Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 04:00 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 04:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,194
 [634]
34
Kudos
Add Kudos
597
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
User avatar
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Last visit: 17 Feb 2025
Posts: 1,694
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 766
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,694
Kudos: 15,175
 [384]
197
Kudos
Add Kudos
185
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,344
Own Kudos:
3,796
 [283]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,344
Kudos: 3,796
 [283]
136
Kudos
Add Kudos
147
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,418
 [23]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,418
 [23]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Technically, “quicksand” is the term for sand that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid's character.


A. that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid's character--- more ideal than B as it avoids the prickly pronoun issue.

B. that is so saturated with water that it acquires the character of a liquid-- 'it' may refer to either the term quicksand or just sand.

C. that is saturated with water enough to acquire the liquid characteristics --- Liquid characteristics means different from the character of a liquid.

D. saturated enough with water so as to acquire the character of a liquid--- so as to acquire in a stretch isn't acceptable. 'So adjective as to' is the correct idiom.

E. saturated with water so much as to acquire a liquid character-- liquid character changes the meaning.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,764
 [9]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,764
 [9]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Friends,

Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
Bunuel
Technically, "quicksand" is the term for sand that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid's character.

(A) that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid's character

(B) that is so saturated with water that it acquires the character of a liquid

(C) that is saturated with water enough to acquire liquid characteristics

(D) saturated enough with water so as to acquire the character of a liquid

(E) saturated with water so much as to acquire a liquid character


Meaning is crucial to solving this problem:
Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended core meaning of this sentence is that quicksand is sand that is so saturated with water that it acquires the characteristics typically possessed by a liquid.

Concepts tested here: Meaning + Idioms + Awkwardness/Redundancy

• "so as to" is generally an incorrect usage; "so + cause + as to + effect" and “so + cause + that + effect” are the correct, idiomatic usages.
• “enough + to” is a correct, idiomatic usage; besides, “enough” is used to show “adequacy” and generally not used to show a cause-effect relationship; rather, “so + cause + that + effect” or “so + cause + as to + effect” are some of the preferred constructions for conveying a cause-effect relationship.

A: Trap. This answer choice incorrectly uses the unidiomatic construction “so + cause (“saturated with water”) + as to + effect (“acquire a liquid’s character”)”; please remember, "so as to" is generally an incorrect usage; "so + cause + as to + effect" and “so + cause + that + effect” are the correct, idiomatic usages. Further, Option A uses the passive voice construction “a liquid's character”, rendering it awkward and needlessly indirect.

B: Correct. This answer choice uses the phrase “character of a liquid”, conveying the intended meaning – that quicksand is sand that is so saturated with water that it acquires the characteristics typically possessed by a liquid. Further, Option B correctly uses the preferred, idiomatic construction “so + cause (“saturated with water”) + that + effect (“it acquires the character of a liquid”)” to refer to the cause-effect relationship between the sand being saturated with water and the sand acquiring the character of a liquid. Besides, Option B is free of any awkwardness or redundancy.

C: Trap. This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase “liquid characteristics”; the construction of this phrase illogically implies that quicksand is sand that is so saturated with water that it acquires characteristics that are liquid in nature; the intended meaning is that quicksand is sand that is so saturated with water that it acquires the characteristics typically possessed by a liquid. Further, Option C uses the phrase “enough to” to refer to the cause-effect relationship between the sand being saturated with water and the sand acquiring the character of a liquid; please remember, “enough” is used to show “adequacy” and generally not used to show a cause-effect relationship; rather, “so + cause + that + effect” or “so + cause + as to + effect” are some of the preferred constructions for conveying a cause-effect relationship.

D: This answer choice incorrectly uses the unidiomatic construction “enough so as to”; please remember, “enough + to” is correct, idiomatic usage. Further, Option D uses “enough” to refer to the cause-effect relationship between the sand being saturated with water and the sand acquiring the character of a liquid; please remember, “enough” is used to show “adequacy” and generally not used to show a cause-effect relationship; rather, “so + cause + that + effect” or “so + cause + as to + effect” are some of the preferred constructions for conveying a cause-effect relationship.

