray
GMAT Coach
m.w.murray@hotmail.com
http://infinitemindprep.com

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 24 May 2017
Posts: 13
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
Reviews Badge
Re: Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Nov 2017, 00:28
I want to understand why option E is incorrect. In the long term, profitability may be sustained because of more number of passengers that the airlines managed to attract.

Whereas in option B, the airlines will again decrease prices thereby affecting profitability further.

Need an expert's opinion on this question.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2225
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Nov 2017, 20:53
3
1
Nikhil_as wrote:
I want to understand why option E is incorrect. In the long term, profitability may be sustained because of more number of passengers that the airlines managed to attract.

Whereas in option B, the airlines will again decrease prices thereby affecting profitability further.

Need an expert's opinion on this question.

Choice (E) only tells us that we will have more customers "when airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route." But what will happen when the airline increases its fares? Will those customers stick around? If they do, will other airlines offer lowers prices to undercut the increased fares?

The author of the passage would argue that an increase in the popularity of the route wouldn't help of those customers just end up flying with competitors once we start charging higher fares to recoup our earlier losses. Thus, choice (E) doesn't impact the author's specific argument and should be eliminated.

Notice the words "for an extended period" in the passage. The author's concern is that if the airline charges higher fares for an EXTENDED period, then eventually rivals will undercut those prices. Choice (B) tells us that the airline can charge higher fares for a while and then, after an EXTENDED period, reduce the fares again if needed to drive away competitors. Even though the airline has to repeatedly lower its prices, with each cycle they'll enjoy an EXTENDED period of charging higher fares and recouping their losses.

I hope that helps!

In other words, the airline would take some losses and then gain them back by charging higher fares for a while. If competitors try to undercut the airline, they'll simply slash fares again for a while to drive out the competition and then repeat the cycle.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | Instagram | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 08 Jul 2016
Posts: 41
CAT Tests
Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jan 2019, 22:30
Nikhil_as wrote:
I want to understand why option E is incorrect. In the long term, profitability may be sustained because of more number of passengers that the airlines managed to attract.

Whereas in option B, the airlines will again decrease prices thereby affecting profitability further.

Need an expert's opinion on this question.


Adding to what GMATNinja said - The conclusion says that eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run. Why? Because competitors will undercut airline's fare.
Now, the whole process involves two step - 1. Airline reduces price . 2. Airline increases price/ competitors undercut airline's price
Our argument focuses on second step.
The correct answer choice must show that why eliminating competition strategy will remain profitable even after competitors lower their fare below that of the airline.
Choice E may suggest that profitability of the airline will increase when airline reduces its fare (looks more relevant to step 1) , but it doesn't fit the reasoning structure. It doesn't take into account the support (highlighted in yellow) that we provided for the conclusion.
GMAT Club Bot
Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at &nbs [#permalink] 06 Jan 2019, 22:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.