GMATMadeeasy wrote:
The fact of some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely they vary considerably on a spectrum of genetic relatedness.
(A) The fact of some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely they vary considerably
(B) That some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly while others look quite dissimilar highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely that they vary considerably
(C) With some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar, it highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely considerable variation
(D) With some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar, it is a fact that highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely a considerable variation
(E) Because some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly and others look quite dissimilar, this fact highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely they vary considerably
egmatdaaghSaraiGMATmikemcgarryPlz clear my doubts on this one
In option E,
a) I understand this, that, these, those cannot occur alone but here this is accompanied by the fact so why is it wrong?
b)Is because used only in the cause-effect scenario.
Because he is intelligent, he is the monitor of the class.
here cause is :
he is intelligent
effect is: he is monitor
same way :
cause is : some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly and others look quite dissimilar
effect is : this fact highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely they vary considerably
but if i invert and read :
This fact highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely they vary considerably because
some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly and others look quite dissimilar.
then it doesnot make sense . Please help me on how to eliminate this?
cannot this fact refer to " some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly and others look quite dissimilar".
c)That some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly while others look quite dissimilar highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely that they vary considerably on a spectrum of genetic relatedness.
here namely modifies highlights or feature?
feature is that they vary considerably on a spectrum of genetic relatedness.
so namely must modify feature.
Also
feature namely a,b,c
e.g
he is the owner of many companies,namely a,b and c.
feature namely that a,b,c
he is the owner of many companies,namely that a,b and c.
How does it make sense.
Plz clear this with examples.
Will his be correct ?
Because some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly and others look quite dissimilar, they are a mystery to science.
close