E: This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase “liquid character”; the construction of this phrase illogically implies that quicksand is sand that is so saturated with water that it acquires characteristics that are liquid in nature; the intended meaning is that quicksand is sand that is so saturated with water that it acquires the characteristics typically possessed by a liquid.

Hence, B is the best answer choice.

To understand the concept of "So As To" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):



All the best!
Experts' Global Team
General Discussion
avatar
SWAT09
Joined: 20 Feb 2015
Last visit: 05 Apr 2022
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
59
 [4]
Given Kudos: 97
Posts: 51
Kudos: 59
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO, B makes sense.
Other options say "as to acquire" liquid's character (which could be one particular type of liquid) or characteristics of liquid, means sand itself want to acquire those characteristics by enough saturation of water. However, in general, quicksand is a condition where sand behaves like a liquid when it is saturated with enough water. Also "so X that Y" is correct
User avatar
sqube
Joined: 18 Mar 2017
Last visit: 09 May 2020
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
47
 [3]
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
WE:Asset Management (Energy)
Posts: 10
Kudos: 47
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
urvashis09
IMO B.

to+verb is used to denote aim/purpose/intention. The sand does not acquire water to become like liquid. Therefore, B.

Also, there is no pronoun ambiguity as water cannot acquire a liquid's character as it already is a liquid.

Not very sure, waiting for the OA.

I think there is a subtle difference in meaning between A & B.Lets have a re-look at the options.

A. that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid's character
In A, 'liquid' works to replace 'water'.
So option A could be read as : that is so saturated with water as to acquire a water's character.

B. that is so saturated with water that it acquires the character of a liquid
In B, 'liquid' do not acts as a replacement of 'water'. It means that 'quicksand' acts as a 'liquid'

IMO, sentence intends to convey that 'quicksand' works as 'water' and not just a 'liquid'.

Experts comments awaited.
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 1,143
Own Kudos:
22,215
 [4]
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Technically, “quicksand” is the term for sand that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid's character.

(A) that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid's character

(B) that is so saturated with water that it acquires the character of a liquid

(C) that is saturated with water enough to acquire liquid characteristics

(D) saturated enough with water so as to acquire the character of a liquid

(E) saturated with water so much as to acquire a liquid character

NEW question from GMAT® Official Guide 2019


(SC00971)

https://www.nytimes.com/1986/04/15/science/q-a-262786.html

Does quicksand really suck in its victims? A. Dr. Stanley Schumm, a professor of geology at Colorado State University, said that contrary to superstition, quicksand does not draw in its victims. The human body will not sink out of sight in quicksand, he said, because the density of the quicksand is greater than that of the body. Most of the people who perish in quicksand, however, do drown after losing their balance from struggling to get out, he said. Quicksand is the term for sand that is so saturated with water that it loses its supporting capacity. As water beneath the surface is forced upward through the sand, the grains are pushed apart and the sand swells, acquiring the character of a liquid.
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,039
Own Kudos:
9,961
 [13]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,039
Kudos: 9,961
 [13]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
Hello Everyone!

Even though the stats for this question show it's a tricky one, we can narrow down to the right option by exploiting the error type clues.

Let's start by looking at the differences in the options:

1. that is so saturated / saturated enough
2. acquires / to acquire
3. character / characteristics

Verb tenses are often an easy place to start narrowing down options, so definitely let's start by tackling #2 on our list: acquires vs. to acquire.

When we use the to+verb combination, it implies intention. This means that when we say the sand wants "to acquire" the characteristics of water, it is a thinking, breathing, intentional being that chooses to go out and get the characteristics of water. We know that sand isn't a living thing that has intentions of its own. Therefore, it isn't appropriate to say "to acquire." Here are some examples:

I want to acquire the rights to that song for my movie. = CORRECT (I'm a person with thoughts and intentions, so it's okay.)

The chair is so short as to acquire the perfect balance for short children. = WRONG (A chair can't want "to acquire" balance from somewhere - it's either balanced or it's not. The chair can't decide for itself what it wants to be!)

