GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Mar 2019, 15:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Supreme Court decisions while binding on all United States courts

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Senior SC Moderator
avatar
V
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 2561
Supreme Court decisions while binding on all United States courts  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jan 2019, 13:15
2
1
8
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

49% (01:43) correct 51% (01:58) wrong based on 280 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Project SC Butler: Day 57 Sentence Correction (SC1)


For SC butler Questions Click Here


Supreme Court decisions, while binding on all United States courts, leave room for interpretation; it is therefore important for lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of the law.

A) important for lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of the law

B) important that lawyers and judges be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, and holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of the law

C) important for lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, that refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, and holdings, that refer to the binding decisions of the law

D) important that lawyers and judges are able to distinguish dicta, referring to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, referring to the binding decisions of the law

E) important that lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of law

The best or excellent answers get kudos, which will be awarded after the answer is revealed.

_________________

And above all, watch with glittering eyes the whole world around you
because the greatest secrets are always hidden in the most unlikely places.
Those who don't believe in magic will never find it
.
—Roald Dahl

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Posts: 250
Re: Supreme Court decisions while binding on all United States courts  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jan 2019, 13:33
2
Supreme Court decisions, while binding on all United States courts, leave room for interpretation; it is therefore important for lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of the law.

A) important for lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of the law( between dicta and holdings is correct, between dicta from holdings is incorrect)

B) important that lawyers and judges be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, and holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of the law( correct)

C) important for lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, that refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, and holdings, that refer to the binding decisions of the law( that is not used for non restrictive clause.which is used for non restrictive clause )

D) important that lawyers and judges are able to distinguish dicta, referring to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, referring to the binding decisions of the law(between dicta from holding is incorrect)

E) important that lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of law( between dicta and holdings is incorrect)

Will go with choice B.

Thanks
_________________

IMPOSSIBLE IS JUST AN OPINION

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2016
Posts: 21
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Supreme Court decisions while binding on all United States courts  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2019, 04:23
2
IDIOM: distinguish between X AND Y
That introduces essential modifiers; therefore, Comma before that here is incorrect usage.
Considering above, Gotta go with Choice B.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Aug 2018
Posts: 222
CAT Tests
Re: Supreme Court decisions while binding on all United States courts  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2019, 06:11
1
Imo B
Correct idiom is distinguish between x and y
Also the reference of using for lawyers and judges does not convey the exact meaning....that is preferred

important for lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of the law--incorrect, as mentioned wrong idiom and usage of that

B) important that lawyers and judges be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, and holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of the law---correct

C) important for lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, that refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, and holdings, that refer to the binding decisions of the law---incorrect, that is used to represent important information therefore it should have been without comma

D) important that lawyers and judges are able to distinguish dicta, referring to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, referring to the binding decisions of the law---incorrect, wrong idom and ing modifier is to present clause modification

E) important that lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of law+--incorrect, wrong idiom

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

"Press +1 KUDOS"

Be very critical of my Post
Ask as many questions of my post possible

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 25 Mar 2018
Posts: 36
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GPA: 4
WE: Analyst (Manufacturing)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Supreme Court decisions while binding on all United States courts  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2019, 09:18
generis wrote:

Project SC Butler: Day 57 Sentence Correction (SC1)


For SC butler Questions Click Here


Supreme Court decisions, while binding on all United States courts, leave room for interpretation; it is therefore important for lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of the law.

A) important for lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of the law

B) important that lawyers and judges be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, and holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of the law

C) important for lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, that refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, and holdings, that refer to the binding decisions of the law

D) important that lawyers and judges are able to distinguish dicta, referring to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, referring to the binding decisions of the law

E) important that lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of law

The best or excellent answers get kudos, which will be awarded after the answer is revealed.



it tests distinguish between X and Y idiom , so A ,D and E are out.

B has error that Holdings is taken as singular but its plural - so - incorrect

So, correct option is C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 22 Sep 2018
Posts: 250
Re: Supreme Court decisions while binding on all United States courts  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2019, 15:49
1
Yash312 wrote:
Imo B
Correct idiom is distinguish between x and y
Also the reference of using for lawyers and judges does not convey the exact meaning....that is preferred

important for lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of the law--incorrect, as mentioned wrong idiom and usage of that

B) important that lawyers and judges be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, and holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of the law---correct

C) important for lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, that refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, and holdings, that refer to the binding decisions of the law---incorrect, that is used to represent important information therefore it should have been without comma

D) important that lawyers and judges are able to distinguish dicta, referring to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, referring to the binding decisions of the law---incorrect, wrong idom and ing modifier is to present clause modification

E) important that lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of law+--incorrect, wrong idiom

Posted from my mobile device


Just wanted to let you know there is no idiom error in D. The error is with the ing modifiers being used to modify a noun when it should modify a clause.

Distinguish X from Y is perfectly fine IMO.
Senior SC Moderator
avatar
V
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 2561
Supreme Court decisions while binding on all United States courts  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2019, 16:57
3

Project SC Butler: Day 57 Sentence Correction (SC1)


For SC butler Questions Click Here


Supreme Court decisions, while binding on all United States courts, leave room for interpretation; it is therefore important for lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of the law.

A) important for lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of the law
B) important that lawyers and judges be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, and holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of the law
C) important for lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, that refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, and holdings, that refer to the binding decisions of the law
D) important that lawyers and judges are able to distinguish dicta, referring to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, referring to the binding decisions of the law
E) important that lawyers and judges to be able to distinguish between dicta, which refers to the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, from holdings, which refers to the binding decisions of law

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

• [Paraphrasing] This question tests the idiom [Distinguish] between X and Y.
That construction is correct. [Distinguish] between X from Y is not correct.