The school acquires new students every fall. = CORRECT (Just saying "acquires" doesn't imply intention is involved. It just happens, so it's okay.)

Now, let's use that understanding and we'll be able to decimate the incorrect options. Check it out:


(A) that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid's character

(B) that is so saturated with water that it acquires the character of a liquid

(C) that is saturated with water enough to acquire liquid characteristics

(D) saturated enough with water so as to acquire the character of a liquid

(E) saturated with water so much as to acquire a liquid character


There we have it. The only answer that doesn't imply that sand or quicksand "chooses" to take on the characteristics of a liquid is answer B.

Don’t study for the GMAT. Train for it.
I found the below explanation from a GMAT expert on another site -

The explanation is that “to acquire” indicates the purpose/intention of “sand”. Since “sand” cannot have an intention, this option is incorrect.

However, this explanation is incorrect. In this “so x as to verb y” construction, “to verb” doesn’t denote purpose or intention. “to verb y” part indicates the extent of “x”.

For example:
-The numbers coming out of Exxon Mobil XOM 0.37% were so good as to be slightly embarrassing. (https://www.wsj.com/articles/no-more-ti ... 1517589782)
-Potential penalties would be so low as to have no relevance for financial markets. (https://www.wsj.com/articles/investor-t ... 1536256548)
-The company’s descriptions of the partnership dealings were so complicated as to be practically indecipherable. (https://jp.wsj.com/articles/SB1011560211577333280)

In all the above sentences, the subjects of the sentences cannot have an intention. Still, the sentences are correct. There are hundreds of other similar sentences on WSJ.com and NYTimes.com. Unless we consider all these sentences incorrect, we cannot agree with the above explanation.



Technically, “quicksand” is the term for sand that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid's character.

(A) that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid's character - the phrase a liquid's character is incorrect because we want to discuss the general nature of any given liquid

(B) that is so saturated with water that it acquires the character of a liquid - Correct

(C) that is saturated with water enough to acquire liquid characteristics - “enough” word is misplaced. It should come before “water”. The construction should be “that is saturated with enough water to…”

(D) saturated enough with water so as to acquire the character of a liquid -- so as to acquire -- Doesn't it mean intention?

(E) saturated with water so much as to acquire a liquid character - ‘a liquid character’ doesn’t necessarily mean the character of a liquid. It could mean a character which is liquid or malleable

2- Also, can we eliminate options based on saturated enough(which specifies a threshold) or so saturated(which specifies a high value) here?
3 - In option D, doesn't "so as to acquire" mean intention?

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , GMATGuruNY , VeritasKarishma , DmitryFarber , RonPurewal other experts -please enlighten and provide an explanation for the question
User avatar
MagooshExpert
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 30 Oct 2017
Last visit: 15 Jan 2020
Posts: 231
Own Kudos:
436
 [15]
Given Kudos: 20
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 231
Kudos: 436
 [15]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skywalker18

I found the below explanation from a GMAT expert on another site -

The explanation is that “to acquire” indicates the purpose/intention of “sand”. Since “sand” cannot have an intention, this option is incorrect.

However, this explanation is incorrect. In this “so x as to verb y” construction, “to verb” doesn’t denote purpose or intention. “to verb y” part indicates the extent of “x”.

For example:
-The numbers coming out of Exxon Mobil XOM 0.37% were so good as to be slightly embarrassing. (https://www.wsj.com/articles/no-more-ti ... 1517589782)
-Potential penalties would be so low as to have no relevance for financial markets. (https://www.wsj.com/articles/investor-t ... 1536256548)
-The company’s descriptions of the partnership dealings were so complicated as to be practically indecipherable. (https://jp.wsj.com/articles/SB1011560211577333280)

In all the above sentences, the subjects of the sentences cannot have an intention. Still, the sentences are correct. There are hundreds of other similar sentences on WSJ.com and NYTimes.com. Unless we consider all these sentences incorrect, we cannot agree with the above explanation.



Technically, “quicksand” is the term for sand that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid's character.

(A) that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid's character - the phrase a liquid's character is incorrect because we want to discuss the general nature of any given liquid

(B) that is so saturated with water that it acquires the character of a liquid - Correct

(C) that is saturated with water enough to acquire liquid characteristics - “enough” word is misplaced. It should come before “water”. The construction should be “that is saturated with enough water to…”

(D) saturated enough with water so as to acquire the character of a liquid -- so as to acquire -- Doesn't it mean intention?

(E) saturated with water so much as to acquire a liquid character - ‘a liquid character’ doesn’t necessarily mean the character of a liquid. It could mean a character which is liquid or malleable

2- Also, can we eliminate options based on saturated enough(which specifies a threshold) or so saturated(which specifies a high value) here?
3 - In option D, doesn't "so as to acquire" mean intention?

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , GMATGuruNY , VeritasKarishma , DmitryFarber , RonPurewal other experts -please enlighten and provide an explanation for the question
Hi Skywalker18,

Great due diligence here! :)

There are actually two different idioms being discussed here. When we see:

"so as to X"

"so as to" means "in order to". This usage doesn't make any sense here -- we would not want to say "saturated with water in order to acquire the characteristics of a liquid", because that does imply intention/purpose, which would be incorrect. This is the idiom used in D, so D is incorrect.

This idiom:

"so X as to Y"

is a totally different idiom, which is actually a comparison. See this article (under "Clause of consequence") for more examples of this idiom. The examples that you quoted are examples of this construction, not the "so as to X" construction. The "so X as to Y" structure is used in choice A, and GMATGuruNY gave a great explanation above of why that construction is incorrect here.

Hope that helps! :)
-Carolyn
User avatar
testprep11
Joined: 08 Aug 2016
Last visit: 25 Oct 2023
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Location: India
Posts: 10
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatVerbal

I have a question.

What about the sentence -
The sauce was SO hot AS TO burn my mouth.

Here also the usage of TO + Verb can be seen and as per your explanation the 'Sauce' cannot decide/have intention to burn 'my mouth'. So this sentence must be wrong. But this is used by Manhattanprep as an example for the usage of phrase - So...As to...

Can you please help!

EMPOWERgmatVerbal
Hello Everyone!

Even though the stats for this question show it's a tricky one, we can narrow down to the right option by exploiting the error type clues.

Let's start by looking at the differences in the options:

1. that is so saturated / saturated enough
2. acquires / to acquire
3. character / characteristics

Verb tenses are often an easy place to start narrowing down options, so definitely let's start by tackling #2 on our list: acquires vs. to acquire.

When we use the to+verb combination, it implies intention. This means that when we say the sand wants "to acquire" the characteristics of water, it is a thinking, breathing, intentional being that chooses to go out and get the characteristics of water. We know that sand isn't a living thing that has intentions of its own. Therefore, it isn't appropriate to say "to acquire." Here are some examples:

I want to acquire the rights to that song for my movie. = CORRECT (I'm a person with thoughts and intentions, so it's okay.)

The chair is so short as to acquire the perfect balance for short children. = WRONG (A chair can't want "to acquire" balance from somewhere - it's either balanced or it's not. The chair can't decide for itself what it wants to be!)

The school acquires new students every fall. = CORRECT (Just saying "acquires" doesn't imply intention is involved. It just happens, so it's okay.)

Now, let's use that understanding and we'll be able to decimate the incorrect options. Check it out:


(A) that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid's character

(B) that is so saturated with water that it acquires the character of a liquid

(C) that is saturated with water enough to acquire liquid characteristics

(D) saturated enough with water so as to acquire the character of a liquid

(E) saturated with water so much as to acquire a liquid character


There we have it. The only answer that doesn't imply that sand or quicksand "chooses" to take on the characteristics of a liquid is answer B.

Don’t study for the GMAT. Train for it.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
User avatar
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Last visit: 17 Feb 2025
Posts: 1,694
Own Kudos:
15,175
 [4]
Given Kudos: 766
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,694
Kudos: 15,175
 [4]
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
testprep11
EMPOWERgmatVerbal

I have a question.