Eliminate options A and E

• Choice B correctly changes [Distinguish] between X from Y (between . . . from) to [Distinguish] between X and Y (between . . . and).
[Option B also] correctly changes to be able to the subjunctive be able, which is commanded by the clause it is . . . important

• Choice C removes between but does not use the other possible idiom, Distinguish X from Y;
instead choice C incorrectly uses Distinguish X and Y (distinguish . . . and . . .).
Eliminate option C

• Choice D incorrectly changes the verb to be able to are able, instead of rendering the verb in the subjunctive mood as be able.
Eliminate D.

The correct answer is B

COMMENTS

I am glad that the expression "It is (therefore) important THAT" is at issue.
Command subjunctive, discussed below, is not limited to bossy verbs.
Other constructions require the command subjunctive.
The most common of such constructions is the expression: "It is [adjective of importance] that."

Errors not related to command subjunctive
• Idiom - correct: Distinguish between X and Y. Wrong: Distinguish between X from Y. Discussed above.

• Usage of that.
-- As discussed in the first few posts, that must not be preceded by a comma.
The word that implies an essential modifier:

Right: The house that federal agents searched for drugs is around the corner.
Wrong (remove the commas!): The house, that federal agents searched for drugs, is around the corner.
Commas imply that we can remove a "non-essential modifier."
Correctly punctuated, incorrect meaning: The house, which federal agents searched for drugs, is around the corner.
A slightly different sentence in which the non-essential modifier IS non-essential, correct:
The house, which is not hard to find, is around the corner.
The word used to introduce non essential modifiers is which

GENERAL APPROACH and ANALYSIS OF COMMAND SUBJUNCTIVE

Strip the sentence, put brackets around the questionable parts, and rename long parts of no consequence with variables

Supreme Court decisions, while binding on all United States courts, leave room for interpretation; it is therefore important for lawyers and judges [to be able] to distinguish between dicta, which refers to X the written material detailing the opinions of the prevailing justices, [from] holdings, which refers to Y the binding decisions of the law[/u].

. . . It is therefore important for lawyers and judges [to be able??] to [distinguish between??] dicta, which refers to X, [from??] holdings, which refers to Y.

• Meaning: Lawyers and judges must be able to tell the difference between dicta and holdings [when they read Supreme Court opinions].

WITHOUT THE IDIOM - we can decide this question on the basis of subjunctive construction alone

• Ignore the first IC
Unless it is used in a complicated list, a semicolon always separates two independent clauses, ICs
Ignore the first IC except to note that the question is about written Supreme Court opinions. That fact is enough.

• Words and phrases that should grab our attention, especially if we scan the answer choices:
"it is important"
distinguish (already discussed in OE above)

It is therefore important: requires the command subjunctive

If we compare answers using splits, we see that v. for
-- B, D, and E: It is therefore important that lawyers and judges . . .
-- A and C: It is therefore important for lawyers and judges . . .

If we have
IT IS + an adjective of importance, then command subjunctive is required.*

The expression it is important that is "bossing around" the subjects that follow, just as a bossy verb would boss those subjects around.

• How to construct this type of expression:

IT IS + ADJECTIVE OF IMPORTANCE + that + subject + bare infinitive (command subjunctive)

Correct: It is imperative that smoke detectors be placed in every classroom.
Wrong: It is imperative that smoke detectors are placed in every classroom.

Because A and C incorrectly use "It is important FOR," eliminate them.

• Looking for the correct verb.
Only one form is correct: the bare infinitive. Simply remove the word "to."
Infinitive = to be able [to distinguish]
Bare infinitive = be able

It is important that lawyers and judges be able [to distinguish] . . .

Option D incorrectly uses "are able." Option E incorrectly uses the infinitive "to be able."

Option B is correct.

We have no completely correct answers today, a fact that is just fine. This question is hard.
sonusaini1
Incorrect about E: "between dicta and holdings is incorrect)" -- if that statement were true, then B could not be correct
IronMaiden97
Your first sentence eliminates A and E. Your second sentence eliminates C. How do we choose between B and D?
Yash312 , the idiom in option D is okay. Both are correct: Distinguish between X and Y and Distinguish X from Y
gadde22 , "holdings" is used as a term, a singular term. That issue is hard; dicta is italicized because it is Latin. Although not italicized,
in context, "holdings" refers to a general and singular thing (the part of a Supreme Court opinion in which binding decisions of the Court are found).
kchen1994 , you are correct about option D. (Not pointing out an error. Just acknowledging your contribution, which unfortunately is not a whole solution.)

Thanks for posting, all! :)


**Here is a not-exhaustive sample of adjectives that require the command subjunctive when preceded by "it is."
It is important (that) the rules be followed.
It is best (that)
It is imperative (that)
It is necessary (that)
It is desirable (that) she be given access to the secret code.
It is essential (that) he cooperate with the police.
It is urgent (that)
It is recommended (that)

_________________

And above all, watch with glittering eyes the whole world around you
because the greatest secrets are always hidden in the most unlikely places.
Those who don't believe in magic will never find it
.
—Roald Dahl

GMAT Club Bot
Supreme Court decisions while binding on all United States courts   [#permalink] 03 Jan 2019, 16:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Supreme Court decisions while binding on all United States courts

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.