What about the sentence -
The sauce was SO hot AS TO burn my mouth.

Here also the usage of TO + Verb can be seen and as per your explanation the 'Sauce' cannot decide/have intention to burn 'my mouth'. So this sentence must be wrong. But this is used by Manhattanprep as an example for the usage of phrase - So...As to...

Can you please help!


Thanks for your question testprep11

This is a tricky one for sure! In English, the idiom "so X as to Y" can be correct in some circumstances. It's only meant for showing an extreme case of cause and effect. While this example would surely fit the need for a "so X as to Y" idiom, there are other problems with each option that uses this idiom that eliminates it from contention:

Technically, "quicksand" is the term for sand that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid's character.

(A) that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid's character

This is INCORRECT because the phrase "a liquid's character" is misleading. It suggests that quicksand acquires the characteristics of ONE particular type of liquid, instead of just liquids in general.

(B) that is so saturated with water that it acquires the character of a liquid

This is CORRECT! Its meaning is clear and concise. It just so happens not to use the "so X as to Y" idiom, but that's okay - it didn't need to.

(C) that is saturated with water enough to acquire liquid characteristics

This is INCORRECT because the phrase "saturated with water enough" isn't strong enough to imply this is an extreme situation. Saying that it's "so saturated with water that" is a much stronger statement. Also, the phrase "liquid characteristics" is also misleading. We want to say that quicksand acts like a liquid when it gets too wet, not that it acquires characteristics that happen to be liquid?? That doesn't really work here.

(D) saturated enough with water so as to acquire the character of a liquid

This is INCORRECT because the phrase "saturated enough" isn't strong enough language to suggest this is an extreme situation. The phrase "so as to acquire" is also overly wordy and awkward.

(E) saturated with water so much as to acquire a liquid character

This is also INCORRECT because the phrase "saturated with water so much" is both overly wordy and confusing. We can also eliminate this one because the phrase "a liquid character" doesn't work. What is a liquid character? I'm not sure. If it's not clear what the writer is talking about, it's likely a wrong choice.

I hope this helps explain why the idiom in this question isn't really the problem. You can absolutely use the idiom "so X as to Y" in some cases, but not all!

Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
avatar
analeonnnn
Joined: 07 Jul 2018
Last visit: 10 May 2020
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 200
Posts: 14
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I was between A and B - my reasoning for eliminating B was the it. Looking at potential antecedents I saw: water and sand. Therefore, I deemed option B as confusing for having that specific pronoun. Can you guys help me understand whether there's a pronoun ambiguity in this question?

Thanks!
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
maaariflo
I was between A and B - my reasoning for eliminating B was the it. Looking at potential antecedents I saw: water and sand. Therefore, I deemed option B as confusing for having that specific pronoun. Can you guys help me understand whether there's a pronoun ambiguity in this question?

Thanks!
It's reasonably easy for the reader to understand that the it refers to sand. However, pronoun ambiguity is not usually a massive problem, and you generally don't want to remove an option just because it contains an ambiguous pronoun, unless you've already checked the other options for "bigger" errors. In other words, it is possible for an option that is ambiguous to be correct.
avatar
Alpha14
Joined: 27 Sep 2018
Last visit: 10 Apr 2020
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
12
 [1]
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 31
Kudos: 12
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja hazelnut daagh In option B ... i find the usage of "it" very confusing .. it can refer to sand, water and also to quicksand ?

how to figure out the actual precedent of "it" ?

Generally "it" should be avoided as the usage is confusing ? still here we are choosing it inspite of the confusion ??


Also please help with why option D is not correct ?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,783
 [9]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,783
 [9]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Alpha14
GMATNinja hazelnut daagh In option B ... i find the usage of "it" very confusing .. it can refer to sand, water and also to quicksand ?

how to figure out the actual precedent of "it" ?

Generally "it" should be avoided as the usage is confusing ? still here we are choosing it inspite of the confusion ??


Also please help with why option D is not correct ?
Pronoun ambiguity isn't automatically wrong on the GMAT -- for more on that, check out this video.

Looking at the three possible antecedents you mentioned (sand, water, and quicksand), which one makes the most sense? Can a term ("quicksand") acquire the character of a liquid? Can water, which is already a liquid, acquire the character of a liquid? It's pretty clear from the meaning that "it" refers to "sand", and since the pronoun and antecedent are both singular, the pronoun doesn't seem like a huge problem.

Quote:
(D) Technically, "quicksand" is the term for sand saturated enough with water so as to acquire the character of a liquid.
In (D), "so as to" implies a degree of intention. Why is the sand saturated with water? In order to acquire the character of a liquid. Well, that doesn't make much sense in this case, because the sand doesn't intentionally become saturated in order to acquire the character of a liquid. The meaning is much clearer in choice (B).

I hope this helps!
avatar
twentylegend20
Joined: 12 Aug 2018
Last visit: 10 Jun 2021
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
Posts: 2
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
Hello Everyone!

Even though the stats for this question show it's a tricky one, we can narrow down to the right option by exploiting the error type clues.

Let's start by looking at the differences in the options:

1. that is so saturated / saturated enough
2. acquires / to acquire
3. character / characteristics


Verb tenses are often an easy place to start narrowing down options, so definitely let's start by tackling #2 on our list: acquires vs. to acquire.

When we use the to+verb combination, it implies intention. This means that when we say the sand wants "to acquire" the characteristics of water, it is a thinking, breathing, intentional being that chooses to go out and get the characteristics of water. We know that sand isn't a living thing that has intentions of its own. Therefore, it isn't appropriate to say "to acquire." Here are some examples:

I want to acquire the rights to that song for my movie. = CORRECT (I'm a person with thoughts and intentions, so it's okay.)

The chair is so short as to acquire the perfect balance for short children. = WRONG (A chair can't want "to acquire" balance from somewhere - it's either balanced or it's not. The chair can't decide for itself what it wants to be!)

The school acquires new students every fall. = CORRECT (Just saying "acquires" doesn't imply intention is involved. It just happens, so it's okay.)

Now, let's use that understanding and we'll be able to decimate the incorrect options. Check it out:

(A) that is so saturated with water as to acquire a liquid's character

(B) that is so saturated with water that it acquires the character of a liquid

(C) that is saturated with water enough to acquire liquid characteristics

(D) saturated enough with water so as to acquire the character of a liquid

(E) saturated with water so much as to acquire a liquid character


There we have it. The only answer that doesn't imply that sand or quicksand "chooses" to take on the characteristics of a liquid is answer B.

Don’t study for the GMAT. Train for it.

Hi,

I've come across an OG question below:
'Between 14,000 and 8,000 b.c. the ice cap that covered northern Asia, Europe, and America began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied by migrating peoples moving northward.'

Please explain the difference between the role played by 'began to melt' in this question vs 'to acquire' in the quicksand question. Neither are living, but one implies intention while the other appears not to.

Appreciate the help, thanks in advance.
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 768
Kudos: 418
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I guess "a liquid's character" is wrong in choice A. we need 'the character of a liquid". choice B means the liquidity of a liquid. choice A mean "a character of a liquid", which possibly is not the liquidity but another character of a liquid. so, the meaning is not logic

am I right. ?

sorry for posting 2 times.
avatar
hbawa993
Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Last visit: 12 Aug 2021
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 41
Posts: 3
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja GMATNinjaTwo VeritasKarishma
Are possessives allowed for non living things? (Used in option A in this question)
eg. Is '' India's economy '' correct according to the GMAT?
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [2]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hbawa993
GMATNinja GMATNinjaTwo VeritasKarishma
Are possessives allowed for non living things? (Used in option A in this question)
eg. Is '' India's economy '' correct according to the GMAT?
Hi hbawa993,

It is perfectly acceptable to say "India's economy" or "the Indian economy". There may be some situations in which we'd want to be a little more careful (for example, I think most people would go with "the US economy" over "the US's economy" or "the US' economy"). That's when the noun ends in an s. More generally though, there is no rule that says that we cannot add an 's to the name of a non-living thing.
 1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts